Does short-term cessation of smoking before lung resections reduce the risk of complications?

The impact of smoking on postoperative complications following elective off-pump CABG in an ERAS setting

PURPOSE

This study investigates the impact of smoking on major postoperative complications following elective off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program.

METHODS

A total of 3168 patients who underwent elective off-pump and minimally invasive direct CABG under ERAS between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020, were enrolled. Propensity score matching was applied to minimize potential confounders when comparing postoperative outcomes between smokers and non-smokers.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed no significant difference in 30-day postoperative mortality between smokers and non-smokers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-1.56). However, smokers had a higher risk of 30-day major complications, including postoperative acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (aOR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.02-1.99) and overall postoperative complications (aOR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.04-1.48). Similarly, for the 31-90-day period, smokers had no significantly higher risk of mortality (aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.49-1.19), but experienced higher rates of major complications, including postoperative AMI (aOR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.17-2.55) and overall postoperative complications (aOR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.13-1.92).

CONCLUSIONS

The ERAS program benefits patients undergoing CABG surgery, including smokers, by providing similar major postoperative outcomes to non-smokers, except for increased risks of postoperative AMI and overall complications.

Impact of smoking habits on postoperative outcomes following lung surgery for cancer: results from the Epithor database

OBJECTIVES

Smoking is a modifiable risk factor for lung resections but to what extent preoperative smoking cessation reduces that risk remains unclear. The study hypothesis was that the potential benefit of smoking cessation can be assessed by measuring the risk difference between active and former smokers in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons (Société Française de Chirurgie Thoracique et Cardiovasculaire) database. The study cohort comprised patients who underwent lung resection for cancer from January 2002 to December 2020 and for which information on smoking status was available. The risk of overall and specific postoperative complications according to smoking status was defined by logistic regression models, and results were presented in terms of odds ratios (ORs) and relative 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for confounding factors.

RESULTS

Of the 7204 analysed patients at the time of their operations, 20.2% were active smokers, 60.7% were ex-smokers and 19.1% were never smokers. Compared to former smokers, active smokers experienced a higher rate of respiratory complications (OR 1.5, CI 1.2-1.7) and infections (OR 1.6, CI 1.3-1.9). Postoperative atelectasis was significantly reduced in former smokers (3%) compared to active smokers (6.9%, P < 0.01). In active smokers, the risk was related to the level of exposure, being higher for smokers of more than 40 pack-year.

CONCLUSIONS

After lung surgery, active smokers experience a higher risk of respiratory complications, infections and prolonged air leak compared to former smokers. This risk seems to be related to the level of exposure.

Smoking and Complications After Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Surgical cancer treatments may be delayed for patients who smoke over concerns for increased risk of complications. Quantifying risks for people who had recently smoked can inform any trade-offs of delaying surgery.

Objective

To investigate the association between smoking status or smoking cessation time and complications after cancer surgery.

Data Sources

Embase, CINAHL, Medline COMPLETE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published from January 1, 2000, to August 10, 2023.

Study Selection

Observational and interventional studies comparing the incidence of complications in patients undergoing cancer surgery who do and do not smoke.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two reviewers screened results and extracted data according to the Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guidelines. Data were pooled with a random-effects model and adjusted analysis was performed.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The odds ratio (OR) of postoperative complications (of any type) for people who smoke currently vs in the past (4-week preoperative cutoff), currently smoked vs never smoked, and smoked within shorter (2-week cutoff) and longer (1-year cutoff) time frames.

Results

The meta-analyses across 24 studies with a pooled sample of 39 499 participants indicated that smoking within 4 weeks preoperatively was associated with higher odds of postoperative complications compared with ceasing smoking for at least 4 weeks (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.10-1.55]; n = 14 547 [17 studies]) and having never smoked (OR, 2.83 [95% CI, 2.06-3.88]; n = 9726 [14 studies]). Within the shorter term, there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications between people who had smoked within 2 weeks preoperatively and those who had stopped between 2 weeks and 3 months in postoperative complications (OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.89-1.59]; n = 5341 [10 studies]), although the odds of complications among people who smoked within a year of surgery were higher compared with those who had quit smoking for at least 1 year (OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.00-1.29]; N = 31 238 [13 studies]). The results from adjusted analyses were consistent with the key findings.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review and meta-analysis of smoking cessation and complications after cancer surgery, people with cancer who had stopped smoking for at least 4 weeks before surgery had fewer postoperative complications than those smoking closer to surgery. High quality, intervention-based evidence is needed to identify the optimal cessation period and inform clinicians on the trade-offs of delaying cancer surgery.

Evaluation of Surgical Cases of Lung Cancer Admitted in Shiraz Referral Hospitals, Southern Iran in 2009-2022

INTRODUCTION

Globally, lung cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers and continues to take the lead in cancer-related mortality rates. This study aims to provide the latest statistics on the clinical, histopathological, and epidemiological features of lung cancer patients who underwent surgical resection in referral hospitals in Southern Iran.

METHOD

In this retrospective study, records of all patients with operable primary and secondary lung cancer who underwent surgical resection of the lung in Shiraz hospitals, located in Southern Iran from November 2009 to May 2022 were screened. Data on demographic, clinical, surgical, and pathological characteristics were analyzed by SPSS software.

RESULTS

A total of 232 patients with operable lung cancer, including 150 (64.7%) primary cases and 82 (35.3%) secondary cases, underwent 249 operations. The mean age of primary and secondary lung cancer patients was 56.70 ± 13.99 and 45.56 ± 18.88, respectively (p < 0.001). Males accounted for 54.0% and 58.5% of primary and secondary lung cancer patients, respectively. Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent primary pathology, while sarcomas were the most common metastatic lesions. The predominant presenting symptoms were cough (n = 75, 75.0%) and dyspnea (n = 31, 59.7%) in primary and secondary cases, respectively. Involvement of the right lung was more frequent in both groups (65.5% and 53.1% for primary and secondary cases respectively). The most commonly performed surgeries were lobectomy (69.9%) and limited resection (69.8%) for primary and secondary lesions, respectively. Cigarette smoking and extensive resection had a significant association with the in-hospital mortality rate (p = 0.012 and 0.009 respectively). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 3.6% (n = 9).

CONCLUSION

Surgical interventions were mostly performed in men and histopathologic subtypes of primary lung adenocarcinoma, metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, and metastatic colon cancer. Smoking and extensive resection accompany a higher risk of short-term postoperative mortality.

Risk factors and prognostic significance of early postoperative complications for patients who underwent pneumonectomy for lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Although pneumonectomy has relatively high mortality and morbidity rates, it remains valid in the surgical treatment of lung cancer. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of postoperative complications after pneumonectomy and demonstrate the risk factors related to early postoperative complications.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer between January 2008 and May 2021 were included in the study. Factors related to the development of early postoperative complications and overall survival were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients were included in the study. Early postoperative complications were seen in 33 (24.3%) patients and late postoperative complications in 7 (5.1%) patients. The amount of cigarette smoking, and the operation side were the independent variables that affect the development of early postoperative complications. In multivariate analysis, smoking amount and pericardial invasion were associated with the development of postoperative hemorrhage, and advanced age was associated with the development of postoperative pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

Early postoperative complications have a negative effect on the prognosis after pneumonectomy therefore careful patient selection and preoperative risk assessment are essential to minimize the occurrence of complications and improve patient outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This observational study was approved by the (Ethical Committee of Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Education and Research Center) Institutional Review Board of our center (E-49109414-604.02.02-218625439).

Smoking Status and Outcomes following Lung Resection

BACKGROUND

 Surgical resection is the gold standard treatment for the management of early-stage lung cancer. Several modifiable factors may significantly influence postoperative morbidity and mortality. We examined the outcomes of patients following lung resection based upon preoperative smoking status to quantify the impact on postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

 Data from consecutive lung resections from January 1, 2012 to June 11, 2021 were included. Biopsies for interstitial lung disease and resections for emphysematous lung or bullae were excluded. Patients were divided into three cohorts: current smokers (those who smoked within 4 weeks of surgery), ex-smokers (those who stopped smoking prior to 4 weeks leading up to surgery), and nonsmokers (those who have never smoked). Patient's preoperative variables, postoperative complications, length of stay, and mortality were examined.

RESULTS

 A total of 2,426 patients were included in the study. A total of 502 patients (20.7%) were current smokers, 1,445 (59.6%) were ex-smokers and 479 patients (19.7%) nonsmokers. Of those smoking immediately prior to surgery 36.9% developed postoperative complications. Lower respiratory tract infections (18.1%) and prolonged air leak (17.1%), in particular, were significant higher in smokers. 90-day mortality (5.8%) was higher in the current smokers when compared with ex- and nonsmokers (5.3 and 1%, respectively). Median length of hospital stay, readmissions, and cost of hospital stay was also higher in the current smoker cohort.

CONCLUSION

 Smoking immediately prior to surgery is associated with an increase in morbidity, mortality, and length of stay. Not only does this have a significant individual impact, but it is also associated with a significant financial burden to the National Health Service.

Pneumonectomy for Primary Lung Tumors and Pulmonary Metastases: A Comprehensive Study of Postoperative Morbidity, Early Mortality, and Preoperative Clinical Prognostic Factors

BACKGROUND

Pneumonectomy is a major surgical resection that still remains a high-risk operation. The current study aims to investigate perioperative risk factors for postoperative morbidity and early mortality after pneumonectomy for thoracic malignancies.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent pneumonectomy for thoracic malignancies at our institution between 2014 and 2022. Complications were assessed up to 30 days after the operation. Mortality for any reason was recorded after 30 days and 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 145 out of 169 patients undergoing pneumonectomy were included in this study. The postoperative 30-day complication rate was 41.4%. The 30-day-mortality was 8.3%, and 90-day-mortality 17.2%. The presence of cardiovascular comorbidities was a risk factor for major cardiopulmonary complications (54.2% vs. 13.2%, p < 0.01). Postoperative bronchus stump insufficiency (OR: 11.883, 95% CI: 1.288-109.591, p = 0.029) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 4 (OR: 3.023, 95% CI: 1.028-8.892, p = 0.044) were independent factors for early mortality.

CONCLUSION

Pneumonectomy for thoracic malignancies remains a high-risk major lung resection with significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. Attention should be paid to the preoperative selection of patients.

Special Anesthesiologic Considerations in Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Purpose of Review

This review summarizes the key issues for preoperative, peri- and intraoperative, and postoperative patient management for robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS). It provides practical guidance for anesthesiologists and thoracic surgeons starting a RATS program.

Recent Findings

RATS is a new technological approach to execute minimal invasive chest operations. In management of RATS patients, the established ERAS principles for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) apply. In addition, RATS imposes additional conditions on anesthesiologists, nurses, and surgeons alike: The spatial constriction in operation theaters caused by the large robotic equipment longs for a reallocation of the anesthetist’s and surgeon’s working environment that may vary additionally depending on the type of surgery performed in the individual patient. Additionally, the implementation of a positive pressure carbon dioxide gas cavity in the pleura has a direct effect on patient cardio-circulatory and respiratory mechanics that have to be balanced by the anesthesiologist.

Summary

RATS advances by replacing open surgery approaches and will complement—but most likely not replace—video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). RATS brings new specific intraoperative requirements to the anesthesiological and surgical team members that have to be implemented into clinical routine.