Thrombectomy approach for access maintenance in the end stage renal disease population: a narrative review

Efficiency of the Viabahn® Covered Stent-Graft as Salvage Treatment for Failing Hemodialysis Accesses

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of covered stent grafts (CSG) and in particular the Viabahn® CSG for arteriovenous access (AVA) salvage.

METHODS

A retrospective data review of all patients treated with Viabahn® CSG placement for dysfunctional access between September 2018 and October 2024 in two hospital centers was performed. The primary outcome measured was the functional patency at three months. Secondary outcomes included technical success, mid-term patency rates, major complications, need and type for reinterventions and overall patient mortality.

RESULTS

We included 73 patients (53% males) in this study with a mean age of 65 ±14 years. Access salvage and functional patency after placement of a Viabahn® CSG was achieved for 94% of patients at three months. During the median follow-up of 28 months (range: 3-80 months), the primary patency rates were 76%, 51% and 48%, and the secondary patency rates were 100%, 100% and 95% at 6 months, 12 months and 18 months respectively. A total of 15 patients developed clinically significant stent restenosis requiring at least one additional procedure, 14 patients had acute access thrombosis requiring thrombectomy and PTA, with involvement of the Viabahn® CSG in 6 cases. Overall access patency rate and access loss were overall survival rate were respectively Access loss occurred in 5 patients, and 7 patients died from other causes.

CONCLUSION

The use of the Viabahn® stent-graft was associated with excellent technical success and a favorable long-term profile in terms of assisted-secondary patency. The device demonstrated sustained effectiveness over time, with no major adverse events such as stent migration, infection, or death, underscoring its high safety and reliability. These findings support the Viabahn® as a highly effective and safe therapeutic option. However, larger prospective multicenter studies with extended follow-up are warranted to further validate these outcomes.

Rotational thrombectomy versus balloon maceration in dialysis access salvage

BACKGROUND

Although end stage renal disease patients who undergo hemodialysis frequently experience dialysis-associated thrombotic complications, there remains a paucity of literature comparing the efficacy of different endovascular salvage techniques for grafts and fistulas. This study aims to compare primary patency in dialysis access following salvage mechanical thrombolysis/thrombectomy with a rotational thrombolysis device versus balloon maceration.

METHODS

Using a database of patient records at a tertiary medical center, all patients who underwent rotational thrombectomy with the Cleaner XT™ Rotational Thrombectomy System for endovascular salvage of arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft from August 2016 to July 2022 were included in the population. Fourteen patients who underwent balloon maceration for endovascular salvage were matched to the patients in the rotational thrombectomy group based on date of procedure. The primary patency of the fistula or graft for the two groups was measured.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients who underwent dialysis access salvage with rotational thrombectomy (10 grafts, 3 fistulas) were matched with 14 patients who underwent balloon maceration for dialysis access salvage (10 grafts, 4 fistulas). Six patients in both groups required additional graft access salvage (46% rotational thrombectomy; 43% balloon maceration). The median time to next dialysis salvage was 51 days for rotational thrombectomy and 43.5 days for balloon maceration (W + 9, critical value 1; compatible with statistically significant difference).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular access salvage by rotational thrombectomy may provide longer primary patency compared to salvage by balloon maceration. However, a longer follow-up prospective study of a larger study population is necessary to clarify the safety and efficacy of rotational thrombectomy using the Cleaner XT™ device.

Comparison of the efficacy of drug-coated balloon angioplasty and conventional balloon angioplasty in the endovascular treatment of thrombosed arteriovenous dialysis fistulas

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty in the treatment of thrombosed arteriovenous fistulas.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, controlled study investigated the use of drug-eluting balloons in the treatment of the thrombosis of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) at our center between January 2018 and January 2023. A total of 246 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 61.3 ± 11.5 years. Of the patients, 150 (61%) were male and 96 (39%) were female. Angioplasty was performed using a plain balloon (PB) in 126 patients (51.2%) and a drug-coated balloon (DCB) in 120 (48.8%). The control images of the patients were obtained at the sixth and 12th months. Patency was evaluated during the follow-up.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, fistula location, or stenosis length. No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding the number of complications observed during and after the procedure. At the end of the sixth month, the patency rate was found to be 86.7% in the DCB group and 78.6% in the PB group. The 12th-month patency rate was 77.5% in the DCB group and 57.9% in the PB group. A significant difference was detected between the two groups in relation to the 6th- and 12th-month patency rates (p = 0.034 and p = 0.046, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Drug-coated balloon angioplasty is an effective approach to the treatment of thrombosed AVFs, especially in terms of prolonging primary patency and reducing the need for secondary procedures.

Outcomes of early cannulation arteriovenous graft versus PTFE arteriovenous graft in hemodialysis patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Arteriovenous graft (AVG) is an alternative for hemodialysis (HD) patients with end-stage renal disease when their permanent vascular accesses fail. Since the last decades, the most widely used materials in these patients have been polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-AVGs. Recently, several studies have reported that early cannulation (EC)-AVG can be an alternative to PTFE-AVG. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of EC-AVG and PTFE-AVG in HD patients. We searched the Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for the relevant studies published from 01.01.2000 to 19.12.2022 by keywords and free words. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies comparing EC-AVG with PTFE-AVG were included. Ten studies were included in analysis: one RCT, six retrospective cohort studies, and three prospective cohort studies. The results showed shorter cannulation intervals (four studies, 1116 participants: mean difference -23.62 days, 95% CI [-32.03, -15.21], p < 0.05) and less central venous catheter (CVC) usage (four studies, 733 participants: OR 0.20, 95% CI [0.04, 0.92], p < 0.05) for EC-AVG compared with PTFE-AVG, while comparable outcomes of primary patency (eight studies, 1712 participants: HR 0.89, 95% CI [0.70, 1.12]), primary assisted patency (five studies, 1355 participants: HR 1.13, 95% CI [0.70, 1.84]), secondary patency (nine studies, 1920 participants: HR 0.93, 95% CI [0.66, 1.31]), and infection risk (four studies, 640 participants: HR 1.12, 95% CI [0.48, 2.58]). When compared to PTFE-AVG in HD patients, EC-AVG seems to exhibit shorter cannulation intervals, less CVC usage, and comparable outcomes of graft patency, and infection risk.

Recurrent thrombosis and patency of the arteriovenous access in patients receiving hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Thrombosis of the vascular access in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis are common and require timely interventional procedures to restore patency. The aim of the current study was to identify factors having a significant effect on patency rates after access thrombosis. Our hypothesis was the length of time between the initial clotting of the access and the subsequent percutaneous declotting impacts the patency rates of the vascular access.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients with a clotted arteriovenous access between Jan 1, 2011, and Jan 1, 2016, were included. Demographics, access history, and associated details of the access procedure were reviewed from the electronic medical record. Statistical analysis was done using t-test and chi-square or fisher exact tests to compare arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) and arteriovenous grafts (AVG). Primary patency, defined as the time from index procedure to endpoint, was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test.

RESULTS

There were 883 percutaneous declotting procedures reviewed. About 351 procedures were performed in patients with an AVF and 532 with an AVG. The mean time from thrombosis to declotting was 1.71 ± 2.29 days. The overall median primary patency for both AVF and AVG was 43 days with no difference in patency between patients with AVF (39 days) versus AVG (42 days; p = 0.385). The time period from access thrombosis to declotting did not affect patency rates for either AVG or AVF (p = 0.385). On multivariable analysis, prior intervention (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.14-1.53, p < 0.001) and cardiovascular disease (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03-1.37, p = 0.016) were independently associated with access patency.

CONCLUSIONS

Time from thrombosis to declotting did not affect patency rates however once there was a thrombotic event, recurrent thrombosis requiring intervention was common with patency significantly decreased. Future prospective studies to validate our results and study pathogenic mechanisms of recurrent thrombosis are warranted.

Restoring Access in a Thrombosed Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow Graft Using the InThrill Thrombectomy System

Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) provide vascular access for hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, vascular access thrombosis often occurs, requiring frequent reinterventions to maintain access patency. This report describes the successful use of the InThrill Thrombectomy System (Irvine, CA: Inari Medical) for macerating and removing thrombus from an occluded and heavily thrombosed AVG. A 47-year-old male was sent to our institute for a thrombosed right upper extremity arteriovenous access with a HeRO graft (South Jordan, UT: Merit Medical). The patient underwent interventions for the thrombosis of the same AVG two weeks prior using an Aspirex catheter (Franklin Lakes, NJ: BD Medical), and again two days prior with a Fogarty balloon catheter (Irvine, CA: Edwards Lifesciences). The patient presented with a recurrent completely occluded AVG. Using the InThrill Thrombectomy System and balloon angioplasty, the stenosis was reduced to less than 20%, resulting in brisk flow. The patient tolerated the procedure well without complication and recovered in the holding area with no acute distress. He was discharged the same day on anticoagulation therapy. This study highlights the successful use of the InThrill Thrombectomy System for the treatment of thrombosed AVG in a hemodialysis-dependent ESRD patient. The device was easy to use and efficient. Device and procedure times are unparalleled when compared with thrombolytic-based procedures. The patient's AVG remained patent at a 14-day follow-up.

Management of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with distal involvement

Endovascular treatment of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IF DVT) can become more complex when thrombus extends below the knee. This article discusses various techniques that can be used to treat IF DVT with distal involvement.

Efficacy of cutting balloon angioplasty versus high-pressure balloon angioplasty for the treatment of arteriovenous fistula stenoses in patients undergoing hemodialysis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess and compare the therapeutic outcomes of cutting balloon angioplasty and high-pressure balloon angioplasty for arteriovenous fistula stenosis in hemodialysis patients. All studies indexed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Web of Science were retrieved. The retrieval deadline was July 15, 2023. Risk of bias 2.0 was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Revman 5.4 software was used for data analysis. This review included three studies and 180 patients, with 90 patients in the cutting balloon angioplasty group and 90 patients in the high-pressure balloon angioplasty group. The results of the meta-analysis suggested that compared with high-pressure balloon angioplasty, cutting balloon angioplasty can improve primary lesion patency rates of internal arteriovenous fistulas at 6 months (relative risk, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.96; P = 0.01). However, there were no significant differences between the technical success rate (relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.05; P = 0.72) and clinical success rate (relative risk, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.07; P = 0.73). Therefore, cutting balloon angioplasty is likely to increase primary lesion patency rates at 6 months. However, more high-quality, large-sample, multicenter, randomized controlled trials are needed for further validation due to the limited number of included studies.