Does timing of transplantation of neural stem cells following spinal cord injury affect outcomes in an animal model?

Clinical Trials Targeting Secondary Damage after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) often causes loss of sensory and motor function resulting in a significant reduction in quality of life for patients. Currently, no therapies are available that can repair spinal cord tissue. After the primary SCI, an acute inflammatory response induces further tissue damage in a process known as secondary injury. Targeting secondary injury to prevent additional tissue damage during the acute and subacute phases of SCI represents a promising strategy to improve patient outcomes. Here, we review clinical trials of neuroprotective therapeutics expected to mitigate secondary injury, focusing primarily on those in the last decade. The strategies discussed are broadly categorized as acute-phase procedural/surgical interventions, systemically delivered pharmacological agents, and cell-based therapies. In addition, we summarize the potential for combinatorial therapies and considerations.

Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Application of Multipotent Stem Cells for Spinal Cord Injury

Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) is a common neurological disorder with devastating psychical and psychosocial sequelae. The majority of patients after SCI suffer from permanent disability caused by motor dysfunction, impaired sensation, neuropathic pain, spasticity as well as urinary complications, and a small number of patients experience a complete recovery. Current standard treatment modalities of the SCI aim to prevent secondary injury and provide limited recovery of lost neurological functions. Stem Cell Therapy (SCT) represents an emerging treatment approach using the differentiation, paracrine, and self-renewal capabilities of stem cells to regenerate the injured spinal cord. To date, multipotent stem cells including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), neural stem cells (NSCs), and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) represent the most investigated types of stem cells for the treatment of SCI in preclinical and clinical studies. The microenvironment of SCI has a significant impact on the survival, proliferation, and differentiation of transplanted stem cells. Therefore, a deep understanding of the pathophysiology of SCI and molecular mechanisms through which stem cells act may help improve the treatment efficacy of SCT and find new therapeutic approaches such as stem-cell-derived exosomes, gene-modified stem cells, scaffolds, and nanomaterials. In this literature review, the pathogenesis of SCI and molecular mechanisms of action of multipotent stem cells including MSCs, NSCs, and HSCs are comprehensively described. Moreover, the clinical efficacy of multipotent stem cells in SCI treatment, an optimal protocol of stem cell administration, and recent therapeutic approaches based on or combined with SCT are also discussed.

Advances in Neural Stem Cell Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury: Safety, Efficacy, and Future Perspectives

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating central nervous system injury that leads to severe disabilities in motor and sensory functions, causing significant deterioration in patients' quality of life. Owing to the complexity of SCI pathophysiology, there has been no effective treatment for reversing neural tissue damage and recovering neurological functions. Several novel therapies targeting different stages of pathophysiological mechanisms of SCI have been developed. Among these, treatments using stem cells have great potential for the regeneration of damaged neural tissues. In this review, we have summarized recent preclinical and clinical studies focusing on neural stem cells (NSCs). NSCs are multipotent cells with specific differentiation capabilities for neural lineage. Several preclinical studies have demonstrated the regenerative effects of transplanted NSCs in SCI animal models through both paracrine effects and direct neuronal differentiation, restoring synaptic connectivity and neural networks. Based on the positive results of several preclinical studies, phase I and II clinical trials using NSCs have been performed. Despite several hurdles and issues that need to be addressed in the clinical use of NSCs in patients with SCI, gradual progress in the technical development and therapeutic efficacy of NSCs treatments has enhanced the prospects for cell-based treatments in SCI.

OUP accepted manuscript

Traumatic injury of the central nervous system (CNS) is a worldwide health problem affecting millions of people. Trauma of the CNS, that is, traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI), lead to massive and progressive cell loss and axonal degeneration, usually with very limited regeneration. At present, there are no treatments to protect injured CNS tissue or to replace the lost tissue. Stem cells are a cell type that by definition can self-renew and give rise to multiple cell lineages. In recent years, therapies using stem and progenitor cells have shown promising effects in experimental CNS trauma, particularly in the acute-subacute stage, but also in chronic injuries. However, the therapeutic mechanisms by which transplanted cells achieve the structural and/or functional improvements are often not clear. Stem cell therapies for CNS trauma can be categorized into 2 main concepts, transplantation of exogenous neural stem cells and neural progenitor cells and recruitment of endogenous stem and progenitor cells. In this review, focusing on the advances during the last decade, we will discuss the major cell therapies, the pros and cons of these 2 concepts for TBI and SCI, and the treatment strategies we believe will be successful.

LncRNA Airsci increases the inflammatory response after spinal cord injury in rats through the nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathway

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a serious traumatic event to the central nervous system. Studies show that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play an important role in regulating the inflammatory response in the acute stage of SCI. Here, we investigated a new lncRNA related to spinal cord injury and acute inflammation. We analyzed the expression profile of lncRNAs after SCI, and explored the role of lncRNA Airsci (acute inflammatory response in SCI) on recovery following acute SCI. The rats were divided into the control group, SCI group, and SCI + lncRNA Airsci-siRNA group. The expression of inflammatory factors, including nuclear factor kappa B [NF-κB (p65)], NF-κB inhibitor IκBα and phosphorylated IκBα (p-IκBα), and the p-IκBα/IκBα ratio were examined 1-28 days after SCI in rats by western blot assay. The differential lncRNA expression profile after SCI was assessed by RNA sequencing. The differentially expressed lncRNAs were analyzed by bioinformatics technology. The differentially expressed lncRNA Airsci, which is involved in NF-κB signaling and associated with the acute inflammatory response, was verified by quantitative real-time PCR. Interleukin (IL-1β), IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) at 3 days after SCI were measured by western blot assay and quantitative real-time PCR. The histopathology of the spinal cord was evaluated by hematoxylin-eosin and Nissl staining. Motor function was assessed with the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan Locomotor Rating Scale. Numerous differentially expressed lncRNAs were detected after SCI, including 151 that were upregulated and 186 that were downregulated in the SCI 3 d group compared with the control group. LncRNA Airsci was the most significantly expressed among the five lncRNAs involved in the NF-κB signaling pathway. LncRNA Airsci-siRNA reduced the inflammatory response by inhibiting the NF-κB signaling pathway, alleviated spinal cord tissue injury, and promoted the recovery of motor function in SCI rats. These findings show that numerous lncRNAs are differentially expressed following SCI, and that inhibiting lncRNA Airsci reduces the inflammatory response through the NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby promoting functional recovery. All experimental procedures and protocols were approved by the approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Jining Medical University (approval No. JNMC-2020-DW-RM-003) on January 18, 2020.

Standardization of an experimental model of intradural injection after spinal cord injury in rats

OBJECTIVES

The intrathecal route has not yet been thoroughly standardized and evaluated in an experimental model of spinal cord injury (SCI) in Wistar rats. The objective of this study was to standardize and evaluate the effect of intradural injection in this animal model.

METHOD

The animals were divided into 6 groups: 1) laminectomy and intradural catheter; 2) laminectomy, intradural catheter and infusion; 3) only SCI; 4) SCI and intradural catheter; 5) SCI, intradural catheter and infusion; and 6) control (laminectomy only). Motor evaluations were performed using the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan (BBB) scale and the horizontal ladder test; motor evoked potentials were measured for functional evaluation, and histological evaluation was performed as well. All experimental data underwent statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Regarding motor evoked potentials, the groups with experimental SCI had worse results than those without, but neither dural puncture nor the injection of intrathecal solution aggravated the effects of isolated SCI. Regarding histology, adverse tissue effects were observed in animals with SCI. On average, the BBB scores had the same statistical behaviour as the horizontal ladder results, and at every evaluated timepoint, the groups without SCI presented scored significantly better than those with SCI (p<0.05). The difference in performance on motor tests between rats with and without experimental SCI persisted from the first to the last test.

CONCLUSIONS

The present work standardizes the model of intradural injection in experimental SCI in rats. Intrathecal puncture and injection did not independently cause significant functional or histological changes.

Subarachnoid transplantation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell in rodent model with subacute incomplete spinal cord injury: Preclinical safety and efficacy study

Functional multipotency renders human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell (hUC-MSC) a promising candidate for the treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI). However, its safety and efficacy have not been fully understood for clinical translation. In this study, we performed cellular, kinematic, physiological, and anatomical analyses, either in vitro or in vivo, to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy associated with subarachnoid transplantation of hUC-MSCs in rats with subacute incomplete SCI. Concerning safety, hUC-MSCs were shown to have normal morphology, excellent viability, steady proliferation, typical biomarkers, stable karyotype in vitro, and no tumorigenicity both in vitro and in vivo. Following subarachnoid transplantation of hUC-MSCs in the subject rodents, the biodistribution of hUC-MSCs was restricted to the spinal cord, and no toxicity to immune system or organ function was observed. Body weight, organ weight, and the ratio of the latter upon the former between stem cell-transplanted rats and placebo-injected rats revealed no statistical differences. Regarding efficacy, hUC-MSCs could differentiate into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, adipocytes and neural progenitor cells in vitro. While in vivo studies revealed that subarachnoid transplantation of stem cells resulted in significant improvement in locomotion, earlier automatic micturition recovery and reduced lesion size, which correlated with increased regeneration of tracking fiber and reduced parenchymal inflammation. In vivo luminescence imaging showed that a few of the transplanted luciferase-labeled hUC-MSCs tended to migrate towards the lesion epicenter. Shortened latency and enhanced amplitude were also observed in both motor and sensory evoked potentials, indicating improved signal conduction in the damaged site. Immunofluorescent staining confirmed that a few of the administrated hUC-MSCs integrated into the spinal cord parenchyma and differentiated into astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, but not neurons. Moreover, decreased astrogliosis, increased remyelination, and neuron regeneration could be observed. To the best of our knowledge, this preclinical study provides detailed safety and efficacy evidence regarding intrathecal transplantation of hUC-MSCs in treating SCI for the first time and thus, supports its initiation in the following clinical trial.

A scoping review of trials for cell-based therapies in human spinal cord injury

INTRODUCTION

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with significant and life-long disability. Yet, despite decades of research, no regenerative treatment has reached clinical practice. Cell-based therapies are one possible regenerative strategy beginning to transfer to human trials from a more extensive pre-clinical basis.

METHODS

We therefore conducted a scoping review to synthesise all cell-based trials in SCI to consider the current state of the field and the cell transplant type or strategy with greatest promise. A search strategy of MEDLINE returned 1513 results. All clinical trials including adult human patients with acute or chronic, compete or incomplete SCI and a recorded ASIA score were sought. Exclusion criteria included non-traumatic SCI, paediatric patients and animal studies. A total of 43 studies, treating 1061 patients, were identified. Most trials evaluated cells from the bone marrow (22 papers, 660 patients) or the olfactory bulb (10 papers, 245 patients).

RESULTS

Cell transplantation does appear to be safe, with no serious adverse effects being reported in the short-term. 86% of trials described efficacy as a primary outcome. However, varying degrees of outcome reporting prevented meta-analysis. No emerging cell type or technique was identified. The majority of trials, 53%, took place in developing countries, which may suggest more stringent regulatory requirements within Western countries.

CONCLUSION

We believe cell-based transplantation translation remains in its infancy and that, although further robust clinical research is required, it is an important strategy to consider in the treatment of SCI.

The Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Treat Systemic Inflammation in Horses

One hallmark of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is the ability to differentiate into multiple tissue types which assists in tissue regeneration. Another hallmark of MSCs is their potent anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties and the potential to treat inflammatory, immune-mediated, and ischemic conditions. In equine practice, MSCs have shown efficacy in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders such as tendinopathy, meniscal tears and cartilage injury. However, there are many equine disease processes and conditions that may benefit from the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs. Examples include conditions associated with overwhelming acute inflammatory response such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome to chronic diseases characterized by a prolonged low level of inflammation such as equine asthma and recurrent uveitis. For the acute inflammatory response processes, there is often high morbidity and mortality with no effective immunomodulatory treatment to prevent the overwhelming synthesis of proinflammatory mediators. For chronic inflammatory disease processes, frequently long-term corticosteroid treatment is the therapeutic mainstay, with serious potential complications. Thus, there is an unmet need for alternative anti-inflammatory treatments for both acute and chronic illnesses in horses. While MSCs show promise for such conditions, much research is needed before a clinically safe and effective treatment will be available. Optimal MSC tissue source, patient vs. donor source (autologous vs. allogeneic) and cell growth conditions need to be determined for each problem. For immediate use, allogeneic MSC treatments is preferable, but immune tolerance and adequate safety require further study. MSC collection and cryopreservation from horses before they are injured or ill, whether from umbilical cord tissue, bone marrow or adipose might become more widespread. Once these fundamental approaches to treating specific diseases with MSCs are determined, the route of administration, dose and timing of administration also need to be studied. To provide a framework for development of MSC immunomodulatory treatments, this article reviews the current understanding of equine MSC anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties and proposes how MSC therapy may be further developed to treat acute onset systemic inflammatory processes and chronic inflammatory diseases.

Design of hydrogel-based scaffolds for the treatment of spinal cord injuries

Hydrogel-based scaffold design approaches for the treatment of spinal cord injuries.

Integrated analysis of competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) networks in subacute stage of spinal cord injury

This study aims to investigate the genetic and epigenetic mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of subacute stage of spinal cord injury (SCI). Gene-expression datasets associated with SCI were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and differential expression analyses were performed in order to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Multiple network types were constructed and analyzed, including protein-protein-interaction (PPI) network, miRNA-target network, lncRNA-associated competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network, and miRNA-transcription factor (TF)-target network. Cluster analyses were performed to identify significant modules. To verify the prediction accuracy of the in-silico identified molecules, qRT-PCR experiments were conducted. The results depicted the Ywhae gene as the hub gene with the highest degree in the PPI network. The ceRNA network identified specific genes (Flna, ID3, and HK2), miRNAs (miR-16-5p, miR-1958, and miR-185-5p), and lncRNAs (Neat1, Xist, and Malat1) as playing critical regulating roles in the pathological mechanisms of SCI. The miRNA-TF-gene interaction network identified four important TFs (Sp1, Trp53, Jun, and Rela). The miRNA-gene-TF interaction loops from the significant modules indicated that miR-325-3p can interact with the Asah1 gene and TF-Sp1 by forming a closed loop. The qRT-PCR experiments verified four selected genes (Flna, ID3, HK2, and Ywhae) and two selected TFs (Jun, and Sp1) as significantly up-regulated following SCI. The results indicated that four genes (Flna, ID3, HK2, and Ywhae), four transcription factors (Sp1, Trp53, Jun, and RelA), two miRNAs (miR-16-5p and miR-325-3p), and three lncRNAs (Neat1, Xist, and Malat1) are likely to be involved in the molecular mechanisms underlying the subacute stage of SCI. These findings uncover putative pathogenic mechanisms involved in SCI and might bear translation significance for future research towards therapeutic development.

Restoring Motor Neurons in Spinal Cord Injury With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating neurological disorder that damages motor, sensory, and autonomic pathways. Recent advances in stem cell therapy have allowed for the in vitro generation of motor neurons (MNs) showing electrophysiological and synaptic activity, expression of canonical MN biomarkers, and the ability to graft into spinal lesions. Clinical translation, especially the transplantation of MN precursors in spinal lesions, has thus far been elusive because of stem cell heterogeneity and protocol variability, as well as a hostile microenvironment such as inflammation and scarring, which yield inconsistent pre-clinical results without a consensus best-practice therapeutic strategy. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) in particular have lower ethical and immunogenic concerns than other stem cells, which could make them more clinically applicable. In this review, we focus on the differentiation of iPSCs into neural precursors, MN progenitors, mature MNs, and MN subtype fates. Previous reviews have summarized MN development and differentiation, but an up-to-date summary of technological and experimental advances holding promise for bench-to-bedside translation, especially those targeting individual MN subtypes in SCI, is currently lacking. We discuss biological mechanisms of MN lineage, recent experimental protocols and techniques for MN differentiation from iPSCs, and transplantation of neural precursors and MN lineage cells in spinal cord lesions to restore motor function. We emphasize efficient, clinically safe, and personalized strategies for the application of MN and their subtypes as therapy in spinal lesions.

Spinal cord injury: pathophysiology, treatment strategies, associated challenges, and future implications

Axonal regeneration and formation of tripartite (axo-glial) junctions at damaged sites is a prerequisite for early repair of injured spinal cord. Transplantation of stem cells at such sites of damage which can generate both neuronal and glial population has gained impact in terms of recuperation upon infliction with spinal cord injury. In spite of the fact that a copious number of pre-clinical studies using different stem/progenitor cells have shown promising results at acute and subacute stages, at the chronic stages of injury their recovery rates have shown a drastic decline. Therefore, developing novel therapeutic strategies are the need of the hour in order to assuage secondary morbidity and effectuate improvement of the spinal cord injury (SCI)-afflicted patients' quality of life. The present review aims at providing an overview of the current treatment strategies and also gives an insight into the potential cell-based therapies for the treatment of SCI.

Filling the Gap: Neural Stem Cells as A Promising Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) can lead to severe motor, sensory and social impairments having a huge impact on patients’ lives. The complex and time-dependent SCI pathophysiology has been hampering the development of novel and effective therapies. Current treatment options include surgical interventions, to stabilize and decompress the spinal cord, and rehabilitative care, without providing a cure for these patients. Novel therapies have been developed targeting different stages during trauma. Among them, cell-based therapies hold great potential for tissue regeneration after injury. Neural stem cells (NSCs), which are multipotent cells with inherent differentiation capabilities committed to the neuronal lineage, are especially relevant to promote and reestablish the damaged neuronal spinal tracts. Several studies demonstrate the regenerative effects of NSCs in SCI after transplantation by providing neurotrophic support and restoring synaptic connectivity. Therefore, human clinical trials have already been launched to assess safety in SCI patients. Here, we review NSC-based experimental studies in a SCI context and how are they currently being translated into human clinical trials.

Combinational therapy of lithium and human neural stem cells in rat spinal cord contusion model

A large number of treatment approaches have been used for spinal cord injury improvement, a medically incurable disorder, and subsequently stem cell transplantation appears to be a promising strategy. The main objective of this study is to ascertain whether combinational therapy of human neural stem cells (hNSCs) together with lithium chloride improves cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation in a rat spinal contusion model, or not. Contusive spinal cord injury was implemented on Wistar male rats. Experimental groups comprised of: control, hNSCs transplanted, lithium chloride (Li), and hNSCs and lithium chloride (hNSCs + Li). In every experimental group, locomotor activity score and motor evoked potential (MEP) were performed to evaluate motor recovery as well as histological assessments to determine mechanisms of improvement. In accordance with our results, the hNSCs + Li and the Li groups showed significant improvement in locomotor scores and MEP. Also, Histological assessments revealed that transplanted hNSCs are capable of differentiation and migration along the spinal cord. Although NESTIN-positive cells were proliferated significantly in the Lithium group in comparison with control and the hNSCs + Li groups, the quantity of ED1 cells in the hNSCs + Li was significantly larger than the other two groups. Our results demonstrate that combinational therapy of hNSCs with lithium chloride and lithium chloride individually are adequate for ameliorating more than partial functional recovery and endogenous repair in spinal cord-injured rats.

Biomaterials and Gene Manipulation in Stem Cell-Based Therapies for Spinal Cord Injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI), a prominent health issue, represents a substantial portion of the global health care burden. Stem cell-based therapies provide novel solutions for SCI treatment, yet obstacles remain in the form of low survival rate, uncontrolled differentiation, and functional recovery. The application of engineered biomaterials in stem cell therapy provides a physicochemical microenvironment that mimics the stem cell niche, facilitating self-renewal, stem cell differentiation, and tissue reorganization. Nonetheless, external microenvironment support is inadequate, and some obstacles persist, for example, limited sources, gradual aging, and immunogenicity of stem cells. Targeted stem cell gene manipulation could eliminate many of these drawbacks, allowing safer, more effective use under regulation of intrinsic mechanisms. Additionally, through genetic labeling of stem cells, their role in tissue engineering may be elucidated. Therefore, combining stem cell therapy, materials science, and genetic modification technologies may shed light on SCI treatment. Herein, recent advances and advantages of biomaterials and gene manipulation, especially with respect to stem cell-based therapies, are highlighted, and their joint performance in SCI is evaluated. Current technological limitations and perspectives on future directions are then discussed. Although this combination is still in the early stages of development, it is highly likely to substantially contribute to stem cell-based therapies in the foreseeable future.

Transplantation of neural precursors generated from spinal progenitor cells reduces inflammation in spinal cord injury via NF-κB pathway inhibition

BACKGROUND

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) triggers a chain of events that is accompanied by an inflammatory reaction leading to necrotic cell death at the core of the injury site, which is restricted by astrogliosis and apoptotic cell death in the surrounding areas. Activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway has been shown to be associated with inflammatory response induced by SCI. Here, we elucidate the pattern of activation of NF-κB in the pathology of SCI in rats and investigate the effect of transplantation of spinal neural precursors (SPC-01) on its activity and related astrogliosis.

METHODS

Using a rat compression model of SCI, we transplanted SPC-01 cells or injected saline into the lesion 7 days after SCI induction. Paraffin-embedded sections were used to assess p65 NF-κB nuclear translocation at days 1, 3, 7, 10, 14, and 28 and to determine levels of glial scaring, white and gray matter preservation, and cavity size at day 28 after SCI. Additionally, levels of p65 phosphorylated at Serine536 were determined 10, 14, and 28 days after SCI as well as levels of locally secreted TNF-α.

RESULTS

We determined a bimodal activation pattern of canonical p65 NF-κB signaling pathway in the pathology of SCI with peaks at 3 and 28 days after injury induction. Transplantation of SCI-01 cells resulted in significant downregulation of TNF-α production at 10 and 14 days after SCI and in strong inhibition of p65 NF-κB activity at 28 days after SCI, mainly in the gray matter. Moreover, reduced formation of glial scar was found in SPC-01-transplanted rats along with enhanced gray matter preservation and reduced cavity size.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate strong immunomodulatory properties of SPC-01 cells based on inhibition of a major signaling pathway. Canonical NF-κB pathway activation underlines much of the immune response after SCI including cytokine, chemokine, and apoptosis-related factor production as well as immune cell activation and infiltration. Reduced inflammation may have led to observed tissue sparing. Additionally, such immune response modulation could have impacted astrocyte activation resulting in a reduced glial scar.