Post-pancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage: DSA diagnosis and endovascular treatment

Delayed postpancreatectomy hemorrhage as the role of endovascular approach: Four case reports

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic resection is still associated with high morbidity rates and delayed postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is the most feared complication as it may lead to hemorrhagic shock or serious septic complications. Today, endovascular approach represent safe and efficient method for minimally invasive management of extraluminal PPH.

CASE SUMMARY

We describe four patients whose postoperative recovery after pancreatic resection was complicated by postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and visceral artery hemorrhage. In all cases endovascular approach was utilized and it resulted in satisfactory outcomes. We discuss modern diagnostic and therapeutic approach in this clinical scenario.

CONCLUSION

PPH is relatively uncommon, but it is a leading cause of surgical mortality after pancreatic surgery. Careful monitoring and meticulous follow-up are required for all patients post-operatively, especially in the case of confirmed POPF, which is the most significant risk factor for the development of a PPH. Angiography as a diagnostic and therapeutic method may be an optimal first-line treatment for the management of delayed PPHs. In our experience, endovascular treatment for hemorrhagic complications of pancreatic resections has shown satisfactory results.

Pancreatic Dysfunction and Reduction in Quality of Life Is Common After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Improvements in survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy has increased the number of patients potentially at risk of pancreatic insufficiency.

AIMS

We studied long-term (> 1 year) pancreatic functions (endocrine and exocrine) after pancreaticoduodenectomy and aimed to recognize the impact of various clinicopathological factors and postoperative complications on pancreatic functions.

METHODS

All patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at least 1 year prior were recruited from July 2020 to December 2021. Endocrine function was assessed using HbA1c, fasting blood sugar and postprandial blood sugar levels. Pancreatic exocrine function was assessed clinically with history of steatorrhea and objectively with quantitative estimation of fecal elastase-1 levels in stool samples. Volume of remnant pancreas, parenchymal thickness and duct diameter were assessed by computed tomography. Quality of life assessment was done using SF-36 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the 106 patients assessed, 64 patients met the inclusion criteria. Endocrine insufficiency was noted in 51.6%, and 34.3% had new onset diabetes mellitus. The incidence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency was 87.5% and severe insufficiency was found in 62.5% of patients. Twenty-nine (45.3%) patients had both exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. Patients with CRPOPF had higher risk of severe exocrine insufficiency (5 vs. 2, OR 1.57(0.28-8.81) p = 0.6). The SF-36 scores were lower than general population especially in role limitation due to physical health, role limitation due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, general health perception and health change domains.

CONCLUSION

Post-pancreaticoduodenectomy patients have a high frequency of pancreatic insufficiency and should be screened for same. The post-operative pancreatic fistula increases the risk of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency.

The role of repeated imaging in detecting complications in the post-operative period following pancreaticoduodenectomy: Serial CT imaging post-pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Post-pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage is a potentially life-threatening complication. Delay in the detection and subsequent management of complications contribute significantly to post-operative mortality and morbidity associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

All patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at an Australian-based tertiary referral center between 2017 and 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. We identified those patients who suffered a post-pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage and further analysed those patients who had their post-pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage identified on repeated CT imaging performed within 24 h of their previous CT scan.

RESULTS

A total of 232 pancreaticoduodenectomies were identified for analysis during the study period, of which 23 patients (9.9%) suffered a post-pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage. We present four patients who had their post-pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage identified on repeat CT scan in the setting of a recent (within 24 h) CT scan which showed no evidence of active haemorrhage or pseudoaneurysm formation. All patients received prompt and definitive endovascular management through stent insertion or coil embolization resulting in successful cessation of bleeding. Three patients made an uncomplicated recovery thereafter. Unfortunately, one patient died as a complication of the bleed despite early and definitive endovascular intervention.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the importance of having a low threshold for repeated CT imaging in the post-pancreaticoduodenectomy setting, particularly when there remains a high index of suspicion clinically for a post-operative complication, even in the context of previous benign imaging. Given the complexity of pancreaticoduodenectomy, we believe early detection with liberal imaging allows the best chance at successfully managing the morbidity and mortality associated in the post-pancreaticoduodenectomy setting.

Comparing the Clinical Efficacy of Coil Embolization in GDA Stump versus Common Hepatic Artery in Postoperative Hemorrhage after Pancreatoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy is an uncommon but fatal complication. In this retrospective study, the different treatment modalities and outcomes for treating post-pancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage are analyzed.

METHODS

Our hospital imaging database was queried to identify patients who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy during the period of 2004-2019. The patients were retrospectively split into three groups, according to their treatment: conservative treatment without embolization (group A: A1, negative angiography; A2, positive angiography), hepatic artery sacrifice/embolization (group B: B1, complete; B2, incomplete), and gastroduodenal artery (GDA) stump embolization (group C).

RESULTS

There were 24 patients who received angiography or transarterial embolization (TAE) treatment 37 times (cases). In group A, high re-bleeding rates (60%, 6/10 cases) were observed, with 50% (4/8 cases) for subgroup A1 and 100% (2/2 cases) for subgroup A2. In group B, the re-bleeding rates were lowest (21.1%, 4/19 cases) with 0% (0/16 cases) for subgroup B1 and 100% (4/4 cases) for subgroup B2. The rate of post-TAE complications (such as hepatic failure, infarct, and/or abscess) in group B was not low (35.3%, 6/16 patients), especially in patients with underlying liver disease, such as liver cirrhosis and post-hepatectomy (100% (3/3 patients), vs. 23.1% (3/13 patients); p = 0.036, p < 0.05). The highest rate of re-bleeding (62.5%, 5/8 cases) was observed for group C. There was a significant difference in the re-bleeding rates of subgroup B1 and group C (p = 0.00017). The more iterations of angiography, the higher the mortality rate (18.2% (2/11 patients), <3 times vs. 60% (3/5 patients), ≥3 times; p = 0.245).

CONCLUSIONS

The complete sacrifice of the hepatic artery is an effective first-line treatment for pseudoaneurysm or for the rupture of the GDA stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatic complications are not uncommon and are highly associated with underlying liver disease. Conservative treatment, the selective embolization of the GDA stump, and incomplete hepatic artery embolization do not provide enduring treatment effects.

InterNet: Detection of Active Abdominal Arterial Bleeding Using Emergency Digital Subtraction Angiography Imaging With Two-Stage Deep Learning

Objective

Active abdominal arterial bleeding is an emergency medical condition. Herein, we present our use of this two-stage InterNet model for detection of active abdominal arterial bleeding using emergency DSA imaging.

Methods

Firstly, 450 patients who underwent abdominal DSA procedures were randomly selected for development of the region localization stage (RLS). Secondly, 160 consecutive patients with active abdominal arterial bleeding were included for development of the bleeding site detection stage (BSDS) and InterNet (cascade network of RLS and BSDS). Another 50 patients that ruled out active abdominal arterial bleeding were used as negative samples to evaluate InterNet performance. We evaluated the mode's efficacy using the precision-recall (PR) curve. The classification performance of a doctor with and without InterNet was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

The AP, precision, and recall of the RLS were 0.99, 0.95, and 0.99 in the validation dataset, respectively. Our InterNet reached a recall of 0.7, the precision for detection of bleeding sites was 53% in the evaluation set. The AUCs of doctors with and without InterNet were 0.803 and 0.759, respectively. In addition, the doctor with InterNet assistant could significantly reduce the elapsed time for the interpretation of each DSA sequence from 84.88 to 43.78 s.

Conclusion

Our InterNet system could assist interventional radiologists in identifying bleeding foci quickly and may improve the workflow of the DSA operation to a more real-time procedure.

Endovascular treatment of delayed arterial bleeding after pancreatic surgery: single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate technical aspects and clinical results of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for delayed postoperative arterial bleeding after pancreatic surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 821 pancreatectomies between 2012 and 2020. Delayed bleeding occurred in 106 (12.9%) patients; 74 patients were included in the study. Previous pancreatic head resection was carried out in 75.7% of cases, pancreatic body resection - in 17.6% of cases, pancreatic tail resection - in 6.8% of patients. Primary endpoint was technical success of TAE, secondary endpoints - complications after TAE, as well as recurrent bleeding after embolization.

RESULTS

Angiography of celiac-mesenteric arterial system was performed in 74 patients (91 procedures). The most common sources of bleeding were gastroduodenal and superior mesenteric arteries (35.7%), jejunal arteries (13.1%), common hepatic artery (11.9%). Combination of embolization agents was applied for TAE (metal coils and non-calibrated PVA particles, 48.6%). In 11 (14.9%) patients, we applied stent-grafts. Technical success rate was 100%. Recurrent bleeding occurred in 13 (17.6%) patients. In-hospital mortality was 12.2% (n=9).

CONCLUSION

TAE is an effective treatment procedure in patients with arrosive bleeding. This method is characterized by high technical efficiency and low in-hospital mortality, but it does not affect recurrence of bleeding.

Endovascular therapy choices for different sites of delayed postoperative arterial hemorrhage after hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery: a retrospective study

Background

Angiography and subsequent endovascular therapy is an effective technique for delayed postoperative arterial hemorrhage (PAH) after hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery. In this research, we aimed to evaluate endovascular therapy choices for different sites of delayed PAH after hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery.

Methods

A total of 85 patients with delayed PAH who underwent endovascular therapy at the Department of Radioactive Intervention of Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were retrospectively enrolled. According to the hemorrhage site, participants were divided into 3 groups, all of whom then received embolization, covered stent placement, or a combination of both. Ongoing or recurrent hemorrhages, intervention times, complications associated with intervention, and mortality rate were documented. The chi-squared (χ²) test was used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 22 participants with arterial branch hemorrhage underwent superselective embolization. Overall, 81.8% (18/22) of patients underwent embolization once. The successful hemostasis rate was 77.3% (17/22), and the mortality rate was 13.6% (3/22). A total of 53 participants with arterial trunk hemorrhage underwent embolization or covered stent placement. The rate of multi-time intervention, failure to achieve hemostasis, complications associated with intervention, and mortality was lower in the stent group than in the embolization group, and there was a significant difference in complications between the 2 groups (χ²=4.93, P=0.026). Among a total of 10 patients with multisite hemorrhage who underwent embolization, covered stent placement, or a combination, the successful hemostasis rate was 20%; and the mortality rate was 70%.

Conclusions

Superselective embolization is a safe treatment method for arterial branch hemorrhage, and covered stent placement may be a better choice for arterial trunk hemorrhage. Verification of these findings is required via additional large population studies.

Impact of Vascular Anomalies on Pancreatoduodenectomy Procedure

BACKGROUND

One of the critical steps during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) procedure lies in identifying the complicated vascular anatomy of the resected area. The blood supply usually stems from branches of the celiac and the superior mesenteric arteries. However, only in 55-79% of surgeries, the anatomy of the blood vessels encountered by the surgeon is considered normal, while in the remaining cases, there are vascular variations that make these surgeries even more challenging. Any change or deviation from the known surgical course of PD makes surgery difficult and can result in an increase in intra/postoperative complications. In order to reduce difficulties encountered during PD, as well as reducing complication rates and improving surgical outcomes, a preliminary design, which includes preoperative identification of anatomical variations, is needed. The most accurate and accessible tool for identifying such variations is computed tomographic angiography (CTA). The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the prevalence of vascular anomalies encountered during PD, and examine whether there is an association between these anomalies and intra/postoperative morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective study over 5 years was performed at the HPB and Surgical Oncology Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. The charts of all patients submitted to PD were reviewed, and all patients with vascular anomalies were included. The types of anatomical variant as well as other information were collected. For statistical purposes, the group of patients with vascular anomalies was compared to a control group with identical demographic characteristics. A statistical analysis on possible association between vascular anomalies and intra/postoperative complications (mainly bleeding) was performed.

RESULTS

During the aforementioned period, 202 patients underwent PD, and in 41 (20.3%) vascular anomalies were identified. The majority of these patients (32/41) had single anatomical variant, where two and three anatomical variants were identified in seven and two patients, respectively. The most common vascular anomaly was replaced right hepatic artery, noticed in 34 patients (83%). The most common indication for PD for both groups (anatomical variant and control group) was pancreas adenocarcinoma (56%). Intraoperative complication, in the form of bleeding, developed in 6/41 patients (14.6%) of the anatomical variant group and none in the control group. Postoperative complication rates, including post- pancreatoduodenectomy hemorrhage (PPH), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), intra-abdominal abscess and wound infection were almost identical for both groups. One case of death within 30 days occurred, and it was in the anatomical variant group.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical vascular anomalies are a common variant encountered during PD, with RRHA being the most common. Although postoperative morbidity and mortality are not affected by the presence of these anomalies, intraoperative bleeding rate is higher in this specific group, thus; a preoperative diagnosis by means of CTA is mandatory.

Prolonged operating time is a significant perioperative risk factor for arterial pseudoaneurysm formation and patient death following hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Arterial pseudoaneurysm is a rare but potentially fatal complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and predictors associated with pseudoaneurysm formation and patient death caused by its rupture.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 453 patients who underwent PD from April 2007 to February 2019. Uni- and multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to identify risk factors and optimal cutoff values.

RESULTS

Among the 453 patients, 22 (4.9%) developed pseudoaneurysm after PD. Median duration from surgery to detection of pseudoaneurysm was 17.0 (1-51) days. The locations of pseudoaneurysms were hepatic artery in 8, splenic artery in 3, gastroduodenal artery in 4, gastric artery in 2 and others in 5 patients, and 72.7% (16/22) of patients presented with hemorrhage. All pseudoaneurysms were treated using angioembolization. Lower age (<65.5 years, p = 0.004), prolonged operation time (Cutoff ˃610 min, p = 0.026) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (p = 0.013) were the independent risk factors for development of pseudoaneurysm. 6 (27.3%) patients died due to rupture of pseudoaneurysm and prolonged operation time (Cutoff ˃657 min, p = 0.043) was a significant risk factor for death related to pseudoaneurysm.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged operating time was identified as a risk factor for both pseudoaneurysm formation and patient death following pseudoaneurysm bleeding. Interventional radiology treatment offered a central role in the treatment of pseudoaneurysms after PD. Therefore, it is important to have a high index of suspicion in high risk patients of the possibility of pseudoaneurysm formation and bleeding.

Risk factors for 30-day unplanned reoperation after pancreatoduodenectomy: A single-center experience

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the rate and reasons and also the risk factors for unplanned reoperation after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in a single center.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective analysis included patients who underwent PD in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between January 2010 and January 2018. The patients were divided into nonreoperation and reoperation groups according to whether they underwent unplanned reoperation following the primary PD. The incidence and reasons were examined. In addition, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for unplanned reoperation.

Results

Of the 330 patients who underwent PD operations, 22 (6.67%) underwent unplanned reoperation. The main reasons for reoperation were postpancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage (PPH) (12/22 [54.5%]) and pancreaticoenteric anastomotic (PEA) leak (5/22 [22.7%]). Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified that diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 3.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-12.90; P = 0.04), intraoperative blood loss ≥400 mL (OR, 4.06; 95% CI, 1.29-12.84; P = 0.02), occurrence of postoperative complications in the form of PPH (OR, 30.67; 95% CI, 8.85-106.31; P < 0.001), and PEA leak (OR, 11.53; 95% CI, 3.03-43.98, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for unplanned reoperation.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that diabetes, intraoperative blood loss ≥400 mL, PPH, and PEA leak were independent risk factors for unplanned reoperation after primary PD.

The Role of Interventional Radiology in the Management of Late Postpancreaticoduodenectomy Hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To explore the role of interventional radiology (IR) in the management of late postpancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage (PPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who had late PPH (occurring >24 h after index operation) managed by the IR procedure in our institution between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULT

Hired patients who were diagnosed with grade B (n = 10) and C (n = 22) late PPH underwent 40 transcatheter arterial angiographies (TAA). The overall positive rate of angiography was 45.0% (18/40). Eighteen transcatheter arterial embolizations (TAEs) were performed, and the technical success rate was 88.89% (16/18). The rebleeding rate after embolization was 18.8% (3/16), and no severe procedure-related complications were recorded. The overall mortality of late PPH was 25.0% (8/32).

CONCLUSION

Nearly half of hemorrhagic sites in late PPH could be identified by TAA. TAE is an effective and safe method for the hemostasia of late PPH in patients with positive angiography results.

Efficacy and hepatic complications of three endovascular treatment approaches for delayed postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: evolution over 15 years

Background

Delayed postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a fatal complication caused by arterial erosion. This study reports a single-center experience of managing delayed PPH with different endovascular treatment approaches.

Methods

We reviewed the data of patients who had delayed PPH due to hepatic artery or gastroduodenal artery stump perforation and underwent endovascular treatment between 2003 and 2018. We categorized endovascular treatment approaches involving hepatic artery sacrifice, superselective pseudoaneurysm embolization with hepatic artery preservation, and covered stent placement. Technical success rates, hemorrhage recurrence rates, major and minor hepatic complication rates, and 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were assessed.

Results

A total of 18 patients were reviewed; 11 (61%), 4 (22%), and 3 (17%) delayed PPH cases were managed through hepatic artery sacrifice, superselective pseudoaneurysm embolization, and hepatic artery stenting, respectively. Multidetector computed tomography was performed in 14 (78%) patients. The technical success rate was 100%. The overall hemorrhage recurrence rate was 39%, with superselective pseudoaneurysm embolization having a 100% hemorrhage recurrence rate—much higher than that of hepatic artery sacrifice or stent graft placement. The overall major and minor hepatic complication rates were 56% and 83%, respectively. The overall 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 11% and 25%, respectively. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates and minor and major hepatic complication rates were similar in each group.

Conclusion

Hepatic artery sacrifice is more effective than superselective pseudoaneurysm embolization in the management of delayed PPH. Covered stent placement may be a reasonable alternative treatment to hepatic artery sacrifice.

Two forms of one complication: Late erosive and nonerosive postpancreatectomy hemorrhage following laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) remains a rare but lethal complication following laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in the modern era of advanced surgical techniques. The main reason for early PPH (within 24 hours following surgery) has been found to be a failure of hemostasis during the surgical procedure. The reasons for late PPH tend to be variate. Positive associations have been identified between late PPH and intraabdominal erosive factors such as postoperative pancreatic fistula, bile leakage, gastrointestinal fistula, and intraabdominal infection. Still, some patients suffer PPH who do not have these erosive factors. The severity of bleeding and clinical prognosis of erosive and nonerosive PPH following LPD is different.We analyzed the electronic clinical records of 33 consecutive patients undergoing LPD and experiencing one or more episodes of hemorrhage after postoperative day 1 in this study. All patients received an LPD with standard lymphadenectomy. The patient's hemorrhage-related information was extracted, such as interval from surgery to bleeding, presentation, bleeding site, severity, management, and clinical prognosis. Based on our clinical practice, we proposed a treatment strategy for these 2 forms of late PPH following LPD.Of these 33 patients, 8 patients (24.24%) developed nonerosive bleeding, and other 25 patients (75.76%) suffered from postoperative hemorrhage caused by various intraabdominal erosive factors. The median interval from the LPD surgery to postoperative hemorrhage for both groups was 11 days, and no significant differences were found (P = .387). For patients with erosive bleeding, most (60%) underwent their episodes of bleeding on postoperative days 5 to 14. For patients with nonerosive bleeding, most (75%) began postoperative hemorrhage 2 weeks after surgery, and 50% of these patients had bleeding between postoperative days 20 and 30. In the present study, 64% (16/25) of patients with erosive bleeding and 87.5% (7/8) of patients with nonerosive bleeding had internal bleeding. The fact that 90% (9/10) of all gastrointestinal bleeding patients had intraabdominal erosive factors indicated strong relationships between gastrointestinal hemorrhage and these erosive factors. The bleeding sites were detected in most patients, except for 4 patients who received conservative treatments. For patients with erosive bleeding, the most common bleeding site detected was the pancreatic remnant (43.48%); others included the hepatic artery (39.13%), splenic artery (13.04%), and left gastric artery (4.35%). For patients with nonerosive bleeding, the most common bleeding site was the hepatic artery (83.33%), and the 2nd most frequent site was the splenic artery (16.67%). No hemorrhage from pancreaticojejunal anastomosis occurred in the patients with nonerosive bleeding. Statistical significance was noted between these 2 groups in hemorrhage severity (P = .012), management strategies (P = .001), rebleeding occurrence (P = .031), and prognosis outcome (P = .010). The patients with intraabdominal erosive factors tended to have a higher risk of grade C bleeding (68.00%) than that of their nonerosive bleeding counterparts (12.50%). As for treatment strategy for postoperative bleeding, the favorable method to manage nonerosive bleeding was conservative and endovascular treatments if the patients' hemodynamics was stable. All these nonerosive bleeding patients survived. On the contrary, 22 patients (88.00%) in the erosive bleeding group had a 2nd surgical procedure, and the mortality was 56.00%. In this group, 2 patients received conservative therapy due to the demand of their family and expired. One patient underwent endovascular treatment and had another episode of hemorrhage, finally dying from multi-organ failure. No patients in the nonerosive bleeding group suffered from rebleeding after complete hemostasis, and 44.00% of patients with erosive bleeding underwent a 2nd episode of postoperative bleeding.Erosive and nonerosive PPH are 2 forms of this lethal complication following LPD. Their severity of bleeding, rebleeding rate, and treatment strategy are different. Patients with erosive factors tend to have a higher incidence of grade C bleeding, rebleeding, and mortality. Factors influencing treatment protocols for PPH include the existence of intraabdominal erosive factors, patient hemodynamics, possibility to detect the bleeding site during endovascular treatment, and surgeon's preference. The performance of endovascular treatment with stent repair for managing postoperative hemorrhage after LPD depends on the discovery of the bleeding site. Surgery should be reserved as an emergent and final choice to manage PPH.

Late Pancreatic Anastomosis Stricture Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

With an increasing postoperative survival and prolonged follow-up, late complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) have yet to be thoroughly described and analyzed. Among those, pancreatic anastomosis stricture may lead to severe consequences.

METHODS

A systematic review focusing on pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis (PJA) stricture.

RESULTS

PJA stricture incidence reached 1.4-11.4% with a median time interval of 34 months after PD. No risk factor was identified. PJA stricture repercussions were inconsistent but postprandial abdominal pain and recurrent acute pancreatitis were the most common symptoms, followed by impaired pancreatic function. To confirm diagnosis, secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (SMRCP) sensitivity reached 56-100%. As impaired pancreatic function is not improved by any procedure, only PJA stricture leading to abdominal pain or acute pancreatitis should be considered for treatment. Endoscopic techniques (mainly ultrasound-assisted "rendezvous") should be proposed prior to surgical repair, with a morbidity, an overall technical and clinical success reaching 16.5-33% and 28.6-100% and 33-100%, respectively. Regarding surgical repair, overall morbidity varied between 14.3 and 33%, with a clinical success reaching 26.1-100%. Finally, total pancreatectomy with islet auto-transplantation should be considered only for pain intractable to medical management and recurrent acute pancreatitis which has failed medical, endoscopic, and traditional surgical management strategies.

CONCLUSION

PJA stricture following PD is a late, unusual, and potentially serious complication. When there is currently no clear consensus, PJA stricture leading to abdominal pain or acute pancreatitis should be considered treatment. With increasing survival after PD, further studies should focus on late complications.

CORE TIP

Stricture of pancraticojejunostomy is a late and potentially serious complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Incidence reaches 1.4-11.4% and no risk factor is identified. Symptoms are inconsistent but postprandial abdominal pain, recurrent acute pancreatitis, and impaired pancreatic function are the most frequent. To confirm diagnosis, secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is the best modality. Only PJA stricture leading to abdominal pain or acute pancreatitis should be considered for treatment. Endoscopic techniques (mainly ultrasound-assisted "rendezvous") should be proposed prior to surgical repair. Finally, total pancreatectomy with islet auto-transplantation should be considered only for pain intractable to medical management and recurrent acute pancreatitis which has failed medical, endoscopic, and traditional surgical management strategies.

Surgery for pancreatic cancer: critical radiologic findings for clinical decision making

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, with an estimated 53,670 new cases diagnosed and an estimated 43,090 deaths in 2017. This high mortality rate is in part due to the small percentage of patients diagnosed with local disease, as well as the biologically aggressive nature of the disease. While only 10-20% of patients will present with surgically resectable disease, this is the only possible curative therapy. Five-year survival of resected pancreatic cancer ranges from 12 to 27%. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend specific guidelines for imaging modalities used in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Indeed, high-quality imaging is not only necessary to accurately stage the disease, but is critical for the determination of key clinical decision branch points such as the determination of surgical resectability. Identification of the lesion within the pancreas, the degree of extra-pancreatic extension, and potential involvement of surrounding vascular structures with the tumor are all findings necessary to classify patients as having resectable, borderline resectable, or with unresectable primary tumors. This article reviews imaging modalities used to evaluate the pancreatic cancer patient from the surgeon's perspective, with particular emphasis on determination of resectability and preoperative planning, as well as imaging in the postoperative period.