Clinical adjustability of radiological tools in patients with surgically resected cT1N0-staged non-small-cell lung cancer from the long-term survival evaluation

Prognostic value of consolidation-to-tumor ratio on computed tomography in NSCLC: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although several studies have confirmed the prognostic value of the consolidation to tumor ratio (CTR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there still remains controversial about it.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to April, 2022 for eligible studies that reported the correlation between CTR and prognosis in NSCLC. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were extracted and pooled to assess the overall effects. Heterogeneity was estimated by I² statistics. Subgroup analysis based on the cut-off value of CTR, country, source of HR and histology type was conducted to detect the sources of heterogeneity. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 12.0.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies published between 2001 and 2022 with 10,347 patients were enrolled. The pooled results demonstrated that elevated CTR was associated with poorer overall survival (HR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.42-2.50, P < 0.01) and disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS)/progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.27-1.59, P < 0.01) in NSCLC. According to subgroup analysis by the cut-off value of CTR and histology type, both lung adenocarcinoma and NSCLC patients who had a higher CTR showed worse survival. Subgroup analysis stratified by country revealed that CTR was a prognostic factor for OS and DFS/RFS/PFS in Chinese, Japanese, and Turkish patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In NSCLC patients with high CTR, the prognosis was worse than that with low CTR, indicating that CTR may be a prognostic factor.

Effects of high-quality nursing care on quality of life, survival, and recurrence in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nursing can improve the quality of life (QoL) and functional prognosis for lung cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of high-quality nursing on inflammation and prognosis in postoperative patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A total of 372 patients with NSCLC were enrolled between the May 2014 and June 2016. Patients were randomly received high-quality nursing (n = 192) or normal nursing (n = 180). Symptom management, QoL, hospital stay, inflammatory score, survival time, recurrence rate, symptoms, anxiety, depression scale and psychological distress were assessed at baseline and 5-year follow up.

RESULTS

High-quality nursing significantly shortened hospital stay, improved postoperative inflammation, symptom management, QoL compared to patients received normal nursing. Compare with normal nursing, high-quality nursing decreased anxiety, depression scale and psychological distress for postoperative patients with advanced NSCLC. Outcomes showed that high-quality nursing increased the survival time and decreased recurrence rate for postoperative patients with advanced NSCLC.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, data in the current study indicate that high-quality nursing can decrease inflammation and improve prognosis for the postoperative patients with NSCLC.

Efficacy of a combined tool for stage I non‑small cell lung cancer against lymph node metastasis

In patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the prediction of occult lymph node metastasis (LNM) based on a combination of morphology using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and metabolism using positron emission tomography (PET)-CT is unknown. The present study evaluated the use of predictive radiological tools, chest CT and PET-CT, for occult LNM in patients with clinical stage I NSCLC. The records of patients who underwent lobectomy between July 2014 and November 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The differences in clinicopathological parameters, including CT and PET, between the LNM and non-LNM groups were assessed. Pure solid tumor was defined as a consolidation-to-tumor ratio of 1. The optimal cut-off value for predictive radiological tools for LNM was assessed according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The present study included 288 patients, of whom 39 (13.5%) had LNM; of these 38 (97.4%) were pure solid type. Larger consolidation size (CS), higher maximal standardized uptake (SUVmax) value and histological type were statistically associated with LNM (all P<0.05). The optimal cutoff values of CS and SUVmax for predicting LNM were 19 mm and 5.5 respectively, as assessed using the area under the ROC curve. The combination of CS ≥19 mm and SUVmax ≥5.5 demonstrated a markedly higher odds ratio (9.184; 95% CI, 4.345-19.407) than each parameter individually. The minimum values of CS and SUVmax associated with LNM were 10 mm and 0.8 respectively. Pure solid formation and CS as morphology and SUVmax as metabolism were useful tools that complemented each other in predicting LNM. The combined method of evaluating SUVmax and CS may identify eligibility for LN dissection. However, considering the minimum values of CS and SUVmax in LNM, it cannot affirm the omission of LN dissection for cases that do not meet the combined criteria using HRCT and PET-CT.

Permissible Outcomes of Lobe-Specific Lymph Node Dissection for Elevated Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background and Objectives: Lobe-specific nodal dissection (L-SND) is currently acceptable for the dissection of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but not for cancers of more advanced clinical stages. We aimed to assess the efficacy of L-SND, compared to systemic nodal dissection (SND). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of patients with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) abnormality who underwent complete resection of NSCLC via lobectomy or more in addition to either SND or L-SND at two cancer-specific institutions from January 2006 to December 2017. Results: A total of 799 patients, including 265 patients who underwent SND and 534 patients who underwent L-SND, were included. On multivariate analysis, thoracotomy, more than lobectomy, cN1-2, advanced pathological stage, adjuvant treatment, and EGFR or ALK were strongly associated with SND. No significant differences were found in overall survival, disease-free survival, and overtime survival after propensity adjustment (p = 0.09, p = 0.11, and p = 0.50, respectively). There were no significant differences in local (p = 0.16), regional (p = 0.72), or distant (p = 0.39) tumor recurrence between the two groups. Conclusions: SND did not improve the prognosis of NSCLC patients with CEA abnormality. Complete pulmonary resection via L-SND seems useful for NSCLC patients with CEA abnormality.

Narrative review of optimal prognostic radiological tools using computed tomography for T1N0-staged non-small cell lung cancer

Various radiological tools can predict the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we evaluated the prognostic effect of different radiological tools such as whole tumor size (WTS), consolidation size (CS), consolidation tumor ratio (CTR), tumor disappearance ratio (TDR), mediastinal diameter (MD), and ground glass opacity (GGO) using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). We reviewed recent retrospective studies on the predictive effect of these radiological tools on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with T1N0-staged NSCLC. We searched PubMed and the British Library databases for the English literature published from January 2010 to December 2020 and generated a total of 32 publications (NSCLC, n=16; adenocarcinoma, n=16). The TNM classification version 7 was used in 18 studies, and version 8 in 14 studies. The evaluated radiological parameters were WTS, CS including T category, CTR, TDR, MD, presence of GGO, GGO ratio, and pure GGO. This review suggested that CS, MD, and the presence of GGO are optimal prognostic radiological tools for cT1N0-Staged NSCLC. CTR or TDR for part solid nodules (PSNs) is not a well-accepted prognostic factor. Further investigations are required to differentiate between benign scars and malignant components on HRCT and evaluate the prognosis of PSNs (1< CS ≤2 cm) with large WTS in the future.