Early detection of thymidylate synthase resistance in non-small cell lung cancer with FLT-PET imaging

Association of expression and genotypes of thymidylate synthase in non-small cell lung cancer patients with different clinicopathological characteristics

Objective

To explore the expression and genotypes of thymidylate synthase (TS) in patients of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with different clinicopathological characteristics.

Methods

The expression profiles of TS were examined by immunohistochemical staining and quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in 160 patients with NSCLC. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) was used to detect TS-5′UTR tandem repeats, G/C nucleotide polymorphisms, and 3′UTR 6 bp deletion/insertion polymorphisms. The relationships between clinicopathological characteristics and TS expression or genotypes were investigated through χ 2 test. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to analyze the association between TS expression and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of NSCLC patients.

Results

The expression levels of TS protein and TS gene in NSCLC tissues were significantly higher than that in paracancerous tissues (P < 0.05). Furthermore, high expression of TS protein and 5′UTR polymorphism of TS gene showed significant correlation with differentiation, TNM stage, and lymph node metastases. The frequency of −6 bp/−6 bp genotypes in patients with NSCLC was 43.13% (69/160), which was higher than others. In addition, the rate of TS protein overexpression in NSCLC patients with 3R/3R was 79.79%, which was higher than others. Interestingly, high expression of TS protein predicted shorter DFS and OS and lower 3-year DFS rate and 3-year OS rate.

Conclusions

The expression levels of TS in NSCLC were significantly increased and may help to predict the prognosis of NSCLC, and high expression of TS protein and 5′UTR polymorphism of TS gene were significantly related to differentiation, TNM stage, and lymph node metastases.

Dexamethasone pretreatment impairs the thymidylate synthase inhibition mediated flare in thymidine salvage pathway activity in non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Successful inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TS) by pemetrexed, a TS inhibitor, results in a reproducible transient burst or "flare" in thymidine salvage pathway activity at 2 hrs. of therapy which can be measurable with FLT-PET ([18F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Routine administration of dexamethasone with pemetrexed-based therapy could potentially confound this imaging approach since dexamethasone is known to inhibit expression of thymidine kinase 1, a key enzyme in the thymidine salvage pathway. Here we examine the potential impact of dexamethasone on the TS inhibition-mediated thymidine salvage pathway "flare" in NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In order to determine NSCLC cell line sensitivity to dexamethasone and pemetrexed, IC50 studies were performed on NSCLC cell lines H23, H1975, H460, H1299. TS inhibition-mediated "flare" in thymidine salvage pathway activity was then measured at 2hrs. of exposure to pemetrexed and cisplatin in NSCLC cells lines following using 3H-thymidine incorporation assays under the following conditions: control (no chemotherapy or dexamethasone), or treated with pemetrexed and cisplatin without dexamethasone, with 24 hrs. pre-treatment of dexamethasone or with dexamethasone administered together with chemotherapy. These conditions were chosen to model the delivery of pemetrexed-based therapy in the clinic.

RESULTS

The IC50 of H23, H1975, H460, H1299 for dexamethasone and pemetrexed were 40, 5.9, 718, 362 μM and 0.22, 0.73, 0.14 and 0.66 μM respectively. Significant blunting of the thymidine salvage pathway "flare" is observed at 2hrs. of pemetrexed-based therapy when dexamethasone sensitive cell lines H23 and H1975 were pretreated with dexamethasone but not when dexamethasone was given together with pemetrexed therapy or in the setting of dexamethasone resistance (H460 and H1299).

CONCLUSION

24 hr. pretreatment with dexamethasone, but not same day co-administration of dexamethasone with therapy, impairs the TS inhibition-mediated "flare" in thymidine salvage pathway activity in NSCLC.

PET imaging for assessing tumor response to therapy

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a radioisotope imaging technique capable of quantifying the regional distribution of molecular imaging probes targeted to biochemical pathways and processes allowing direct measurement of biochemical changes induced by cancer therapy, including the activity of targeted growth pathways and cellular populations. In this manuscript, we review the underlying principles of PET imaging, choices for PET radiopharmaceuticals, methods for tumor analysis and PET applications for cancer therapy response assessment including potential future directions.

Using Radiolabeled 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-Fluorothymidine with PET to Monitor the Effect of Dexamethasone on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States, and pemetrexed-based therapies are regularly used to treat nonsquamous NSCLC. Despite widespread use, pemetrexed has a modest effect on progression-free survival, with varying efficacy between individuals. Recent work has indicated that dexamethasone, given to prevent pemetrexed toxicity, is able to protect a subset of NSCLC cells from pemetrexed cytotoxicity by temporarily suppressing the S phase of the cell cycle. Therefore, dexamethasone might block treatment efficacy in a subpopulation of patients and might be contributing to the variable response to pemetrexed. Methods: Differences in retention of the experimental PET tracer 3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine (FLT) were used to monitor S-phase suppression by dexamethasone in NSCLC cell models, animals with tumor xenografts, and patients with advanced cancer. Results: Significant reductions in tracer uptake were observed after 24 h of dexamethasone treatment in NSCLC cell lines and xenograft models expressing high levels of glucocorticoid receptor α, coincident with pemetrexed resistance visualized by attenuation of the flare effect associated with pemetrexed activity. Two of 4 patients imaged in a pilot study with ¹⁸F-FLT PET after dexamethasone treatment demonstrated reductions in tracer uptake from baseline, with a variable response between individual tumor lesions. Conclusion: ¹⁸F-FLT PET represents a useful method for the noninvasive monitoring of dexamethasone-mediated S-phase suppression in NSCLC and might provide a way to individualize chemotherapy in patients receiving pemetrexed-based regimens.