Electroconvulsive Therapy for Depression: A Review of the Quality of ECT versus Sham ECT Trials and Meta-Analyses

Mental health treatments and the influence of culture: portrayals of hypnotherapy and electroconvulsive therapy in Singaporean television dramas

Stigma is one of the chief reasons for treatment-avoidant behaviour among people with mental health conditions. Stigmatising attitudes are spread through multiple determinants, including but not limited to: (i) individual beliefs; (ii) interpersonal influences; (iii) local cultural values and (iv) shared culture such as depictions in television shows. Our research indicates that popular television shows are currently understudied vectors for narratives that alternately reify or debunk assumptions and stereotypes about people with mental health conditions. Although such shows are fictional, they influence perception by normalising 'common sense' assumptions over extended periods of time. Consequently, representations of patients, psychiatrists and treatments influence knowledge and understanding of mental health and treatment-seeking behaviour. While storytelling about sickness can inspire possibilities and bestow meaning on traumatic experiences, fictional narratives written without sufficient care can have the inverse effect of curtailing horizons and limiting expectations. Problematic portrayals of patients, mental health professionals and psychological interventions are often reductive and may increase stigma and prevent treatment-seeking behaviour. This article analyses the representation of hypnotherapy and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in Singaporean television dramas that attract a wide, mainstream audience. Our diverse team investigated dramas in all four of the official languages of Singapore: English, Mandarin Chinese, Bahasa Melayu and Tamil. We found that depictions of hypnotherapy tend to produce problematic images of mental health professionals as manipulative, able to read minds, engaging in criminal behaviour, lacking in compassion and self-interested. Meanwhile, representations of ECT typically focus on the fear and distress of the patient, and it is primarily depicted as a disciplinary tool rather than a safe and effective medical procedure for patients whose condition is severe and refractory to pharmacotherapy and behavioural interventions. These depictions have the potential to discourage treatment-seeking behaviour-when early intervention has found to be crucial-among vulnerable populations.

Investigating the factors that impede or facilitate the acceptance of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): perspectives from psychiatrists and patients' companions

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the positive and negative factors that can influence an individual's acceptance of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) from the perspective of psychiatrists and patients' companions (PCs).

DESIGN

A multicentre qualitative phenomenological study.

SETTING

Cities of Shiraz and Fasa in Fars province.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight psychiatrists and 10 PCs were interviewed.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with psychiatrists and PCs in hospitals in Fars Province, Iran. The interviews focused on the positive and negative factors influencing the participants' acceptance of ECT. Subsequently, the interviews were transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 8 males and 10 females participated. The average age of psychiatrists and PCs was 42.43±6.37 and 53.20±16.64, respectively. Furthermore, the average working experience of psychiatrists was 8.57±1.90 years. Five themes emerged from the interviews: feeling supported, awareness, communications between physicians, patients, and PCs, previous experiences of oneself and others, and hospital structure.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides valuable insights into the negative and positive factors that influence the acceptance of ECT from the perspectives of psychiatrists and PCs. The findings indicate important ways to enhance perspectives on ECT within the community.

Machine Learning in Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Despite years of research, we are still not able to reliably predict who might benefit from electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) treatment. As we exhaust what is possible using traditional statistical analysis, ECT remains a good candidate for machine learning approaches due to the large data sets with data captured through electroencephalography (EEG) and other objective measures. A systematic review of 6 databases led to the full-text examination of 26 articles using machine learning approaches in examining data predicting response to ECT treatment. The identified articles used a wide variety of data types covering structural and functional imaging data (n = 15), clinical data (n = 5), a combination of clinical and imaging data (n = 2), EEG (n = 3), and social media posts (n = 1). The clinical indications in which response prediction was assessed were depression (n = 21) and psychosis (n = 4). Changes in multiple anatomical regions in the brain were identified as holding a predictive value for response to ECT. These primarily centered on the limbic system and associated networks. Clinical features predicting good response to ECT in depression included shorter duration, lower severity, higher medication dose, psychotic features, low cortisol levels, and positive family history. It has also been possible to predict the likelihood of relapse of readmission with psychosis after ECT treatment, including a better response if higher transfer entropy was calculated from EEG signals. A transdisciplinary approach with an international consortium collecting a wide range of retrospective and prospective data may help to refine and extend these outcomes and translate them into clinical practice.

An independent audit of electroconvulsive therapy patient information leaflets in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy of patient information leaflets about electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) used in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales, and their compliance with the principle of informed consent.

DESIGN AND METHODS

To replicate an audit in England, Freedom of Information Act requests were sent to the 26 providers of ECT for their ECT patient information leaflet. These were scored, by two independent raters, on the same 40-item accuracy measure used in the England audit.

RESULTS

The number of accurate statements (out of a possible 29) ranged from seven to 20, with a mean of 16.9. The most frequently omitted statements included: cardiovascular risks (mentioned by five leaflets), that it is not known how ECT works (3), risk of mortality (2), risks from multiple general anaesthetic procedures (2), how to access a legal advocate (2) and that that there is no evidence of long-term benefits (1). The leaflets made between six and nine inaccurate statements (out of 11) with a mean of 7.0. Nineteen minimised memory loss, blamed the memory loss on depression, claimed that ECT is the 'most effective treatment' and asserted it has very high response rates without mentioning similar placebo response rates. All 23 leaflets wrongly told patients that ECT saves lives.

CONCLUSIONS

Electroconvulsive therapy information leaflets in these three nations are barely more accurate than those in England and do not comply with the ethical principle of informed consent. Patients and families across the UK are systematically being misled about the risks they are taking and the limited nature of ECT's benefits.

Geriatric Depression

Late-life depression is common but underrecognized and undertreated leading to significant morbidity and mortality, including from suicide. The presence of comorbidities necessitates screening followed by a careful history in order to make the diagnosis of depression. Because older adults tend to take longer to respond to treatment and have higher relapse rates than younger patients, they benefit most from persistent, attentive therapy. Although both pharmacotherapy and psychosocial treatments, or a combination of the two, are considered as the first-line therapy for late-life depression, most data support a combined, biopsychosocial treatment approach provided by an interdisciplinary team.

The effect of continuation and maintenance electroconvulsive therapy on cognition: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for depression, mania, and refractory schizophrenia. Its tolerability profile is established for acute treatment, but less is known regarding the effects of longer treatment courses, particularly on cognitive performance.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of the long-term ECT on cognition.

METHODS

We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychInfo and Pubmed, for the period between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2022, in English or French, for randomized controlled trials, prospective or retrospective studies of ECT continued for at least 2 months for the treatment of mood or schizophrenic disorders and which measured cognition before and at the end of treatment. Non-peer reviewed records were excluded. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess study quality. Classical meta-analyses, with heterogeneity statistics (tau², I²) were complemented with three level-meta-analysis and Bayesian Meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in the narrative and quantitative review. Controlled comparison at 6 months (k = 6, n = 334) and at 12 months (k = 3, n = 56), within-subject comparisons at 6 (k = 6, n = 218) and 12 months (k = 4, n = 147) showed no detrimental effect of maintenance or continuation ECT on cognition, with little to no heterogeneity. Bayesian analysis further confirmed that data better supported the no effects hypothesis.

LIMITATIONS

Insufficient data resulted in imprecision in estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuation and maintenance ECT do not appear detrimental for cognitive performance. However, the low number of studies limit the interpretation of the results.

Electroconvulsive therapy in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A case report

The use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in patients with underlying cardiac disease like hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains without satisfactory clinical guidelines. We provide a case report of successful application of ECT in a 43-year-old patient with bipolar disorder and comorbid HCM, including detailed diagnostic information and outlining key clinical considerations.

Biological Psychiatry and the Mass Murder of “Schizophrenics”: From Denial to Inspirational Alternative

This article documents the murder, by psychiatrists, of a quarter of a million patients, mostly diagnosed as “schizophrenic,” in Europe during the second world war; and the sterilization of hundreds of thousands more internationally, including in the USA and Scandinavia. These sterilizations and murders were justified by biological psychiatry’s unsubstantiated hypothesis that the conditions involved are genetically determined. Gas chambers in the six psychiatric hospitals involved, in Germany, were subsequently dismantled and moved, along with the psychiatrists and their staff, to help establish some of the Holocaust’s concentration camps, in Poland. The avoidance of these facts and their profound implications, by the profession of psychiatry, internationally, over subsequent decades, is discussed. An inspirational trauma-focussed alternative to the pessimistic, unscientific ideology of biological psychiatry, involving psychiatrists 60 years later, is presented.

Depression: why drugs and electricity are not the answer

The dominant view within mental health services and research suggests that feeling depressed is a kind of medical illness, partially caused by various biological deficits which are somehow corrected by physical interventions. This article critically appraises evidence for the effectiveness and value of antidepressant drugs and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), the two principle physical treatments recommended for depression. It also describes the negative effects of these interventions and raises concerns about how they impact the brain. We propose an alternative understanding that recognises depression as an emotional and meaningful response to unwanted life events and circumstances. This perspective demands that we address the social conditions that make depression likely and suggests that a combination of politics and common sense needs to guide us in providing help for one another when we are suffering in this way. This alternative view is increasingly endorsed around the world, including by the United Nations, the World Health Organization and service users who have suffered negative consequences of physical treatments that modify brain functions in ways that are not well-understood.

'Shock tactics', ethics and fear: an academic and personal perspective on the case against electroconvulsive therapy

Despite extensive evidence for its effectiveness, electroconvulsive therapy remains the subject of fierce opposition from those contesting its benefits and claiming extreme harms. Alongside some reflections on my experiences of this treatment, I examine the case against electroconvulsive therapy and find that it appears to rest primarily on unsubstantiated claims about major ethical violations, rather than clinical factors such as effectiveness and risk.

A response to yet another defence of ECT in the absence of robust efficacy and safety evidence

It is estimated that electroconvulsive therapy is still administered to approximately a million people a year. It involves passing enough electric current through the human brain, eight to twelve times, to cause convulsions, in the hope of somehow alleviating emotional suffering, primarily depression. There have only ever been 11 placebo-controlled studies (where general anaesthesia is administered but the electric shock is withheld), all of which were pre-1986, had very small sample sizes and were seriously methodologically flawed. Five of these studies found no difference between the two groups at the end of treatment, four found ECT produced better outcomes for some patients, and two produced mixed results, including one where psychiatrists' ratings produced a difference, but the ratings of nurses and patients did not. In the 80 years since the first ECT no studies have found any evidence that ECT is better than placebo beyond the end of treatment. Nevertheless, all five meta-analyses relying on these studies have somehow concluded that ECT is more effective than placebo despite the studies' multiple failings. Meanwhile, evidence of persistent or permanent memory loss in 12% to 55% of patients has accumulated. Attempts to highlight this failure of ECT proponents to provide robust evidence that their treatment is effective and safe are routinely dismissed, diminished, denied and denounced. This paper responds to one such attempt, by Drs Meechan, Laws, Young, McLoughlin and Jauhar, to discredit two systematic reviews of the eleven pre-1986 studies, in 2010 and 2019, the latter of which also reviewed five meta-analyses that had ignored the studies' failings. The criticisms and claims of the recent crtiique of the two systematic reviews are examined in detail, by the first author of both reviews, for accuracy, relevance and logic. The critique is found to include multiple errors, misrepresentations, omissions, inconsistencies and logical flaws. It is concluded that Meechan et al. fail to make a fact-based, coherent argument against suspending ECT pending a series of large, carefully designed placebo-controlled studies to establish whether ECT does have any beneficial effects against which to weigh the significant established adverse effects.

A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression

There has been recent debate regarding the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of depression. This has been based on narrative reviews that contradict existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In this special article, we highlight the mistakes that occur when interpreting evidence using narrative reviews, as opposed to conventional systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

A second independent audit of electroconvulsive therapy in England, 2019: Usage, demographics, consent, and adherence to guidelines and legislation

OBJECTIVES

To assess progress towards improving the administering of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in England since an audit covering 2011, 2013, and 2015. The same information was gathered, for 2019, on usage, demographics, consent, and adherence to national guidelines and the Mental Health Act.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Freedom of Information Act requests were sent to 56 National Health Service Trusts.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven trusts (66%) provided data. The gradual decline in the use of ECT in England has levelled off at about 2,500 people per year. There was a 47-fold difference between the Trusts with the highest and lowest rates per capita. Most recipients are still women (67%) and over 60 (58%). Only one Trust could report how many people received psychological therapy prior to ECT, as required by government (NICE) guidelines. More than a third of ECT (37%) is still given without consent, with 18% of Trusts non-compliant with legislation concerning second opinions. There were slight declines, compared to a previous audit, in the use of standardized depression scales, down to 30%, and standardized measures of cognitive dysfunction, down to 24%. Only six Trusts provided any data for positive outcomes and seven for adverse effects. None provided data on efficacy or adverse effects beyond the end of treatment. Twelve Trusts used identical sentences to each other, verbatim, in response to one or more questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the apparent failure of current monitoring and accrediting of ECT clinics in England, by the Royal College of Psychiatrists' ECT Accreditation Service (ECTAS), an independent government sponsored review is urgently needed.

PRACTITIONER POINTS

Psychologists and other mental health staff should ensure that people are offered evidence-based psychological treatments before being offered E.C.T. All staff should ensure that patients are fully informed of the high risk of memory loss and the smaller risk of cardiovascular failure and mortality. Individuals receiving ECT should be closely monitored for adverse cognitive effects, and treatment immediately terminated if these become apparent. Because of increased risk of memory loss for women and older people, the use of ECT should be kept to a minimum and avoided where possible, with these two groups.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) versus sham ECT for depression: do study limitations invalidate the evidence (and mean we should stop using ECT)?

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for depression is a controversial treatment with highly polarised views about the balance between therapeutic benefits and adverse effects. Studies investigating whether ECT is more effective than a placebo treatment started in the 1950s, with the most important randomised controlled trials carried out about four decades ago in which ECT was compared with sham ECT (SECT) involving anaesthesia but no electrically induced seizure. Subsequently the data have been pooled in a number of meta-analyses which have found that ECT is an effective treatment. However, a recent review of the quality of the SECT-controlled studies, and the meta-analyses based on them, concludes that their quality is too poor to allow assessment of the efficacy of ECT and that, given its risks (permanent memory loss and death), the use of ECT should be suspended. This commentary critically discusses the methodology of this review and its conclusions.

On this month's Round the Corner: I welcome the argument about ECT

A recent review of research in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for depression, for which I was the first author, found that only 11 placebo-controlled studies have even been conducted, all pre-1986. Our review concluded that they were so flawed that the meta-analyses that relied on them were wrong to conclude that ECT is effective. This commentary responds to a critique of the review by Ian Anderson. Some valuable comments are acknowledged and several errors or misunderstandings rectified.