Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for glioblastoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Bevacizumab‑associated intracerebral hemorrhage in patients with malignant glioma

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a serious complication of the use of bevacizumab in patients with malignant glioma; however, the risk factors are unclear. Therefore, the present study retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients treated with bevacizumab for malignant glioma to investigate the characteristics of those in the cohort who had ICH. Between January 2015 and December 2022, 64 patients with malignant glioma were treated with bevacizumab. Clinical and molecular biological information, treatment details, and information regarding the presence of ICH after bevacizumab administration were extracted from the hospital database. ICH was found to have occurred in seven patients (10.9%) after bevacizumab administration. The mean (standard deviation) age of these seven patients was 64(11) years, and six of them (85.7%) underwent needle biopsy. Two patients (28.6%) had grade ≥3 hemorrhage. The median number of administrations of bevacizumab before the onset of ICH was seven (range: 1-32), and the duration from first administration to ICH was 4 months (range: 1-22). Furthermore, ICH was associated with a comparatively short overall survival time (log-rank, P=0.008). Tumor invasion into the corpus callosum on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging before bevacizumab administration was associated with ICH according to univariate analysis (P=0.01) and multivariate analysis (P=0.02). In conclusion, bevacizumab-associated ICH was associated with poor prognosis in the present cohort of patients with malignant glioma. Furthermore, corpus callosum infiltration shown on magnetic resonance imaging before bevacizumab administration was suggested to be a risk factor for ICH; however, further studies on larger cohorts are required for confirmation.

Tumor heterogeneity and resistance in glioblastoma: the role of stem cells

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most aggressive and treatment-resistant brain tumor, characterized by its heterogeneity and the presence of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs). GSCs are a subpopulation of cells within the tumor that possess self-renewal and differentiation capabilities, contributing to tumor initiation, progression, and recurrence. This review explores the unique biological properties of GSCs, including their molecular markers, signalling pathways, and interactions with the tumor microenvironment. We discuss the mechanisms by which GSCs evade conventional therapies, such as enhanced DNA repair and metabolic plasticity, which complicate treatment outcomes. Furthermore, we highlight recent advancements in identifying novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets that may improve the efficacy of treatments aimed at GSCs. The potential of targeted therapies, including immunotherapy and combination strategies, is also examined to overcome the challenges posed by GSCs. Ultimately, a deeper understanding of GSC biology is essential for developing personalized treatment approaches that can enhance patient outcomes in glioblastoma.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Effectiveness of Radiotherapy and Temozolomide Treatment With or Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most frequent primary brain malignancy in adults. Despite improvements in imaging and therapy, the prognosis remains poor. To evaluate and compare the impact of combining bevacizumab with temozolomide and radiotherapy on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients diagnosed with GBM. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library, covering the period from their inception to December 2022. The collected data underwent analysis employing appropriate statistical methods. Six articles were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The addition of bevacizumab to the combination of temozolomide/radiotherapy did not increase the OS in GBM patients. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was 0.843 (95% CI: 0.615-1.156, P = 0.290). The addition of bevacizumab to radiotherapy/temozolomide did not increase the PFS in patients with GBM. The pooled OR was 0.829 (95% CI: 0.561-1.224, P = 0.346). The funnel plot demonstrated the absence of the alleged pleiotropic effects by showing no evidence of observable variability across the estimations. This study does not support the benefit of the addition of bevacizumab to temozolomide and radiotherapy in improving OS and PFS in GBM patients.

Current approaches in glioblastoma multiforme immunotherapy

Glioblastoma multiform (GBM) is the most prevalent CNS (central nervous system) tumor in adults, with an average survival length shorter than 2 years and rare metastasis to organs other than CNS. Despite extensive attempts at surgical resecting, the inherently permeable nature of this disease has rendered relapse nearly unavoidable. Thus, immunotherapy is a feasible alternative, as stimulated immune cells can enter into the remote and inaccessible tumor cells. Immunotherapy has revolutionized patient upshots in various malignancies and might introduce different effective ways for GBM patients. Currently, researchers are exploring various immunotherapeutic strategies in patients with GBM to target both the innate and acquired immune responses. These approaches include reprogrammed tumor-associated macrophages, the use of specific antibodies to inhibit tumor progression and metastasis, modifying tumor-associated macrophages with antibodies, vaccines that utilize tumor-specific dendritic cells to activate anti-tumor T cells, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and enhanced T cells that function against tumor cells. Despite these findings, there is still room for improving the response faults of the many currently tested immunotherapies. This study aims to review the currently used immunotherapy approaches with their molecular mechanisms and clinical application in GBM.

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab for Treating Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Phase II and III Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To fully investigate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for glioblastoma.

METHODS

Databases were searched for phase II/III randomized controlled trials treated with bevacizumab.

RESULTS

Bevacizumab significantly improved the PFS in glioblastoma patients, but did not prolong OS. PFS was significantly prolonged in both first-line and second-line treatment. Bevacizumab plus temozolomide was correlated with improved PFS for patients with different MGMT methylation status. Bevacizumab could increase the risk of hypertension, proteinuria, thromboembolic, and infection. Hypertension should be well concerned.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab-containing regimen can significantly improve PFS, but did not prolong OS.

Engineering antibody and protein therapeutics to cross the blood-brain barrier

Diseases in the central nervous system (CNS) are often difficult to treat. Antibody- and protein-based therapeutics hold huge promises in CNS disease treatment. However, proteins are restricted from entering the CNS by the blood-brain barrier (BBB). To achieve enhanced BBB crossing, antibody-based carriers have been developed by utilizing the endogenous macromolecule transportation pathway, known as receptor-mediated transcytosis. In this report, we first provided an overall review on key CNS diseases and the most promising antibody- or protein-based therapeutics approved or in clinical trials. We then reviewed the platforms that are being explored to increase the macromolecule brain entry to combat CNS diseases. Finally, we have analyzed the lessons learned from past experiences and have provided a perspective on the future engineering of novel delivery vehicles for antibody- and protein-based therapies for CNS diseases.

Bevacizumab-induced isolated oculomotor nerve palsy in glioblastoma multiforme

INTRODUCTION

Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, is the standard treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. In addition to common systemic side effects of bevacizumab, there are rare cases of cranial nerve palsy.

CASE REPORT

We report a case of transient oculomotor nerve palsy after systemic administration of bevacizumab. Twenty-four hours after the systemic infusion of bevacizumab, transient oculomotor nerve palsy developed in a 49-year-old male patient. In the cranial MRI, there was no malignancy-related progression.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

Bevacizumab treatment was discontinued. Methylprednisolone was started considering that bevacizumab increased the inflammatory response. Oculomotor nerve palsy resolved in 14 days.

DISCUSSION

There are many side effects of bevacizumab whose mechanisms of action have not been fully explained. Cranial nerve involvement is rarely reported. Our case is the first reported case of bevacizumab-induced oculomotor nerve palsy.

Recent Advances in Glioma Therapy: Combining Vascular Normalization and Immune Checkpoint Blockade

Glioblastoma (GBM) accounts for more than 50% of all primary malignancies of the brain. Current standard treatment regimen for GBM includes maximal surgical resection followed by radiation and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, due to the heterogeneity of the tumor cells, tumor recurrence is often inevitable. The prognosis of patients with glioma is, thus, dismal. Glioma is a highly angiogenic tumor yet immunologically cold. As such, evolving studies have focused on designing strategies that specifically target the tyrosine kinase receptors of angiokines and encourage immune infiltration. Recent promising results from immunotherapies on other cancer types have prompted further investigations of this therapy in GBM. In this article, we reviewed the pathological angiogenesis and immune reactivity in glioma, as well as its target for drug development, and we discussed future directions in glioma therapy.

Targeting Glucose Metabolism of Cancer Cells with Dichloroacetate to Radiosensitize High-Grade Gliomas

As the cornerstone of high-grade glioma (HGG) treatment, radiotherapy temporarily controls tumor cells via inducing oxidative stress and subsequent DNA breaks. However, almost all HGGs recur within months. Therefore, it is important to understand the underlying mechanisms of radioresistance, so that novel strategies can be developed to improve the effectiveness of radiotherapy. While currently poorly understood, radioresistance appears to be predominantly driven by altered metabolism and hypoxia. Glucose is a central macronutrient, and its metabolism is rewired in HGG cells, increasing glycolytic flux to produce energy and essential metabolic intermediates, known as the Warburg effect. This altered metabolism in HGG cells not only supports cell proliferation and invasiveness, but it also contributes significantly to radioresistance. Several metabolic drugs have been used as a novel approach to improve the radiosensitivity of HGGs, including dichloroacetate (DCA), a small molecule used to treat children with congenital mitochondrial disorders. DCA reverses the Warburg effect by inhibiting pyruvate dehydrogenase kinases, which subsequently activates mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation at the expense of glycolysis. This effect is thought to block the growth advantage of HGGs and improve the radiosensitivity of HGG cells. This review highlights the main features of altered glucose metabolism in HGG cells as a contributor to radioresistance and describes the mechanism of action of DCA. Furthermore, we will summarize recent advances in DCA's pre-clinical and clinical studies as a radiosensitizer and address how these scientific findings can be translated into clinical practice to improve the management of HGG patients.

Targeting Glucose Metabolism of Cancer Cells with Dichloroacetate to Radiosensitize High-Grade Gliomas

As the cornerstone of high-grade glioma (HGG) treatment, radiotherapy temporarily controls tumor cells via inducing oxidative stress and subsequent DNA breaks. However, almost all HGGs recur within months. Therefore, it is important to understand the underlying mechanisms of radioresistance, so that novel strategies can be developed to improve the effectiveness of radiotherapy. While currently poorly understood, radioresistance appears to be predominantly driven by altered metabolism and hypoxia. Glucose is a central macronutrient, and its metabolism is rewired in HGG cells, increasing glycolytic flux to produce energy and essential metabolic intermediates, known as the Warburg effect. This altered metabolism in HGG cells not only supports cell proliferation and invasiveness, but it also contributes significantly to radioresistance. Several metabolic drugs have been used as a novel approach to improve the radiosensitivity of HGGs, including dichloroacetate (DCA), a small molecule used to treat children with congenital mitochondrial disorders. DCA reverses the Warburg effect by inhibiting pyruvate dehydrogenase kinases, which subsequently activates mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation at the expense of glycolysis. This effect is thought to block the growth advantage of HGGs and improve the radiosensitivity of HGG cells. This review highlights the main features of altered glucose metabolism in HGG cells as a contributor to radioresistance and describes the mechanism of action of DCA. Furthermore, we will summarize recent advances in DCA’s pre-clinical and clinical studies as a radiosensitizer and address how these scientific findings can be translated into clinical practice to improve the management of HGG patients.

Salvage Boron Neutron Capture Therapy for Malignant Brain Tumor Patients in Compliance with Emergency and Compassionate Use: Evaluation of 34 Cases in Taiwan

Although boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a promising treatment option for malignant brain tumors, the optimal BNCT parameters for patients with immediately life-threatening, end-stage brain tumors remain unclear. We performed BNCT on 34 patients with life-threatening, end-stage brain tumors and analyzed the relationship between survival outcomes and BNCT parameters. Before BNCT, MRI and 18F-BPA-PET analyses were conducted to identify the tumor location/distribution and the tumor-to-normal tissue uptake ratio (T/N ratio) of 18F-BPA. No severe adverse events were observed (grade ≥ 3). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 50.0% and 85.3%, respectively. The mean overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) times were 7.25, 7.80, and 4.18 months, respectively. Remarkably, the mean OS, CSS, and RFS of patients who achieved a complete response were 17.66, 22.5, and 7.50 months, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis identified the optimal BNCT parameters and tumor characteristics of these patients, including a T/N ratio ≥ 4, tumor volume < 20 mL, mean tumor dose ≥ 25 Gy-E, MIB-1 ≤ 40, and a lower recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class. In conclusion, for malignant brain tumor patients who have exhausted all available treatment options and who are in an immediately life-threatening condition, BNCT may be considered as a therapeutic approach to prolong survival.

Glioma Stem Cells as Immunotherapeutic Targets: Advancements and Challenges

Glioblastoma is the most common and lethal primary brain malignancy. Despite major investments in research into glioblastoma biology and drug development, treatment remains limited and survival has not substantially improved beyond 1-2 years. Cancer stem cells (CSC) or glioma stem cells (GSC) refer to a population of tumor originating cells capable of self-renewal and differentiation. While controversial and challenging to study, evidence suggests that GCSs may result in glioblastoma tumor recurrence and resistance to treatment. Multiple treatment strategies have been suggested at targeting GCSs, including immunotherapy, posttranscriptional regulation, modulation of the tumor microenvironment, and epigenetic modulation. In this review, we discuss recent advances in glioblastoma treatment specifically focused on targeting of GCSs as well as their potential integration into current clinical pathways and trials.

Update on Chemotherapeutic Approaches and Management of Bevacizumab Usage for Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor in adults, has one of the most dismal prognoses in cancer. In 2009, bevacizumab was approved for recurrent glioblastoma in the USA. To evaluate the clinical impact of bevacizumab as a first-line drug for glioblastoma, two randomized clinical trials, AVAglio and RTOG 0825, were performed. Bevacizumab was found to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and was reported to be beneficial for maintaining patient performance status as an initial treatment. These outcomes led to bevacizumab approval in Japan in 2013 as an insurance-covered first-line drug for glioblastoma concurrently with its second-line application. However, prolongation of overall survival was not evinced in these clinical trials; hence, the clinical benefit of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastomas remains controversial. A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of bevacizumab combined with temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma also showed an effect only on PFS, and the benefit of bevacizumab even for recurrent glioblastoma is controversial. Here, we discuss the clinical impact of bevacizumab for glioblastoma treatment by reviewing previous clinical trials and real-world evidence by focusing on Japanese experiences. Moreover, the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab are summarized, and we provide suggestions for updating the approaches and management of bevacizumab.

Endothelial Progenitors in the Tumor Microenvironment

Tumor vascularization refers to the formation of new blood vessels within a tumor and is considered one of the hallmarks of cancer. Tumor vessels supply the tumor with oxygen and nutrients, required to sustain tumor growth and progression, and provide a gateway for tumor metastasis through the blood or lymphatic vasculature. Blood vessels display an angiocrine capacity of supporting the survival and proliferation of tumor cells through the production of growth factors and cytokines. Although tumor vasculature plays an essential role in sustaining tumor growth, it represents at the same time an essential way to deliver drugs and immune cells to the tumor. However, tumor vasculature exhibits many morphological and functional abnormalities, thus resulting in the formation of hypoxic areas within tumors, believed to represent a mechanism to maintain tumor cells in an invasive state.Tumors are vascularized through a variety of modalities, mainly represented by angiogenesis, where VEGF and other members of the VEGF family play a key role. This has represented the basis for the development of anti-VEGF blocking agents and their use in cancer therapy: however, these agents failed to induce significant therapeutic effects.Much less is known about the cellular origin of vessel network in tumors. Various cell types may contribute to tumor vasculature in different tumors or in the same tumor, such as mature endothelial cells, endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), or the same tumor cells through a process of transdifferentiation. Early studies have suggested a role for bone marrow-derived EPCs; these cells do not are true EPCs but myeloid progenitors differentiating into monocytic cells, exerting a proangiogenic effect through a paracrine mechanism. More recent studies have shown the existence of tissue-resident endothelial vascular progenitors (EVPs) present at the level of vessel endothelium and their possible involvement as cells of origin of tumor vasculature.

Safety and efficacy of VB-111, an anticancer gene therapy, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: results of a phase I/II study

BACKGROUND

VB-111 is a non-replicating adenovirus carrying a Fas-chimera transgene, leading to targeted apoptosis of tumor vascular endothelium and induction of a tumor-specific immune response. This phase I/II study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of VB-111 with and without bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM).

METHODS

Patients with rGBM (n = 72) received VB-111 in 4 treatment groups: subtherapeutic (VB-111 dose escalation), limited exposure (LE; VB-111 monotherapy until progression), primed combination (VB-111 monotherapy continued upon progression with combination of bevacizumab), and unprimed combination (upfront combination of VB-111 and bevacizumab). The primary endpoint was median overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were safety, overall response rate, and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

VB-111 was well tolerated. The most common adverse event was transient mild-moderate fever. Median OS time was significantly longer in the primed combination group compared with both LE (414 vs 223 days; hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; P = 0.043) and unprimed combination (414 vs 141.5 days; HR, 0.24; P = 0.0056). Patients in the combination phase of the primed combination group had a median PFS time of 90 days compared with 60 in the LE group (HR, 0.36; P = 0.032), and 63 in the unprimed combination group (P = 0.72). Radiographic responders to VB-111 exhibited characteristic, expansive areas of necrosis in the areas of initial enhancing disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with rGBM who were primed with VB-111 monotherapy that continued after progression with the addition of bevacizumab showed significant survival and PFS advantage, as well as specific imaging characteristics related to VB-111 mechanism of action. These results warrant further assessment in a randomized controlled study.

First-line bevacizumab contributes to survival improvement in glioblastoma patients complementary to temozolomide

INTRODUCTION

First-line bevacizumab (BEV) is now available as a treatment option for glioblastoma patients with severe clinical conditions in Japan. However, the survival benefits remain controversial. To elucidate these potential survival benefits, we retrospectively analyzed survival in glioblastoma patients receiving BEV.

METHODS

We analyzed survival in 120 patients with IDH-wild type glioblastoma treated from 2002 to 2018. Overall survival (OS) was assessed in three treatment era subgroups [pre-temozolomide (TMZ), TMZ, and TMZ-BEV], and the correlations of prognostic factors with survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

An improvement in survival was observed after BEV approval (median OS in the pre-TMZ, TMZ, and TMZ-BEV eras: 14.6, 14.9, and 22.1 months, respectively). A Cox proportional hazards model identified extent of resection and MGMT methylation status as significant prognostic factors in the TMZ era; however, these factors were not significant in the TMZ-BEV era. In subgroup analyses, patients with MGMT methylation had improved OS after TMZ introduction (pre-TMZ vs. TMZ, 18.5 vs. 28.1 months; P = 0.13), and those without MGMT methylation had significantly increased OS after BEV approval (TMZ vs. TMZ-BEV, 12.2 vs. 16.7 months; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings imply that optional first-line administration of BEV can overcome the impact of conventional risk factors and prolong survival complementary to TMZ. The patient subgroups benefitting from TMZ and BEV did not seem to overlap, and stratification based on risk factors, including MGMT methylation status, might be effective for selecting patients in whom BEV should be preferentially used as a first-line therapy.

Glioblastoma Multiforme: An Overview of Emerging Therapeutic Targets

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive malignant primary brain tumour in humans and has a very poor prognosis. The existing treatments have had limited success in increasing overall survival. Thus, identifying and understanding the key molecule(s) responsible for the malignant phenotype of GBM will yield new potential therapeutic targets. The treatment of brain tumours faces unique challenges, including the presence of the blood brain barrier (BBB), which limits the concentration of drugs that can reach the site of the tumour. Nevertheless, several promising treatments have been shown to cross the BBB and have shown promising pre-clinical results. This review will outline the status of several of these promising targeted therapies.

Patterns of long-term survivorship following bevacizumab treatment for recurrent glioma: a case series

Aim:

Long-term survivors (LTS) after glioma recurrence while on bevacizumab (Bev) therapy are rarely reported in the current literature. The purpose of this case series is to confirm the existence of and describe a large cohort of recurrent glioma LTS treated with Bev (Bev-LTS).

Patients & methods:

We identified Bev-LTS as patients with post-Bev initiation survival times of ≥3 years among 1397 Bev treated recurrent glioma patients.

Results:

Among 962 grade-IV, 221 grade III, and 214 grade II Bev-treated glioma patients, we identified 28 (2.9%), 14 (6.3%) and 8 (3.7%) Bev-LTS patients, respectively. 45 Bev-LTS patients recurred on Bev, with 36 of those patients continuing therapy.

Conclusion:

Our study shows that a small portion of grade-IV, -III, and -II glioma patients can have long-term survival on Bev therapy even after Bev recurrence.

A case report of high-grade astroblastoma in a young adult

Astroblastoma is an uncommon neuroepithelial primary tumor of the brain which is of uncertain origin. We present a case of high-grade astroblastoma in an 18-year-old female with a severe headache, loss of appetite, vomiting and generalized weakness. The patient had undergone a right frontoparietal craniotomy. Large subfalcine meningioma was excised. The lesion was suspected to be a meningioma. Primary radiological investigation revealed a 6.8 cm × 5.8 cm × 5.4 cm lesion. Although the radiological and intraoperative findings were of an extra-axial tumor, the histology and immunophenotype was of an astroblastoma. The patient was treated with cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy regimen. The patient was later treated with bi-weekly bevacizumab. The patient had improved symptomatically post-chemotherapy. However, there was no significant difference in lesion size. The patient died after 2 weeks. The prognosis of patients with astroblastoma is extremely poor as observed in our case.

EGFR amplification and classical subtype are associated with a poor response to bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma

PURPOSE

The highly vascular malignant brain tumor glioblastoma (GBM) appears to be an ideal target for anti-angiogenic therapy; however, clinical trials to date suggest the VEGF antibody bevacizumab affects only progression-free survival. Here we analyze a group of patients with GBM who received bevacizumab treatment at recurrence and are stratified according to tumor molecular and genomic profile (TCGA classification), with the goal of identifying molecular predictors of the response to bevacizumab.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients with a diagnosis of glioblastoma who were treated with bevacizumab in the recurrent setting at our hospital, from 2006 to 2014. Treatment was discontinued by the treating neuro-oncologists, based on clinical and radiographic criteria. Pre- and post-treatment imaging and genomic subtype were available on 80 patients. We analyzed time on bevacizumab and time to progression. EGFR gene amplification was determined by FISH.

RESULTS

Patients with classical tumors had a significantly shorter time on bevacizumab than mesenchymal, and proneural patients (2.7 vs. 5.1 vs. 6.4 and 6.0 months respectively, p = 0.011). Classical subtype and EGFR gene amplification were significantly associated with a shorter time to progression both in univariate (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively) and multivariate analysis (both p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

EGFR gene amplification and classical subtype by TCGA analysis are associated with significantly shorter time to progression for patients with recurrent GBM when treated with bevacizumab. These findings can have a significant impact on decision-making and should be further validated prospectively.

Identification of hub genes and pathways in glioblastoma by bioinformatics analysis

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common type of malignant brain tumor, and is associated with poor patient prognosis. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying GBM may help to guide the identification of novel diagnoses and treatment targets. The gene expression profile of the GSE4290 GBM dataset was analyzed in order to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Enriched pathways were identified through Gene Ontology and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analyses. A protein-protein interaction network was constructed in order to identify hub genes and for module analysis. Expression and survival analyses were conducted in order to screen and validate critical genes. A total of 1,801 DEGs were recorded, including 620 upregulated and 1,181 downregulated genes. Upregulated DEGs were enriched in the terms ‘mitotic cell cycle process’, ‘mitotic cell cycle’ and ‘cell cycle process’. Downregulated genes were enriched in ‘transsynaptic signaling’, ‘anterograde transsynaptic signaling’ and ‘synaptic signaling’. A total of 15 hub genes, which displayed a high degree of connectivity, were selected. These genes included vascular endothelial growth factor A, cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), cell-division cycle protein 20 (CDC20), aurora kinase A (AURKA), and budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 (BUB1). The identified DEGs and hub genes may help guide investigations on the mechanisms underlying the development and progression of GBM. CDK1, CDC20, AURKA and BUB1, which are involved in cell cycle pathways, may be potential targets in the diagnosis and therapy of GBM.

The potential for remodelling the tumour vasculature in glioblastoma

Despite significant improvements in the clinical management of glioblastoma, poor delivery of systemic therapies to the entire population of tumour cells remains one of the biggest challenges in the achievement of more effective treatments. On the one hand, the abnormal and dysfunctional tumour vascular network largely limits blood perfusion, resulting in an inhomogeneous delivery of drugs to the tumour. On the other hand, the presence of an intact blood-brain barrier (BBB) in certain regions of the tumour prevents chemotherapeutic drugs from permeating through the tumour vessels and reaching the diseased cells. In this review we analyse in detail the implications of the presence of a dysfunctional vascular network and the impenetrable BBB on drug transport. We discuss advantages and limitations of the currently available strategies for remodelling the tumour vasculature aiming to ameliorate the above mentioned limitations. Finally we review research methods for visualising vascular dysfunction and highlight the power of DCE- and DSC-MRI imaging to assess changes in blood perfusion and BBB permeability.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Glioblastoma is one of the most common primary brain tumors in adults. The current treatment strategies failed to achieve satisfactory outcomes. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have been proposed to enhance the survival and quality of life in these patients. To investigate this, different databases were searched in addition to hand searching. Relevant studies were screened and only ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the eligibility criteria; six of them were considered for meta-analysis. Eligible RCTs were assessed regarding risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. Relevant data were extracted and meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects model analysis on RevMan software. One thousand seventy-eight patients in the anti-VEGF group and 946 patients in the control group were available for analysis. No statistically significant improvement in the overall survival (OS) was detected for anti-VEGF (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.7-1.09, p = 0.23) or bevacizumab subgroup (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.65-1.08, p = 0.17) compared to standard therapy alone. However, the progression-free survival (PFS) showed a significant improvement with both anti-VEGF (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.89, p = 0.0007) and bevacizumab subgroup (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.87, p = 0.0001). In conclusion, anti-VEGF agents can improve the PFS but not OS in glioblastoma patients. The current evidence is not satisfactory to declare a new therapeutic line. Further RCTs with sharply determined outcomes and assessment methods are required.

Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy vs single-agent therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: evidence from randomized controlled trials

Background

Recent studies showed inconsistent results of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy vs single-agent therapy in terms of their safety and efficacy for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the value of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy and single-agent therapy in recurrent glioblastoma treatment.

Methods

Databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the topic of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy and single-agent therapy as treatments for recurrent glioblastoma from January 1980 to April 2018. Subsequent articles were then sorted, evaluated, and analyzed.

Results

We pooled 1,169 patient cases from seven RCTs. Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy showed a significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.65; 95% CI 0.57-0.74; P<0.001) compared to single-agent therapy. In addition, the overall survival (OS) rate showed insignificant differences between the two groups (HR=0.96; 95% CI 0.83-1.12; P=0.622). Simultaneously, we found that bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy had a higher objective response rate (ORR) (OR=2.10; 95% CI 1.32-3.33; P=0.002), but also higher incidence of adverse events (AEs) (OR=1.85; 95% CI 1.26-2.71; P=0.002). However, in subgroup analysis, we found that AEs showed insignificant differences between the two treatment methods when bevacizumab was used as the single-agent therapy subgroup (P=0.058). In addition, in the subgroup with low corticosteroid use rate at baseline (N<50%), ORR (P=0.108) and AEs (P=0.134) showed insignificant differences between the two groups.

Conclusion

Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy can significantly improve PFS and ORR, but did not prolong OS in these studies, and can even lead to higher odds of AEs. In addition, bevacizumab may play a dominant role and corticosteroid may be an unfavorable factor in the combination therapy of recurrent glioblastoma.