Micro-incision thoracoscopic treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: the "loop" technique

Next-day discharge following small uniportal thoracoscopic bullectomy assisted with an anchoring suture

Objective

Manipulating the instruments during uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) bullectomy requires a relatively large incision. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of next-day discharge following U-VATS bullectomy using an anchoring suture.

Methods

A stapler and a scope were inserted through a single incision in the anchoring group. The bullae were retracted by the suture, which was inserted from outside of the chest wall into the thorax, and then bullectomy was performed. For those in the control group, resection of the bullae was performed with the assistance of a grasping forceps.

Results

The length of the incision of the patients in the anchoring group ([13.2 ± 2.2] mm) was significantly smaller than in the control group ([26.2 ± 3.9] mm). In addition, the number of staplers used in the anchoring group was significantly less than in the control group ([1.2 ± 0.4] vs. [1.4 ± 0.5]). Furthermore, 36 (92.3%) cases in the anchoring group were uneventfully discharged within 24 hours after bullectomy.

Conclusion

Next-day discharge after U-VATS bullectomy through a small incision assisted with an anchoring suture is safe and feasible.

Uniportal thoracoscopic surgical management using a suture traction for primary pneumothorax

BACKGROUND

We devised a new strategy using suture traction to facilitate the management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax during uniportal thoracoscopy. To test its validity, we compared the outcomes of our modified technique with those of conventional three-port thoracoscopy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all 43 consecutive patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax undergoing thoracoscopy between January 2017 and December 2019. They were divided within two groups: uniportal thoracoscopy using suture traction (n = 21) and conventional 3-port thoracoscopy (n = 22). Postoperative pain, paresthesia, patient satisfaction, and surgical outcomes were compared to test the validity of our technique.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in operative time (47 ± 4.8 vs. 43 ± 7.9 min), number of staples used (2.5 ± 0.9 vs. 2.3 ± 0.6), postoperative drainage (235 ± 15 vs. 240 ± 19 mL), chest tube drainage time (3.2 ± 0.8 vs. 3.4 ± 1.8 days), and hospital stay (4.2 ± 1.2 vs. 4.3 ± 0.9 days). However, uniportal thoracoscopy was associated with less pain at 24 (p = 0.01), 48 (p = 0.02), and 72 h (p = 0.03) postoperatively, less paresthesia at 24 (p = 0.03), 48 (p = 0.02), and 72 h (p = 0.02) postoperatively, and greater patient satisfaction at 24 (p = 0.04), 48 (p = 0.02), and 72 h (p = 0.02) postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our technique may facilitate the use of uniportal thoracoscopy for treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax, reducing neurological sequelae and improving patient satisfaction compared to the traditional three-port thoracoscopy.