Clinicopathological characteristics of solitary cavitary lung cancer: a case-control study

Low-Malignant-Potential Adenocarcinoma: A Histological Category with a Significantly Better Prognosis than Other Solid Adenocarcinomas at IA Stage

INTRODUCTION

Low-malignant-potential adenocarcinoma has been defined as a type of non-mucinous tumor, which has a total tumor size measuring ≤ 3 cm, exhibits ≥ 15% lepidic growth, lacks non-predominant high-grade patterns (≥10% cribriform, ≥5% micropapillary, ≥5% solid), has an absence of angiolymphatic or visceral pleural invasion, spread through air spaces (STAS), necrosis and >1 mitosis per 2 mm2. The aim of this study is to validate, with regard to cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS), the proposed definition of LMP adenocarcinoma in an independent external cohort of lung adenocarcinoma patients having undergone surgical resection, and having presented with a long follow-up period.

METHODS

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients who underwent lung resection for adenocarcinoma from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with ground-glass opacity (GGO) and part-solid tumors, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), tumors ≥5 cm in size, nodal involvement and/or distant metastases, patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment, and those who had an incomplete follow-up or a follow-up shorter than 60 months were excluded. The proposed criteria for low-malignant-potential adenocarcinoma (LMPA) were tumor size ≤ 3 cm, invasive size ≥ 0,5 cm, lepidic growth ≥ 15%, and absence of the following: mitosis (>1 per 2 mm2), mucinous subtype, angiolymphatic invasion, visceral pleural invasion, spread through air spaces (STAS) and tumor necrosis. End points were disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The log-rank test was used to assess differences between subgroups.

RESULTS

Out of 80 patients meeting the proposed criteria, 14 (17.5%) had the LMPA characteristics defined. The mean follow-up time was 67 ± 39 months. A total of 19 patients died, all in the non-LMPA category, and 33 patients experienced recurrence: 4 (28.5%) with LMPA and 29 (43.9%) with non-LMPA. Log-rank analysis showed 100% 10-year CSS for patients with LMPA and 77.4% for patients without LMPA, with this difference being statistically significant (p-value = 0.047). Univariate analysis showed a significant association with the cStage (AJCC eighth edition), both for CSS (p value = 0.005) and DFS (p-value = 0.003). LMPA classification did not show a statistically significant impact on CSS and DFS, likely due to the limited number of events (CSS p-value = 0.232 and DFS p-value = 0.213). No statistical association was found for CSS and DFS with pT, the number of resected nodes (< or >10) or the number of resected N2 stations (< or >2).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed the prognostic role of LMPA features, with a low risk of recurrence and a good CSS and DFS. The criteria for diagnosis are replicable and feasible for application. The clinical implications of these findings, such as pre-operative prediction and surveillance scheduling, may be the topic of future prospective studies.

Bronchoscopically-visible massive central airway cancer cavitation is associated with metastatic disease, lack of actionable mutations and poor prognosis: a case series

Cavitating lung tumors occur in approximately 10-15% of the patients, are more commonly associated with squamous histology, and are typically located in the lung parenchyma. Herein, we describe an exceedingly rare series of five patients, four of whom treatment-naïve, whose tumor caused the disruption of the normal airway anatomy at the level of lobar or segmental bronchi, leading to the formation of an endoscopically visible cavity that ended up in the lung parenchyma or even into the pleural space. Sex (3 males, 2 females), smoking habit (2 never smokers, 2 former smokers, 1 current smoker), and histology (3 adenocarcinoma, 2 squamous cell carcinoma) were heterogeneous, but the 4 patients treatment-naïve presented with metastatic disease, poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, similar clinical complaints of long duration, and a lack of actionable mutations. The only patient who exhibited a meaningful response to treatment had the lowest symptoms' duration, the smallest size of the cavitated mass, and the best performance status at the time of diagnosis. This series provides the first comprehensive description of a rare presentation of lung cancer characterized by similar clinical complaints, delayed diagnosis, and poor prognosis.

Adenocarcinoma in situ detected on a thin-walled lung cavity: a case report

BACKGROUND

Cavitary lesions pathologically diagnosed as adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) have been rarely reported. The examination of these type of lesions is necessary for a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying their formation and development of more efficient diagnostic and treatment strategies. Here, we present the case of a patient with cavitary lung carcinoma, diagnosed as AIS, who underwent partial resection.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 72-year-old man presented with an abnormal shadow on chest radiography. Computed tomography findings showed a nodule in the right upper lobe, which was later diagnosed as an adenocarcinoma via transbronchial biopsy. A thin-walled cavity with partial thickening in the right lower lobe was also noted. We suspected that the thin-walled cavitary lesion was malignant, and performed wedge resection during a right upper lobectomy. AIS was diagnosed based on the histopathological findings of the thickened part of the thin-walled cavity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that, although rare, AIS may be observed in cavitary lung carcinoma cases, particularly in thin-walled lesions.

A Comparative Study of Cavitary and Noncavitary Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with CT-Guided Microwave Ablation

PURPOSE

To explore the outcomes of computed tomography‒guided microwave (MW) ablation in patients with cavitary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to compare the outcomes of cavitary and noncavitary NSCLC treated with MW ablation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 317 patients with NSCLC (194 men and 123 women) treated with MW ablation were include: 19 patients with cavitary NSCLC and 298 patients with noncavitary NSCLC. Complications, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to investigate the correlation of cavity and OS in patients with NSCLC.

RESULTS

A total of 364 MW ablation procedures were performed. Adenocarcinoma was the predominant histopathological subtype in patients with cavitary NSCLC (73.7%). Cavitary NSCLC had an incidence rate of 57.9% in overall complications, which was significantly higher than that of 34.6% for noncavitary NSCLC (P = .040). In a mean follow-up of 27.2 months ± 11.9, the median PFS and OS for cavitary NSCLC were 9.0 months ± 8.5 and 14.0 months ± 10.8, respectively, and those for noncavitary NSCLC were 13.0 months ± 10.7 and 17.0 months ± 10.9, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS (P = .180) or OS (P = .133) between cavitary and noncavitary NSCLC. In addition, the local recurrence rates for cavitary and noncavitary NSCLC were 15.8% and 21.5%, respectively, and no significant difference was found (P = .765). The Kaplan-Meier method revealed no association between the cavity and OS in patients with NSCLC treated with MW ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

MW ablation was an effective and safe approach for cavitary NSCLC treatment. Compared with noncavitary NSCLC, cavitary NSCLC manifested with more complications but a comparable outcome after MW ablation.