Laparoscopic cryoablation vs. percutaneous cryoablation for treatment of small renal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Predictive characteristics for disease recurrence and overall survival in non-metastatic clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma - results from the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register

OBJECTIVE

Patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma (cT1RCC) have risks for recurrence and reduced overall survival despite being in the best prognostic group. This study aimed to evaluate the association of different treatments on disease recurrence and overall survival using clinical and pathological characteristics in a nation-wide cT1RCC cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 4,965 patients, registered in the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register (NSKCR) between 2005 and 2014, with ≥ 5-years follow-up were identified: 3,040 males and 1,925 females, mean age 65 years. Times to recurrence and overall survival were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Age, TNM-stage, tumor size, RCC-type, and performed treatment were all associated with disease recurrence. Patients selected for ablative treatments had increased risk for recurrent disease: hazard ratio (HR) = 3.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.69-5.32]. In multivariate analyses, age, gender, tumor size, RCC-type, N-stage, recurrence and performed treatment were all independently associated with overall survival. Patients with chRCC had a 41% better overall survival (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.44-0.78; p < 0.001) than ccRCC. Patients treated with partial nephrectomy (PN) had an 18% better overall survival (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.71-0.95, p < 0.001) than patients treated with radical nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, gender, T-stage, tumor size, RCC type and treatment modality are all associated with risk of recurrence. Furthermore, age, male gender, tumor size, N-stage and recurrence are associated with reduced overall survival. Patients with chRCC, compared with ccRCC and pRCC patients, and PN compared with RN treated patients, had an advantageous overall survival, indicating a possible survival advantage of nephron sparing treatment.

Assessing Trifecta Achievement after Percutaneous Cryoablation of Small Renal Masses: Results from a Multi-Institutional Collaboration

Background and Objectives: To assess efficacy and safety of Percutaneous Cryoablation (PCA) of small renal masses (SRMs) using Trifecta outcomes in a large cohort of patients who were not eligible for surgery. Materials and methods: All PCAs performed in four different centers between September 2009 and September 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided in two different groups depending on masses dimensional criteria: Group-A: diameter ≤ 25 mm and Group-B: diameter > 25 mm. Complications rates were reported and classified according to the Clavien−Dindo system. The estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated before PCA and during follow-up schedule. Every patient received a Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) evaluation on the first postoperative day. Radiological follow-up was taken at 3, 6, and 12 months for the first year, then yearly. Radiological recurrence was defined as a contrast enhancement persistence and was reported in the study. Finally, Trifecta outcome, which included complications, RFS, and preservation of eGFR class, was calculated for every procedure at a median follow-up of 32 months. Results: The median age of the patients was 74 years. Group-A included 200 procedures while Group-B included 140. Seventy-eight patients were eligible for Trifecta evaluation. Trifecta was achieved in 69.6% of procedures in Group-A, 40.6% in Group-B (p = 0.02). We observed an increased rate of complication in Group-B (13.0% vs. 28.6; p < 0.001). However, 97.5% were <II Clavien−Dindo grade. No differences were found between the two groups regarding eGFR before and after treatment. Further, 24-months RFS rates were respectively 98.0% for Group-A and 92.1% in Group-B, while at 36 months were respectively 94.5% and 87.5% (p = 0.08). Conclusions: PCA seems to be a safe and effective treatment for SRM but in the need of more strict dimensional criteria to achieve a higher possible success rate.

Differential efficacy of ablation therapy versus partial nephrectomy between clinical T1a and T1b renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the differential clinical outcomes of patients treated with partial nephrectomy (PN) vs. those treated with ablation therapy (AT) such as radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation and microwave ablation for cT1b compared to cT1a renal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multiple databases were searched for articles published before August 2021. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared clinical outcomes in patients who underwent PN with those who underwent AT for cT1a and/or cT1b renal tumors.

RESULTS

Overall, 27 studies comprising 13,996 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. In both cT1a and cT1b renal tumors, there was no significant difference in the percent decline of estimated glomerular filtration rates or in the overall/severe complication rates between PN and AT. Compared to AT, PN was associated with a lower risk of local recurrence in both patients with cT1a and cT1b tumors (cT1a: pooled risk ratio [RR]; 0.43, 95% confidence intervals [CI]; 0.28-0.66, cT1b: pooled RR; 0.41, 95%CI; 0.23-0.75). Subgroup analyses regarding the technical approach revealed no statistical difference in local recurrence rates between percutaneous AT and PN in patients with cT1a tumors (pooled RR; 0.61, 95%CI; 0.32-1.15). In cT1b, however, PN was associated with a lower risk of local recurrence (pooled RR; 0.45, 95%CI; 0.23-0.88). There was no difference in distant metastasis or cancer mortality rates between PN and AT in patients with cT1a, or cT1b tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

AT has a substantially relevant disadvantage with regards to local recurrence compared to PN, particularly in cT1b renal tumors. Despite the limitations inherent to the nature of retrospective and unmatched primary cohorts, percutaneous AT could be used as a reasonable alternative treatment for well-selected patients with cT1a renal tumors.

Laparoscopic ultrasonography-guided cryoablation of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a preliminary report

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate safety and feasibility of laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS)-guided cryoablation of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From April 2018 to December 2018, ten patients (five women, five men; mean age 58.2 ± 9.4 years) with LAPC underwent the operation. LUS was used to guide the cryoablation. Computed tomography (CT) imaging, biochemical analysis and pain score analysis by numeric rating scale (NRS) were used to assess treatment outcomes at 1 week and 3 months after the operation.

RESULTS

Cryoablation was performed by the operation in all cases. Seven patients received complete ablation and the success rate of operation was 70%. Two cryoablation cycles and an average of 1.4 ± 0.5 cryoprobes were used. The average freezing time and operation time were 23.8 ± 1.0 and 110.5 ± 24.7 min, respectively. The mean blood loss was 52.0 ± 16.6 ml. No major complications were observed after the operation. The mean maximum tumor diameter determined by CT decreased from 4.9 ± 0.7 cm before the operation to 4.7 ± 1.0 cm at 1 week and 4.6 ± 1.3 cm at 3 months, with P values of 0.53 and 0.51 (relative to the preoperative values), respectively. Postoperative CT imaging results suggested tumor necrosis in cryoablation-treated areas. The mean CA19-9 levels decreased from 347.5 ± 345.7 U/mL before operation to 190.4 ± 153.8 U/mL at 1 week and 182.7 ± 165.6 U/mL at 3 months, with P values of 0.15 and 0.14 (relative to the preoperative values), respectively. The average pain scores declined from 6.9 ± 1.1 before operation to 1.3 ± 1.2 at 1 week and 2.0 ± 0.8 at 3 months, with both P values of < 0.01 (relative to the preoperative values).

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study suggested that LUS-assisted cryoablation was a safe and feasible treatment for LAPC.

Active surveillance and focal ablation for small renal masses: a better solution for comorbid patients

The natural history of small renal masses (SRM) is still not well understood and they are frequently incidentally diagnosed in elderly patients. Therefore, there is a need for less invasive options sparing the patient from the side-effects related to conventional surgical treatment. PubMed and Medline database search was performed to look for new findings on active surveillance and focal therapy for SRM. Sixty-one articles published between 2002 and 2018 were selected for the purpose of the review. There is growing evidence confirming the safety of active surveillance in patients at surgical risk and there appears to be a satisfactory intermediate-term outcome of focal treatment of SRM. In the group of elderly patients with a decreased life expectancy active surveillance appears to be the most appropriate approach. The future of minimally invasive therapy appears bright, especially with the improvement of new imaging modalities.

Renal Thermal Ablation Trends of American Urologists

Objective: To define current trends in the utilization of renal thermal ablation by urologists in the United States. Material and Methods: A six-month case log data for renal procedures submitted by certifying and recertifying American urologists from 2003 to 2018 were obtained from the American Board of Urology and stratified by current procedural terminology code. The utilization of thermal ablative techniques was examined with respect to overall trends, surgeon, and practice characteristics associated with its use. Results: Six thousand two hundred eleven unique urologists performed 54,075 renal procedures, including 1916 (3.5%) thermal ablations, 630 (1.2%) renal biopsies, 17,361 (32.1%) partial nephrectomies, 20,403 (37.8%) radical nephrectomies, and 7957 (14.7%) nephroureterectomies. Eight hundred twenty-five (13.3%) unique urologists performed renal ablations, including 1344 (70.2%), 418 (21.8%), and 154 (8.0%) laparoscopic, percutaneous, and open ablation procedures, respectively. The annual volume of ablation was highest in 2008, followed by 2010 and 2009. On multivariate modeling of those performing renal interventions, the first decade of practice, self-declared endourologist, urologist who completed an endourology fellowship, urologist who practices in the Mid Atlantic, North Central, South Central, and South Eastern United States (compared with New England) were more likely to perform thermal ablation for renal masses. Urologists who perform renal biopsies and partial nephrectomies are also more likely to perform ablation of renal masses. Conclusions: Thermal ablation accounted for a small percentage of renal interventions performed by urologists in the last 1.5 decades with definable associations to practice characteristics. Renal ablation was most commonly performed laparoscopically, with declining use in recent years.

Peri-operative and local control outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy vs percutaneous cryoablation for renal masses: comparison after matching on radiological stage and renal score

OBJECTIVES

To compare the oncological outcomes of percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) vs robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for the treatment of T1 renal tumours.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in all patients treated by RAPN or PCA for malignant renal tumours in one of four centres between 2009 and 2016. Tumours were paired one by one using radiological tumour stage and RENAL nephrometry score (package matchit, R software version 3.2.2). Malignancy was confirmed by biopsy for all patients in the PCA group. Patient characteristics before and after matching and oncological results were compared between the two groups. Cox regression, adjusted for age, treatment type, histological type and margins, was used to identify factors associated with time to local recurrence. Positive margins were defined histologically in the RAPN group and radiologically in the PCA group.

RESULTS

A total of 647 patients were identified; 470 underwent RAPN and 177 underwent PCA. After matching, there was no significant difference between the two groups (RAPN, n = 177; PCA, n = 177) with regard to tumour stage, RENAL nephrometry score, tumour size (27.6 vs 25.9 mm; P = 0.07) and gender ratio. Patients in the PCA group remained significantly older (69.9 vs 59.8 years; P < 0.001). The absolute recurrence rate was 2.8% in the RAPN group vs 8.4% in the PCA group (P = 0.03). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 85% in the PCA group vs 95% in the RAPN group (log-rank P = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, the presence of positive margins and the type of treatment were the two factors significantly associated with local recurrence (P < 0.001 and P = 0.046, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The local recurrence rate after PCA was significantly higher than after RAPN for T1 renal tumours. Incomplete treatment was the main criterion associated with recurrence. The recurrence rate may have been overestimated in the PCA group because of closer radiological follow-up in these patients.

The application effect of percutaneous cryoablation for the stage IIIB/IV advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after the failure of chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

A retrospective review is required to assess the application effect of percutaneous cryoablation on the stage IIIB/IV advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after the failure of chemoradiotherapy. A total of twenty-two cases with stage IIIB/IV advanced NSCLC after failure of chemoradiotherapy were enrolled.

METHODS

Computed Tomography (CT) was used for the assessment of tumor response, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) was applied for the evaluation of quality of life. After the treatment of cryoablation, we performed a follow-up analysis.

RESULTS

The primary technique effectiveness of 100% was observed in the one month of follow-up. At three months, local tumor progression was shown in 4 of 31 lesions (13.6%). The one-year survival rate of 81.8% and progression-free rate of 27.8% were obtained. Six patients died 7, 9, 10, 12, 15 and 22 months after treatment, respectively. Decreased scores of total quality of life at one week after cryoablation (P = 0.006), but increased scores at one month after cryoablation (P = 0.024) were observed, compared with pre-cryoablation.

CONCLUSION

Cryoablation contributes to the effective local tumor therapy for stage IIIB/IV advanced NSCLC after the failure of chemoradiotherapy.

[Percutaneous renal ablation: Pre-, per-, post-interventional evaluation modalities and adapted management]

OBJECTIVES

Ablative treatment (AT) rise is foreseen, validation of steps to insure good proceedings is needed. By looking over the process of the patient, this study evaluates the requirements and choices needed in every step of the management.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE^®, Embase^®, using (MeSH) words and we looked for all the studies. Investigators graded the strength of evidence in terms of methodology, language and relevance.

RESULTS

Explanations of AT proposal rather than partial nephrectomy or surveillance have to be discussed in a consultation shared by urologist and interventional radiologist. Per-procedure choices depend on predictable ballistic difficulties. High volume, proximity of the hilum or of a risky organ are in favor of general anesthesia, cryotherapy and computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI). Percutaneous approach should be privileged, as it seems as effective as the laparoscopic approach. Early and delayed complications have to be treated both by urologist and radiologist. Surveillance by CT/MRI insure of the lack of contrast-enhanced in the treated area. Patients and tumors criteria, in case of incomplete treatment or recurrence, are the key of the appropriate treatment: surgery, second session of AT, surveillance.

CONCLUSION

AT treatments require patient's comprehension, excellent coordination of the partnership between urologist and radiologist and relevant choices during intervention.

[Ablative therapy in kidney cancer: Oncological, functional, perioperative outcomes and cost]

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of kidney cancer has increased significantly over the past few decades presumably due to the increased use of imaging. The aim of this article is to describe contemporary outcomes of ablative therapy and to compare them to other therapeutic options in terms of oncological, functional, perioperative outcomes and cost.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE^®, Embase^®, using (MeSH) words; from January 2005 through May 2017, and we looked for all the studies. Investigators graded the strength of evidence in terms of methodology, language and relevance.

RESULTS

Ninety-one articles were analyzed. We described the outcomes of ablative therapy in relation to the energy used and the approach, and compared these outcomes to the other therapeutic options in terms of oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes. We analyzed these studies in order to search for predictive factors influencing the results of ablative therapy. We also analyzed the economic burden of small renal tumor management.

CONCLUSION

The strength of evidence is based almost entirely on retrospective studies and is susceptible to the inherent limitations of this study design. Although, the evidence was low among studies, our revue showed that, in elderly patients treated with ablative therapy for cT1a tumors, the cancer-specific survival was comparable to partial nephrectomy with differences in overall survival that are explained by competing risks of death in the old population. Considering the functional results, the renal function preservation seems to be comparable between the 2 groups while the perioperative morbidity is higher in the partial nephrectomy group. The evidence base medicine at this time cannot support the extension of the indications of ablative therapy beyond the actual implementations.