Effect of vancomycin loading dose on clinical outcome in critically ill patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia

Impact of Limiting Vancomycin Loading Doses in Patients With Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections After Hospital Protocol Revision

Background: Vancomycin loading doses are commonly used to quickly attain target serum concentrations; however, data supporting their effect on clinical patient outcomes is limited. In April 2020, our institution revised our pharmacist-driven vancomycin dosing protocol to reserve loading doses for hemodynamically unstable patients with suspected serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Prior to the protocol update, all patients treated with vancomycin at our institution received a weight-based loading dose. The purpose of this study is to assess clinical efficacy and safety outcomes related to the use of vancomycin loading doses. Methods: A retrospective, quasi-experimental study was performed to compare clinical outcomes in adult patients treated with vancomycin for laboratory-confirmed MRSA infections. Patients who received vancomycin therapy prior to our institution's vancomycin dosing protocol revisions (pre-intervention) were compared to patients who received vancomycin after the revisions (post-intervention). The primary outcome was all-cause, inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes included persistent signs and symptoms of infection ≥5 days after vancomycin initiation, switch to alternative anti-MRSA therapy, and nephrotoxicity. Results: A total of 122 patients (63 pre-intervention patients and 59 post-intervention patients) were included. Receipt of a vancomycin loading dose did not impact the rate of inpatient mortality (4.76%vs 6.78%; OR 1.46, 95% CI [0.31, 6.79]). All secondary outcomes were similar between the two groups, including persistent signs and symptoms of infection, switch to alternative anti-MRSA therapy, and nephrotoxicity. Conclusions: Routine use of vancomycin loading doses is not associated with improved outcomes in hemodynamically stable patients with MRSA infections.

Appropriateness of antimicrobial selection for treatment of pneumonia in selected public hospitals of Eastern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study

Objective

Inappropriate antimicrobial use leads to drug resistance and poor clinical outcomes. Considering the lack of data regarding the drug use patterns in the treatment of pneumonia in selected study areas, the authors felt compelled to assess the appropriateness of antimicrobial usage in the treatment of pneumonia at Hiwot Fana Specialized Comprehensive University Hospital and Jugal Hospital from May 1 to 31, 2021.

Methods

A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted using the medical cards of 693 admitted patients with pneumonia. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify the factors associated with an initial inappropriate antibiotic use. A p value of 0.05 was used to determine the statistical significance of the association using an adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval.

Results

Of the total participants, 116 (16.74%, 95% confidence interval: 14.1-19.6) of them received an initial inappropriate antimicrobial regimen. Ceftriaxone plus azithromycin was the most prescribed antimicrobial agent. Patients who were younger than 5 years (adjusted odds ratio = 1.71; 95% confidence interval: 1.00-2.94), between 6 and 14 years (adjusted odds ratio = 3.14; 95% confidence interval: 1.64-6.00), and older than 65 years (adjusted odds ratio = 2.97; 95% confidence interval: 1.07-2.66), with comorbid conditions (adjusted odds ratio = 1.74; 95% confidence interval: 1.10-2.72) and prescribed by medical interns (adjusted odds ratio = 1.80; 95% confidence interval: 1.14-2.84) were associated with an initial inappropriate antimicrobial use.

Conclusion

Around one out of every six patients had received initial inappropriate treatments. Adherence to the recommendation of guidelines and attention to extreme-aged groups and comorbidity may improve antimicrobial use.

A Systematic Review on Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Vancomycin Loading Dose in Critically Ill Patients

Background: The clinical significance of utilizing a vancomycin loading dose in critically ill patients remains unclear. Objective: The main aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of the vancomycin loading dose in critically ill patients. Methods: We performed a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, the Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, the Saudi Digital Library and other databases were searched. Studies that reported clinical outcomes among patients receiving the vancomycin LD were considered eligible. Data for this study were collected using PubMed, the Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar and the Saudi Digital Library using the following terms: “vancomycin”, “safety”, “efficacy” and “loading dose” combined with the Boolean operator “AND” or “OR”. Results: A total of 17 articles, including 2 RCTs, 11 retrospective cohorts and 4 other studies, met the inclusion/exclusion criteria out of a total 1189 studies. Patients had different clinical characteristics representing a heterogenous group, including patients in critical condition, with renal impairment, sepsis, MRSA infection and hospitalized patients for hemodialysis or in the emergency department. Conclusions: The study shows that the target therapeutic level is achieved more easily among patients receiving a weight-based LD as compared to patients received the usual dose without an increased risk of new-onset adverse drug reactions.