Proton stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases-results of 5-year experience for 81 hepatic lesions

HyperSHArc: Single-Isocenter Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases Using Proton, Helium, and Carbon Ion Arc Therapy

Purpose

This work presents a proof-of-concept study of HyperSHArc, spot-scanning hadron arc (SHArc) therapy for single-isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases (MBMs). HyperSHArc plans using proton, helium, and carbon ions were compared with state-of-the-art volumetric modulated photon arc therapy.

Methods and Materials

Treatment design and optimization procedures were devised using commercial and in-house treatment planning systems. Planning and delivery methods considered dedicated energy, spot, and multiarc selection strategies. Proton, helium, and carbon HyperSHArc plans were generated for patients with MBM exhibiting 3 to 11 intracranial lesions with gross tumor volumes (GTVs) between 0.03 and 19.8 cc, at prescribed doses between 19 and 21Gy in a single-fraction. Planning target volumes (PTVs) considered a 1-mm isotropic margin around the GTV, and robust optimization with 2.5%/1 mm criteria for range and position uncertainty was applied. Photon hyper-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (HA-VMAT) plans were optimized for the PTVs using the HyperArc® single-isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery platform (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA).

Results

HyperSHArc plans were comparable between particle species, achieving highly conformal target doses and satisfying clinical coverage criteria. Particle arc plans reduced V2Gy and V4Gy in the healthy brain compared with HA-VMAT, while intermediate doses (V8Gy-V16Gy) were similar or reduced depending on the number of lesions. Particularly for the case with 11 targets, a considerable reduction in V12Gy was observed that could be relevant for reducing the risk of treatment-induced radionecrosis. HyperSHArc using carbon ions boosted dose-averaged linear energy transfer inside the target relevant to overcoming radioresistance factors (>100 keV/μm).

Conclusions

We present the first particle arc therapy strategies for MBM. Results demonstrate that with HyperSHArc, dose conformity comparable or superior to HA-VMAT is achievable while reducing the low-dose bath and increasing mean dose-averaged linear energy transfer in the GTV. Our findings suggest that HyperSHArc using light and heavy ions could be an effective and efficient means of treating MBM. Further development of HyperSHArc optimization and delivery is justified.

Radiotherapy as a metastasis directed therapy for liver oligometastases - comparative analysis between CT-guided interstitial HDR brachytherapy and two SBRT modalities performed on double-layer and single layer LINACs

Introduction

Surgical resection is gold standard for treatment of liver metastasis, locally ablative techniques including computer tomography (CT)-guided interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (CT-BRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have gained prominence as alternatives, offering comparable outcomes in selected patients. We aim to compare CT-BRT and SBRT - based on dosimetric analysis.

Material and methods

Patients who underwent CT-BRT for oligometastatic, ≤4cm liver metastases between 2018 and 2024 were eligible. SBRT plans for Halcyon (SBRTh) and TrueBeam (SBRTtb) were prepared virtually. In the CT-BRT group CTV was equal to PTV, for SBRTh and SBRTtb planning, a 5 mm margin was applied to CTV to create PTV. Dose calculation was carried out with the TG-43 algorithm for CT-BRT and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm for SBRTh and SBRTtb group. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the data. The Wilcoxon pairwise order test was utilized to compare dependent groups.

Results

CT-BRT resulted in a more favorable dose distribution within PTVs for Dmean, D50, and D90, while SBRT showed better results for D98 and V27.5Gy. No significant differences were observed for V25Gy between CT-BRT and SBRTtb, but SBRTh favored over CT-BRT. For OARs, CT-BRT plans showed better values for V5, V10, and V11.6Gy in the uninvolved liver volume. There were no significant differences in dose distribution for the duodenum, bowel, and heart. SBRT modalities performed better in the kidney. CT-BRT had improved dose distribution in the esophagus, great vessels, ribs, skin, spinal cord, and stomach compared to SBRT.

Conclusions

CT-BRT could be a viable alternative to SBRT for certain patients with liver malignancies.

Do We Have a Winner? Advocating for SBRT in HCC Management

•Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a safe and effective locoregional therapy for inoperable patients with HCC.•SBRT compares favorably with other local therapies in terms of local control, survival, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness.•SBRT should be considered and discussed in multidisciplinary management of appropriate HCC patients.•Advances in SBRT and novel combinations with systemic therapy may further widen the therapeutic index in HCC.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases in oligometastatic disease

Oligometastatic cancers designate cancers in which the number of metastases is less than five, corresponding to a particular biological entity whose prognosis is situated between a localized and metastatic disease. The liver is one of the main sites of metastases. When patients are not suitable for surgery, stereotactic body radiotherapy provides high local control rate, although these data come mainly from retrospective studies, with no phase III study results. The need for a high therapeutic dose (biologically effective dose greater than 100Gy) while respecting the constraints on the organs at risk, and the management of respiratory movements require expertise and sufficient technical prerequisites. The emergence of new techniques such as MRI-guided radiotherapy could further increase the effectiveness of stereotactic radiotherapy of liver metastases, and thus improve the prognosis of these oligometastatic cancers.

Initial experience and patient tolerance of proton stereotactic body radiotherapy

Purpose

To review our initial experience with proton-based SBRT to evaluate the planning outcomes and initial patient tolerance of treatment.

Patients and methods

From Sep. 2019 to Dec. 2020, 52 patients were treated with proton SBRT to 62 lesions. Fractionation varied by indication and site with a median of 5 fractions and median fractional dose of 8 Gy. Planning outcomes, including plan heterogeneity, conformity, and PTV volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (PTV V100%) were evaluated. Acute toxicities were prospectively recorded, and patient reported outcomes were assessed prior to and at completion of treatment using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and EQ-5D5L visual analogue score (VAS).

Results

All treated patients completed their course of proton-based SBRT. The mean conformity index was 1.05 (range 0.51-1.48). R50% values were comparable to ideal photon parameters. PTV V100% was 89.9% on average (40.44% - 99.76%). 5 patients (10%) required plan modification due to setup or tumor changes. No patients developed a new grade 3 or greater toxicity during treatment. Comparing pretreatment to end of treatment timepoints, there was a significant improvement in the mean VAS (65 to 75, p = 0.014), with no significant change in the mean MDASI symptom (1.7, 1.8; p = 0.79) or interference (2.3, 2.4; p = 0.452) scores.

Conclusion

Proton-based SBRT can achieve dosimetric goals required by major clinical photon trials. It was well-tolerated with no decrement in patient reported outcomes and a mean 10-point improvement in VAS at the conclusion of SBRT. Further follow-up is necessary for tumor control and late effects analysis.

Local Control Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Oligometastases: Lessons from a Quarter Century

The utilization of stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of liver metastasis has been widely studied and has demonstrated favorable local control outcomes. However, several predictive factors play a crucial role in the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy, such as the number and size (volume) of metastatic liver lesions, the primary tumor site (histology), molecular biomarkers (e.g., KRAS and TP53 mutation), the use of systemic therapy prior to SBRT, the radiation dose, and the use of advanced technology and organ motion management during SBRT. These prognostic factors need to be considered when clinical trials are designed to evaluate the efficacy of SBRT for liver metastases.

The Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Management of Liver Metastases

The liver is a common site for metastatic spread for various primary tumor histologies. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a non-invasive treatment technique with broad patient candidacy for the ablation of tumors in the liver and other organs. SBRT involves focused, high-dose radiation therapy delivered in one to several treatments, resulting in high rates of local control. Use of SBRT for ablation of oligometastatic disease has increased in recent years and emerging prospective data have demonstrated improvements in progression free and overall survival in some settings. When delivering SBRT to liver metastases, clinicians must balance the priorities of delivering ablative tumor dosing while respecting dose constraints to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Motion management techniques are crucial for meeting dose constraints, ensuring low rates of toxicity, maintaining quality of life, and can allow for dose escalation. Advanced radiotherapy delivery approaches including proton therapy, robotic radiotherapy, and real-time MR-guided radiotherapy may further improve the accuracy of liver SBRT. In this article, we review the rationale for oligometastases ablation, the clinical outcomes with liver SBRT, tumor dose and OAR considerations, and evolving strategies to improve liver SBRT delivery.

Clinical outcomes and factors involved in the local control of proton beam therapy for oligometastatic liver tumors in patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There are no existing reports on proton beam therapy (PBT) for local control (LC) of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer (LMCRC). We calculated the LC rate of PBT for LMCRC and explored the influence of each factor on the LC rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases in which PBT was performed at our center between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively selected from the database. Patients with LMCRC without extrahepatic lesions and no more than three liver metastases were included. Effectiveness was assessed based on LC, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. Adverse events (AEs) are described. Factors that may be related to LC were also investigated.

RESULTS

This study included 23 men and 18 women, with a median age of 66 (range 24-87) years. A total of 63 lesions were included in the study. The most frequent dose was 72.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness)/22 fractions. The median follow-up period was 27.6 months. The 3‑year LC, OS, and PFS rates were 54.9%, 61.6%, and 16.7%, respectively. Our multivariate analysis identified the distance between the tumor and the gastrointestinal (GI) tract as a factor associated with LC (P = 0.02). No grade ≥ 3 AEs were observed. None of the patients experienced liver failure during the acute or late phase.

CONCLUSION

Care must be taken with tumors that have reduced planning target volume coverage owing to organs at risk restrictions, especially in tumors near the GI tract.

Proton liver stereotactic body radiation therapy: Treatment techniques and dosimetry feasibility from a single institution

Purpose

To assess the resulting dosimetry characteristics of simulation and planning techniques for proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of primary and secondary liver tumors.

Methods

Consecutive patients treated under volumetric daily image guidance with liver proton SBRT between September 2019 and March 2022 at Emory Proton Therapy Center were included in this study. Prescriptions ranged from 40 Gy to 60 Gy in 3- or 5-fraction regimens, and motion management techniques were used when target motion exceeded 5 mm. 4D robust optimization was used when necessary. Dosimetry evaluation was conducted for ITV V100, D99, Dmax, and liver-ITV mean dose and D700cc. Statistical analysis was performed using independent-samples Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

Thirty-six tumors from 29 patients were treated. Proton therapy for primary and secondary liver tumors using motion management techniques and robust optimization resulted in high target coverage and low doses to critical organs. The median ITV V100% was 100.0%, and the median ITV D99% was 111.3%. The median liver-ITV mean dose and D700cc were 499 cGy and 5.7 cGy, respectively. The median conformity index (CI) was 1.03, and the median R50 was 2.56. Except for ITV D99% (primary 118.1% vs. secondary 107.2%, p = 0.005), there were no significant differences in age, ITV volume, ITV V100%, ITV maximum dose, liver-ITV mean dose, or D700cc between primary and secondary tumor groups.

Conclusion

The study demonstrated that proton therapy with motion management techniques and robust optimization achieves excellent target coverage with low normal liver doses for primary and secondary liver tumors. The results showed high target coverage, high conformality, and low doses to the liver.

Challenges and opportunities in stereotactic body proton radiotherapy of liver malignancies

Stereotactic body proton radiotherapy (SBPT) has the potential to be an effective tool for treating liver malignancies. While proton therapy enables near-zero exit dose and could improve normal tissue sparing, including liver and other surrounding structures, there are challenges in implementing the SBPT technique for proton therapy, including respiratory motion, range uncertainties, dose regimen, treatment planning, and image guidance. This article summarizes the technical and clinical challenges facing SBPT, along with the potential benefits of SBPT for liver malignancies. The clinical implementation of the technique is also described for the first six patients treated at the Johns Hopkins Proton Therapy Center using liver SBPT.

A phase II trial of hypofractionated high-dose proton beam therapy for unresectable liver metastases

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Proton beam therapy (PBT) is an effective treatment option for primary malignant liver disease. However, evidence regarding liver metastasis is insufficient. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated high-dose PBT in the treatment of metastatic liver disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2019 to January 2021, patients with unresectable liver metastases were enrolled. For PBT, the dose schemes of 60 Gy relative biological effectiveness (GyRBE) in 5 fractions (fx) (biologically effective dose [BED] 132 GyE) or 70 GyRBE in 10 fx (BED 119 GyE) were used. Either a passive scattered beam or pencil beam scanning (PBS)-based intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) was performed with proper respiratory management. The primary endpoint of the study was 6-month freedom from local progression (FFLP) rate; and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the FFLP and survival rates.

RESULTS

Of the 49 liver metastases in 46 patients, the colorectum accounted for 60% of the primary cancer sites, followed by the gastrointestinal organs and pancreas/biliary tract. Forty patients presented only 1 liver metastasis, while the other 6 patients had 2 to 4 metastases. The Six-month FFLP rate was 95.2%. The 1-year FFLP rate in patients with <3 cm liver metastasis was 87.4%, while that was 74.1% in patients with > 3 cm group (p = 0.087). With regard to systemic treatment, the 1-year FFLP rate after PBT was better (94.1%) than that without systemic treatment (75.8%; p = 0.051). Regarding PBT-related toxicity, one patient developed a grade 2 gastric ulcer, while none of the patients developed grade ≥3 toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypofractionated PBT with a BED > 100 GyRBE for liver metastasis is safe and effective, given the high rate of 6-month FFLP without grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities. However, further improvements are required for larger tumors and/or those without prior systemic therapy.