Programmed death ligand 1 expression in early stage, resectable non-small cell lung cancer

Prognostic implication of PD-L1 in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective single-centre study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic role of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with localised and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer has not been fully elucidated. This information could help to better interpret recent and upcoming results of phase III adjuvant or neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy studies.

METHODS

In a cohort of 146 patients with early or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with curative intent (by surgery or radiotherapy), we investigated the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression and its correlation with other biological and clinical features. PD-L1 expression was stratified by quartiles. Primary endpoints were overall and disease-free survival. We also analysed the prognostic impact of the presence of actionable mutations, implemented treatment modality and completion of the treatment plan. Neither type of patient received neoadjuvant or adjuvant immunotherapy or target therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 146 selected patients, 32 (21.9%) presented disease progression and 15 died (10.3%) at a median follow-up of 20 months. In a univariable analysis, PD-L1 expression ≥25% was associated with significantly lower disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]) 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-3.9, p = 0.049). PD-L1 expression ≥50% did not lead to disease-free survival or overall survival benefits (HR 1.2 and 1.1, respectively; 95% CI 0.6-2.6 and 0.3-3.4, respectively; pnot significant). In a multivariate analysis, a stage >I (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6, p = 0.012) and having an inoperable tumour (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.4, p = 0.005) were associated with lower disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

The population of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and PD-L1 expression ≥25% who were treated with curative intent during the pre-immunotherapy era exhibited a worse prognosis. This finding provides justification for the utilisation of adjuvant immunotherapy in this subgroup of patients, based on the current evidence derived from disease-free survival outcomes. However, for patients with PD-L1 expression <25%, opting to wait for the availability of the overall survival results may be a prudent choice.

Analysis of Molecular Biomarkers in Resected Early-Stage Non-Small Cells Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review

Simple Summary

In the last few years, the treatment of advanced NSCLC has radically changed after the development of new drugs against specific molecular targets. Moreover, multiple tumour biopsies have become mandatory in order to better select the appropriate targeted therapy. Molecular analysis using NGS in the early stage of NSCLC is still relatively widespread. The recent clinical trials that use targeted therapies in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings also require molecular characterisation for early-stage patients. Due to the widespread use of molecular analysis in patients with early-stage NSCLC, the prognostic role of molecular biomarkers needs to be fully understood. This paper aimed to review the most recent studies associating the molecular expressions of early-stage NSCLC with survival.

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing has become a cornerstone in clinical oncology practice and is recommended for the appropriate use of tailored therapies in NSCLC. While NGS has already been standardised in advanced-stage NSCLC, its use is still uncommon in the early stages. The recent approval of Osimertinib for resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC in an adjuvant setting has launched the hypothesis that other targeted therapies used in metastatic patients can also lead to improved early-stage outcomes of NSCLC. The impact of molecular biomarkers on the prognosis of patients undergoing radical surgery for NSCLC is still unclear. Notably, the heterogeneous populations included in the studies that analysed surgical patients could be the main reason for these results. In this review, we report the most important studies that analysed the impact of principal molecular biomarkers on the survival outcomes of patients who underwent radical surgery for NSCLC.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-Clinical Trials Experience

Simple Summary

Surgical resection remains the gold standard of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. However, only a minority of resected patients remain recurrence-free at 5 years. Systemic treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy after surgical resection has been shown to improve survival in this setting. In the last few years, immunotherapy has established its position in treatment of metastatic lung cancer patients. Can the phenomenal results of this treatment be directly transferred to early NSCLC patients? Clinical trials with immunotherapy in this indication are ongoing, some with already promising results. In order to immediately prove the efficacy of immunotherapy in preoperative use, the surrogates of overall and progression free survival have to be validated. In this article, we review the data in support of immunotherapy in adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of early NSCLC patients together with new definitions of primary end points of these studies.

Abstract

Across all tumor types, we observe that the role of immunotherapy has increased rapidly. Due to a number of potential advantages, it is considered in neoadjuvant treatment of localized tumors. In neoadjuvant settings, immunotherapy addresses micrometastatic diseases at the moment of their formation. However, some issues concerning neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy still has to be covered. The choice of drug and use of monotherapy or combination regimens remains unclear. The timing of surgery and preoperative evaluation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy efficacy is challenging. Although there is currently limited confirmed clinical data to support the use of immune checkpoint blockade in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, there are many studies exploring this strategy in NSCLC patients.

TMB in NSCLC: A Broken Dream?

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors have changed the treatment paradigm of a variety of cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer, not all patients respond to immunotherapy in the same way. Predictive biomarkers for patient selection are thus needed. Tumor mutation burden (TMB), defined as the total number of somatic/acquired mutations per coding area of a tumor genome (Mut/Mb), has emerged as a potential predictive biomarker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We found that the limited use of TMB in clinical practice is due to the difficulty in its detection and compounded by several different biological, methodological and economic issues. The incorporation of both TMB and PD-L1 expression or other biomarkers into multivariable predictive models could result in greater predictive power.

Serum-derived exosomal PD-L1 expression to predict anti-PD-1 response and in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PD-L1 expression is the most useful predictive biomarker for immunotherapy efficacy on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8+ TILs) play an essential role in the clinical activity of immunotherapy. PD-L1 is found on the exosome’s surface, and PD-L1 expressing exosomes can inhibit antitumor immune responses. This study aimed to analyze tumor PD-L1 expression, serum exosomal PD-L1, and CD8+ TILs to investigate anti-PD-1 response and clinicopathological outcomes in NSCLC. One hundred twenty patients with stage I–III NSCLC were enrolled, and serum samples collected during the initial surgery were pooled. The Human CD274/PD-L1 ELISA kit was used to quantify the exosomal PD-L1. Exosomal PD-L1 levels were significantly correlated with tumor PD-L1 levels (p < 0.001) and the number of CD8+ TILs (p = 0.001). Patients with exosomal PD-L1 ≥ 166 pg/mL tended to have a worse RFS than those with < 166 pg/mL in all stage (p = 0.163) and stage I patients (p = 0.116). Seventeen patients exhibited postoperative recurrences and received anti-PD-1 treatment. The disease control rate of patients with exosomal PD-L1 ≥ 166 pg/mL was 100%. The measurement of serum exosomal PD-L1 as a quantitative factor with tumor PD-L1 status may help predict anti-PD-1 response and clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC.

Prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

Background

Expression of PD-L1 is the most investigated predictor of benefit from immune checkpoint blockade in advanced NSCLC but little is known about the association of PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological parameters of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Methods

National registry data was searched for medical records of consecutive inoperable stage III NSCLC patients treated with ChT and RT from January 2012 to December 2017. Totally 249 patients were identified that met inclusion criteria and of those 117 patients had sufficient tissue for PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining.

Results

Eighty patients (68.4%) expressed PD-L1 of ≥ 1% and 29.9% of more than 50%. Median PFS was 15.9 months in PD-L1 negative patients and 16.1 months in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% (p = 0.696). Median OS in PD-L1 negative patients was 29.9 months compared to 28.5 months in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ % (p = 0.888). There was no difference in median OS in patients with high PD-L1 expression (≥ 50%) with 29.8 months compared to 29.9 months in those with low (1–49%) or no PD-L1 expression (p = 0.694). We found that patients who received a total dose of 60 Gy or more had significantly better median OS (32 months vs. 17.5 months, p < 0.001) as well as patients with PS 0 (33.2 vs. 20.3 months, p = 0.005).

Conclusions

In our patients PD-L1 expression had no prognostic value regarding PFS and OS. Patients with good performance status and those who received a total radiation dose of more than 60 Gy had significantly better mOS.

Combined Immunoscore for Prognostic Stratification of Early Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background

To date, no combined immunoscore has been evaluated for prognostic stratification of early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The main goal of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and different immune cell components (CD4+, CD8+ T-lymphocytes, and CD68+ macrophages) in early stage NSCLC patients, distinguishing peritumoral (PT) and intratumoral (IT) localizations. The secondary aim was to identify a combined immunoscore to optimize the prognostic stratification of NSCLC patients.

Methods

This retrospective study included surgical specimens from consecutive chemo-naive stage II-III radically resected NSCLC patients. Immunohistochemistry was carried out to evaluate PD-L1 expression and to quantify IT and PT CD4+, CD8+ T-lymphocytes, and CD68+ macrophages. The impact of a single marker and of a combination of multiple markers on overall survival (OS) was investigated.

Results

Seventy-nine patients were included in the study. PD-L1 expression was associated with worse prognosis (3 years OS: 58% in high- compared with 67% in low-expressing tumors), even though without statistical significance. When integrating PT CD8+, CD4+, and CD68 into a combined PT immunoscore, a significant prognostic stratification of patients was obtained and confirmed at multivariate analysis (3 years OS: 86% in patients with low PT immunoscore vs. 59% in patients with high PT immunoscore, p = 0.018). The integration of derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) with combined PT immunoscore improved prognostic stratification, with longer OS in patients with low PT immunoscore and low dNLR (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

The combined PT immunoscore (CD8+, CD4+, and CD68) integrated with dNLR may be a promising marker for the development of an integrated Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) immunoscore.

Expression of Immune Response Markers in Arab Patients With Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a marker for checkpoint inhibitor use in the management of solid tumors, especially in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study was aimed at determining the patterns of PD-L1 expression and cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) immunostains in patients with NSCLC in the Arab population.

METHODS

Archival tumor tissue from patients with a confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC were obtained and stained for PD-L1 with antibody 22C3, using immunohistochemistry staining and giving the tumor proportion score (TPS) as a percentage from 0%-100% of stained tumor cells. Tumors were categorized into negative expressers (TPS < 1%), low positive (TPS, 1%-49%), and high positive (TPS, 50%-100%). Correlation of expression with clinical and pathologic features, including CD8-positive (CD8+) lymphocyte density, was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients with NSCLC were included in the study from 6 centers in Saudi Arabia and Algeria. Median age was 65 years (28-93 years), and the majority were men (75%) with stage 4 NSCLC (64%). The TPS was high in 37 patients (18%), low in 60 patients (30%), and negative in 103 patients (52%). In a univariate analysis, the following were significant predictors of any PD-L1 expression (> 1%): male sex, being Saudi national patients, high expression of CD8+, and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In the multivariate analysis, only high expression of CD8+ cells (≥ 2+) was significant, with an odds ratio of 4.4 (95% CI, 1.5 to 12.9; P = .003).

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression in our population is similar to the published literature and correlated with the density of CD8+ cells. Validation of the predictive value of this marker in our population and identifying easier and reliable methods to test for it are warranted.

PD-L1 expression on tumor-infiltrating immune cells is highly associated with M2 TAM and aggressive malignant potential in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TCs) and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (ICs) plays important roles in regulating the antitumor T cell response. However, the mechanistic and clinical significance of the effect of PD-L1 on TCs versus ICs remains unclear. On the other hand, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), M2 macrophages in particular, can promote tumor progression.

METHODS

We evaluated PD-L1 expression on TCs and ICs using Ventana SP263 assay and the stromal M2 TAM distribution using CD163 staining in 160 consecutive patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

RESULTS

PD-L1 expression on TCs and ICs was significantly higher in stromal M2 TAM-high group than in stromal M2 TAM-low group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Regarding the clinical significance of PD-L1, PD-L1 expression on TCs was significantly associated with histology (p = 0.001), tumor differentiation (p < 0.001) and nodal status (p = 0.029). Furthermore, PD-L1 expression on ICs was significantly associated with histology (p < 0.001), tumor differentiation (p < 0.001), tumor status (p = 0.024), nodal status (p = 0.016), and pathologic stage (p = 0.004). The disease-free survival rate was significantly lower in patients with PD-L1-positive TC than in those with PD-L1-negative TC (p = 0.023), as well as in patients with PD-L1-positive IC than in those with PD-L1-negative IC (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the overall survival rate was significantly lower in patients with PD-L1-positive IC than in those with PD-L1-negative IC (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

During tumor progression in NSCLC, the presence of M2 TAMs might affect PD-L1 expression both on TCs and ICs. In patients with NSCLC, PD-L1 expression both on TCs and ICs was associated with malignant behaviors, which was more in case of ICs.