Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy: review of a single surgeon's consecutive 317 cases

Efficacy and Safety of Robotic Bilateral Axillo-Breast Approach Versus Robotic Gasless Axillary Approach for Thyroidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of robotic thyroidectomy techniques, including the robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) and the robotic gasless axillary approach (GAA).

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across 5 major electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) to identify relevant studies published until May 2024.

REVIEW METHODS

Analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software with pooled mean and rate ratios calculated with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

A total of 73 studies, comprising 70 eligible for meta-analysis, were included. Compared with robotic GAA, robotic BABA was associated with significantly longer operative time (pooled mean: 64.65 min, 95% CI: 51.77-77.53, P<0.00001), increased hospital stay (pooled mean: 1.24 d, 95% CI: 0.92-1.56, P<0.00001), and higher intraoperative bleeding (pooled mean: 44.90 mL, 95% CI: 26.99-62.81, P<0.00001). While no significant differences were observed in the rates of hypoparathyroidism, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, chyle leakage, seroma, hematoma, or infection, the incidence of Horner syndrome was significantly higher in the BABA group (pooled risk ratio: 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.05, P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic BABA was associated with longer operative times, increased hospital stays, and higher intraoperative bleeding compared with Robotic GAA, although both techniques demonstrated comparable safety profiles for most outcomes. The higher incidence of Horner syndrome with BABA should be considered when selecting the optimal surgical approach for thyroidectomy.

Robotic Revolution in Thyroid Surgery: An Umbrella Review of Clinical Outcomes

Objective

This umbrella review aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted thyroid surgery compared to traditional endoscopic and open surgical approaches.

Data Sources

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database through August 2024.

Review Methods

We conducted a comprehensive analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses that compare robotic-assisted thyroid surgery with endoscopic or open methods. The primary outcomes assessed include surgical efficiency indicators, general postoperative complications, specific complications (nerve and endocrine), postoperative recovery and patient experience, and recurrence and long-term prognosis. The methodological quality of the included reviews was assessed using the AMSTAR2 tool.

Results

Of the 1987 articles retrieved, 21 were eligible. Robotic surgery, though associated with longer operative times, offers distinct advantages in terms of precision. Although robotic surgery shows some variation in central lymph node dissection and an increase in postoperative drainage, its safety is comparable to both open and endoscopic techniques. Additionally, robotic surgery demonstrates superior cosmetic outcomes and shorter hospital stays from multiple approaches, though its high costs remain a significant factor. In terms of recurrence and survival rates, no significant differences were observed between robotic and open surgery.

Conclusion

Robotic surgery choices should balance benefits, costs, and patient needs. As technology and skills improve, efficiency and cost-effectiveness may increase, expanding its clinical role.

Parathyroid carcinoma: New insights

Parathyroid carcinoma (PC) is a rare malignancy, comprising 1 % of all cases of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). This narrative review explores recent advances in PC management, with a focus on molecular insights, diagnostic advancements, surgical innovations, and emerging targeted therapies. Manuscripts published between 2023 and 2024 were obtained from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The review highlights advances in biochemical markers, such as circulating tumour cells (CTCs), and imaging modalities such as 18F-FDG PET/CT and 4D-CT, which are improving diagnostic accuracy. Surgical resection remains central to localised and metastatic disease management. For patients with widespread metastatic or unresectable disease, newer targeted approaches such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), temozolomide, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may offer clinical benefit to specific patient cohorts. This review identifies future research areas to improve outcomes and recommends that patients with advanced PC continue to be managed in centres of excellence.

Comparison of learning curves and related postoperative indicators between endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET) and robotic thyroidectomy (RT) yield similar perioperative outcomes. This study investigated how the learning curve (LC) affects perioperative outcomes between ET and RT, identifying factors that influence the LC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two researchers individually searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for relevant studies published until February 2024. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed study quality. A random-effects model was used to compute the odds ratio and weighted mean difference (WMD). Poisson regression comparison of the number of surgeries (N LC ) was required for ET and RT to reach the stable stage of the LC. Heterogeneity was measured using Cochran's Q. Publication bias was tested using funnel plots, and sensitivity analysis assessed findings robustness. Subgroup analysis was done by operation type and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis involved 33 studies. The drainage volume of ET was higher than that of RT (WMD=-17.56 [30.22, -4.49]). After reaching the N LC , the operation time of ET and RT was shortened (ET: WMD=28.15 [18.04-38.26]; RT: WMD=38.53 [29.20-47.86]). Other perioperative outcomes also improved to varying degrees. Notably, RT showed more refined central lymph node resection (5.67 vs. 4.71), less intraoperative bleeding (16.56 ml vs. 42.30 ml), and incidence of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (24.59 vs. 26.77). The N LC of RT was smaller than that of ET (incidence-rate ratios [IRR]=0.64 [0.57-0.72]). CUSUM analysis (ET: IRR=0.84 [0.72-0.99]; RT: IRR=0.55 [0.44-0.69]) or a smaller number of respondents (ET: IRR=0.26 [0.15-0.46]; RT: IRR=0.51 [0.41-0.63]) was associated with smaller N LC . In RT, transoral approach (IRR=2.73 [1.96-4.50]; IRR=2.48 [1.61-3.84]) and retroauricular approach (RAA) (IRR=2.13 [1.26-3.60]; IRR=1.78 [1.04-3.05]) had smaller N LC compared to bilateral axillo-breast and transaxillary approach (TAA). In ET, the N LC of RAA was smaller than that of TAA (IRR=1.61 [1.04-2.51]), breast approach (IRR=1.67 [1.06-2.64]), and subclavian approach (IRR=1.80 [1.03-3.14]).

CONCLUSIONS

Rich surgical experience can improve surgical results of ET and RT. After reaching the N LC , the perioperative outcomes of RT are better than those of ET. Study subjects, surgical approaches, and analysis methods can affect N LC .

Review of Surgical Interventions in the Thyroid Gland: Recent Advances and Current Considerations

The thyroid gland, located at the base of the neck, regulates metabolism and hormone balance through hormones like T4 and T3, which are essential for growth, neurological development, and energy production. Thyroid diseases affect 10% of the global population, making accurate and up-to-date information on surgical interventions and advancements crucial for improving clinical outcomes. Thyroid gland surgery is a dynamic field that has experienced remarkable advances in diagnosis, surgical techniques, and postoperative management. These include new advances in surgical techniques that improve precision, reduce surgical trauma, and speed up patient recovery, identification of biomarkers, and understanding of the molecular characteristics of tumors that allow for more targeted therapeutic strategies, and incorporation of advanced technologies that improve diagnostic accuracy and efficacy. This review aims to guide healthcare professionals and lay the groundwork for future research and innovative treatments in thyroid surgery.

Transoral robotic thyroidectomy: Lessons learned from consecutive series of 1,000 patients

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic thyroidectomy has gained popularity as a promising approach for thyroid surgery owing to its improved cosmetic outcomes. The objective of this retrospective study was to describe the surgical and safety outcomes of 1,000 consecutive transoral robotic thyroidectomy cases.

METHODS

1,000 consecutive patients who underwent transoral robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid disease were reviewed at a large metropolitan tertiary hospital (Seoul, Korea) between September 2012 and March 2022.

RESULTS

The study comprised 1,000 patients (815 women), with 891 cancer cases. Lobectomy was the most common procedure (89.4%), followed by total thyroidectomy (9.8%) and isthmusectomy (0.8%), and their respective mean total operative times were 173.8 ± 36.2, 236.8 ± 50.5, and 107.5 ± 19.8 minutes. An obvious learning curve was noted. The respective postoperative pain scores on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2 were 4.6 ± 1.3, 3.1 ± 0.8, and 2.5 ± 0.8. The mean postoperative hospital stay duration was 2.6 ± 0.9 days. Complications occurred in 3.6% of cases, including oral wound infection, skin flap burn, bleeding, chyle leakage, transient and permanent mental nerve injury, and transient and permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Transient hypoparathyroidism occurred in 4.1% of total thyroidectomy cases. Thirty-seven patients (4.2%) underwent additional radioactive iodine therapy. The median follow-up period was 39 months, and there were no cases of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the expertise of an experienced surgeon, transoral robotic thyroidectomy results in favorable cosmetic outcomes, tolerable postoperative pain, and acceptable complication rates in carefully selected patients.

Detailed analysis of learning phases and outcomes in robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy

BACKGROUND

Thyroid surgery has undergone significant transformation with the introduction of minimally invasive techniques, particularly robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy. These advancements offer improved precision and faster recovery but also present unique challenges. This study aims to compare the learning curves, operational efficiencies, and patient outcomes of robotic versus endoscopic thyroidectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, analyzing 258 robotic (da Vinci) and 214 endoscopic thyroidectomy cases. Key metrics such as operation duration, drainage volume, lymph node dissection outcomes, and hypoparathyroidism incidence were assessed to understand surgical learning curves and efficiency.

RESULTS

Robotic thyroidectomy showed a longer learning curve with initially longer operation times and higher drainage volumes but superior lymph node dissection outcomes. Both techniques were safe, with no permanent hypoparathyroidism or recurrent laryngeal nerve damage reported. The study delineated four distinct stages in the robotic and endoscopic surgery learning curve, each marked by specific improvements in proficiency. Endoscopic thyroidectomy displayed a shorter learning curve, leading to quicker operational efficiency gains.

CONCLUSION

Robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomies are viable minimally invasive approaches, each with its learning curves and efficiency metrics. Despite initial challenges and a longer learning period for robotic surgery, its benefits in complex dissections may justify specialized training. Structured training programs tailored to each technique are crucial for improving outcomes and efficiency. Future research should focus on optimizing training protocols and increasing accessibility to these technologies, enhancing patient care in thyroid surgery.

Current and Future of Robotic Surgery in Thyroid Cancer Treatment

Thyroid cancer is among the most common endocrine malignancies, necessitating effective surgical interventions. Traditional open cervicotomy has long been the standard approach for thyroidectomy. However, the advent of robotic surgery has introduced new possibilities for minimally invasive procedures with benefits in terms of cosmetic outcomes, enhanced precision, comparable complication rates, and reduced recovery time. This study mainly reviewed the most widely used and well-known robotic thyroidectomy approaches: the transaxillary approach, the bilateral axillo-breast approach, and the transoral approach. This review examines the current status and future potential of robotic surgery in thyroid cancer treatment, comparing its efficacy, safety, and outcomes with those of conventional open cervicotomy. Challenges such as a longer operative time and higher costs exist. Future directions include technological advancements, tele-surgery, single-port surgery, and the integration of artificial intelligence. Robotic surgery holds promise in optimizing patient outcomes in thyroid cancer treatment.

Robotic Surgery for Head and Neck Tumors: What are the Current Applications?

BACKGROUND

The journey from radical treatments to the precision of robotic surgery underscores a commitment to innovation and patient-centered care in the field of head and neck oncology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides a comprehensive overview that not only informs but also stimulates ongoing discourse and investigation into the optimization of patient care through robotic surgery. The literature on current robotic applications within head and neck region was systematically reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Thirty-four studies with a total of 1835 patients undergoing robotic surgery in head and neck region were included. Clinical staging, histological types, operative duration, postoperative complications, functional recovery and survival outcomes were compared and evaluated. Clinical outcomes have shown promising results and thus the indication on the robotic usage has no longer been limited to oropharyngeal region but from skull base to neck dissection. The latest advancement in robotic surgery further refines the capabilities of surgeons into previously difficult-to-access head and neck regions and heralds a new era of surgical treatment for head and neck oncology.

Defining competencies in robotic thyroidectomy: development of a model assessing an expert operator's intraoperative performance skills and cognitive strategies

Background

The changing medical education environment emphasizes the need for time efficiency, increasing the demand for competency-based medical education to improve trainees' learning strategies. This study was performed to determine the competencies required for successful performance of robotic thyroidectomy (RT) and to determine the consensus of experts for performance of RT.

Methods

Data were collected through 12 semi-structured interviews with RT experts and 11 field observations. Cognitive task analysis was performed to determine the competencies required for experts to perform RT. A modified Delphi methodology was used to determine how 20 experts rated the importance of each item of RT performance on a Likert 7-point scale. The criteria for the Delphi consensus were set at a Cronbach's α≥0.80 with two survey rounds.

Results

After 11 field observations and 12 semi-structured interviews, 89 items were identified within six modules. These items were grouped into sub-modules according to their theme. The modified Delphi survey, involving 21 experts, reached the consensus standard during the second round (Cronbach's α=0.954), enabling the identification of the 64 most important items within six modules related to RT performance: midline incision to isthmectomy (MID module; n=8), lateral dissection (LAT module; n=7), preservation of inferior parathyroid glands (INF module; n=16), preservation of recurrent laryngeal nerve and dissection of the ligament of Berry (BER module; n=21), dissection of the thyroid upper pole (SUP module; n=10), and specimen removal and closure (END module; n=2).

Conclusions

This mixed-method study combining qualitative and quantitative methodology identified modules of core competencies required to perform RT. These modules can be used as a standard and objective guide to train surgeons to perform RT and evaluate outcomes.

Definition of learning curve for thyroidectomy: systematic review on the different approaches

Background

Thyroidectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures carried out worldwide and it has evolved in recent years with alternative approaches. With the advent of minimally invasive techniques, the learning curve (LC) concept has become a fundamental "dogma".

Methods

A literature search, according to the PRISMA guidelines, was performed via PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Only studies assessing the learning process to thyroidectomy (including hemi- and total thyroidectomy), reporting a minimum of 30 procedures and describing clearly the minimum number of performances required to achieve proficiency and the main evaluation items used to establish it, were included. Conventional, endoscopic and robotic approaches were separately analyzed. Only English-language studies were considered.

Results

Forty-five relevant studies were selected for the analysis [respectively 16 concerning robotic thyroidectomy (RT), 22 endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET), 6 mini-invasive video assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT), 1 conventional thyroidectomy (CT)]. The number of procedures required for a single surgeon to achieve competence and the parameters used to define surgical proficiency were fully investigated for each individual technique.

Conclusions

Our research shows how the current literature lacks an objective definition of the LC concept. The heterogeneity of analysis methodologies and parameters evaluated, the various surgical techniques and training background of single surgeons, make it impossible to draw univocal results. Future studies should consider confounding factors and establish criteria that should be consensually recognized in the assessment of surgical performances and skills.

The Advantages of Robotic Over Open Thyroidectomy in Thyroid Diseases: A Systematic Review

Over a hundred thousand thyroid surgeries are performed per year in the United States. Although conventional thyroidectomy has successful surgical outcomes, robotic minimally invasive procedures, known for their scar free (regarding the neck, no collar incision) surgical outcomes gained popularity through the years. Furthermore, these techniques are new and still debatable. The purpose is to know the advantages of robotic over open thyroidectomy in thyroid diseases. Note that we didn't aim to compare different robotic techniques due to the lack of data.

We performed a systematic review comparing surgical approaches for thyroidectomy, open vs robotic techniques, from January 2017 to December 2021, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. All papers with no full free article access and not in the English language were excluded. The outcomes of interest were superior cosmetics outcome, cost-effectiveness, limitations, operation time, length of hospital stay and postoperative pain or complications, and future outcomes.

A literature search was carried out in electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar) in order to retrieve all papers comparing the effectiveness of robotic vs open thyroidectomy. An initial reference search yielded 433 articles. Finally, we chose nine studies covering different robotic thyroidectomy techniques compared to the open thyroidectomy approach. Promising results were seen in these studies, especially with superior cosmetic results, less post-operative pain, swallowing discomfort, and voice changes. In addition, the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury is almost the same as the open approach. Multiple types of biases were caused by the selection of the population and the limitation of the studies to certain regions associated with the low numbers of robotic thyroidectomy approaches in Europe and the United States of America and the lack of randomized trials and long-term follow-up respectively. All studies discussed the importance of the surgeon's skills and the patient decision in choosing the appropriate approach for the thyroidectomy depending on the risk factors, a larger number of patients, and longer follow-up from multiple hospitals.

Robotic bilateral axillo-breast versus endoscopic bilateral areola thyroidectomy outcomes of 757 patients

BACKGROUND

Remote endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET) and robotic thyroidectomy (RT) seem to be beneficial in selected situations to avoid anterior neck scars. There are limited data in the literature to determine whether RT via a bilateral axillo-breast approach (RT-BABA) is superior to ET via a bilateral areolar approach (ET-BAA). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of RT-BABA versus ET-BAA.

METHODS

Between May 2013 and May 2022, 757 patients who underwent RT-BABA or ET-BAA at a high-volume Chinese thyroid center were included. Intraoperative and postoperative outcome parameters were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The moving average method was used to evaluate the learning curve.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients older than 45 years was greater in the RT group than in the ET group (14.8% vs. 7.4%, p < 0.001). The percentage of overweight patients was greater in the RT group (28.8% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001). The number of patients treated for malignant lesions was higher in the RT group (86.8% vs. 75%, p < 0.001). The rate of thyroiditis was higher in the RT group (10.9% vs. 6.6%, p < 0.001). Surgical time was significantly shorter in the RT group (140 vs. 165min, p < 0.001). Drainage volume was higher in the RT group (100 vs. 85ml, p < 0.001). Postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the RT group (3.04 ± 0.44 vs. 3.67 ± 0.89 days, p < 0.001). The cost in the RT group was higher (49627 ± 2795 vs. 25094 ± 3368 yuan, p < 0.001). Transient vocal cord dysfunction was lower in the RT group (2.9% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.003). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the number of central lymph nodes sampled, positive lymph nodes, neural monitoring (EMG) results, and rate of transient hypoparathyroidism. The learning curve for RT was 26 cases, and the operative time for ET was constant throughout the study.

CONCLUSIONS

RT-BABA is as safe and feasible as ET-BAA. RT-BABA performed better in some surgical outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the safety of RT-BABA.

Learning curve for robotic thyroidectomy using BABA: CUSUM analysis of a single surgeon's experience

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the safety and oncologic outcomes of robotic thyroidectomy via the bilateral axillary breast approach (BABA RT) for conventional open procedures. The learning curves of BABA RT were further evaluated.

METHODS

An exact 1:1 matching analysis was performed to compare the technical safety and oncologic outcomes between robotic thyroidectomy and conventional open surgery. Learning curves were assessed using cumulative summation analysis.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in general characteristics, short time outcomes (including transient hypoparathyroidism, transient postoperative hoarseness, hematoma/seroma, mean postoperative hospital stay, and other complications), the number of retrieved central lymph nodes, and recurrence rates between robotic BABA and conventional groups. The mean number of retrieved lateral LNs in the robotic group was significantly less than those in the conventional group. The learning curve for working space making, robotic lobectomy, and total thyroidectomy are approximately 15, 30, and 20 cases, respectively. No differences except for operation time were found between the learning group and the proficient group.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic thyroidectomy and neck dissection via BABA are feasible in terms of surgical completeness, surgical safety, and oncological safety. Our results provide a criterion for judging whether the surgeon has entered the stable stage of robotic thyroidectomy via BABA in terms of the operative time.