Single-incision robotic adrenalectomy (SIRA): the future of adrenal surgery?

Exploring the Benefits of a Reduced-Port Approach in Robotic Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy: A Comparative Study of the Two-Port and Three-Port Techniques

Background: Robotic adrenalectomy has become a surgical treatment option for benign and selected malignant adrenal diseases. We aimed to evaluate the eligibility of two-port robotic posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) as an alternative to the conventional three-port technique by comparing their surgical outcomes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared the clinicopathological factors and surgical outcomes among 197 patients who underwent two-port or three-port robotic adrenalectomy between 2016 and 2020 in a single tertiary center. For further evaluation, propensity score matching was performed to reduce the selection bias in population characteristics. Results: Patients were categorized by the number of ports (two-port group, 87; and three-port group, 110). The two-port group compared with the three-port group was significantly older (P = .006) and had a smaller mean tumor size (P = .003) and shorter mean operation time (P = .001). Upon comparing clinicopathologic characteristics according to adrenal disorders, for pheochromocytoma, the three-port group had a larger tumor size and a longer operation time. For Cushing's syndrome, the operation time was short and numeric rating scale pain score was significantly low in the two-port group. After propensity score matching, the two-port group had a short operation time and a significantly low postoperative pain score (P < .05). Predictive factors associated with prolonged operation time included male gender, an increased number of ports, and large tumor size. Conclusions: The two-port technique resulted in a shorter operation time and lower pain score compared with the three-port technique. The two-port technique may be a safe alternative to the conventional three-port technique for robotic PRA.

Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic and Robotic Transperitoneal Adrenalectomy Performed at a Single Institution

Background and Objectives: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the standard surgical approach for adrenalectomy. At present, robotic adrenalectomy (RA) has been introduced at various hospitals. This study evaluated our initial experience with robotic adrenalectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Materials and Methods: From October 2018 to March 2022, 56 adrenalectomies were performed by a single endocrine surgeon. Thirty-two patients underwent LA (LA group), and twenty-four patients underwent RA (RA group). Results: Patients in the RA group were significantly younger than those in the LA group (48.6 ± 9.7 years vs. 55.1 ± 11.4 years, p = 0.013). The RA group had a shorter operation time than the LA group (76.1 ± 28.2 min vs. 118.0 ± 54.3 min, p < 0.001). The length of hospital stay and postoperative pain level between the two groups were similar. There were no complications in the RA group. There was no significant difference in the pathologic diagnosis between the two groups. The cost of surgery was significantly higher in the RA group than in the LA group (5288.5 US dollars vs. 441.5 ± 136.8 US dollars, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In our initial experience, RA showed a shorter operation time than LA and no complications. RA could be a viable alternative surgical option for adrenalectomy, notwithstanding its higher cost.

[Minimally invasive techniques in adrenal gland surgery]

Today, adrenalectomy can be performed by a variety of laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic approaches. Of particular importance are the lateral transperitoneal and the posterior retroperitoneoscopic access routes. Comparative studies of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal procedures still demonstrate heterogeneous results. Nevertheless, retroperitoneal access techniques seem to enable less postoperative pain and a faster recovery. Robotic procedures are gaining in popularity but the final importance cannot yet be determined. All minimally invasive techniques are considered to be so safe and reliable that open approaches are only justified in exceptional cases.

Robotic Adrenalectomy Using the da Vinci SP Robotic System: Technical Feasibility Comparison with Single-Port Access Using the da Vinci Multi-arm Robotic System

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the gold standard for adrenal tumor; however, robotic adrenal surgery has gained interest recently. For minimally invasive surgeries, we first reported on robotic adrenalectomy using a single-port access performed using the da Vinci multi-arm robotic system (RA-SA) in 2011. Since its introduction in 2018, we first performed robotic adrenalectomy using the da Vinci SP robotic system in 2020.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to introduce the novel single-port robotic system (RA-SP) for adrenalectomy and evaluate its technical feasibility by comparing it with the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent robotic adrenalectomy using the RA-SA.

METHODS

Eight patients who underwent robotic adrenalectomy using the RA-SP from February 2020 to June 2021 were compared with 11 patients who underwent RA-SA from 2011 to 2015 by a single surgeon.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in age, sex, body mass index, type of operation, and final pathologic diagnosis. Despite no significant differences, RA-SP resulted in moderately less mean operation time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The Da Vinci SP robotic system is a novel, safe, and feasible technique to improve the convenience of operation and cosmetic effect for adrenalectomy.