The K-line in the cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament is different on plain radiographs and CT images

Classification of expert-level therapeutic decisions for degenerative cervical myelopathy using ensemble machine learning algorithms

Background

Therapeutic decisions for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) are complex and should consider various factors. We aimed to develop machine learning (ML) models for classifying expert-level therapeutic decisions in patients with DCM.

Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients diagnosed with DCM, and the diagnosis of DCM was confirmed clinically and radiologically. The target outcomes were defined as conservative treatment, anterior surgical approaches (ASA), and posterior surgical approaches (PSA). We performed the following classifications using ML algorithms: multiclass, one-versus-rest, and one-versus-one. Two ensemble ML algorithms were used: random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) was the primary metric. We also identified the variable importance for each classification.

Results

In total, 304 patients were included (109 conservative, 66 ASA, 125 PSA, and 4 combined surgeries). For multiclass classification, the AUC-ROC of RF and XGB models were 0.91 and 0.92, respectively. In addition, ML models showed AUC-ROC values of >0.9 for all types of binary classifications. Variable importance analysis revealed that the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and central motor conduction time were the two most important variables for distinguishing between conservative and surgical treatments. When classifying ASA and PSA, the number of involved levels, age, and body mass index were important contributing factors.

Conclusion

ML-based classification of DCM therapeutic options is valid and feasible. This study can be a basis for establishing generalizable ML-based surgical decision models for DCM. Further studies are needed with a large multicenter database.

Posterior Decompression and Fusion with Vertical Pressure Procedure in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical OPLL with Kyphotic Deformity

Objective

To report the outcomes and feasibility of a new technique to change K‐line (−) to K‐line (+) via only a posterior approach to treat multilevel non‐continuous cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (C‐OPLL) with kyphotic deformity.

Methods

In this study, 17 consecutive cases of patients who underwent vertical pressure procedure (VP) combined with posterior cervical single‐open‐door laminoplasty and instrumented fusion from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019 were enrolled. The following radiographic parameters: C2‐C7 Cobb angle, local Cobb angle, extent of OPLL, and the distance from OPLL to the K‐line(DK) were measured and analyzed. Clinically, the JOA score, VAS‐N and VAS‐A, NDI, and complications were collected from medical records to evaluate the clinical outcomes.

Results

All 17 cases shifted from K‐line (−) to K‐line (+).Comparing the preoperative images to the final follow‐up images, the mean C2‐7 Cobb angle changed from −6.94° ± 8.30° to 8.18° ± 4.43°, and the local Cobb angle altered from −9.12° ± 8.68° to 6.65° ± 6.11°. The mean DK increased from −2.64 ± 1.52 mm to 3.09 ± 2.19 mm. One patient showed C5 palsy and recovered within 3 months. The mean JOA score increased from 8.88 ± 2.11 to 14.71 ± 1.36. The average NDI decreased from 20.65 ± 7.80 to 8.94 ± 4.93. The mean VAS‐N and VAS‐A decreased from 3.44 ± 1.80 and 4.69 ± 1.97 to 1.25 ± 0.86 and 1.38 ± 1.16. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year.

Conclusion

A new technique added to posterior decompression and fusion (PDF), the vertical pressure procedure effectively corrects K‐line (−) to K‐line (+) and avoids the shortcomings of conventional anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) as well as PDF to provide a relatively safe and adequate decompression, cervical realignment. It pronounced satisfactory clinical outcome for extensive non‐continuous OPLL with kyphotic deformity even though OPLL remains ventral to the spinal cord.

The Kappa Line as a Regional Modification of the K-line: A Predictor of Neurological Outcome and Indicator of the Adequate Level of Decompression in Selective Laminoplasty

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to introduce Kappa line (modification of K-line) for the prediction of postoperative neurological recovery after selective cervical laminoplasty (LMP) and use in determining the decompression level.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The K-line is a radiographic marker that can predict prognosis and aid in surgical planning for patients undergoing LMP through C3 to C7. However, its efficacy in LMP involving limited segments is unclear. Furthermore, no specific radiographic marker to predict the prognosis of selective LMP has been reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-one consecutive patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up after selective LMP for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament were retrospectively reviewed. The Kappa line was defined as a straight line connecting the midpoints of the spinal canal made by remaining bony structure after decompression procedures on a plain lateral radiograph in the neutral position. Patients were classified as K-line (+) or (-) and Kappa line (+) or (-) based on whether the ossified mass crossed the indicator line.

RESULTS

The Kappa line (+) group demonstrated significantly higher Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) recovery rate (P=0.01), final JOA score (P<0.01), and dural sac diameter (P<0.01) postoperatively than the Kappa line (-) group. Cord compression grade was significantly lesser in the Kappa line (+) group. However, the K-line-based classification did not demonstrate significant difference in JOA recovery rate, final JOA score, and cord compression grade between the (+) and (-) groups; the dural sac diameter was significantly higher in the K-line (+) group (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The Kappa line showed better correlation with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament size and cervical alignment, providing better prediction of neurological recovery and remaining cord compression following selective LMP. Therefore, the Kappa line can aid in determining the level of decompression in selective LMP.

Preoperative Radiological Parameters to Predict Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Laminoplasty

Many studies have focused on pre-operative sagittal alignment parameters which could predict poor clinical or radiological outcomes after laminoplasty. However, the influx of too many new factors causes confusion. This study reviewed sagittal alignment parameters, predictive of clinical or radiological outcomes, in the literature. Preoperative kyphotic alignment was initially proposed as a predictor of clinical outcomes. The clinical significance of the K-line and K-line variants also has been studied. Sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope (T1s), T1s-cervical lordosis (CL), anterolisthesis, local kyphosis, the longitudinal distance index, and range of motion were proposed to have relationships with clinical outcomes. The relationship between loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) and T1s has been widely studied, but controversy remains. Extension function, the ratio of CL to T1s (CL/T1s), and Sharma classification were recently proposed as LCL predictors. In predicting postoperative kyphosis, T1s cannot predict postoperative kyphosis, but a low CL/T1s ratio was associated with postoperative kyphosis.

Influence of K-line on intraoperative and hidden blood loss in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament when undergoing unilateral open-door laminoplasty

Background

The K-line is a virtual straight line that connects the midpoints of the anteroposterior spinal canal diameter from C2 to C7 on a cervical lateral X-ray film. Patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), in which the peak of the OPLL exceeds the K-line (K-line [-]), are less likely to experience sufficient decompression after laminoplasty compared with patients for whom the OPLL does not exceed the K-line (K-line [+]). This retrospective study investigated the influence of K-line position relative to the OPLL on intraoperative and hidden blood loss during unilateral open-door laminoplasty for OPLL.

Methods

Data were retrospectively analyzed of 108 patients with OPLL who underwent unilateral open-door laminoplasty between April 2015 and March 2018. Patient cases were categorized as K-line (+) or (-). The evaluated perioperative parameters were haematocrit, haemoglobin, intraoperative and hidden blood loss, surgical time, postoperative drainage, and complications. Radiological parameters included ossification occupancy ratio and C2-7 lordosis.

Results

The K-line (+) and K-line (-) groups were statistically comparable with regard to age, gender, body mass index, OPLL classification, medication history, C2-7 lordosis, postoperative haemoglobin and haematocrit, postoperative drainage, hidden blood loss, and complications. The occupying ratio of the K-line (-) group was significantly greater than that of the K-line (+) group (49.5 ± 15.3% cf. 42.3 ± 10.1%; P = 0.006), and the intraoperative blood loss was also significantly higher (286 ± 110.5 mL cf. 205.5 ± 98.3 L, P = 0.003). The hidden blood loss of the K-line (-) group was higher than that of the K-line (+), but not significantly (295.5 ± 112.6 mL cf. 265.6 ± 103.8 mL; P = 0.072).

Conclusion

Intraoperative and hidden blood loss associated with unilateral open-door laminoplasty can be predicted by the spatial relationship of the K-line and osteophyte. This relationship is a simple and practical index that may help surgeons determine the appropriate surgical strategy for patients with OPLL.

Surgical decision-making for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament versus other types of degenerative cervical myelopathy: anterior versus posterior approaches

Background

The debate between anterior or posterior approach for pathologies such as cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) have drawn heated debate but are still inconclusive.

Main body of the abstract

A narrative review was performed specifically to study the differences pertaining to OPLL and other causes of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Current evidence suggests that anterior approach is preferred for K-line (−) OPLL, K-line (+) with canal occupying ratio > 60% and DCM with pre-existing cervical kyphosis. Posterior approach is preferred for K-line (+) OPLL with canal-occupying ratio < 50–60%, and multi-level CSM. No particular advantage for either approach was observed for DCM in a lordotic cervical spine. Anterior approach is generally associated with more complications and thus needs to be weighed carefully during decision-making. The evidence is not convincing for comparing single versus multi-level involvement, and the role of patients' co-morbidity status, pre-existing osteoporosis and co-existent spinal pathologies in influencing patient outcome and surgical options. This should be a platform for future research directives.

Conclusion

From this review, evidence is still inconclusive but there are some factors to consider, and DCM and OPLL should be considered separately for decision-making. Anterior approach is considered for pre-existing cervical kyphosis in DCM, for K-line (−) regardless of canal-occupying ratio, and K-line (+) and canal-occupying ratio > 60% for OPLL patients. Posterior approach is considered for patients with multi-level pathology for DCM, and K-line (+) and canal-occupying ratio < 50–60% for OPLL.

Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Surgical Approaches and Associated Complications

Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is a rare but potentially devastating cause of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Decompressive surgery is the standard of care for OPLL and can be achieved through anterior, posterior, or combined approaches to the cervical spine. Surgical correction of OPLL via any approach is associated with higher rates of complications and the presence of OPLL is considered a significant risk factor for perioperative complications in DCM surgeries. Potential complications include dural tear (DT) and subsequent cerebrospinal fluid leak, C5 palsy, hematoma, hardware failure, surgical site infections, and other neurological deficits. Anterior approaches are technically more demanding and associated with higher rates of DT but offer greater access to ventral OPLL pathology. Posterior approaches are associated with lower rates of complications but may allow for continued disease progression. Therefore, the decision to pursue either an anterior or posterior approach to surgical decompression may be critically influenced by complications associated with each procedure. The authors critically review anterior and posterior approaches to surgical decompression of OPLL with particular focus on the complications associated with each approach. We also review the recent work in developing new surgical treatments for OPLL that aim to reduce complication incidence.