Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism with paricalcitol with or without cinacalcet in hemodialysis patients

Pharmacogenetic and safety analysis of cinacalcet hydrochloride in healthy Chinese subjects

BACKGROUND

Our study aims to explore the effect of genetics on the pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of cinacalcet in healthy Chinese subjects; to investigate the effect of dietary factors on cinacalcet, and to evaluate the safety of cinacalcet under fasting and non-fasting conditions using a bioequivalence trial.

METHODS

We investigated the relationship of cinacalcet PK with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of CYP3A4, CYP1A2 and CYP2D6, and of cinacalcet PD with SNPs of calcium-sensitive receptors (CASR) and vitamin D receptors (VDR) in 65 healthy Chinese subjects recruited to participate in this study. Our study was a phase I, open-label, randomized, two-period, two-sequence crossover, a single-center clinical study designed under both fasting and non-fasting conditions to investigate the effect of dietary factors on cinacalcet. Plasma cinacalcet concentrations were analyzed using a validated HPLC-MS/MS assay. Clinical laboratory tests evaluated safety. Thirteen SNPs of CASR, VDR, and CYP genes were selected for pharmacogenetic analysis.

RESULTS

CYP3A4 rs4646437 was found to be associated with the PK of cinacalcet under fasting conditions (P<0.01). Subjects carrying T alleles of rs4646437 appeared to metabolize cinacalcet poorly. The C_max and AUC of subjects in the non-fasting group were significantly higher (P<0.0001) than those in the fasting group. The T_max, CL/F, and Vd/F in the fasting group were significantly higher (P<0.0001) than those in the non-fasting group. In the fasting group, the geometric least square mean ratios (T/R) of the C_max and AUC_0-t were 109.89% and 105.33%, and the corresponding 90% CIs were 98.36-122.79% and 98.04-113.15%, respectively. In the non-fasting group, the T/R of the C_max and AUC_0-t were 100.74% and 99.09%, and the corresponding 90% CIs were 92.65-109.54% and 94.79-103.58%, respectively. All adverse events (AEs) were mild, and no serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred during the bioequivalence trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Following our investigation, we reached the following conclusions: CYP3A4 rs4646437 may affect cinacalcet PK; the reference and test preparations of cinacalcet were bioequivalent under fasting and non-fasting conditions and were safe to use; and dietary factors had a significant effect on the PK of cinacalcet, in that exposure to the drug increased when cinacalcet was taken after eating.

Three Therapeutic Strategies: Cinacalcet, Paricalcitol or Both in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Treatment in Hemodialysed Patients During 1-Year Observational Study-A Comparison

Introduction: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) is a common hormonal complication of chronic kidney disease. There are several therapeutic options for sHPT management aiming at calcium-phosphorus balance normalization and decrease of parathormone secretion. Objectives: The aim of this retrospective, observational study was the outcome assessement of three most common therapeutic strategies of secondary hyperparathyroidism treatment with vitamin D receptor activator-paricalcitol, calcimimetic-cinacalcet or both agents administered together during in 12-months period. Methods: One hundred and thirty-one haemodialysed patients with uncontrolled parathyroid hormone secretion have been treated with paricalcitol administered intravenously (group PAR-60 patients) or cinacalcet per os (group CIN-50 patients). The last group (group PAR+CIN-21 patients) received paricalcitol i.v. and oral cinacalcet administered simultaneously. Results: In all groups, the iPTH level decreased significantly, however in group 1 treated with paricalcitol administered intravenously iPTH level decrease was greater than in group 2 treated with cinacalcet and in group 3 treated with paricalcitol and cinacalcet in parallel. The most substantial change of iPTH level was noticed after 3-months of observation. After this period the iPTH level was stabilized and maintained till the end of observation. Safety level of all strategies was comparable. No severe hypercalcemia or hypocalcemia was observed during the whole period of observation. Conclusions: The results of observation show significant advantage of intravenous paricalcitol treatment. Complementing cinacalcet therapy with paricalcitol does not improve treatment outcomes. In case of unsatisfactory results after 3-months treatment, potential continuation should be considered carefully. Among three available therapeutic options, the treatment with paricalcitol i.v. should be considered in all haemodialysed patients with inadequate control of serum PTH level. The second option-with cinacalced administered orally should be considered in PD patients and when severe hypercalcemia occurs.