1
|
Xia L, Liu Y, Yang Z, Ge Y, Wang L, Du Y, Jiang H. Obesity and acute type A aortic dissection: unraveling surgical outcomes through the lens of the upper hemisternotomy approach. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 11:1301895. [PMID: 38361588 PMCID: PMC10867118 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1301895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a pressing cardiovascular emergency necessitating prompt surgical intervention. Obesity, a pervasive health concern, has been identified as a significant risk factor for ATAAD, introducing unique surgical challenges that can influence postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of ATAAD surgery across various body mass index (BMI) categories, focusing on the implications of the upper hemisternotomy (UHS) approach. Methods Between April 2017 and October 2023, 229 patients diagnosed with ATAAD underwent aortic arch intervention via UHS at the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command. Based on BMI (WS/T 428-2013), patients were categorized into normal weight, overweight, and obese. The primary outcomes included perioperative parameters, intraoperative details, and postoperative complications, with specific emphasis on hypoxemia, defined by the Berlin criteria as a PaO2/FiO2 ratio of ≤300 mmHg. Results The average age of the cohort was 50.1 ± 11.2 years with a male predominance (174 males). Preoperatively, 49.0% presented with hypoxemia, with the Obese group exhibiting a significantly elevated rate (77.9%, P < 0.001). Postoperatively, while the Normal group demonstrated a lower thoracic drainage volume 24 h post-surgery [180.0 (140.0) ml; P < 0.001], the Obese group indicated prolonged durations for mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, without statistical significance. Unlike the Normal and Overweight groups, the Obese group showed no notable changes in pre- and postoperative PaO2/FiO2 ratio. No significant difference was observed in severe postoperative complications among the groups. Further ROC curve analysis identifies a BMI cutoff of 25.5 for predicting postoperative hypoxemia, with 76.3% sensitivity and 84.4% specificity. And multivariate analysis reveals BMI and preoperative hypoxemia as independent predictors of postoperative hypoxemia. Conclusion Obesity, although presenting unique challenges in ATAAD interventions, does not necessarily portend adverse outcomes when managed with meticulous surgical planning and postoperative care. The study emphasizes the significance of individualized patient assessment and tailoring surgical strategies, suggesting the potential of UHS in addressing the surgical intricacies posed by obesity in ATAAD patients. Further research is warranted to consolidate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Hui Jiang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mikus E, Fiorentino M, Sangiorgi D, Calvi S, Tenti E, Cavallucci A, Tremoli E, Tripodi A, Pin M, Savini C. Less Is More? Combined Approaches to Improve Mortality and Morbidity after Aortic Valve Replacement. Biomedicines 2023; 11:2989. [PMID: 38001989 PMCID: PMC10669498 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11112989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nowadays, one of the main goals of aortic valve surgery is to reduce the biological impact, mortality, and complications. It is well-known that long operative times in terms of the extracorporeal circulation, but above all, of the aortic cross-clamp time (ACC), represent a risk factor for mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In order to shorten the aortic cross-clamp time, many technological improvements, such as sutureless prostheses, have been introduced, but their actual effectiveness has not been proven yet. The aim of this study was to assess the 30-day outcomes of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement surgery, focusing on the ACC length. METHODS All 3139 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement between January 2013 and July 2022 at our institution were enrolled. The data were retrospectively collected and the baseline characteristics and intraoperative variables were recorded. In order to adjust the results according to the differences in the baseline characteristics, propensity score matching was performed and four groups of 351 patients were obtained based on the first, second, third, and fourth quartile of the ACC time. RESULTS The patient population included 132 redo surgeries (9.4%) and 61 cases of active endocarditis (4.3%), with an overall median EuroSCORE II of 1.8 (IQR 1.2-3.1). An increase across the groups was observed in terms of the acute kidney failure (p < 0.001) incidence, the number of blood transfusions (p = 0.022), prolonged hospital stays (p < 0.001), the and respiratory failure (p < 0.001) incidence. A p of < 0.1 was found for the 30-day mortality (p = 0.079). The predictors of an early 30-day mortality were standard full sternotomy (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.14-5.40, p = 0.022), EuroSCORE II (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.16, p < 0.001), and a trend for a longer ACC time (Q4 vs. Q1: OR 2.62, 95% CI 0.89-7.68, p = 0.080). CONCLUSIONS Shortening the operative times resulted in marked improvements of the patients' outcomes. The combined use of minimally invasive approaches and sutureless aortic valve prostheses allows for a lower 30-day events rate. New technologies should be assessed to obtain the best results with the least risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Mikus
- Cardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 48033 Cotignola, Italy; (M.F.); (D.S.); (S.C.); (E.T.); (A.C.); (E.T.); (A.T.); (M.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Mariafrancesca Fiorentino
- Cardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 48033 Cotignola, Italy; (M.F.); (D.S.); (S.C.); (E.T.); (A.C.); (E.T.); (A.T.); (M.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Diego Sangiorgi
- Cardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 48033 Cotignola, Italy; (M.F.); (D.S.); (S.C.); (E.T.); (A.C.); (E.T.); (A.T.); (M.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Simone Calvi
- Cardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 48033 Cotignola, Italy; (M.F.); (D.S.); (S.C.); (E.T.); (A.C.); (E.T.); (A.T.); (M.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Elena Tenti
- Cardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 48033 Cotignola, Italy; (M.F.); (D.S.); (S.C.); (E.T.); (A.C.); (E.T.); (A.T.); (M.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Andrea Cavallucci
- Cardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 48033 Cotignola, Italy; (M.F.); (D.S.); (S.C.); (E.T.); (A.C.); (E.T.); (A.T.); (M.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Elena Tremoli
- Cardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 48033 Cotignola, Italy; (M.F.); (D.S.); (S.C.); (E.T.); (A.C.); (E.T.); (A.T.); (M.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Alberto Tripodi
- Cardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 48033 Cotignola, Italy; (M.F.); (D.S.); (S.C.); (E.T.); (A.C.); (E.T.); (A.T.); (M.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Maurizio Pin
- Cardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 48033 Cotignola, Italy; (M.F.); (D.S.); (S.C.); (E.T.); (A.C.); (E.T.); (A.T.); (M.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Carlo Savini
- Cardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, 48033 Cotignola, Italy; (M.F.); (D.S.); (S.C.); (E.T.); (A.C.); (E.T.); (A.T.); (M.P.); (C.S.)
- Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Surgical Medicine (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jolliffe J, Moten S, Tripathy A, Skillington P, Tatoulis J, Muneretto C, Di Bacco L, Galvao HBF, Goldblatt J. Perceval valve intermediate outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis at 5-year follow-up. J Cardiothorac Surg 2023; 18:129. [PMID: 37041628 PMCID: PMC10091543 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-023-02273-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES New technologies for the treatment of Aortic Stenosis are evolving to minimize risk and treat an increasingly comorbid population. The Sutureless Perceval Valve is one such alternative. Whilst short-term data is promising, limited mid-term outcomes exist, until now. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate mid-term outcomes in the Perceval Valve in isolation. METHODS A systematic literature review of 5 databases was performed. Articles included evaluated echocardiographic and mortality outcomes beyond 5 years in patients who had undergone Perceval Valve AVR. Two reviewers extracted and reviewed the articles. Weighted estimates were performed for all post-operative and mid-term data. Aggregated Kaplan Meier curves were reconstructed from digitised images to evaluate long-term survival. RESULTS Seven observational studies were identified, with a total number of 3196 patients analysed. 30-day mortality was 2.5%. Aggregated survival at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years was 93.4%, 89.4%, 84.9%, 82% and 79.5% respectively. Permanent pacemaker implantation (7.9%), severe paravalvular leak (1.6%), structural valve deterioration (1.5%), stroke (4.4%), endocarditis (1.6%) and valve explant (2.3%) were acceptable at up to mid-term follow up. Haemodynamics were also acceptable at up mid-term with mean-valve gradient (range 9-13.6 mmHg), peak-valve gradient (17.8-22.3 mmHg) and effective orifice area (1.5-1.8 cm2) across all valve sizes. Cardiopulmonary bypass (78 min) and Aortic cross clamp times (52 min) were also favourable. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this represents the first meta-analysis to date evaluating mid-term outcomes in the Perceval Valve in isolation and demonstrates good 5-year mortality, haemodynamic and morbidity outcomes. KEY QUESTION What are the mid-term outcomes at up to 5 years follow up in Perceval Valve Aortic Valve Replacement? KEY FINDINGS Perceval Valve AVR achieves 80% freedom from mortality at 5 years with low valve gradients and minimal morbidity. KEY OUTCOMES Perceval Valve Aortic Valve Replacement has acceptable mid-term mortality, durability and haemodynamic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarrod Jolliffe
- Cardiothoracic Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Simon Moten
- Cardiothoracic Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amit Tripathy
- Cardiothoracic Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Skillington
- Cardiothoracic Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - James Tatoulis
- Cardiothoracic Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Lorenzo Di Bacco
- School of Cardiac Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - John Goldblatt
- Cardiothoracic Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sakata T, De La Pena C, Ohira S. Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement: Patient Selection and Special Considerations. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2023; 19:169-180. [PMID: 37016696 PMCID: PMC10066891 DOI: 10.2147/vhrm.s374410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Sutureless or rapid deployment valves in the setting of aortic valve replacement (AVR) is an emerging surgical technique using the transcatheter valve technology, which may lead to reduction in cross-clamp time and potentially better hemodynamics compared to a stented bioprosthetic valve. The absence of subannular pledgets results to excellent hemodynamic performance with reduced turbulent flow and larger effective orifice area. However, complications from both surgical and transcatheter AVR may still occur and impact survival. The incidence of paravalvular leakage and permanent pacemaker implantation are not low. Although technical modifications can improve these outcomes, there is a learning curve effect. Therefore, technical and anatomical considerations as well as better patient selection are paramount for better outcomes. In this review, we discuss the use of sutureless or rapid deployment valves in setting of (1) complex procedures, (2) minimally invasive AVR, and (3) small aortic annulus. The advantage of sutureless or rapid deployment valves in terms of mortality remains to be clarified; therefore, it is necessary to accumulate long-term outcomes in an appropriate patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoki Sakata
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Corazon De La Pena
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Suguru Ohira
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
- Correspondence: Suguru Ohira, Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, 100 Woods Road, Macy Pavilion, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA, Tel +1 404 234 5433, Email
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Berretta P, De Angelis V, Alfonsi J, Pierri MD, Malvindi PG, Zahedi HM, Munch C, Di Eusanio M. Enhanced recovery after minimally invasive heart valve surgery: Early and midterm outcomes. Int J Cardiol 2023; 370:98-104. [PMID: 36375597 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the use of protocols for "enhanced recovery after surgery" (ERAS) have been associated with improved results in different surgical specialties, only a few data are available for ERAS in cardiac surgery. This study aimed to compare 30-day outcomes of patients undergoing ultra-fast-track minimally invasive valve surgery (UFT-MIVS) versus conventional MIVS (c-MIVS). METHODS The key features of UFT-MIVS approach involves: 1) less invasive valve surgery techniques, 2) normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass management, 3) UFT-anesthesia with table extubation, 4) immediate rehabilitation therapy and patient-family contact. Five-hundred and seventy-six consecutive patients who underwent aortic or mitral MIVS were analyzed (2016-2020). Treatment selection bias (UFT-MIVS vs. c-MIVS) was addressed by the use of propensity score (PS) matching. After PS-matching 2 well-balanced groups of 152 patients each were created. RESULTS In the matched cohort, the overall 30-day mortality and stroke rates were 0.3% and 0.7%, respectively, with no difference between groups. UFT-MIVS resulted in lower rates of respiratory insufficiency and agitation/delirium compared with c-MIVS. Patients receiving UFT-MIVS were associated with significantly shorter intensive care unit length of stay and hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS Our study confirms that MIVS is associated with excellent results in terms of early mortality and major postoperative complications rates. The implementation of UFT-MIVS protocol showed to be safe and was associated with improved clinical outcomes in regard to respiratory insufficiency, delirium and lengths of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Berretta
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
| | - Veronica De Angelis
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Jacopo Alfonsi
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Michele D Pierri
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Pietro Giorgio Malvindi
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Hossein M Zahedi
- Cardiac Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Christopher Munch
- Cardiac Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Marco Di Eusanio
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berretta P, Andreas M, Meuris B, Langenaeken T, Solinas M, Concistrè G, Kappert U, Arzt S, Santarpino G, Nicoletti A, Misfeld M, Borger MA, Savini C, Gliozzi G, Albertini A, Mikus E, Fischlein T, Kalisnik J, Martinelli GL, Cotroneo A, Mignosa C, Ricasoli A, Yan T, Laufer G, Di Eusanio M. Sutureless and Rapid Deployment Versus Sutured Aortic Valve Replacement: a Propensity Matched Comparison from the Sutureless and Rapid Deployment International Registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022; 62:6625655. [PMID: 35775935 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare procedural and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing sutureless (Perceval, Livanova PLC, London, UK) and rapid deployment (Intuity Elite, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, USA) aortic valve replacement (group 1) versus sutured aortic valve replacement (group 2). METHODS Patients receiving isolated aortic valve replacement between 2014 and 2020 were analysed using data from the Sutureless and Rapid Deployment International Registry. Patients in group 1 and group 2 were propensity-score matched in a 1:1 ratio. RESULTS A total of 7708 patients were included in the study. After matching, 2 groups of 2643 each were created. Patients in group 1 were more likely to undergo minimally invasive approaches and were associated with shorter operative times when compared with group 2. Overall in-hospital mortality was similar between groups. While an increased risk of stroke was observed in group 1 in the first study period (2014-2016) (relative risk 3.76, p < 0.001), no difference was found in more recent year period (relative risk 1.66, p = 0.08)(p for heterogeneity 0.003). Group 1 was associated with reduced rates of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome, atrial fibrillation and mild aortic regurgitation. New pacemaker implant was three-fold higher in group 1. CONCLUSIONS Our findings showed significant differences in procedural and clinical outcomes between the study groups. These results suggest that sutureless and rapid deployment aortic valve replacement should be considered as part of a comprehensive valve program. The knowledge of the respective post-aortic valve replacement benefits for different valve technologies may result in patient-tailored valve selection with improved clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Berretta
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Martin Andreas
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bart Meuris
- Departement of Cardiovascular Disease, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Utz Kappert
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Heart Centre Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sebastian Arzt
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Heart Centre Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Santarpino
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Italy.,Department of Cardiac Surgery, "Città di Lecce" Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Lecce, Italy.,Cardiovascular Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Anna Nicoletti
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, "Città di Lecce" Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Lecce, Italy
| | - Martin Misfeld
- University Department for Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Institute of Academic Surgery, RPAH, Sydney, Australia.,The Baird Institute of Applied Heart and Lung Surgical Research, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael A Borger
- University Department for Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Carlo Savini
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Gregorio Gliozzi
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Sant'Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto Albertini
- Cardiovascular Surgery Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy
| | - Elisa Mikus
- Cardiovascular Surgery Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy
| | - Theodor Fischlein
- Cardiovascular Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Jurij Kalisnik
- Cardiovascular Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Carmelo Mignosa
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "policlinico-San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ricasoli
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "policlinico-San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Tristan Yan
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,The Collaborative Research (CORE) Group
| | - Ghunter Laufer
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marco Di Eusanio
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.,The Collaborative Research (CORE) Group
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fatehi Hassanabad A, Aboelnazar N, Maitland A, Holloway DD, Adams C, Kent WDT. Right anterior mini thoracotomy approach for isolated aortic valve replacement: Early outcomes at a Canadian center. J Card Surg 2021; 36:2365-2372. [PMID: 34002895 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this manuscript was to report the clinical outcomes of the initial series of 100 consecutive Right Anterior Mini Thoracotomy (RAMT) aortic valve replacement (AVR) implantations at a Canadian Center. METHODS This retrospective study reported the clinical outcomes of the first 100 patients who underwent the RAMT approach for isolated surgical AVR in Calgary, Canada, between 2016 and 2020. Primary outcomes were death within 30 days of surgery and disabling stroke. Secondary outcomes included surgical times, the need for permanent pacemaker (PPM), incidence of postoperative blood transfusion in the intensive care unit (ICU), postsurgical atrial fibrillation (AF), length of ICU/hospital stay, postsurgical AF, residual paravalvular leak (PVL), postoperative transvalvular gradient, need for postsurgical intravenous opioids, duration of invasive ventilation in the ICU, and chest tube output in the first 12 h postsurgery. RESULTS In this study, 54 patients were male, and the average age of the cohort was 72 years. Mortality within 30 days of surgery was 1% with no disabling postoperative strokes. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass and cross clamp was 84 and 55 min, respectively. PPM rate was 3%, incidence of blood transfusion in the ICU was 4%, and the rate of postoperative AF was 23%. Median length of ICU and hospital stay was 1 and 5 days, respectively. Rate of mild or greater residual PVL was 3%, while the average residual transvalvular mean gradient was 8.5 mmHg. CONCLUSION The sternum-sparing RAMT approach can be safely integrated into surgical practice as a minimally invasive alternative for isolated AVR, and can reduce postoperative bleeding and narcotic requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Fatehi Hassanabad
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nader Aboelnazar
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, London Health Sciences Center, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Maitland
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Daniel D Holloway
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Corey Adams
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - William D T Kent
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thourani VH, Edelman JJ, Holmes SD, Nguyen TC, Carroll J, Mack MJ, Kapadia S, Tang GHL, Kodali S, Kaneko T, Meduri CU, Forcillo J, Ferdinand FD, Fontana G, Suwalski P, Kiaii B, Balkhy H, Kempfert J, Cheung A, Borger MA, Reardon M, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Ad N. The International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Propensity-Matched Studies. INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY 2021; 16:3-16. [PMID: 33491539 DOI: 10.1177/1556984520978316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is an increasing amount of evidence supporting use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for treatment of aortic stenosis in patients at low or intermediate risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). TAVR is now approved for use in all patient cohorts. Despite this, there remains debate about the relative efficacy of TAVR compared with SAVR in lower-risk cohorts and various subgroups of patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-matched trials to guide a consensus among expert cardiologists and surgeons. METHODS Studies comparing TAVR and SAVR in low- and intermediate-risk patients were identified by a thorough search of the major databases. Mortality, stroke, and other perioperative outcomes were assessed at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS Early mortality was lower in TAVR compared to SAVR in RCTs, but not propensity-matched studies in low-risk cohorts (0.66% vs 1.5%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20 to 0.98, I2 = 0%). No difference in mortality between TAVR and SAVR was identified in intermediate-risk patients at early or later time points. Incidence of perioperative stroke in 3 low-risk RCTs was significantly lower in TAVR (0.4%) than SAVR (1.4%; OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.81, I2 = 0%). There was no difference in stroke for intermediate-risk patients between TAVR and SAVR. The expert panel of cardiologists and cardiac surgeons provided recommendations for TAVR and SAVR in various clinical scenarios. CONCLUSIONS In RCTs comparing TAVR and SAVR in low-risk patients, early mortality and stroke were lower in TAVR, but did not differ at 1 year. There was no difference in mortality and stroke in intermediate-risk patients. The Multidisciplinary Heart Team must consider individual patient characteristics and preferences when recommending TAVR or SAVR. The decision must consider the long-term management of each patient's aortic valve disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinod H Thourani
- 165591 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Marcus Heart and Vascular Center, Piedmont Heart and Vascular Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - J James Edelman
- 2720 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Sari D Holmes
- 12264 Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tom C Nguyen
- Division of Adult Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John Carroll
- 1878 Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Michael J Mack
- 384526 Department of Cardiology, Baylor Health Care System, Heart Hospital Baylor Plano, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Samir Kapadia
- 2569 Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Gilbert H L Tang
- 5944 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA
| | - Susheel Kodali
- 5798 Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tsuyoshi Kaneko
- 1861 Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher U Meduri
- 165591 Division of Cardiology, Marcus Heart and Vascular Center, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jessica Forcillo
- 5622 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Canada
| | - Francis D Ferdinand
- 6595 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine & UPMC Hamot Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA, USA
| | - Gregory Fontana
- Cardiovascular Institute, Los Robles Hospital and Medical Center, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Piotr Suwalski
- 359917 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Bob Kiaii
- 8789 Cardiothoracic Surgery, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Husam Balkhy
- 12246 Section of Cardiac Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, IL, USA
| | - Joerg Kempfert
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, German Heart Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anson Cheung
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Michael Reardon
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Martin B Leon
- 5798 Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Popma
- 1859 Department of Interventional Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Niv Ad
- 12264 Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Cardiovascular Surgery, Adventist White Oak Medical Center, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|