Patients with breast cancer may be at higher risk of colorectal neoplasia

Role of the intestinal microbiota and diet in the onset and progression of colorectal and breast cancers and the interconnection between both types of tumours

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the leading causes of mortality in adults of both sexes worldwide, while breast cancer (BC) is among the leading causes of death in women. In addition to age, gender, and genetic predisposition, environmental and lifestyle factors exert a strong influence. Global diet, including alcohol consumption, is one of the most important modifiable factors affecting the risk of CRC and BC. Western dietary patterns promoting high intakes of xenobiotics from food processing and ethanol have been associated with increased cancer risk, whereas the Mediterranean diet, generally leading to a higher intake of polyphenols and fibre, has been associated with a protective effect. Gut dysbiosis is a common feature in CRC, where the usual microbiota is progressively replaced by opportunistic pathogens and the gut metabolome is altered. The relationship between microbiota and BC has been less studied. The estrobolome is the collection of genes from intestinal bacteria that can metabolize oestrogens. In a dysbiosis condition, microbial deconjugating enzymes can reactivate conjugated-deactivated oestrogens, increasing the risk of BC. In contrast, intestinal microorganisms can increase the biological activity and bioavailability of dietary phytochemicals through diverse microbial metabolic transformations, potentiating their anticancer activity. Members of the intestinal microbiota can increase the toxicity of xenobiotics through metabolic transformations. However, most of the microorganisms involved in diet-microbiota interactions remain poorly characterized. Here, we provide an overview of the associations between microbiota and diet in BC and CRC, considering the diverse types and heterogeneity of these cancers and their relationship between them and with gut microbiota.

Colon Adenoma After Diagnosis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-mediated Colitis

Purpose: While the occurrence of colitis during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment is recognized as a sign of robust immune activation and correlates with better oncological outcomes, the long-term impact of ICI-mediated colitis on the colonic mucosa has not been studied. We thus aim to describe the colonoscopy and histology findings in patients at a follow-up time of ≥ 6 months post initial colitis event. Methods: This retrospective analysis included adult cancer patients diagnosed with ICI colitis at a tertiary cancer center between October 2013 and June 2020. The study group included patients diagnosed with immune mediated colitis who had also undergone a follow up colonoscopy or flex sigmoidoscopy. The control group was patients exposed to ICI without immune mediated colitis. We reported patients' colitis clinical course, treatment, outcomes, and endoscopic and histologic features at diagnosis and at follow-up time of ≥ 6 months. Results: Total 39 patients met the study criteria, with 82% being male, and 35.8% having melanoma. Most patients received a combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1/L1 inhibitors (82%). On initial endoscopic evaluation, inflammation without ulceration was reported in 76.9% of patients and active inflammation on histologic examination in 79.3% of patients. Most patients (79.4%) received corticosteroids, and 56.4% received add-on selective immunosuppressive therapy. Four patients received fecal microbiota transplantation. On follow-up, new incidence of colonic polyps was reported in 51.2% of patients, including adenomas in 33.3% among the colitis patients with median follow up duration of 12 months. The incidence of adenoma polyps 12 months after the colitis event was significantly higher compared to the control group without colitis based on the time-to-event analysis (p=0.041). Conclusion: At a median follow up of 12 months after their initial colitis diagnosis, 51.2% of the patients had new incidence of colonic polyps, including a third with adenoma, at a significantly higher incidence than the control group without colitis. Studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further define the long-term impact of colitis and its treatments on colon health and to refine recommendations for surveillance of colonic adenomas and colorectal cancer.

Pseudouridylate Synthase 7 Promotes Cell Proliferation and Invasion in Colon Cancer Through Activating PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is commonly malignant tumor. Herein, we demonstrate that pseudouridylate synthase 7 (PUS7) is closely related to colon cancer. But the biological role of PUS7 in colon cancer is not known.

AIMS

The present study aims to investigate the effects of PUS7 in colon cancer clinical samples and cells and the related molecular mechanism.

METHODS

A profile data set was downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas database, which included data from colon cancer tissue samples and normal tissue samples. The top 200 differentially expressed genes were subsequently investigated by a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. RT-PCR and western blot assays were used to determine gene expression levels. CCK8 assay, colony formation experiment, transwell and flow cytometry assay were used to determine cell viability, proliferation, invasion, and apoptosis, respectively.

RESULTS

PUS7 is a key gene from the most significant module of the PPI network. PUS7 was upregulated in colon cancer tissues and cell lines. Moreover, PUS7 overexpression is significantly related to the poor survival rate for 60 colon cancer's patients. Cell proliferation and invasion was significantly reduced by PUS7 inhibition and promoted by PUS7 overexpression. The protein levels of cleaved caspase-3/9, c-myc, E-cadherin and vimentin genes were significantly regulated in colon cancer cells transfected with PUS7 interference or overexpression. PUS7 overexpression significantly upregulated the phosphorylation levels of PI3K, AKT and mTOR.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrate that PUS7 overexpression upregulates cell proliferation, invasion and inhibits cell apoptosis of colon cancer cells via activating PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway.

Interaction of Gut Microbiome and Host microRNAs with the Occurrence of Colorectal and Breast Cancer and Their Impact on Patient Immunity

Breast and colorectal cancers are two primary malignancies on which most of the research done worldwide investigates the potential genetic and environmental risk factors and thereby tries to develop therapeutic methods to improve prognosis. Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer type in women, while colorectal cancer is diagnosed in males as the third most and females as the second most cancer type. Though these two cancer types are predominantly seen in adult patients worldwide, in the current context, these malignancies are diagnosed at a younger age with a significant rate of incidents than previous. Such early-onset cancers are generally present at an advanced stage of the most aggressive type with a poor prognosis. In the past, the focus of the research was mainly on studying possible candidate genes to understand the onset. However, it is now recognized that genetics, epigenetics, and other environmental factors play a pivotal role in cancer susceptibility. Thus, most studies were diversified to study the behavior of host microRNAs, and the involvement of gut microbiota and good communication between them surfaced in the occurrence and state of the disease. It is understood that the impact of these factors affects the outcome of the disease. Out of the adverse outcomes identified relating to the disease, immunosuppression is one of the most concerning outcomes in the current world, where such individuals remain vulnerable to infections. Recent studies revealed that microbiome and microRNA could create a considerable impact on immunosuppression. This review focused on the behavior of host microRNAs and gut microbiome for the onset of the disease and progression, thereby influencing an individual's immunosuppression. Understanding the interactions among microRNA, microbiome, presentation of the disease, and impact on the immune system will be immensely useful for developing future therapeutic strategies based on targeting host microRNA and the patient's gut microbiome. Therapies such as inhibitory-miRNA therapies, miRNA mimic-based therapeutics, immune checkpoint blockade therapies, and bacteria-assisted tumor-targeted therapies help modulate cancer. At the same time, it paid equal attention to potential noninvasive biomarkers in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutics in both cancers.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Survival of Patients With Double Primary Malignancies: Breast and Colorectal Cancer

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathologic features and survival in patients with both breast cancer (BrC) and colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods

Between 1996 and 2019, patients who were diagnosed with both BrC and CRC were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with distant metastasis, palliative resection, and previous cancer histories except for BrCs or CRCs were excluded. Altogether, 105 patients were divided into the B=C group (n=21), B-first group (n=40), and C-first group (n=44) according to the definition of synchronous and metachronous cancers. The clinicopathologic features and overall survival were evaluated.

Results

TNM stages and histologic types were comparable among the 3 groups (P=0.434). The interval of diagnosis was 67.1±40.4 and 59.3±47.2 months in the B- and C-first groups, respectively. The incidence of adjuvant chemotherapy in the B-first group was 57.5%, which was higher than the B=C and C-first groups (P<0.001). The estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and HER-2 molecular markers were not significantly different among the groups. The overall survival of the B-first group showed lower survival rates than the C-first group (P=0.039). In the logistic regression, HER-2 status (hazard ratio [HR], 11.9; P=0.032) and lymph node metastasis of CRC (HR, 5.8; P=0.036) were prognostic factors affecting overall survival.

Conclusion

B-first group had poorer survival outcomes than the C-first group in patients with the metachronous BrC and CRC. HER2 positivity and CRC lymph node metastasis may be prognostic factors that affect overall survival in these patients. The findings support that a colorectal cancer screening program should be included during BrC surveillance.