1
|
Bott RK, George G, McEwen R, Zylstra J, Knight WRC, Baker CR, Kelly M, Griffin N, McAddy N, Maisey N, Van Hemelrijck M, Gossage JA, Lagergren J, Davies AR. Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:1629-1636. [PMID: 34613874 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1986228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is often used prior to surgical resection for oesophageal adenocarcinoma but remains ineffective in a high proportion of patients. The histological Mandard tumour regression grade is used to determine chemoresponse but is not available at the time of treatment decision-making. The aim of this cohort study was to identify factors that predict chemotherapy response prior to surgery. METHODS A prospectively collected database of patients undergoing surgical resection for oesophageal adenocarcinoma from a high-volume UK institution was used. Patients were subcategorised using pathological tumour response into 'responders' (Mandard grade 1-3) and 'non-responders' (Mandard grade 4 and 5). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for responder status adjusting for a variety of parameters. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. RESULTS Among 315 patients included, 102 (32%) were responders and 213 (68%) non-responders. A decrease in radiological tumour volume (OR 1.92 95%CI 1.02-3.62; p = 0.05), a 'partial response' RECIST score (OR 7.16 95%CI 1.49-34.36; p = 0.01), a clinically improved dysphagia score (OR 2.79 95%CI 1.05-7.04; p = 0.04) and lymphovascular invasion (OR 0.06 95%CI 0.02-0.13; p = 0.000) influenced responder status. ROC curve analysis for responder status utilising all available parameters had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86. CONCLUSION This study has highlighted the potential for using pre-defined factors to identify those patients who have responded to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, prior to surgical resection, potentially facilitating a more individualised therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca K. Bott
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Gincy George
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Ricardo McEwen
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Janine Zylstra
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - William R. C. Knight
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Cara R. Baker
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Kelly
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Nyree Griffin
- Department of Radiology, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Naami McAddy
- Department of Radiology, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nick Maisey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy’s Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), King’s College London, London, UK
| | - James A. Gossage
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jesper Lagergren
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andrew R. Davies
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abdelhakeem A, Patnana M, Wang X, Rogers JE, Murphy MB, Sagebiel T, Ikoma N, Badgwell BD, Trail A, Estrella JS, Lu Y, Devine C, Ajani JA. Influence of Baseline Positron Emission Tomography in Metastatic Gastroesophageal Cancer on Survival and Response to Therapy. Oncology 2021; 99:659-664. [PMID: 34352788 DOI: 10.1159/000517842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The value of baseline fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) remains uncertain once gastroesophageal cancer is metastatic. We hypothesized that assessment of detailed PET-CT parameters (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] and/or total lesion glycolysis [TLG]), and the extent of metastatic burden could aid prediction of probability of response or prognosticate. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed treatment-naive patients with stage 4 gastroesophageal cancer (December 2002-August 2017) who had initial PET-CT for cancer staging at MD Anderson Cancer Center. SUVmax and TLG were compared with treatment outcomes for the full cohort and subgroups based on metastatic burden (≤2 or >2 metastatic sites). RESULTS We identified 129 patients with metastatic gastroesophageal cancer who underwent PET-CT before first-line therapy. The median follow-up time was 61 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.5 months; the first progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months. SUVmax or TLG of the primary tumor or of all metastases combined had no influence on OS or PFS, whether the number of metastases was ≤2 or >2. Overall response rates (ORRs) to first-line therapy were 48% and 45% for patients with ≤2 and >2 metastases, respectively (nonsignificant). ORR did not differ based on low or high values of SUVmax or TLG. CONCLUSIONS This is the first assessment of a unique set of PET-CT data and its association with outcomes in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. In our large cohort of patients, detailed analyses of PET-CT (by SUVmax and/or TLG) did not discriminate any parameters examined. Thus, baseline PET-CT in untreated metastatic gastroesophageal cancer patients has limited or no utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Abdelhakeem
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA,
| | - Madhavi Patnana
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Xuemei Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jane E Rogers
- Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mariela Blum Murphy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tara Sagebiel
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Brian D Badgwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Allison Trail
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeannelyn S Estrella
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yang Lu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Catherine Devine
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Manning MA, Shafa S, Mehrotra AK, Grenier RE, Levy AD. Role of Multimodality Imaging in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Its Complications, with Clinical and Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics 2021; 40:44-71. [PMID: 31917657 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020190029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition and impairs the quality of life for millions of patients, accounts for considerable health care spending, and is a primary risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. There have been substantial advances in understanding the pathogenesis of GERD and its complications and much progress in diagnosis and management of GERD; however, these have not been comprehensively discussed in the recent radiology literature. Understanding the role of imaging in GERD and its complications is important to aid in multidisciplinary treatment of GERD. GERD results from prolonged or recurrent reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. Common symptoms include heartburn or regurgitation. Prolonged reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus can cause erosive esophagitis. Over time, the inflammatory response related to esophagitis can lead to deposition of fibrous tissue and development of strictures. Alternatively, the esophageal mucosa can undergo metaplasia (Barrett esophagus), a precursor to dysplasia (which can lead to adenocarcinoma). Conventional barium esophagography has long been considered the primary imaging modality for the esophagus, and the fluoroscopic findings for diagnosis of GERD have been well established. Multimodality imaging has a clear role in detection and assessment of the complications of GERD, specifically reflux esophagitis and Barrett esophagus; differentiation of benign and malignant strictures; and detection, staging, and posttreatment surveillance of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Given the dramatic changes in utilization of abdominal imaging during the past 2 decades, with significantly declining volume of fluoroscopic procedures and concomitant increase in CT and MRI studies, it is crucial that modern radiologists appreciate the value of barium esophagography in the workup of GERD and recognize the key imaging features of GERD and its complications at CT and MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A Manning
- From the American Institute for Radiologic Pathology, 1100 Wayne Ave, Suite 1020, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (M.A.M.); Department of Radiology (M.A.M., A.D.L.) and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (S.S.), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; the Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (A.K.M.); and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC (R.E.G.)
| | - Shervin Shafa
- From the American Institute for Radiologic Pathology, 1100 Wayne Ave, Suite 1020, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (M.A.M.); Department of Radiology (M.A.M., A.D.L.) and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (S.S.), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; the Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (A.K.M.); and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC (R.E.G.)
| | - Anupamjit K Mehrotra
- From the American Institute for Radiologic Pathology, 1100 Wayne Ave, Suite 1020, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (M.A.M.); Department of Radiology (M.A.M., A.D.L.) and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (S.S.), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; the Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (A.K.M.); and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC (R.E.G.)
| | - Rachel E Grenier
- From the American Institute for Radiologic Pathology, 1100 Wayne Ave, Suite 1020, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (M.A.M.); Department of Radiology (M.A.M., A.D.L.) and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (S.S.), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; the Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (A.K.M.); and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC (R.E.G.)
| | - Angela D Levy
- From the American Institute for Radiologic Pathology, 1100 Wayne Ave, Suite 1020, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (M.A.M.); Department of Radiology (M.A.M., A.D.L.) and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (S.S.), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; the Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (A.K.M.); and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC (R.E.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The relationship between FDG PET/CT-defined metabolic parameters and the histopathological subtype of oesophageal carcinomas. Pol J Radiol 2020; 85:e254-e260. [PMID: 32612724 PMCID: PMC7315051 DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2020.95945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (CT) scan is accepted as a standard tool in the staging of oesophageal cancer (OC). Histological subtype of tumour is known to be a major determinant of prognosis and metabolic behaviour. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of histological subtypes of OC on standard uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) obtained by PET/CT, and also to compare this effect with prognosis. Material and methods Images and clinical course data of 57 patients who were diagnosed with EC and treated in our hospital between 2009 and 2016 were evaluated in a retrospective manner. PET/CT images were re-analysed in terms of metabolic parameters, and observations were compared with histological subtypes. Results No significant difference was observed between histological subtypes with SUVmax, overall survival (OS), or progression-free survival (PFS). Thus, MTV was observed to be related with histological subtype; MTV values of adenocancer patients were significantly higher than those of squamous cell cancer patients. Conclusions Metabolic tumour volume was related with histological subtype of OC, but clinical staging, TLG, and SUVmax values were not related with histological subtype, which may suggest the use of MTV as a routine parameter for OC and inclusion of MTV observations in prognostic scoring.
Collapse
|