The Role of Major Inflammatory Biomarkers in the Pathogenesis of Atrial Fibrillation

Impaired fibrinolysis in patients with atrial fibrillation and elevated circulating lipopolysaccharide

It is unknown whether elevated gut-derived serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS) can affect thrombin generation, fibrinolysis, and fibrin clot properties in atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to evaluate associations of circulating LPS with prothrombotic markers in AF patients. A total of 157 (women, 57.3%) ambulatory anticoagulant-naïve AF patients aged from 42 to 86 years were recruited. Clinical data together with serum LPS, inflammation, endothelial injury, coagulation and fibrinolysis markers, including fibrin clot permeability (Ks) and clot lysis time (CLT), were analyzed. A median LPS concentration was 73.0 (58.0-100.0) pg/mL and it showed association with CLT (r = 0.31, p < 0.001) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1, r = 0.57, p < 0.001), but not other fibrinolysis proteins, thrombin generation, inflammatory markers, or Ks. There were weak associations of LPS with von Willebrand factor (vWF, r = 0.2, p = 0.013), cardiac troponin I (r = 0.16, p = 0.045), and growth differentiation factor-15 (r = 0.27, p < 0.001). No associations of LPS and CHA2DS2-VASc or other clinical variables were observed. Multivariable regression adjusted for potential confounders showed that serum LPS ≥ 100 pg/mL was an independent predictor of prolonged CLT. This study is the first to demonstrate antifibrinolytic effects of elevated LPS in AF patients largely driven by enhanced PAI-1 release.

Fibrinaloid Microclots and Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a comorbidity of a variety of other chronic, inflammatory diseases for which fibrinaloid microclots are a known accompaniment (and in some cases, a cause, with a mechanistic basis). Clots are, of course, a well-known consequence of atrial fibrillation. We here ask the question whether the fibrinaloid microclots seen in plasma or serum may in fact also be a cause of (or contributor to) the development of AF. We consider known 'risk factors' for AF, and in particular, exogenous stimuli such as infection and air pollution by particulates, both of which are known to cause AF. The external accompaniments of both bacterial (lipopolysaccharide and lipoteichoic acids) and viral (SARS-CoV-2 spike protein) infections are known to stimulate fibrinaloid microclots when added in vitro, and fibrinaloid microclots, as with other amyloid proteins, can be cytotoxic, both by inducing hypoxia/reperfusion and by other means. Strokes and thromboembolisms are also common consequences of AF. Consequently, taking a systems approach, we review the considerable evidence in detail, which leads us to suggest that it is likely that microclots may well have an aetiological role in the development of AF. This has significant mechanistic and therapeutic implications.

Outcome of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Cancer Patients: A Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF), a cardiac arrhythmia, exhibits a heightened prevalence among individuals diagnosed with cancer, notably prominent in cases of lung and gastrointestinal malignancies. Robust evidence from extensive studies underscores this association, emphasizing its clinical significance. However, the precise mechanistic underpinnings and specific risk factors linking cancer and AF remain a subject of incomplete understanding. Notably, the prevalence of AF in cancer patients substantially exceeds that in non-cancer counterparts, prompting further exploration of the underlying pathophysiological processes. This review aims to address the existing knowledge void regarding AF management in cancer patients, with a specific focus on the potential role of ablation procedures. While catheter and surgical ablation techniques have been thoroughly investigated and validated as effective treatments within non-cancer populations, their applicability and outcomes in cancer patients have remained inadequately explored. The principal objective of this exhaustive review is to bridge this research gap by conducting a meticulous examination of the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of ablation interventions for AF in the context of cancer patients. By amalgamating existing evidence and pinpointing critical areas necessitating additional investigation, this review endeavors to provide invaluable insights into AF management in cancer patients, with the ultimate goal of enhancing their clinical care and optimizing outcomes.