1
|
Scholer AJ, Marcus RK, Garland-Kledzik M, Ghosh D, Ensenyat-Mendez M, Germany J, Santamaria-Barria JA, Khader A, Orozco JIJ, Goldfarb M. Exploring the Genomic Landscape of Hepatobiliary Cancers to Establish a Novel Molecular Classification System. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:325. [PMID: 38254814 PMCID: PMC10814719 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Taxonomy of hepatobiliary cancer (HBC) categorizes tumors by location or histopathology (tissue of origin, TO). Tumors originating from different TOs can also be grouped by overlapping genomic alterations (GA) into molecular subtypes (MS). The aim of this study was to create novel HBC MSs. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) data from the AACR-GENIE database were used to examine the genomic landscape of HBCs. Machine learning and gene enrichment analysis identified MSs and their oncogenomic pathways. Descriptive statistics were used to compare subtypes and their associations with clinical and molecular variables. Integrative analyses generated three MSs with different oncogenomic pathways independent of TO (n = 324; p < 0.05). HC-1 "hyper-mutated-proliferative state" MS had rapidly dividing cells susceptible to chemotherapy; HC-2 "adaptive stem cell-cellular senescence" MS had epigenomic alterations to evade immune system and treatment-resistant mechanisms; HC-3 "metabolic-stress pathway" MS had metabolic alterations. The discovery of HBC MSs is the initial step in cancer taxonomy evolution and the incorporation of genomic profiling into the TNM system. The goal is the development of a precision oncology machine learning algorithm to guide treatment planning and improve HBC outcomes. Future studies should validate findings of this study, incorporate clinical outcomes, and compare the MS classification to the AJCC 8th staging system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony J. Scholer
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC 29605, USA;
| | - Rebecca K. Marcus
- Department of Surgery, Saint John’s Cancer Institute at Providence St. John’s Health Center, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA; (R.K.M.); (J.I.J.O.); (M.G.)
| | - Mary Garland-Kledzik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA;
| | - Debopriya Ghosh
- Janssen Research and Development LLC, Early Development and Oncology, Biostatistics, Raritan, NJ 08869, USA;
| | - Miquel Ensenyat-Mendez
- Cancer Epigenetics Laboratory, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands, 07120 Palma, Spain;
| | - Joshua Germany
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC 29605, USA;
| | - Juan A. Santamaria-Barria
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68105, USA;
| | - Adam Khader
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Hunter Holmes McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA 23249, USA;
| | - Javier I. J. Orozco
- Department of Surgery, Saint John’s Cancer Institute at Providence St. John’s Health Center, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA; (R.K.M.); (J.I.J.O.); (M.G.)
| | - Melanie Goldfarb
- Department of Surgery, Saint John’s Cancer Institute at Providence St. John’s Health Center, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA; (R.K.M.); (J.I.J.O.); (M.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Trifylli EM, Kriebardis AG, Koustas E, Papadopoulos N, Vasileiadi S, Fortis SP, Tzounakas VL, Anastasiadi AT, Sarantis P, Papageorgiou EG, Tsagarakis A, Aloizos G, Manolakopoulos S, Deutsch M. The Arising Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Rundown of the Current Knowledge Regarding Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:15563. [PMID: 37958547 PMCID: PMC10649642 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242115563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs) constitute a heterogeneous group of highly malignant epithelial tumors arising from the biliary tree. This cluster of malignant tumors includes three distinct entities, the intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal CCAs, which are characterized by different epidemiological and molecular backgrounds, as well as prognosis and therapeutic approaches. The higher incidence of CCA over the last decades, the late diagnostic time that contributes to a high mortality and poor prognosis, as well as its chemoresistance, intensified the efforts of the scientific community for the development of novel diagnostic tools and therapeutic approaches. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) comprise highly heterogenic, multi-sized, membrane-enclosed nanostructures that are secreted by a large variety of cells via different routes of biogenesis. Their role in intercellular communication via their cargo that potentially contributes to disease development and progression, as well as their prospect as diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic tools, has become the focus of interest of several current studies for several diseases, including CCA. The aim of this review is to give a rundown of the current knowledge regarding the emerging role of EVs in cholangiocarcinogenesis and their future perspectives as diagnostic and therapeutic tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni-Myrto Trifylli
- Laboratory of Reliability and Quality Control in Laboratory Hematology (HemQcR), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Medical Laboratories, School of Health & Caring Sciences, University of West Attica (UniWA), Ag. Spyridonos Str., 12243 Egaleo, Greece; (E.-M.T.); (S.P.F.); (E.G.P.)
- First Department of Internal Medicine, 417 Army Share Fund Hospital, 11521 Athens, Greece;
- 2nd Academic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias Avenue Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (S.V.); (S.M.); (M.D.)
| | - Anastasios G. Kriebardis
- Laboratory of Reliability and Quality Control in Laboratory Hematology (HemQcR), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Medical Laboratories, School of Health & Caring Sciences, University of West Attica (UniWA), Ag. Spyridonos Str., 12243 Egaleo, Greece; (E.-M.T.); (S.P.F.); (E.G.P.)
| | - Evangelos Koustas
- Oncology Department, General Hospital Evangelismos, 10676 Athens, Greece;
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Nikolaos Papadopoulos
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, 401 General Military Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece;
| | - Sofia Vasileiadi
- 2nd Academic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias Avenue Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (S.V.); (S.M.); (M.D.)
| | - Sotirios P. Fortis
- Laboratory of Reliability and Quality Control in Laboratory Hematology (HemQcR), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Medical Laboratories, School of Health & Caring Sciences, University of West Attica (UniWA), Ag. Spyridonos Str., 12243 Egaleo, Greece; (E.-M.T.); (S.P.F.); (E.G.P.)
| | - Vassilis L. Tzounakas
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece; (V.L.T.); (A.T.A.)
| | - Alkmini T. Anastasiadi
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece; (V.L.T.); (A.T.A.)
| | - Panagiotis Sarantis
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Effie G. Papageorgiou
- Laboratory of Reliability and Quality Control in Laboratory Hematology (HemQcR), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Medical Laboratories, School of Health & Caring Sciences, University of West Attica (UniWA), Ag. Spyridonos Str., 12243 Egaleo, Greece; (E.-M.T.); (S.P.F.); (E.G.P.)
| | - Ariadne Tsagarakis
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA;
| | - Georgios Aloizos
- First Department of Internal Medicine, 417 Army Share Fund Hospital, 11521 Athens, Greece;
| | - Spilios Manolakopoulos
- 2nd Academic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias Avenue Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (S.V.); (S.M.); (M.D.)
| | - Melanie Deutsch
- 2nd Academic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, Vasilissis Sofias Avenue Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (S.V.); (S.M.); (M.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gao DJ, Yang JF, Ma SR, Wu J, Wang TT, Jin HB, Xia MX, Zhang YC, Shen HZ, Ye X, Zhang XF, Hu B. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus plastic stent placement versus stent placement alone for unresectable extrahepatic biliary cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94:91-100.e2. [PMID: 33359435 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS We sought to compare the efficacy and safety between endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and stent placement alone in patients with unresectable extrahepatic biliary cancer (EBC). METHODS In this randomized controlled trial, patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) or ampullary cancer who were unsuitable for surgery were recruited from 3 tertiary centers. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to RFA plus plastic stent placement (RFA group) or plastic stent placement alone (stent placement alone group) in a 1:1 ratio. Both groups underwent 2 scheduled interventions with an interval of approximately 3 months. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS Altogether, 174 participants completed the 2 index endoscopic interventions. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were noted between the 2 groups. The median OS was significantly higher in the RFA group (14.3 vs 9.2 months; hazard ratio, .488; 95% confidence interval, .351-.678; P < .001). A survival benefit was also shown in patients with CCA (13.3 vs 9.2 months; hazard ratio, .546; 95% confidence interval, .386-.771; P < .001). However, no significant between-group differences were found in jaundice control or stent patency duration. The postprocedural Karnofsky performance scores were significantly higher in the RFA group until 9 months (all P < .001). Adverse events were comparable between the 2 groups (27.6% vs 19.5%, P = .211), except for acute cholecystitis, which was more frequently observed in the RFA group (9 vs 0, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS Compared with stent placement alone, additional RFA may improve OS and quality of life of patients with inoperable primary EBC who do not undergo systemic treatments. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01844245.).
Collapse
|
4
|
Tawarungruang C, Khuntikeo N, Chamadol N, Laopaiboon V, Thuanman J, Thinkhamrop K, Kelly M, Thinkhamrop B. Survival after surgery among patients with cholangiocarcinoma in Northeast Thailand according to anatomical and morphological classification. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:497. [PMID: 33941120 PMCID: PMC8094526 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08247-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has been categorized based on tumor location as intrahepatic (ICCA), perihilar (PCCA) or distal (DCCA), and based on the morphology of the tumor of the bile duct as mass forming (MF), periductal infiltrating (PI) or intraductal (ID). To date, there is limited evidence available regarding the survival of CCA among these different anatomical and morphological classifications. This study aimed to evaluate the survival rate and median survival time after curative surgery among CCA patients according to their anatomical and morphological classifications, and to determine the association between these classifications and survival. METHODS This study included CCA patients who underwent curative surgery from the Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP), Northeast Thailand. The anatomical and morphological classifications were based on pathological findings after surgery. Survival rates of CCA and median survival time since the date of CCA surgery and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Multiple cox regression was performed to evaluate factors associated with survival which were quantified by hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% CIs. RESULTS Of the 746 CCA patients, 514 had died at the completion of the study which constituted 15,643.6 person-months of data recordings. The incidence rate was 3.3 per 100 patients per month (95% CI: 3.0-3.6), with median survival time of 17.8 months (95% CI: 15.4-20.2), and 5-year survival rate of 24.6% (95% CI: 20.7-28.6). The longest median survival time was 21.8 months (95% CI: 16.3-27.3) while the highest 5-year survival rate of 34.8% (95% CI: 23.8-46.0) occurred in the DCCA group. A combination of anatomical and morphological classifications, PCCA+ID, was associated with the longest median survival time of 40.5 months (95% CI: 17.9-63.0) and the highest 5-year survival rate of 42.6% (95% CI: 25.4-58.9). The ICCA+MF combination was associated with survival (adjusted HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.01-2.09; P = 0.013) compared to ICCA+ID patients. CONCLUSIONS Among patients receiving surgical treatment, those with PCCA+ID had the highest 5-year survival rate, which was higher than in groups classified by only anatomical characteristics. Additionally, the patients with ICCA+MF tended to have unfavorable surgical outcomes. Showed the highest survival association. Therefore, further investigations into CCA imaging should focus on patients with a combination of anatomical and morphological classifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaiwat Tawarungruang
- grid.9786.00000 0004 0470 0856Epidemiology and Biostatistics Program, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
- grid.9786.00000 0004 0470 0856Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP), Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
- grid.9786.00000 0004 0470 0856Data Management and Statistical Analysis Center (DAMASAC), Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Narong Khuntikeo
- grid.9786.00000 0004 0470 0856Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP), Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
- Cholangiocarcinoma Research Institute (CARI), Khon Kaen, Thailand
- grid.9786.00000 0004 0470 0856Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Nittaya Chamadol
- grid.9786.00000 0004 0470 0856Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP), Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
- Cholangiocarcinoma Research Institute (CARI), Khon Kaen, Thailand
- grid.9786.00000 0004 0470 0856Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Vallop Laopaiboon
- grid.9786.00000 0004 0470 0856Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Jaruwan Thuanman
- grid.9786.00000 0004 0470 0856Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP), Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
- grid.9786.00000 0004 0470 0856Data Management and Statistical Analysis Center (DAMASAC), Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Kavin Thinkhamrop
- Cholangiocarcinoma Research Institute (CARI), Khon Kaen, Thailand
- grid.9786.00000 0004 0470 0856Health and Epidemiology Geoinformatics Research (HEGER), Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Matthew Kelly
- grid.1001.00000 0001 2180 7477Department of Global Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Bandit Thinkhamrop
- grid.9786.00000 0004 0470 0856Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP), Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
- grid.9786.00000 0004 0470 0856Data Management and Statistical Analysis Center (DAMASAC), Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
- grid.9786.00000 0004 0470 0856Epidemiology and Biostatistics Section, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002 Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liao P, Cao L, Chen H, Pang SZ. Analysis of metastasis and survival between extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A large population-based study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e25635. [PMID: 33879742 PMCID: PMC8078350 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000025635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
To date, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECCA) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) have rarely been compared; therefore, we attempted to learn more about the rates of metastasis and survival in both ICCA and ECCA.Data of patients in the SEER database diagnosed with ICCA or ECCA were extracted to analyse the rate of metastasis and survival. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for metastasis. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare survival rates between ECCA and ICCA.Data from a total of 15,751 patients diagnosed with ICCA or ECCA were extracted to analyse the rate of metastasis. Metastasis was more common in ECCA than ICCA (42.62% vs. 31.46%, P < .05), while ICCA in the T1 stage had a lower rate of metastasis (25.35% vs. 30.61%, P < .05). Age, pathology grade, tumour size, lymph node metastasis and T stage were independent risk factors for metastasis in both ECCA and ICCA. There was an inverse correlation between age and metastasis in both ICCA and ECCA. Moreover, PSM demonstrated that patients with ECCA had a better prognosis than patients with ICCA. Patients with ICCA in the T1 stage had better survival than those with ECCA in the T1 stage.Our study was the first to compare the rates of metastasis and survival between ECCA and ICCA. We observed an inverse association between age and metastasis, that patients with ECCA had a better prognosis than patients with ICCA, and that patients with ECCA in the T1 stage had worse survival than patients with ICCA in the T1 stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Liao
- Department of Integration of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine and Anorectum, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
| | - Li Cao
- Department of Integration of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine and Anorectum, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
| | - Hang Chen
- Department of Day-Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
| | - Shui-Zi Pang
- Department of Infection Prevention and Control, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Qin H, Hu X, Zhang J, Dai H, He Y, Zhao Z, Yang J, Xu Z, Hu X, Chen Z. Machine-learning radiomics to predict early recurrence in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection. Liver Int 2021; 41:837-850. [PMID: 33306240 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Up to 40%-65% of patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) rapidly progress to early recurrence (ER) even after curative resection. Quantification of ER risk is difficult and a reliable prognostic prediction tool is absent. We developed and validated a multilevel model, integrating clinicopathology, molecular pathology and radiology, especially radiomics coupled with machine-learning algorithms, to predict the ER of patients after curative resection in PHC. METHODS In total, 274 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and curative resection at 2 institutions were retrospectively identified and randomly divided into training (n = 167), internal validation (n = 70) and external validation (n = 37) sets. A machine-learning analysis of 18,120 radiomic features based on multiphase CECT and 48 clinico-radiologic characteristics was performed for the multilevel model. RESULTS Comprehensively, 7 independent factors (tumour differentiation, lymph node metastasis, pre-operative CA19-9 level, enhancement pattern, A-Shrink score, V-Shrink score and P-Shrink score) were built to the multilevel model and quantified the risk of ER. We benchmarked the gain in discrimination with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.883, superior to the rival clinical and radiomic models (AUCs 0.792-0.805). The accuracy (ACC) of the multilevel model was 0.826, which was significantly higher than those of the conventional staging systems (AJCC 8th (0.641), MSKCC (0.617) and Gazzaniga (0.581)). CONCLUSION The radiomics-based multilevel model demonstrated superior performance to rival models and conventional staging systems, and could serve as a visual prognostic tool to plan surveillance of ER and guide post-operative individualized management in PHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Qin
- Institute of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Xianling Hu
- Communication NCO Academy, Army Engineering University of PLA, Chongqing, China
| | - Junfeng Zhang
- Institute of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, China
| | - Haisu Dai
- Institute of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Yonggang He
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Zhiping Zhao
- Institute of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Jiali Yang
- Institute of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Zhengrong Xu
- Institute of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Xiaofei Hu
- Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Zhiyu Chen
- Institute of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) include a diverse collection of rare and heterogenous tumors with poor prognosis. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is the established first-line therapy for advanced BTC. There are no accepted standard treatments in the second line setting, though there are several ongoing clinical trials that implement chemotherapy as a therapeutic strategy. The understanding of the molecular landscape of BTC has offered hope of targeted therapies to the identified actionable genomic aberrations, such as FGFR2 gene fusions, mutations of IDH1/2, HER2, BRAC1/2 and BRAF. Pembigatinib has become the first approved targeted therapy for BTC with FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangements. Recent immunotherapy has opened new therapy avenues in BTC with pembrolizumab approved for either microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) or DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) advanced solid tumors, including BTC. The combination of immunotherapy with other modalities is currently being evaluated in different clinical trials, since single agent immunotherapy appears to provide modest benefits in advanced BTC. In this review, we summarize the current status of treatment options, including systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and various combinations in advanced BTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changqing Xie
- Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Nicole A McGrath
- Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Cecilia Monge Bonilla
- Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jianyang Fu
- Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher T Aquina
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang J, Huang Z, Cao L, Zhang Z, Wei Y, Zhang X, Song B. Differentiation combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on radiomics machine learning. Ann Transl Med 2020; 8:119. [PMID: 32175412 PMCID: PMC7049063 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are hard to identify in clinical practice preoperatively. This study looked to develop and confirm a radiomics-based model for preoperative differentiation CHC from ICC. METHODS The model was developed in 86 patients with ICC and 46 CHC, confirmed in 37 ICC and 20 CHC, and data were collected from January 2014 to December 2018. The radiomics scores (Radscores) were built from radiomics features of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in 12 regions of interest (ROI). The Radscore and clinical-radiologic factors were integrated into the combined model using multivariable logistic regression. The best-combined model constructed the radiomics-based nomogram, and the performance was assessed concerning its calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. RESULTS The radiomics features extracted from tumor ROI in the arterial phase (AP) with preprocessing were selected to build Radscore and yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.800 and 0.789 in training and validation cohorts, respectively. The radiomics-based model contained Radscore and 4 clinical-radiologic factors showed the best performance (training cohort, AUC =0.942; validation cohort, AUC =0.942) and good calibration (training cohort, AUC =0.935; validation cohort, AUC =0.931). CONCLUSIONS The proposed radiomics-based model may be used conveniently to the preoperatively differentiate CHC from ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Zhang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Zixing Huang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Likun Cao
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Dongdan Campus), Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yi Wei
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Xin Zhang
- Pharmaceutical Diagnostic team, GE Healthcare, Life Sciences, Beijing 100176, China
| | - Bin Song
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|