Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin for early triple negative breast cancer: a single center experience

Early-stage triple negative breast cancer: the therapeutic role of immunotherapy and the prognostic value of pathological complete response

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents an aggressive disease associated with a high risk of recurrence after curative treatment and a poor prognosis in the metastatic setting. Chemotherapy was for years the only treatment available in the early and metastatic setting, due to the lack of actionable targets. Clinical practice has changed following the results obtained with the addition of immunotherapy to standard chemotherapy, the development of novel drugs [i.e. antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)], and the use of targeted treatments for patients carrying germline pathogenic breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA) 1 or BRCA 2 variants. The treatment of early-stage disease has had a shift in clinical practice since July 2021, after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of pembrolizumab in association with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for TNBC and as a single agent in the subsequent adjuvant setting. This intensive treatment based on the combination of a poly-chemotherapy and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) led to the improvement of short- and long-term outcomes, but it has highlighted some new unmet clinical needs in the treatment of early-stage TNBC: the selection of the most effective adjuvant therapy and the integration of pembrolizumab with other therapeutic strategies [capecitabine, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors] based on the achievement of pathologic complete response (pCR); the identification of predictive biomarkers to select patients who could most benefit from the addition of ICI, to minimize toxicities and to maximize outcomes; the possibility of de-escalating chemotherapy in favor of immune-combo or novel agents, such as ADCs; the role of immunotherapy in estrogen receptor (ER)-low patients. The advent of immunotherapy not only addresses current challenges in TNBC treatment but also holds the promise of a radical transformation in its therapeutic paradigm, enhancing significantly clinical outcomes and offering new perspectives for patients grappling with this aggressive form of breast cancer.

Association between homologous recombination deficiency and outcomes with platinum and platinum-free chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

The choice of chemotherapeutic regimen for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains controversial. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has attracted increasing attention in informing chemotherapy treatment. This study was aimed at investigating the feasibility of HRD as a clinically actionable biomarker for platinum-containing and platinum-free therapy.

METHODS

Chinese patients with TNBC who received chemotherapy between May 1, 2008 and March 31, 2020 were retrospectively analyzed with a customized 3D-HRD panel. HRD positivity was defined by an HRD score ≥ 30 or deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation. A total of 386 chemotherapy-treated patients with TNBC were screened from a surgical cohort (NCT01150513) and a metastatic cohort, and 189 patients with available clinical and tumor sequencing data were included.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort, 49.2% (93/189) of patients were identified as HRD positive (40 with deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations and 53 with BRCA1/2 intact with an HRD score of ≥ 30). In the first-line metastatic setting, platinum therapy was associated with longer median progression-free survival (mPFS) than platinum-free therapy [9.1 vs. 3.0 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.84; P = 0.01]. Among HRD-positive patients, the mPFS was significantly longer in those treated with platinum rather than platinum-free therapy (13.6 vs. 2.0 months; HR, 0.11; P = 0.001). Among patients administered a platinum-free regimen, HRD-negative patients showed a PFS significantly superior to that of HRD-positive patients (P = 0.02; treatment-biomarker P-interaction = 0.001). Similar results were observed in the BRCA1/2-intact subset. In the adjuvant setting, HRD-positive patients tended to benefit more from platinum chemotherapy than from platinum-free chemotherapy (P = 0.05, P-interaction = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

HRD characterization may guide decision-making regarding the use of platinum treatment in patients with TNBC in both adjuvant and metastatic settings.

Current Treatment Landscape for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15-20% of all breast cancers and is characterized by an aggressive nature and a high rate of recurrence despite neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Although novel agents are constantly being introduced for the treatment of breast cancer, conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy based on anthracyclines and taxanes is the mainstay treatment option for TNBC. Based on CTNeoBC pooled analysis data, the achievement of pathologic CR (pCR) in TNBC is directly linked to improved survival outcomes. Therefore, the treatment paradigm for early TNBC has shifted to neoadjuvant treatment, and the escalation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to improve the pCR rate and the addition of post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy to control the residual disease have been investigated. In this article, we review the current treatment landscape for early TNBC, from standard cytotoxic chemotherapy to recent data on immune checkpoint inhibitors, capecitabine, and olaparib.

Platinum-based adjuvant therapy was efficient for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was widely accepted for treating TNBC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and survival benefit of platinum-based adjuvant therapy (PBAT) in treating TNBC. The keywords were searched in Medline, Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library database up to July 24, 2022. All the randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing PBAT and non-PBAT in treating TNBC were included in our study. The pathological complete remission (pCR) and complications were compared by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were compared by hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs. A total of 19 RCTs were included in our meta-analysis, among which 2,501 patients were treated with PBAT and 2,290 with non-PBAT. The patients treated with PBAT combined a significantly higher pCR rate compared to those patients treated with non-PBAT (49.8% versus 36.4%, OR = 1.27, 95%CI = 1.14-1.43, P < 0.001). Besides, patients treated with PBAT had a significantly better RFS (HR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.63-0.95, P = 0.016), but not in OS (HR = 0.84, P = 0.304). Although the occurrence of neutropenia and nausea were slightly different between the PBAT group (51.5% and 24.4%) and the non-PBAT group (47.0% and 29.4%), the complications were acceptable in the two treatments groups. Our results demonstrated that TNBC patients treated with PBAT could achieve a higher pCR rate and better RFS benefit without a higher complication rate.Highlights Platinum-based adjuvant therapy provided a higher pCR rate for TNBC.Platinum-based adjuvant therapy prolonged the RFS but without prolongingthe OS.Neutropenia and nausea rate was different between group PBAT and non-PBAT.

Platinum-based systematic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer

Due to the lack of definitive hormone receptors, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients receive little clinical benefit from endocrine or molecular targeted therapies, leading to a highly aggressive disease with a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. In the past decades, chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for TNBC, with taxane/anthracyclines as the representative regimen. However, increasing irreversible cardiotoxicity of anthracyclines and drug-resistance had to be noticed. Gradually, platinum-based chemotherapy has become a topic of interest for researchers. Based on the accumulating studies on platinum-containing regimens for TNBC patients, we will summarize the progress of relevant clinical trials focusing on platinum monotherapy (e.g., cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin) or in combination with other therapeutic modalities (e.g., other chemotherapeutic agents, molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapy). To further evaluate patient response to platinum and screen for the optimal population to benefit from platinum, we will also analyze current potential biomarkers, such as breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1/2), homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), TP53 family and other emerging indicators (e.g., intrinsic subtype, cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) expression, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9)).

Survival benefit of platinum-based regimen in early stage triple negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Platinum (Pt)-based chemo-regimens have been proved effective in neoadjuvant and salvage chemotherapy of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the survival benefit of Pt-based regimens in early stage TNBC(eTNBC) treatment has remained unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to explore its role in improving the clinical outcomes of eTNBC. We carried out a comprehensive literature search on 15 March 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ajuvant/neoadjuvant Pt-based and Pt-free chemo-regimens in eTNBC patients, according to PRISMA 2020. We extracted the survival data and utilized the STATA software to calculate the summarized hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Seven eligible RCTs enrolling a total of 2,027 eTNBC patients were identified in this meta-analysis, with 1,007 receiving Pt-free regimens, and the other 1,020 patients receiving Pt-based regimens, respectively. Patients in Pt-based regimens arm were associated with significant improved DFS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58–0.84), and OS (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.61–1.00). The survival benefits of DFS remained consistent in both the two strategies of Pt usage, either adding Pt to standard anthracyclines&taxanes based regimens (A&T + Pt), or combination of Pt and taxanes alone (TPt). The survival benefits also remained consistent in either neoadjuvant or adjuvant use of Pt. The present meta-analysis of RCTs revealed that Pt-based chemo-regimens could significantly improve both DFS and OS for eTNBC patients. Based on efficiency and toxicity, we recommend Pt-based regimens for eTNBC, especially the “A&T + Pt” mode if the toxicities are tolerable, which may lead TNBC therapy into a new era.

Platinum-based chemotherapy in early-stage triple negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The addition of platinum agents to anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy in early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients improves pathological complete response (pCR). Long-term outcomes, such as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), have not been well-established.

METHODS

A systematic literature review identified studies using platinum-based treatment in TNBC patients in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting with reportable long-term outcomes. Hazard ratios (HR) from collected data were pooled in a meta-analysis using generic inverse-variance and random effects modeling. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on treatment setting and study design.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies comprising 3518 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median follow up was 56.2 months. All studies reported DFS and 9 studies (64%) reported OS. DFS was significantly better in platinum-based treatment (HR 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.89; p = 0.03). However, OS was no different (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.75-1.27; p = 0.87). There was a non-significant difference between platinum exposure in the adjuvant compared to neoadjuvant setting for both DFS (HR 0.75 vs 0.62, p = 0.43) and for OS (HR 0.90 vs 1.10, p = 0.58). The addition of platinum was associated with more thrombocytopenia and all-grade neuropathy and non-significant increases in neutropenia and grade 3-4 neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Platinum-based treatment improves DFS but not OS. The reporting of toxicity was suboptimal, but in general adding platinum increased toxicity. The discordant effect of platinum-based treatment on DFS and OS suggest the potential development of platinum resistance and worse outcomes after recurrence. Platinum-based chemotherapy cannot be recommended in unselected patients with early TNBC.

Triple negative breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical challenges and nano-formulation approaches

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are amongst the most aggressive forms of solid tumors. TNBC is highlighted by absence of genetic components of progesterone receptor, HER2/neu and estrogen receptor in breast cancer. NSCLC is characterized by integration of malignant carcinoma into respiratory system. Both cancers are associated with poor median and overall survival rates with low progression free survival with high incidences of relapse. These cancers are characterized by tumor heterogeneity, genetic mutations, generation of cancer-stem cells, immune-resistance and chemoresistance. Further, these neoplasms have been reported for tumor cross-talk into second primary cancers for each other. Current chemotherapeutic regimens include usage of multiple agents in tandem to affect tumor cells through multiple mechanisms with various such combinations being clinically tested. However, lack of controlled delivery and effective temporospatial presence of chemotherapeutics has resulted in suboptimal therapeutic response. Consequently, passive targeted albumin bound paclitaxel and PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin have been clinically used and tested with newer drugs for improved therapeutic efficacy in these cancers. Active targeting of nanocarriers against surface overexpressed proteins in both neoplasms have been explored. However, use of single agent nanoparticulate formulations against both cancers have failed to elicit desired outcomes. This review aims to identify clinical unmet need in these cancers while establishing a correlation with tested nano-formulation approaches and issues with preclinical to clinical translation. Lipid and polymer-based drug-drug and drug-gene combinatorial nanocarriers delivering multiple chemotherapeutics simultaneously to desired site of action have been detailed. Finally, emerging opportunities such as pharmacological targets (immune check point and epigentic modulators) as well as gene-based modulation (siRNA/CRISPR/Cas9) and the nano-formulation challenges for effective treatment of both cancers have been explored.

BRCA Mutational Status is a Promising Predictive Biomarker for Platinum- based Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) can be distinguished from other breast malignancies by the lack of expression of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR) as well as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). TNBC is associated with adverse clinical outcomes and high risk of metastasis. Currently, several clinical and translational reports are focusing on developing targeted therapies for this aggressive cancer. In addition to approved targeted drugs such as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and immune-checkpoint inhibitors, platinum-based chemotherapy is still a cornerstone therapeutic option in TNBC. However, despite the observed improved outcomes with platinum- based chemotherapy in TNBC, there is still a large proportion of patients who do not respond to this treatment, hence, the need for predictive biomarkers to stratify TNBC patients and therefore, avoiding unwanted toxicities of these agents. With the emergence of genetic testing, several recent studies suggested mutations in breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) in TNBC patients as important predictors of outcomes. These mutations alter the homologous recombination repair (HRR) mechanisms leading to genomic instability. Consequently, sensitivity to platinum-based treatments in this subpopulation of TNBC patients may be explained by cell death enhanced by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage induced by these potent anticancer drugs. Through this paper, we review several recent studies on this topic to better understand the mechanisms and discuss the potential of BRCA mutational status as a predictive biomarker of platinum-based chemotherapy in TNBC.

Carboplatin plus taxanes are non-inferior to epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by taxanes as adjuvant chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

Platinum plays an important role in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in neoadjuvant and metastatic settings. However, its role in an adjuvant setting remains unclear.

METHODS

In this non-inferior randomized phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned 308 chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically confirmed TNBC after primary surgery to receive either six cycles of TP (docetaxel: 75 mg/m² or paclitaxel 175 mg/m² d1; carboplatin AUC = 5, day 1), or four cycles of EC (epirubicin: 90 mg/m²; cyclophosphamide: 600 mg/m², day 1) followed by four cycles of T (docetaxel: 75 mg/m² or paclitaxel 175 mg/m², day 1). The primary end point was the disease-free survival (DFS) rate at 5 years. Both regimens were repeated every 3 weeks. The prognostic and predictive value of germline breast cancer gene mutations and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression was evaluated.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 66.9 months, the 5-year DFS rate was 85.8% in the EC-T arm, and 84.4% in the TP arm (p non-inferiority = 0.034, p log-rank = 0.712). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 94.4% in the EC-T arm and 93.5% in the TP arm (p = 0.770). Patients in the TP arm showed better compliance and experienced significantly lower frequencies of G3/4 neutrocytopenia and G3/4 alopecia, but higher rates of G1-4 thrombocytopenia than those in the EC-T arm. Patients with PD-L1 expressing tumors showed significantly improved DFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that carboplatin plus taxanes could be a feasible adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early TNBC who are cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy with anthracycline.

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review of Conventional and Advanced Therapeutic Strategies

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells are deficient in estrogen, progesterone and ERBB2 receptor expression, presenting a particularly challenging therapeutic target due to their highly invasive nature and relatively low response to therapeutics. There is an absence of specific treatment strategies for this tumor subgroup, and hence TNBC is managed with conventional therapeutics, often leading to systemic relapse. In terms of histology and transcription profile these cancers have similarities to BRCA-1-linked breast cancers, and it is hypothesized that BRCA1 pathway is non-functional in this type of breast cancer. In this review article, we discuss the different receptors expressed by TNBC as well as the diversity of different signaling pathways targeted by TNBC therapeutics, for example, Notch, Hedgehog, Wnt/b-Catenin as well as TGF-beta signaling pathways. Additionally, many epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors effectively inhibit the TNBCs, but they face challenges of either resistance to drugs or relapse. The resistance of TNBC to conventional therapeutic agents has helped in the advancement of advanced TNBC therapeutic approaches including hyperthermia, photodynamic therapy, as well as nanomedicine-based targeted therapeutics of drugs, miRNA, siRNA, and aptamers, which will also be discussed. Artificial intelligence is another tool that is presented to enhance the diagnosis of TNBC.

Dose-dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs. epirubicin and cyclophosphamide with paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk triple-negative breast cancer

Objective

The objective of this open-label, randomized study was to compare dose-dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PCdd) with dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (ECdd-P) as an adjuvant chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Methods

We included Chinese patients with high recurrence risk TNBC who underwent primary breast cancer surgery. They were randomly assigned to receive PCdd [paclitaxel 150 mg/m² on d 1 and carboplatin, the area under the curve, (AUC)=3 on d 2] or ECdd-P (epirubicin 80 mg/m² divided in 2 d and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² on d 1 for 4 cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m² on d 1 for 4 cycles) every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS); the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety.

Results

The intent-to-treat population included 143 patients (70 in the PCdd arm and 73 in the ECdd-P arm). Compared with the ECdd-P arm, the PCdd arm had significantly higher 3-year DFS [93.9% vs. 79.1%; hazard ratio (HR)=0.310; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.137-0.704; log-rank, P=0.005] and OS (98.5% vs. 92.9%; HR=0.142; 95% CI, 0.060-0.825; log-rank, P=0.028). Worse neutropenia (grade 3/4) was found in the ECdd-P than the PCdd arm (47.9% vs. 21.4%, P=0.001).

Conclusions

PCdd was superior to ECdd-P as an adjuvant chemotherapy for early TNBC with respect to improving the 3-year DFS and OS. PCdd also yielded lower hematological toxicity. Thus, PCdd might be a preferred regimen for early TNBC patients with a high recurrence risk.