Subxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic trisegmentectomy

Comparison of short-term results of subxiphoid and conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in diagnostic wedge resections

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare early results in patients who underwent subxiphoid wedge resection with those operated on using a multiportal approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 151 patients who underwent diagnostic wedge resection for suspected interstitial lung disease. Patients who underwent wedge resection via subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were compared.

RESULTS

The study included 90 men (59.6%) and 61 women (40.4%) with a mean age of 54.8 ± 12 years. Of these, 127 patients underwent conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and 24 patients underwent subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Postoperative complications occurred in 13 patients (8.6%), with no significant difference according to surgical technique. Sex was a significant factor in the rate of complications (12.2% in men vs. 3.2% in women). There was no intraoperative mortality; the 30-day mortality rate was 4% (n = 6). Five nonsurviving patients were in the conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group and 1 was in the subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group (p = 0.95).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that the subxiphoid approach reduced procedure time and length of hospital stay in the early period, while there was no significant difference between the techniques in terms of complications or mortality. Based on these findings, we conclude that surgical outcomes were as successful with the subxiphoid approach as with conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Comparison of post-operative pain and quality of life between uniportal subxiphoid and intercostal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy

Background

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) although considered less invasive than the multi-port techniques, is still an intercostal approach, resulting in intercostal nerve injury. Recently, some surgeons have tried to address this problem by attempting a subxiphoid approach. The aim of our study was to assess and compare results between intercostal and subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomy in terms of postoperative pain and quality of life (QoL).

Methods

Patients from January 2014 to January 2018 undergoing subxiphoid and intercostal VATS lobectomy were prospectively assessed for pain and QoL at 1, 3, and 6 months following discharge. Postoperative pain was measured using a numeric rating scale (NRS) and QoL was assessed with the EuroQoL 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ5D)

Results

Eight hundred and thirty-three patients undergoing lobectomy were included: 373 in the intercostal VATS group and 459 in the subxiphoid group. The proportion of patients with moderate or worse clinical pain was significantly lower at 1 and 3 months after subxiphoid VATS (P<0.01) compared with intercostal VATS. QoL was significantly higher following subxiphoid VATS at these same time points (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Uniportal subxiphoid VATS is a safe and feasible minimally invasive approach for undertaking pulmonary lobectomy that may result in reduced postoperative pain compared to conventional VATS. There may also be earlier return of QoL. A randomized controlled trial examining this further would provide further insight into our observations.

Learning curve and subxiphoid lung resections most common technical issues

BACKGROUND

Subxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (SVATS) for major lung resections is a new approach. Clinical evidence is lacking. The aim of this article is to describe the learning curve of the 200 selected patients who underwent uniportal subxiphoid lobectomy or segmentectomy by subxiphoid midline incision, and with the lessons learned from this early experience in SVATS and from the experience with transthoracic uniportal VATS we sought to compile "tips and tricks" for managing the multiple intraoperative technical difficulties that can arise during the SVATS and help to set the recommendations for a SVATS program.

METHODS

We describe the learning curve of the first 200 selected patients who underwent uniportal subxiphoid lobectomy or segmentectomy by subxiphoid midline incision From September 2014 with early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and benign disease. We examine the rate of conversion and the operating time comparing group one (first 100 cases) with group two (subsequent 100 cases).

RESULTS

Of the 200 consecutive selected cases (72 males, 128 females) with a mean age of 57.4±9 years, underwent either uniportal subxiphoid lobectomy or segmentectomy 136 were lobectomies and 64 were segmental resections The mean operating time was 170±45 mins; the average and after the case 86 the rate of the operating time appears to be similar. The conversion rate decrease from 13% in group one to 8% in group two.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a gradual reduction in the operating time and rate conversion with increasing experience. Lessons from our initial experience in the learning curve period in SVATS helps to create this trouble shooting guide that offers "tips and tricks" to both avoid and manage numerous intra-operative technical difficulties that commonly arise during the SVATS initial experience.