Efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Anlotinib plus Sintilimab achieved in an antitumor effect of complete remission in a patient with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report

Systemic therapies-based combination treatments have been developed rapidly in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there are still a few patients not applicable to any recommended therapies, making it considerable to try new therapeutic options. Among them, anlotinib, a new oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is being widely used for many advanced malignancies. We present the first case of the antitumor effect of complete remission by anlotinib combined with an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, sintilimab, in a patient with advanced HCC. In April 2020, a 51-year-old male patient was diagnosed with large HCC and underwent hepatectomy with R0 resection. Two months later, he was admitted to our hospital because of a tumor relapse with multiple liver and lung metastases. After the failure of comprehensive treatment containing sorafenib, camrelizumab and transhepatic arterial chemotherapy and embolization, 2 months after tumor relapse, the patient started to receive anlotinib and sintilimab. The multiple tumor nodules were remarkable repressed both in the liver and lung. Six months after anlotinib plus sintilimab treatment, there were no residual tumors, and the alpha-fetoprotein level was decreased from 2310.9 mg/L to normal. Also, the patient continued to receive anlotinib to date. In subsequent follow-up visits until now, there was no sign of recurrence found on imaging. Anlotinib is a promising alternative for patients insensitive to the first-line targeted drugs. More clinical studies should be conducted to further broaden the clinical indications of anlotinib and immunotherapy in patients with HCC.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in EGFR-Positive Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Compared with Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study

There are no standard third-line or beyond treatments for patients with driver mutation-positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Anlotinib was approved as a third-line multitarget drug in China in 2018. Limited data are available regarding the efficacy and safety of anlotinib compared with chemotherapy. To investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib compared with traditional chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive advanced LUAD. We conducted a retrospective study of 83 EGFR mutation-positive patients with advanced LUAD between 2011 and 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoints, whereas the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were the secondary endpoints. Anlotinib-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded to evaluate the safety of anlotinib. 39 patients with LUAD received anlotinib and 44 patients with LUAD received chemotherapy were enrolled in the study. Patients treated with anlotinib exhibited longer PFS (11.2 vs 4.5 months, P < .01) and OS (18.8 vs 15.8 months, P < .05) than patients treated with chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in ORR (7.9% vs 20.5%, P = .129) or DCR (100% vs 93.2%, P = .120) between the two groups. Anlotinib-related AEs grading 3-4 level were observed in 2 (5.1%) patients, no anlotinib-related death was recorded. Cox regression analyses of PFS and OS showed that brain metastases and age < 30 years at diagnosis had negative effects on clinical outcomes. Anlotinib is effective and safe in patients with EGFR-positive advanced LUAD. Patients without brain metastases had better clinical outcomes.

Prognostic Significance of Tumor Mutation Burden among Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Who Received Platinum-based Adjuvant Chemotherapy: An Exploratory Study

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of tumor mutation burden (TMB) among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor tissue specimens after surgical resection were collected for DNA extraction. Somatic mutation detection and TMB analysis were conducted using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Recurrence status of the patients was assessed in the hospital during the adjuvant chemotherapy period, and long-term survival data of patients were obtained by telephone follow-up. Univariate analysis between TMB status and prognosis was carried out by survival analysis. A retrospective review of 78 patients with non-squamous NSCLC who received platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy showed a median disease-free survival of 3.6 years and median overall survival (OS) of 5.3 years. NGS analysis exhibited that the most common mutated somatic genes among the 78 patients were tumor suppressor protein p53 (TP53), epidermal growth factor receptor, low-density lipoprotein receptor related protein 1B, DNA methyltransferase 3 alpha and FAT atypical cadherin 3, and their prevalence was 56.4%, 48.7%, 37.2%, 30.7%, and 25.6%, respectively. TMB status was divided into TMB-L (≤ 4.5/Mb) and TMB-H (> 4.5/Mb) based on the median TMB threshold. Relevance of TMB to prognosis suggested that the median OS of patients with TMB-L was significantly longer than that of patients with TMB-H (NR vs. 4.6, P = 0.014). Higher TMB status conferred a worse implication on OS among patients with non-squamous NSCLC who received platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Etoposide soft capsule combined with anlotinib in the third-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The physical tolerance in the advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient often deteriorates, with a limited effective rate of the third-line treatment. This study retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of etoposide soft capsules combined with anlotinib in the third-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 46 patients with advanced NSCLC who had failed second-line treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) of advanced NSCLC patients served as an endpoint. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were applied to evaluate the short-term efficacy of anlotinib treatment in advanced NSCLC patients.

Results

Among 46 third-line NSCLC patients, none had complete remission (CR), 9 had partial remission (PR), 29 had stable disease (SD), and 8 had progressive disease (PD). The objective response rate (ORR) was 19.57%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 82.61%, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.3 months, and the median overall survival (mOS) was 10.1 months. Common adverse reactions included fatigue, hypertension, nausea, stomatitis, leukopenia, hand-foot syndrome, abnormal liver function, proteinuria, hemoptysis, and hypothyroidism, among others. The incidence of grade 3 adverse reactions was 8.9%, and there were no grade 4 adverse reactions.

Conclusions

Etoposide soft capsule combined with anlotinib demonstrated a marked effect on the third-line treatment of advanced NSCLC patients, and is well tolerated.

Anlotinib Hydrochloride and PD-1 Blockade as a Salvage Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Progress of Local Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Half a Year After Standard Treatment

Purpose

As for local advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the standard treatment mode. But for patients with progress in half a year, which means the second-line chemotherapy effect is not ideal for them. We observed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib hydrochloride combined with PD-1 blockade as the second-line treatment for those patients in this trial.

Patients and Methods

From January 2018 to December 2019, 57 patients with the progress of local advanced NSCLC treated with anlotinib plus PD-1 blockade until disease progression or intolerance as a result of adverse events. Patients have been assessed using computed tomography prior to treatment and during follow-up every 2 months until disease progression or death. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Survival curves were created using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

57 patients were enrolled. The median age was 64 years, and 61.4% of the patients were men. The ORR was 50.9% with a median OS time of 14 months and the 1-year OS rates and PFS rates were 81.8% and 33.3%, respectively. The patients with squamous cell carcinoma, no brain or liver metastases had longer PFS than patients with liver metastasis. When the PFS was calculated from the time of second treatment, the median PFS was 9 months. Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1-3, one drug-related death was noted.

Conclusion

The expected outcome of this study is that anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockade has tolerable toxicity and better ORR, OS than second-line chemotherapy. The results may indicate additional treatment options for patients with progress of local advance NSCLC in half a year after standard treatment.

A Retrospective Analysis of the Effect of Anlotinib in Patients With Lung Cancer With or Without Previous Antiangiogenic Therapy

Objective

The purpose of this study was to initially investigate the effect of previous antiangiogenic therapy (bevacizumab and endostatin) on the efficacy of anlotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic lung cancer (LC).

Methods

We retrospectively collected the clinical data of patients with LC treated with anlotinib and divided them into group A (treated with anlotinib after the failure of previous antiangiogenic drugs and group B (no prior use of antiangiogenic drugs). We used propensity score matching (PSM) for confounding factors between the groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were also recorded.

Results

A total of 160 patients were included in the analysis. The median OS in groups A and group B was 11.8 months and 16.1 months (P=0.120), whereas the median PFS was 3.1 months and 4.7 months (P=0.009), respectively. Moreover, the objective response rate (ORR) of the two groups was 9.6% and 10.4% (P=0.874), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 71.1% and 80.5% (P=0.165).

After PSM (n=46), baseline characteristics were comparable between groups A and B. Furthermore, the median OS of the two groups was 14.6 months and 16.2 months (P=0.320), whereas the median PFS was 3.5 months and 4.5 months (P=0.040), respectively. Moreover, the ORR of the two groups were 13.0% and 10.9% (P=0.748), and the DCR were 78.3% and 82.6% (P=0.599), respectively.

Conclusions

Previous antiangiogenic treatments may affect the PFS of patients who receive anlotinib later, but it might not affect the patient’s ORR and OS.

Implication of Polymorphism on the Prognosis of Anlotinib Monotherapy for Patients With Treatment-Refractory Advanced NSCLC: An Exploratory Study

Background: This study aimed to investigate the implication of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (VEGFR2) polymorphism on the prognosis of anlotinib monotherapy among patients with treatment-refractory advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Designed as a retrospective study, this study included a total of 129 patients with treatment-refractory advanced NSCLC who were administered with anlotinib monotherapy. The efficacy of the patients was assessed regularly. The prognosis was performed and adverse reactions during anlotinib administration were collected. Available and appropriate biological specimens of the 129 patients were collected to perform VEGFR2 polymorphism analysis and VEGFR2 gene mRNA expression analysis accordingly. Association analysis between genotype status of VEGFR2 polymorphism and other variables was implemented in univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Efficacy data indicated that the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the 129 patients with NSCLC who received anlotinib monotherapy was 9.3% (95% CI: 4.9%-15.7%) and 78.3% (95%CI: 70.2%-85.1%), respectively. Additionally, prognostic data suggested that the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the 129 patients with NSCLC were 4.1 months (95%CI: 2.84-5.36) and 10.1 months (95%CI: 8.58-11.62), respectively. Furthermore, polymorphism analysis indicated that polymorphism of 4397T>C in VEGFR2 was of clinical significance in the exploratory analysis, which exhibited that the median PFS of patients with TC/CC and TT genotype of 4397T>C polymorphism were 2.8 and 5.0 months, respectively (P = .009). Additionally, patients with TT genotype conferred a superior OS compared with those with TC/CC genotype (median OS: 11.5 vs 7.3 months, P = .016). Interestingly, mRNA expression of the VEGFR2 gene suggested that mRNA expression of VEGFR2 in PBMC specimens of patients with TC/CC genotype was significantly higher than that of patients with TT genotype (P < .001). Conclusion: Anlotinib monotherapy exhibited potential efficacy for patients with treatment-refractory advanced NSCLC. VEGFR2 polymorphism 4397T>C might be used as a promising biomarker to predict the survival of patients with NSCLC who received anlotinib administration.

Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization Plus Anlotinib in Patients With Advanced Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization plus anlotinib oral administration in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Consecutive data from 51 patients with advanced NSCLC were retrospectively collected from February 2018 to August 2019. All patients underwent drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) followed by anlotinib treatment. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated and analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test, and factors associated with OS and PFS were assessed by a Cox proportional hazards test. Treatment response at 30 days was assessed by enhanced computed tomography (CT), and then the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also evaluated.

Results: The median OS was 18.4 months (95% CI, 16.6–20.2 months), and the median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI, 6.2–10.6 months). The ORR and DCR for the whole cohort were 21.6 and 100%, respectively, at 30 days after the first cycle of treatment. Most of the treatment-related adverse reactions were mild and moderate and included anorexia, hypertension, fatigue, and hand-foot syndrome. Only eight (15.7%) patients developed grade 3 TRAEs. No deaths or other serious adverse reactions occurred. Both TNM stage and brain metastasis were independent risk factors for OS and PFS.

Conclusion: DEB-BACE concomitant with anlotinib has promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib Monotherapy as Third-Line Therapy for Elderly Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Exploratory Study

Purpose

The present study was to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of anlotinib monotherapy as third-line therapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A total of 83 elderly patients (>65 years) with NSCLC who were progressed at least two lines of previous systemic therapy were recruited retrospectively. Patients were treated with anlotinib monotherapy (12 mg or 10 mg). Efficacy of anlotinib was assessed and all the patients were followed up regularly. Adverse reactions were collected during anlotinib administration. Univariate analysis was performed using Log rank test and multivariate analysis was adjusted by Cox regression analysis. Additionally, prognostic analysis according to common adverse reactions was implemented to identify the potential clinical significance.

Results

The best overall response of the 83 elderly patients during anlotinib monotherapy indicated that partial response (PR) was observed in six patients, stable disease (SD) was noted in 59 patients, and progressive disease (PD) was reported in 18 patients. Consequently, the objective response rate (ORR) was 7.2% (95% CI=2.7–15.1%) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 78.3% (95% CI=67.9–86.6%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 83 elderly patients with NSCLC was 4.2 months (95% CI=3.51–4.89). Furthermore, the median overall survival (OS) of the 83 patients was 9.6 months (95% CI=6.65–12.55). The safety profile suggested that the relatively common adverse reactions of the elderly patients with ES-SCLC receiving anlotinib therapy were hypertension (49.4%), fatigue (45.8%), and hand–foot syndrome (39.8%). Interestingly, association analysis exhibited that the median PFS of patients with hypertension and non-hypertension was 4.5 and 3.0 months, respectively (χ²=6.306, P=0.012).

Conclusion

Anlotinib monotherapy demonstrated a satisfactory efficacy and tolerable safety profile in third-line settings for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients who experienced a hypertension adverse reaction induced by anlotinib therapy might confer superior PFS. The conclusion should be validated in prospective clinical trials subsequently.

Anlotinib-Induced Hypertension: Current Concepts and Future Prospects

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib is a new tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed in China that targets the receptors for vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and stem cell factor. Therefore, anlotinib inhibits tumor angiogenesis, representing a new therapeutic alternative for lung cancer. Hypertension is one of its most common adverse effects, leading to discontinuation of the drug and limited clinical usefulness.

OBJECTIVE

The present review aims to summarize the evidence on the prevalence, physiopathology, and management of anlotinib-induced hypertension, as well as its effect on the cancer prognosis.

METHOD

Searches in Medline, Cochrane Central Library, and Embase were performed using the following terms: anlotinib, adverse effect, hypertension, clinical trial, vascular endothelial growth factor, and antiangiogenic drugs. Citations were also identified by checking the reference sections of selected papers.

RESULTS

Except for a phase I clinical trial with a small sample size (n = 6), almost all the clinical trials on anlotinib have reported the development of anlotinib-induced hypertension. In these trials, the incidence of hypertension ranged from 13% to 67.7%, and that of grade 3/4 hypertension ranged from4.8% to 16%. Alterations in nitric oxide, endothelin-1, microvascular rarefaction, selective vasoconstrictions, and renal injury have been cited as potential mechanisms leading to anlotinib-induced hypertension. When needed, treatment may include general hygienic measures and pharmacotherapy in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

To effectively manage anlotinib-induced hypertension, early prevention, a reasonable dosage regimen, and appropriate treatment are critical to effectively manage anlotinib-induced hypertension. Additionally, anlotinib-induced hypertension may be considered a marker for predicting efficacy.

Anlotinib: A Novel Targeted Drug for Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas account for approximately 15% of pediatric solid malignant tumors and 1% of adult solid malignant tumors. There are over 50 subtypes of sarcomas, each of which is notably heterogeneous and manifested by remarkable phenotypic and morphological variability. Anlotinib is a novel oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting c-kit, platelet-derived growth factor receptors, fibroblast growth factor receptor, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. In comparison with the placebo, anlotinib was associated with better overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) in a phase III trial of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), albeit with cancer progression after two previous lines of treatment. Recently, the National Medical Products Administration approved anlotinib monotherapy as a third-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC. Additionally, a phase IIB randomized trial substantiated that anlotinib is associated with a significant longer median PFS in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Moreover, anlotinib is also effective in patients with advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Anlotinib has similar tolerability to other TKIs targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and other tyrosine kinase-mediated pathways. However, anlotinib has a notably lower rate of side effects ≥grade 3 relative to sunitinib. This review discussed the remarkable characteristics and major dilemmas of anlotinib as a targeted therapy for sarcomas.