Clinical application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in pectus excavatum patients following Nuss procedure

Pain management after pediatric minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Pectus excavatum is a common congenital chest wall abnormality characterized by a concave appearance of the chest, and minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) is the surgical treatment of choice. A rapidly growing field of research is pain management in children undergoing MIRPE, with many shifts in practice occurring over the last decade. The primary objectives of this narrative review are to describe current methods of perioperative pain management and the development of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) to improve the experience of patients undergoing MIRPE.

Methods

Recent literature was found using the PubMed database using combinations of keywords: pectus excavatum, pediatric, pain management, minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE), and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). Literature search was conducted by the authorship team and an independent, certified librarian. Articles published in English from 2010-2024 were the focus of our review; however, older literature was included when appropriate.

Key Content and Findings

Perioperative pain management for patients undergoing MIRPE continues to evolve and improve patient outcomes. While evidence supports the use of more traditional analgesia, such as opioid-based or epidural analgesia, it also supports the trend toward contemporary multimodal pain control via pre-, intra-, and post-operative strategies including opioid-sparing analgesics, intercostal nerve cryoablation (INC), intercostal nerve blocks (INBs), and single or continuous infusion regional anesthesia techniques.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing surgical repair of pectus excavatum benefit from the use of contemporary pain control techniques discussed in this review, with a growing body of literature supporting the use of INC, regional pain blocks and multimodal analgesia. Additionally, ERAS pathways and institutional protocols are discussed that are currently transforming postoperative MIRPE pain management and are being implemented widely.

Perioperative considerations in anesthesia for minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum, Nuss procedure

Pectus excavatum (PE) is a common anterior chest wall deformity that affects the heart and lungs depending on the severity of compression. The Nuss procedure, a minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum, has evolved over the years with thoracoscopic assistance and minimal incision. Despite improved surgical techniques, pain and nausea are often the most common factors determining hospital length of stay. This review will explore the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative anesthetic considerations necessary for improving patient outcomes, reducing surgical stress, and shortening hospital stays for patients undergoing the Nuss procedure.

Implementing Change: Sustaining Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Pediatric Surgery Using Iterative Assessments

INTRODUCTION

While Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are becoming more common in pediatric surgery, there is still little published about protocol compliance and sustainability.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study to evaluate the compliance of an ERAS protocol for pectus repair at a large academic children's hospital. Our primary outcome was overall protocol compliance at 1-y postimplementation of the ERAS protocol. Our comparison group included all pectus repairs for 2 y before protocol implementation.

RESULTS

Overall protocol compliance at 12 mo was 89%. Of the 16 pectus repairs included in the ERAS protocol group, 94% (n = 15) and 94% (n = 15) received preoperative acetaminophen and gabapentin, respectively, which was significantly greater than the historical control group (P < 0.001). For the intraoperative components analyzed, only the intrathecal morphine was significantly different than historical controls (100% versus 49%, P < 0.001). Postoperatively, the time from operating room to return to normal diet was shorter for the ERAS group (0.53 d versus 1.16 d, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in readmission rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS protocol compliance varies based on phase of care. Solutions to sustain protocols depend on the institution and the patient population. However, the utilization of implementation science fundamentals was invaluable in this study to identify and address areas for improvement in protocol compliance. Other institutions may adapt these strategies to improve protocol compliance at their centers.

Implementation Science Fundamentals: Pediatric Surgery Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Pectus Repair

INTRODUCTION

Surgical repair of pectus excavatum and carinatum in children has historically been associated with severe postoperative pain and prolonged hospitalization. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary, multimodal approach designed to fast-track surgical care. However, obstacles to implementation have led to very few within pediatric surgery. The aim of this study is to outline the process of development and implementation of an ERAS protocol for pectus surgical repair using fundamental principles of implementation science.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team of providers worked collaboratively to develop an ERAS protocol for surgical repair of pectus excavatum and carinatum and methods for identifying eligible patients. The surgical champion collaborated with all end users to review and revise the ERAS protocol, assessing all foreseeable barriers and facilitators prior to implementation.

RESULTS

Our entire pediatric surgery team, nurses at every stage (clinic/preoperative/recovery/floor), physical therapy, and information technology contributed to the creation and implementation of an ERAS protocol with seven phases of care. The finalized version was implemented by end users focusing on four main areas: pain control, ambulation, diet, and education. Barriers and facilitators were continually addressed with an iterative process to improve the success of implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the first studies in children which details the step-by-step process of developing and implementing an ERAS protocol for pectus excavatum and carinatum. The process of development and implementation of an ERAS protocol as outlined in this manuscript can serve as a model for future ERAS protocols in pediatric surgery.

A propensity sore-matched study: Applying a modified chest tube drainage strategy in rapid rehabilitation following uni-portal thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the value of a modified chest tube drainage strategy to a traditional drainage strategy in single-port thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection.

METHODS

From January 2019 to July 2021, we collected clinical data on 405 patients who underwent single-port thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection in the No.1 Department of Thoracic Surgery at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, with 121 (29.9%) cases in the modified drainage strategy group and 284 (70.1%) cases in the traditional drainage strategy group. The propensity score matching method (Match Ratio = 1:1) was used to reduce differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups.

RESULTS

Following 1:1 propensity score matching, 120 matched pairs (240 patients) were included in the study. There was no significant difference in general clinical characteristics between the two groups. There was no statistical difference in intraoperative factors except for operative times (71.42 ± 22.98 min vs. 86.80 ± 36.75 min, p < 0.001). In terms of postoperative factors, there were significant differences in postoperative chest tube duration (0.00 ± 0.00 h vs. 32.68 ± 18.51 h, p < 0.001), total drainage volume (143.03 ± 118.33 ml vs. 187.73 ± 140.82 ml, p = 0.008), postoperative hospital stay (2.61 ± 0.70 days vs. 3.27 ± 1.88 days, p < 0.001), number of additional pain relief (0.14 ± 0.40 vs. 0.42 ± 0.74, p < 0.001), facial pain score (2.7 ± 1.8 vs. 3.6 ± 2.7, p = 0.005) and adverse events (p = 0.046). Furthermore, there was a statistical difference between the two groups regarding CTCAE grade-1 complication, but no statistical difference in CTCAE grade-2 complication.

CONCLUSIONS

A modified drainage strategy in single-port thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection is safe and feasible, allowing for less postoperative rehabilitation time, pain relief, reduced postoperative pleural effusion, and reduced clinical workload.

A multimodal protocol utilizing liposomal bupivacaine rib blocks leads to opioid reduction in patients undergoing the Nuss procedure

Background

A major challenge associated with the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum repair is postoperative pain control. Early Recovery Program (ERP) protocols for the Nuss procedure are becoming common, but there is a paucity of experience using liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a long-acting local anesthetic, for rib blocks in this setting. We investigated whether a protocol utilizing LB rib blocks decreased opioid use after the Nuss procedure while achieving equivalent pain control.

Methods

All adolescent patients undergoing the Nuss procedure at our institution between January 2013 and January 2021 were included. Patients were divided into a pre-intervention cohort (n=15), a transition cohort (n=4), and a post-intervention cohort (n=13). Patients in all groups received scheduled acetaminophen and non-steroidals postoperatively. The pre-intervention cohort received an opioid patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump postoperatively, with a transition to oral opiates. The transition and post-intervention cohorts received scheduled gabapentin in addition to intraoperative bilateral rib blocks with longer-acting local anesthetic. Rib blocks were performed using 0.25% Bupivacaine in the pre-intervention group. In the transition group, epinephrine (1 mg/kg) was added to 0.25% bupivacaine for the rib block. Following approval in patients aged 13–18 years, 1.3% LB (2.25 mg/kg) was given for a rib block in the post-intervention cohort.

Results

Demographic and clinical variables were equivalent in all groups. Post-intervention patients received 90% fewer opioids [median morphine equivalent (MME) mg/kg] compared to the pre-intervention cohort (0.8 vs. 8.2 MME mg/kg, P<0.0001), with no significant difference in pain scores between groups. Hospital length of stay was decreased among the intervention cohort (3 vs. 4 days, P=0.002).

Conclusions

Significant decreases in opioid use and length of stay after the Nuss procedure were achieved by the implementation of a multimodal ERP for pain management, without increase in patient-reported pain scores.