Survival and prognostic factors analysis of 151 intestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a single center experience

Correlation between Neurotransmitters (Dopamine, Epinephrine, Norepinephrine, Serotonin), Prognostic Nutritional Index, Glasgow Prognostic Score, Systemic Inflammatory Response Markers, and TNM Staging in a Cohort of Colorectal Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients

Neuroendocrine tumors are uncommon in the gastrointestinal system but can develop in the majority of the body's epithelial organs. Our goal was to examine the presence and clinical application of serum dopamine (DA), serotonin (ST), norepinephrine (NE), and epinephrine (EPI), in addition to determining the significance of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), and systemic inflammatory response (SIR) markers as a prognostic factor for patients with colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (CR-NETs), in various tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stages. We also wanted to identify the possible connection between them. This study included 25 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with CR-NETs and a control group consisting of 60 patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC). We used the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) technique. This study revealed that CR-NET patients showed significantly higher serum levels of DA compared to CRC patients. We showed that serum DA was present in the early stages of CR-NETs, with increasing levels as we advanced through the TNM stages. Moreover, we found a close relationship between the levels of DA and the inflammation and nutritional status of the CR-NET patients in this study. CR-NET patients from the PNI < 47.00 subgroup had a higher level of DA than those from the PNI ≥ 47.00 subgroup. Pearson's correlation analysis revealed correlations between DA, PNI, and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Both hematological indices were negatively correlated with albumin (ALB). Our investigation's findings relating to the PNI, GPS, SIR, and DA indicate that these tools can be markers of nutritional and systemic inflammatory status, are simple to use, and are repeatable. Further research on this topic could provide valuable insights into which biomarkers to incorporate into clinical practice for the management of CR-NET patients.

Time toxicity of lutetium 177 in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Objectives

We aim to investigate the time toxicity of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours treated with Lutetium-177 Dotatate in a single institution.

Design

This is a retrospective cohort study.

Methods

All patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours treated with Lutetium-177 Dotatate at the Alexander Fleming Institute were included. Our primary endpoint was to evaluate time toxicity, which accounted for every day that the patient had contact with any department of any healthcare institution.

Results

Our cohort included 21 patients with metastatic disease, female sex 86%, and a median age of 55 (IQR 44-63). The primary tumour site was the small intestine in 47.6% of the cases. The median number of previous systemic treatments for advanced disease was two (IQR 2-3). The overall response rate was 19%, and 66.6% had clinical benefit. The median calculated 'time toxicity' was 11 days (IQR 8-18), representing 5.7% of the total treatment duration. The main contributors to time toxicity included infusion days, blood draws, radiological scans, and hospitalisations (median of 4 days for each).

Conclusion

Lutetium-177 Dotatate treatment for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours was associated with low time toxicity, excellent tolerability, a good response and prolonged PFS, of which the median was not reached in the short follow-up we present. Newer treatments with different mechanisms of action provide longer survival and widen the landscape of choices. Understanding new clinical endpoints is important for the transition into a more modern clinical practice, strengthening personalised and patient-oriented strategies.

Exploration of Novel Prognostic Markers in Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasia

Simple Summary

High grade neuroendocrine tumours and carcinomas (NETs/NECs) behave aggressively and have limited survival outcomes. The mainstay of therapy is systemic therapy, in which the associated side-effects are a key consideration in a palliative population. We have conducted a retrospective review of patients with high grade NETs and NECs to determine possible tests that will predict survival before patients start treatment. This will allow patients to avoid potentially toxic treatment that is unlikely to be of benefit.

Abstract

Background: High-grade neuroendocrine tumours and carcinomas (NET/NECs) behave aggressively, typically presenting at an advanced stage. Prognosis is poor, with median survival between 5 and 34 months. The mainstay of treatment is palliative systemic therapy. However, therapy carries a risk of toxicity, which can reduce quality of life. Therefore, accurate prognostic scores for risk stratification of patients with high-grade NET/NECs are needed to help guide patient management to decide whether active treatment is likely to improve overall survival (OS). We aimed to compare the prognostic ability of published prognostic scores to predict OS in a cohort of patients with high-grade NET/NECs of any primary site. Methods: Treatment, biochemical and clinicopathological data were collected retrospectively from 77 patients with high-grade NET/NECs across three hospitals between 2016 and 2020. Variables including performance status (PS), Ki-67, age at diagnosis, previous treatment and presence of liver metastases were recorded. Pre-treatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio, modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (GI-NEC) score were derived. Univariable and multivariable survival analyses were used to assess prognostic ability. Results: The median age of the cohort was 63 years (range: 31–85); 53% of subjects were female. Grade 3 NETs (G3-NETs) were identified in 32 patients and NECs in 45 patients. The median OS was 13.45 months (range: 0.87–65.37) with no difference observed between G3-NETs and NECs. Univariable analysis revealed that NLR (n = 72, p = 0.049), mGPS (n = 56, p = 0.003), GI-NEC score (n = 27, p = 0.0007) and Ki-67 (n = 66, p = 0.007) were significantly associated with OS. Multivariable analysis confirmed that elevated mGPS (p = 0.046), GI-NEC score (p = 0.036), and Ki-67 (p = 0.02) were independently prognostic for reduced OS across the entire cohort. mGPS was identified as an independent prognostic factor in G3-NETs. Independent predictors of OS in NECs were PS and Ki-67. Conclusions: mGPS, PS and Ki-67 are independent prognostic markers in high-grade NET/NEC patients. Our study supports the use of these prognostic scores for risk stratification of patients with high grade cancers and as useful tools to guide treatment decisions.