A Randomized Study of Open-Flap Surgery of 32 Intrabony Defects With and Without Adjunct Bovine Bone Mineral Treatment

Periodontal granulation tissue preservation in surgical periodontal disease treatment: a pilot prospective cohort study

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of amniotic membrane with collagen membrane along with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects – A clinico-radiographic study

Context:

The use of human-derived amniotic barrier membranes in regenerative procedures along with allograft like demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) has displayed promising outcomes.

Aims:

The objective of the current research was to clinically and radiographically evaluate and compare amniotic membrane (AM) and collagen membrane (CM) in combination with open flap debridement (OFD) along with DFDBA in the management of human periodontal intrabony defects.

Settings and Design:

The present research-based study was a randomized controlled clinical trial of 6 months duration.

Materials and Methods:

A total of twenty chronic periodontitis patients with intrabony defects were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1 treated with OFD + DFDBA + AM and Group 2 with OFD + DFDBA + CM. Clinical parameters such as plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), pocket probing depth (PPD), and relative attachment level were recorded and evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The relative intrabony defect component level (rIBD) was recorded at baseline and after 6 months employing a millimeter X-ray grid.

Statistical Analysis Used:

For comparison of clinical parameters and radiographic parameters at various intervals unpaired t-test, repeated measures ANOVA test, and paired t-test were used. The P value was taken statistically significant when less than 0.05 (P < 0.05).

Results:

A statistically significant difference in PI, GI, PPD, and RAL for both the groups were found on intragroup comparison between baseline, 3 months, and 6 months (P < 0.05). On intragroup comparison, the difference in mean rIBD was statistically significant from baseline to 6 months. However, for all the clinical and radiographic parameters, no statistically significant difference was noted between both the groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions:

In the treatment of intrabony defects AM being an allograft can be considered an alternative novel membrane for regenerative procedures.

Periodontal infrabony defects: Systematic review of healing by defect morphology following regenerative surgery

BACKGROUND

It is thought that infrabony defect morphology affects the outcome of periodontal regenerative surgery. However, this has not been systematically investigated.

AIMS

To investigate how well defect morphology is described in papers reporting regenerative therapy of periodontal infrabony defects and to investigate its effect on clinical and radiographic outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search was conducted in 3 electronic databases for publications reporting clinical and radiographic outcomes of periodontal intra-bony defects after regenerative therapy, divided by defect morphology.

RESULTS

The initial search resulted in 4487 papers, reduced to 143 after first and second screening. Fifteen of these publications were suitable for a fixed-effects meta-analysis. Initial defect depth was found to influence radiographic bone gain 12 months post-surgery, while narrower angles and increased number of walls influenced both radiographic bone gain and clinical attachment level (CAL) gain at 12 months. These associations seemed to occur irrespective of biomaterials used. Risk of bias ranged from low to high.

CONCLUSION

Deeper defects with narrower angles and increased number of walls exhibit improved CAL and radiographic bone gain at 12 months post-regenerative surgery. More data are needed about other aspects of defect morphology such as extension to buccal/lingual surfaces.

Comparative clinical and radiographic evaluation of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (puros®) and autogenous bone in the treatment of human periodontal intraosseous defects: 6-months follow-up study

AIMS

Several materials have been introduced as bone grafts, i.e., autografts, allograft, xenografts, and alloplastic grafts, and studies have shown them to produce greater clinical bone defect fill than open flap debridement alone. The aim of this clinical and radiological 6-month study was to compare and evaluate the clinical outcome of deep intraosseous defects following reconstructive surgery with the use of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros®) or autogenous bone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients with 12 sites exhibiting signs of moderate generalized chronic periodontitis were enrolled in the study. The investigations were confined to two and three-walled intra bony defects with a preoperative probing depth of ≥5 mm. Six of these defects were treated with Puros® (group A) the remaining six were treated with autogenous bone graft (group B). Allocation to the two groups was randomized. The clinical parameters, plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and bone fill, were recorded at different time intervals at the baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Intraoral radiographs were taken using standardized paralleling cone technique at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Statistical analysis was done by using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey highly significant difference.

RESULTS

Both groups resulted in decrease in probing depth (group A, 3.0 mm; group B, 2.83 mm) and gain in clinical attachment level (group A, 3.33 mm; group B, 3.0 mm) over a period of 6 months, which was statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that both mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros®) or autogenous bone result in significant clinical improvements.

The use of nanocrystalline and two other forms of calcium sulfate in the treatment of infrabony defects: A clinical and radiographic study

Background:

Calcium sulphate(CS) is one of the oldest alloplastic graft materials used because of its biocompatibility, handling characteristics, porosity, different rates of dissolution, chemico-physical resemblance to bone mineral, ability to induce release of growth factors and potentially unlimited supply at a modest cost. Aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of 3 forms of calcium sulphate i.e. Nanogen (nCS)(+), BoneGen(+) and Dentogen(+) in treatment of infrabony defects and to compare their efficacy as bone grafting substitutes.

Materials and Methods:

A prospective randomized, double blind controlled study was conducted on 45 sites from 16 subjects having Moderate to Advanced Periodontitis who were divided into 3 groups i.e. Group I (Nanogen), Group II (Dentogen) and Group III (BoneGen) clinical along with radiographic measurements were taken at baseline, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Results:

There was no significant inter-group difference in mean clinical attachment level (CAL) values at different time intervals whereas Intra-group changes in CAL at 6 and 12 months as compared to baseline were significant statistically. In Group I, changes in CAL between 6 and 12 months were found to be statistically significant in comparison with Group II and III.

Conclusion:

Both Nanogen and BoneGen TR can be considered valuable options in the treatment of infra-bony periodontal defects. The faster degradation of Dentogen may negatively affect its bone regeneration potential.