Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of superficial gastric neoplasms in non-Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lymph Node Metastasis and Its Risk Factors for Early Gastritis Individuals Who Underwent Noncurative Endoscopic Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

In the present review, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze possible lymph node metastasis (LNM) hazards in individuals with endoscopic resection of gastric cancer.

Methods

Relevant literature was selected by evaluating the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar electronic databases since from inception to March 2022. Corresponding clinicopathological outcomes were summarized, and pooled log odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were assessed. The random effect model was preferred if variations among studies is high otherwise fixed effect model was preferred.

Results

Overall, 12 associated papers, including 4808 early gastric cancer individuals who endured more surgery after noncurative endoscopic resection, were entered into this analysis. The outcomes showed that submucosal invasion (log odd ratio 1.75, 95% (CI): 0.77-3.95, I2 = 80.0%); vertical margin (log odd ratio 6.53, 95% (CI): 2.81-15.17, I2 = 65%); horizontal margin (log Odd ratio 0.69 95% (CI): 0.22-2.14, I2 = 52%), lymphatic invasion (Odd ratio 6.33 95% (CI): 1.98-20.24, I2 = 91%), and vascular invasion (Odd ratio 3.55, 95% (CI): 1.31-9.58, I2 = 92%) was significantly related to metastasis of lymph node for these patients.

Conclusion

There was a significant association of LNM hazards in individuals with endoscopic resection of gastric cancer. Therefore, invasion to lymph, vascular, submucosa and positive vertical margin should be strongly noticed when selecting surgical treatment factors.

Value of quantitative microsurface structure analysis for evaluating the invasion depth of type 0-II early gastric cancer

Background and Aim

The microsurface structure reflects the degree of damage to the glands, which is related to the invasion depth of early gastric cancer. To evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative microsurface structure analysis for estimating the invasion depth of early gastric cancer.

Methods

White-light imaging and narrow-band imaging (NBI) endoscopy were used to visualize the lesions of the included patients. The area ratio and depth-predicting score (DPS) of each patient were calculated; meanwhile, each lesion was examined by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS).

Results

Ninety-three patients were included between 2016 and 2019. Microsurface structure is related to the histological differentiation and progression of early gastric cancer. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that when an area ratio of 80.3% was used as a cut-off value for distinguishing mucosal (M) and submucosal (SM) type 0-II gastric cancers, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 82.9%, 80.2%, and 91.6%, respectively. The accuracies for distinguishing M/SM differentiated and undifferentiated early gastric cancers were 87.4% and 84.8%, respectively. The accuracy of EUS for distinguishing M/SM early gastric cancer was 74.9%. DPS can only distinguish M-SM1 (SM infiltration <500 μm)/SM (SM infiltration ≥500 μm) with an accuracy of 83.8%. The accuracy of using area ratio for distinguishing 0-II early gastric cancers was better than those of using DPS and EUS (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Quantitative analysis of microsurface structure can be performed to assess M/SM type 0-II gastric cancer and is expected to be effective for judging the invasion depth of gastric cancer.