Burden of illness for patients with cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a retrospective claims analysis

The Financial Toxicity of Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer: An Analysis of the 1997-2023 National Health Interview Survey

Patients with hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancers may experience financial toxicity as a result of diagnosis and treatment. We characterized the prevalence and predictors of financial toxicity among United States (U.S.) HPB cancer patients using the National Health Interview Survey. Outcomes were delaying medical care due to cost or being unable to afford necessary medical care within the past 12 months. Prevalence was estimated in univariable analyses and sociodemographic predictors were identified in multivariable analyses. Among 5,630,270 U.S. adults with self-reported HPB cancer, 567,531 (10.1%) delayed medical care due to cost and 474,632 (8.4%) were unable to afford necessary medical care within the past 12 months. Uninsured patients were more likely to delay care due to cost (aOR 14.38, 95% CI 4.81-43.01) or to be unable to afford necessary medical care (aOR 19.93, 95% CI 6.45-61.55). Non-White race (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.06-3.81) was a risk factor for delaying care due to cost, whereas household income < 200% of the federal poverty level (aOR 2.69, 95% CI 1.20-6.04) was associated with inability to afford necessary medical care. Patients who had received surgery within the past 12 months were not at higher odds of either financial toxicity outcome. Targeted interventions to mitigate financial toxicity among at-risk patients are warranted to alleviate the financial burden of HPB cancer care.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers Treated with Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study

Background: Historically, the standard of care for advanced biliary tract cancers (aBTCs) was gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis). Immunotherapy plus GemCis is now recommended as a first-line treatment for aBTCs. Whether patients can tolerate eight cycles of GemCis in clinical practice, as per the Advanced Biliary Cancer (ABC)-02 study, remains to be assessed. We performed a retrospective observational cohort study to assess real-world treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) in patients with de novo or recurrent aBTCs treated with first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in the United States. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study used Optum's de-identified Market Clarity Data (Market Clarity). Adults diagnosed with de novo or recurrent aBTCs in the United States who began first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy from January 2016-March 2022 were identified and followed from index until death, the end of continuous enrolment, or the end of study period. Treatment patterns and OS were assessed. Results: Overall, 559 patients were included (de novo, n = 462; recurrent, n = 97). GemCis was the most common first-line therapy received (de novo: 73.8%; recurrent: 57.7%). Most patients received approximately five cycles of GemCis; median (95% CI) time to discontinuation was 4.6 (4.3-5.1) months. Most patients died over the follow-up period (de novo: 70.3%; recurrent: 62.9%). Median OS (95% CI) was 14.2 (12.1-16.1) months (de novo) and 18.5 (15.6-26.9) months (recurrent). Conclusions: GemCis was the most common first-line therapy received during the study period; most patients were unable to receive eight cycles of GemCis. Survival was limited over the follow-up period, highlighting the need for new treatments for aBTCs. Future studies are warranted to understand the real-world impact of first-line immunotherapy plus GemCis for patients with aBTCs.

Real-world treatment patterns, resource utilization and costs in biliary tract cancers in the USA

Aim: To evaluate real-world treatment patterns, survival and healthcare-resource utilization in US patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) receiving systemic therapy.Patients & methods: This study used claims data from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD®) linked to clinical data from the Cancer Care Quality Program (January 1, 2015-September 30, 2020).Results: Of 413 patients, 84.5% received gemcitabine-based first-line (1L) treatment, 46% received second-line treatment, and 16.5% received third-line (3L) treatment. All-cause mortality was 53% and approximately 70% of patients had ≥1 inpatient visit. The total mean per-patient-per-month all-cause costs were $19,589 for 1L and $33,534 for 3L treatment.Conclusion: Results showed poor survival, significant resource use and high costs as treatment line progresses for patients with advanced BTC.

Practical Management of Adverse Events Associated With FGFR Inhibitors for Cholangiocarcinoma for the Advanced Practice Provider

Cholangiocarcinoma is a cancer of the bile duct frequently diagnosed at a late stage with a poor prognosis. Selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, but are associated with hyperphosphatemia, fatigue, and ocular, dermatologic, and gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs). Treatment adherence and patient outcomes can be improved by anticipating and effectively managing the AEs associated with FGFR inhibitors and providing appropriate intervention and patient education. The multidisciplinary care team for patients with cholangiocarcinoma can involve optometrists and advanced practice providers, including nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists. This review provides practical insights for advanced practice providers on the management of these common AEs associated with selective FGFR inhibitors in the real-world setting, focusing on pemigatinib and futibatinib. Impacts of renal or hepatic impairment, drug-drug interactions, and drug-food interactions are discussed. Also presented are practical recommendations for prophylaxis and supportive care measures, and resources for health-care professionals and patients.

Integrated budget impact model to estimate the impact of introducing selpercatinib as a tumor-agnostic treatment option for patients with RET-altered solid tumors in the US

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the potential budget impact on US third party payers (commercial or Medicare) associated with addition of selpercatinib as a tumor-agnostic treatment for patients with Rearranged during Transfection (RET)-altered solid tumors.

METHODS

An integrated budget impact model (iBIM) with 3-year (Y) time horizon was developed for 19 RET-altered tumors. It is referred to as an integrated model because it is a single model that integrated results across multiple tumor types (as opposed to tumor-specific models developed traditionally). The model estimated eligible patient populations and included tumor-specific comparator treatments for each tumor type. Estimated annual total costs (2022USD, $) included costs of drug, administration, supportive care, and toxicity. For a one-million-member plan, the number of patients with RET-altered tumors eligible for treatment, incremental total costs, and incremental per-member per-month (PMPM) costs associated with introduction of selpercatinib treatment were estimated. Uncertainty associated with model parameters was assessed using various sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Commercial perspective estimated 11.68 patients/million with RET-altered tumors as treatment-eligible annually, of which 7.59 (Y1), 8.17 (Y2), and 8.76 (Y3) patients would be selpercatinib-treated (based on forecasted market share). The associated incremental total and PMPM costs (commercial) were estimated to be: $873,099 and $0.073 (Y1), $2,160,525 and $0.180 (Y2), and $2,561,281 and $0.213 (Y3), respectively. The Medicare perspective estimated 55.82 patients/million with RET-altered tumors as treatment-eligible annually, of which 36.29 (Y1), 39.08 (Y2), and 41.87 (Y3) patients would be selpercatinib-treated. The associated incremental total and PMPM costs (Medicare) were estimated to be: $4,447,832 and $0.371 (Y1), $11,076,422 and $0.923 (Y2), and $12,637,458 and $1.053 (Y3), respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses across both perspectives identified drug costs, selpercatinib market share, incidence of RET, and treatment duration as significant drivers of incremental costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-year incremental PMPM cost estimates suggest a modest impact on payer-budgets associated with introduction of tumor-agnostic selpercatinib treatment.

Gallstone and Gallbladder Disease: Biliary Tract and Cholangiopathies

Cholestatic liver diseases are named primarily due to the blockage of bile flow and buildup of bile acids in the liver. Cholestasis can occur in cholangiopathies, fatty liver diseases, and during COVID-19 infection. Most literature evaluates damage occurring to the intrahepatic biliary tree during cholestasis; however, there may be associations between liver damage and gallbladder damage. Gallbladder damage can manifest as acute or chronic inflammation, perforation, polyps, cancer, and most commonly gallstones. Considering the gallbladder is an extension of the intrahepatic biliary network, and both tissues are lined by biliary epithelial cells that share common mechanisms and properties, it is worth further evaluation to understand the association between bile duct and gallbladder damage. In this comprehensive article, we discuss background information of the biliary tree and gallbladder, from function, damage, and therapeutic approaches. We then discuss published findings that identify gallbladder disorders in various liver diseases. Lastly, we provide the clinical aspect of gallbladder disorders in liver diseases and ways to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for congruent diagnosis. © 2023 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 13:4909-4943, 2023.

Productivity loss outcomes and costs among patients with cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: an economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is associated with poor prognosis. Healthcare-related management likely presents a substantial economic burden associated with time away from work in patients with CCA.

OBJECTIVES

To assess productivity loss, associated indirect costs, and all-cause healthcare resource utilization and costs owing to workplace absenteeism, short-term disability, and long-term disability in CCA patients with work absence and disability benefits eligibility in the United States.

METHODS

US retrospective claims data from Merative MarketScan Commercial and Health and Productivity Management Databases. Eligible patients were adults with ≥1 non-diagnostic medical claim for CCA in the index period (1 January 2011-31 December 2019) and had ≥6 months of continuous medical and pharmacy benefit enrolment before and ≥1 month of follow-up and full-time employee work absence and disability benefits eligibility after the index date. Outcomes were assessed in patients with CCA, intrahepatic CCA (iCCA), and extrahepatic CCA (eCCA) in absenteeism, short-term disability, and long-term disability cohorts (measured per patient per month [PPPM] for a month of 21 workdays), with costs standardized to 2019 USD.

RESULTS

One thousand and sixty-five patients with CCA were included (iCCA: n = 624 [58.6%]; eCCA: n = 380 [35.7%]). The mean age was 51.9-53.9 years across cohorts. In patients with iCCA and eCCA, respectively, the number of mean all-cause days absent PPPM for illness was 6.0 and 4.3, and 12.9 and 6.6% had ≥1 CCA-related short-term disability claim. Median indirect costs PPPM owing to absenteeism, short-term disability, and long-term disability, respectively, in patients with iCCA were $622, $635, and $690, and $304, $589, and $465 in patients with eCCA. Patients with iCCA vs. eCCA had higher inpatient, outpatient medical, outpatient pharmacy, and all-cause healthcare costs PPPM.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CCA had high productivity losses, indirect costs, and medical costs. Outpatient services costs contributed greatly to the higher healthcare expenditure observed in patients with iCCA vs. eCCA.

Drug costs in context: assessing drug costs in cost-of-illness analyses

Cost-of-illness (COI) studies attempt to measure and describe the costs associated or attributed to a specific disease, but there are several considerations for measuring and interpreting drug costs estimates. The complexity of the pharmaceutical supply chain and contractual relationships between manufacturers, wholesalers, pharmacies and payers create challenges for researchers attempting to include drug costs in COI analyses. This article aims to provide contextual information for a general audience interested in conducting or evaluating COI studies that may include drug costs and to describe key factors to consider when reviewing drug costs in the peer-reviewed literature.