1
|
Lin H, Li Y, Chen Y, Zeng L, Li B, Chen S. Epidemiology and Prognostic Nomogram for Predicting Long-Term Disease-Specific Survival in Patients With Pancreatic Carcinoid Tumor: A SEER-Based Study. Pancreas 2024; 53:e424-e433. [PMID: 38530947 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000002320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pancreatic carcinoid tumor (PCT) is described as a malignant form of carcinoid tumors. However, the epidemiology and prognostic factors for PCT are poorly understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS The data of 2447 PCT patients were included in this study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and randomly divided into a training cohort (1959) and a validation cohort (488). The epidemiology of PCT was calculated, and independent prognostic factors were identified to construct a prognostic nomogram for predicting long-term disease-specific survival (DSS) among PCT patients. RESULTS The incidence of PCT increased remarkably from 2000 to 2018. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year DSS rates were 96.4%, 90.3%, and 86.5%, respectively. Age at diagnosis, stage, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors to construct a prognostic nomogram. The C -indices; area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for predicting 1-, 5-, and 10-year DSS, and calibration plots of the nomogram in both cohorts indicated a high discriminatory accuracy, preferable survival predictive ability, and optimal concordances, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of PCT has increased rapidly since 2000. In addition, we established a practical, effective, and accurate prognostic nomogram for predicting the long-term DSS of PCT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai Lin
- From the Department of Cancer Center, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai City, Guangdong Province, China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yin M, Guan S, Ding X, Zhuang R, Sun Z, Wang T, Zheng J, Li L, Gao X, Wei H, Ma J, Huang Q, Xiao J, Mo W. Construction and validation of a novel web-based nomogram for patients with lung cancer with bone metastasis: A real-world analysis based on the SEER database. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1075217. [PMID: 36568214 PMCID: PMC9780685 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1075217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Patients with lung cancer with bone metastasis (LCBM) often have a very poor prognosis. The purpose of this study is to characterize the prevalence and associated factors and to develop a prognostic nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with LCBM using multicenter population-based data. Methods Patients with LCBM at the time of diagnosis were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) from 2010 to 2015. Multivariable and univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with all-cause mortality and lung cancer (LC)-specific mortality. The performance of the nomograms was evaluated with the calibration curves, area under the curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA). Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to estimate the survival times of patients with LCBM. Results We finally identified 26,367 patients with LCBM who were selected for survival analysis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated age, sex, T stage, N stage, grade, histology, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, primary site, primary surgery, liver metastasis, and brain metastasis as independent predictors for LCBM. The AUC values of the nomogram for the OS prediction were 0.755, 0.746, and 0.775 in the training cohort; 0.757, 0.763, and 0.765 in the internal validation cohort; and 0.769, 0.781, and 0.867 in the external validation cohort. For CSS, the values were 0.753, 0.753, and 0.757 in the training cohort; 0.753, 0.753, and 0.757 in the internal validation cohort; and 0.767, 0.774, and 0.872 in the external validation cohort. Conclusions Our study constructs a new prognostic model and clearly presents the clinicopathological features and survival analysis of patients with LCBM. The result indicated that the nomograms had favorable discrimination, good consistency, and clinical benefits in patients. In addition, our constructed nomogram prediction models may assist physicians in evaluating individualized prognosis and deciding on treatment for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengchen Yin
- Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China,Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sisi Guan
- Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xing Ding
- Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruoyu Zhuang
- Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhengwang Sun
- Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China
| | - Jiale Zheng
- Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lin Li
- Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Gao
- Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Haifeng Wei
- Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Junming Ma
- Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Quan Huang
- Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianru Xiao
- Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China,*Correspondence: Jianru Xiao, ; Wen Mo,
| | - Wen Mo
- Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China,*Correspondence: Jianru Xiao, ; Wen Mo,
| |
Collapse
|