Recommendations for Perioperative Management of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Anaesthetic Management of Major Abdominal Oncosurgery in a Patient With an Automated Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (AICD): A Case Report

Ischaemic cardiomyopathy with low ejection fraction (EF) poses a perioperative challenge to the anesthetist due to the risk of hemodynamic instability, cardiovascular collapse, and heart failure. More so when a patient has an Automated Implantable Cardiovertor Defibrillator (AICD) in situ. We report the anesthetic management of a patient with ischaemic cardiomyopathy with an EF of 20% and AICD in situ posted for open right hemicolectomy. Dynamic hemodynamic monitoring with preparedness to manage fluid shifts, hemodynamic fluctuations, and adequate pain management is essential to successful anesthetic management in patients with an AICD, where programming is not possible.

MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES UNDERGOING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING - PROPOSAL FOR UNIFIED HOSPITAL PROTOCOL: CROATIAN WORKING GROUP ON ARRHYTHMIAS AND CARDIAC PACING

For many years, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was contraindicated in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). Today, there is a growing amount of evidence that MRI can be performed safely in the majority of patients with CIEDs. Firstly, there are devices considered MRI conditional by manufacturers that are available on the market and secondly, there is clear evidence that even patients with MRI non-conditional devices can also undergo MRI safely. Protocols have been developed and recommendations from different cardiac and radiologic societies have been published in recent years. However, the majority of physicians are still reluctant to refer these patients to MRI. Therefore, this document is published as a joint statement of the Croatian Working Group on Arrhythmias and Cardiac Pacing and Department of Radiology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre to guide and ease the management of patients with CIED undergoing MRI. Also, we propose a unified protocol and checklist that could be used in Croatian hospitals.

LEFT VENTRICULAR LEAD PLACEMENT FOR PACING AND SENSING IN A PATIENT WITH ARRHYTHMOGENIC RIGHT VENTRICULAR CARDIOMYOPATHY UNDERGOING ICD IMPLANTATION

We present a case of a 64-year-old female patient scheduled for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation due to arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Dual coil, active fixation ICD lead was introduced through the axillary vein. More than 20 positions were changed in the right ventricle (RV) (outflow tract, high, mid and apical septum, infero-basal, apical and lateral wall). Maximum R wave amplitude was 2 mV with pacing threshold of 0.5 V. Since the sensing was inappropriate, we decided to place the pace/sense lead of the ICD in the coronary sinus. The lead was placed in the basal part of the lateral vein. The pacing threshold was 1.0 V/0.40 ms and R wave was 9 mV. The lead was connected to the ICD sense-pace port and high voltage coils were connected in the usual way. The RV sense-pace lead was capped off. The device sensed an R wave of 7.0 mV 48 hours later. The purpose of this report is to show a possible solution of sensing problems during an ICD implantation in a patient with ARVC.