1
|
Kawakami K, Horikoshi K. Recovery or change? Differences between in seabird fauna in island ecosystems before alien mammal disturbance and after alien mammal eradication. Restor Ecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.13579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuto Kawakami
- Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI) 1 Matsunosato, Tsukuba Ibaraki 305‐8687 Japan
| | - Kazuo Horikoshi
- Institute of Boninology Nishimachi, Chichijima, Ogasawara Tokyo 100‐2101 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miller‐ter Kuile A, Orr D, Bui A, Dirzo R, Klope M, McCauley D, Motta C, Young H. Impacts of rodent eradication on seed predation and plant community biomass on a tropical atoll. Biotropica 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/btp.12864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Miller‐ter Kuile
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA USA
| | - Devyn Orr
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA USA
| | - An Bui
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA USA
| | - Rodolfo Dirzo
- Department of Biology Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| | - Maggie Klope
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA USA
| | - Douglas McCauley
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA USA
| | - Carina Motta
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA USA
| | - Hillary Young
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Using a natural population collapse of an invasive species to assess the benefits of invader control for native species. Biol Invasions 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s10530-019-02015-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
4
|
Influences on recovery of seabirds on islands where invasive predators have been eradicated, with a focus on Procellariiformes. ORYX 2016. [DOI: 10.1017/s0030605316000880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractProtecting seabirds is a global conservation priority given that 29% of seabird species are threatened with extinction. One of the most acute threats to seabirds is the presence of introduced predators, which depredate seabirds at all life stages, from eggs to adults. Consequently, eradication of invasive predators has been identified as an effective and commonly used approach to seabird conservation. Seabird recovery following the eradication of predators is influenced by complex and interacting environmental and demographic factors, and there are gaps in our understanding of species-specific responses. We reflect on the recovery of seabirds on islands cleared of predators, drawing on the equilibrium theory of island biogeography, and synthesize key influences on recovery reported in the literature. We present a regionally specific case study on the recovery of seabird colonies (n = 98) in the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand, which is a hotspot of seabird diversity (27 species), with a long history of eradications of invasive predators. We found that on islands cleared of predators seabirds recover over time, and such islands have more diverse seabird assemblages than islands that never had predators. Recovery appears to be influenced by a suite of site- and species-specific factors. Managers may assume that given enough time following eradication of predators, seabirds will recolonize an island. Although time is a factor, proximity to source populations and human activities has a significant effect on recolonization by seabirds, as do demographic traits, colonizing ability and habitat suitability. Therefore, integrating expected site and species-specific recovery responses in the planning of eradications should help guide post-eradication management actions.
Collapse
|
5
|
Helmstedt KJ, Shaw JD, Bode M, Terauds A, Springer K, Robinson SA, Possingham HP. Prioritizing eradication actions on islands: it's not all or nothing. J Appl Ecol 2016. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kate J. Helmstedt
- School of Mathematics and Physics; University of Queensland; St Lucia Qld 4072 Australia
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions; School of Biological Sciences; University of Queensland; St Lucia Qld 4072 Australia
| | - Justine D. Shaw
- Antarctic Conservation and Management; Department of the Environment; Australian Antarctic Division; Kingston Tas. 7050 Australia
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions; School of Biological Sciences; University of Queensland; St Lucia Qld 4072 Australia
| | - Michael Bode
- School of Botany; University of Melbourne; Parkville Vic. 3010 Australia
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies; James Cook University; Townsville Qld 4812 Australia
| | - Aleks Terauds
- Antarctic Conservation and Management; Department of the Environment; Australian Antarctic Division; Kingston Tas. 7050 Australia
| | - Keith Springer
- Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service; PO Box 126 Moonah Tas. 7009 Australia
| | - Susan A. Robinson
- Invasive Species Branch; Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment; Biosecurity Tasmania; Newtown Tas. 7008 Australia
| | - Hugh P. Possingham
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions; School of Biological Sciences; University of Queensland; St Lucia Qld 4072 Australia
- Department of Life Sciences; Imperial College London; Silwood Park Ascot Berkshire SL5 7PY UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Buxton RT, Gormley AM, Jones CJ, Lyver PO. Monitoring burrowing petrel populations: A sampling scheme for the management of an island keystone species. J Wildl Manage 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel T. Buxton
- Department of Zoology and Centre for Sustainability; University of Otago; P. O. Box 56 Dunedin 9054 New Zealand
| | - Andrew M. Gormley
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and Management; Landcare Research; P. O. Box 69040 Lincoln 7640 New Zealand
| | - Christopher J. Jones
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and Management; Landcare Research; P. O. Box 69040 Lincoln 7640 New Zealand
| | - Philip O'B. Lyver
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and Management; Landcare Research; P. O. Box 69040 Lincoln 7640 New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|