Soluble ST2 in serum predicts the prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective study

The diagnostic value of sST2 for myocardial fibrosis in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in subclinical stage of cardiac involvement

OBJECTIVE

Myocardial fibrosis occurs in the early subclinical stage of cardiac involvement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) is known to have an immunomodulatory impact during autoimmune disease development. The current study investigated the diagnostic value of sST2 for myocardial fibrosis during early stage of cardiac involvement in IIM.

METHODS

A total of 44 IIM patients with normal heart function and 32 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. Serum sST2 levels were measured by ELISA and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters for myocardial fibrosis [native T1, extracellular volume (ECV), late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE)] and oedema (T2 values) were analysed.

RESULTS

IIM patients had significantly higher sST2 levels than HCs [67.5 ng/ml (s.d. 30.4)] vs 14.4 (5.5), P < 0.001] and levels correlated positively with diffuse myocardial fibrosis parameters, native T1 (r = 0.531, P = 0.000), ECV (r = 0.371, P = 0.013) and focal myocardial fibrosis index and LGE (r = 0.339, P = 0.024) by Spearman's correlation analysis. sST2 was an independent predictive factor for diffuse and focal myocardial fibrosis after adjustment for age, gender, BMI and ESR. Risk increased ≈15.4% for diffuse [odds ratio (OR) 1.154 (95% CI 1.021, 1.305), P = 0.022] and 3.8% for focal [OR 1.038 (95% CI 1.006, 1.072), P = 0.020] myocardial fibrosis per unit increase of sST2. Cut-off values for diagnosing diffuse and focal myocardial fibrosis were sST2 ≥51.3 ng/ml [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.942, sensitivity = 85.7%, specificity = 98.9%, P < 0.001] and 53.3 ng/ml (AUC = 0.753, sensitivity = 87.5%, specificity = 58.3%, P < 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSION

sST2 showed a marked elevation during the subclinical stage of cardiac involvement in IIM and has potential as a biomarker for predicting diffuse and focal myocardial fibrosis in IIM.

Antifibrotic Drugs against Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Pulmonary Fibrosis Induced by COVID-19: Therapeutic Approaches and Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the health and economy of the global population. Even after recovery from the disease, post-COVID-19 symptoms, such as pulmonary fibrosis, continue to be a concern. This narrative review aims to address pulmonary fibrosis (PF) from various perspectives, including the fibrotic mechanisms involved in idiopathic and COVID-19-induced pulmonary fibrosis. On the other hand, we also discuss the current therapeutic drugs in use, as well as those undergoing clinical or preclinical evaluation. Additionally, this article will address various biomarkers with usefulness for PF prediction, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and severity assessment in order to provide better treatment strategies for patients with this disease.

Predictive biomarkers of disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic interstitial disease that cannot be cured, and treatment options for IPF are very limited. Early diagnosis, close monitoring of disease progression, and timely treatment are therefore the best options for patients due to the irreversibility of IPF. Effective markers help doctors judge the development and prognosis of disease. Recent research on traditional biomarkers (KL-6, SP-D, MMP-7, TIMPs, CCL18) has provided novel ideas for predicting disease progression and prognosis. Some emerging biomarkers (HE4, GDF15, PRDX4, inflammatory cells, G-CSF) also provide more possibilities for disease prediction. In addition to markers in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), some improvements related to the GAP model and chest HRCT also show good predictive ability for disease prognosis.

Diagnostic potential of soluble ST2 and D-dimer for Stanford Type B aortic dissection and intramural aortic hematoma

OBJECTIVE

Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) and intramural aortic hematoma (IMH) are common manifestations of Acute Aortic Syndrome (AAS), exhibiting overlapping clinical features. The timely and accurate diagnosis and differentiation between TBAD and IMH are critical for appropriate management. Tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) and D-dimer have been shown to elevate levels in both TBAD and IMH, making them valuable as "rule-out" markers. Hence, we aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of sST2 and D-dimer in distinguishing TBAD from IMH.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed serum levels of sST2 and D-dimer in 182 AAS patients, comprising 90 TBAD cases, 92 IMH cases, and 90 non-AAS cases. Serial measurements were taken at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 72 h post-admission. Comparative analyses were conducted between TBAD and non-AAS cases, IMH and non-AAS cases, and TBAD and IMH cases. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sST2 and D-dimer in identifying TBAD or IMH cases.

RESULTS

Both TBAD and IMH patients displayed elevated levels of sST2 and D-dimer compared to non-AAS cases. Notably, sST2 levels were significantly higher in TBAD patients than in IMH patients, whereas D-dimer levels exhibited moderate differences. TBAD patients tended to exhibit elevated levels of either sST2 or D-dimer, with a modest correlation between the two (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.3614). In contrast, IMH patients showed elevations in both markers, with a positive correlation between them (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.6814). The ROC analysis revealed that both sST2 (AUC, 0.657; 95 % CI, 0.552-0.753; cutoff value, 27.54 ng/ml) and D-dimer (AUC, 0.695; 95 % CI, 0.591-0.787, cutoff value, 1.215 ng/ml) demonstrated favorable diagnostic performance for TBAD. sST2 exhibited a sensitivity of 80.92 % and a specificity of 75.00 %, while D-dimer showed a sensitivity of 80.92 % and a specificity of 75.00 %. For the diagnosis of IMH, the combined assessment of sST2 and D-dimer (AUC, 0.674; 95 % CI, 0.599-0.768; sensitivity, 69.20 %; specificity, 80.00 %) proved effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that both sST2 and D-dimer show diagnostic potential for TBAD. Elevated levels of either serve as an indicator of TBAD onset. However, concurrent elevation of both markers seems to be indicative of IMH. The combination of increased sST2 and D-dimer levels demonstrates strong diagnostic performance in identifying IMH cases.