Combining immunotherapy and radiotherapy in lung cancer: a promising future?

A Review of Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Cancer immunotherapy in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to a dramatic increase in the survival of patients with lung cancer across all stages. Over the past decade, the field has experienced rapid maturation; however, several challenges continue to complicate patient management. This review aims to highlight the data that led to this dramatic shift in practice as well as to focus on key challenges. These include determining the optimal therapy duration, managing frail patients or those with brain metastases, addressing the challenges posed by immune-related adverse events, and defining the various patterns of clinical and radiological responses to immunotherapy.

Cisplatin-based Liposomal Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery in Lung Cancer Therapy: Recent Progress and Future Outlooks

In order to improve the treatment of lung cancer, this paper looks at the development of cisplatinbased liposomal nanocarriers. It focuses on addressing the drawbacks of conventional cisplatin therapy, including systemic toxicity, inadequate tumor targeting, and drug resistance. Liposomes, or spherical lipid vesicles, offer a potentially effective way to encapsulate cisplatin, enhancing its transport and minimizing harmful effects on healthy tissues. The article discusses many liposomal cisplatin formulations, including pH-sensitive liposomes, sterically stabilized liposomes, and liposomes coupled with specific ligands like EGFR antibodies. These novel formulations show promise in reducing cisplatin resistance, optimizing pharmacokinetics, and boosting therapeutic results in the two in vitro and in vivo models. They also take advantage of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect in the direction of improved tumor accumulation. The study highlights the need for more investigation to move these liposomal formulations from experimental to clinical settings, highlighting their potential to offer less harmful and more effective cancer therapy alternatives.

Radiotherapy-induced Immune Response Enhanced by Selective HDAC6 Inhibition

Radiotherapy is a curative cancer treatment modality that imparts damage to cellular DNA, induces immunogenic cell death, and activates antitumor immunity. Despite the radiotherapy-induced direct antitumor effect seen within the treated volume, accumulating evidence indicates activation of innate antitumor immunity. Acute proinflammatory responses mediated by anticancer M1 macrophages are observed in the immediate aftermath following radiotherapy. However, after a few days, these M1 macrophages are converted to anti-inflammatory and pro-cancer M2 phenotype, leading to cancer resistance and underlying potential tumor relapse. Histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) plays a crucial role in regulating macrophage polarization and innate immune responses. Here, we report targeting HDAC6 function with a novel selective inhibitor (SP-2-225) as a potential therapeutic candidate for combination therapy with radiotherapy. This resulted in decreased tumor growth and enhanced M1/M2 ratio of infiltrating macrophages within tumors. These observations support the use of selective HDAC6 inhibitors to improve antitumor immune responses and prevent tumor relapse after radiotherapy.

A Case of Success With Immunotherapy After Changing the Therapeutics Strategy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have already shown benefit with higher response and survival rates when compared to standard chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although there is evidence that radiation and immunotherapy offer good response rates without additional toxicity, these treatments are not currently utilized in our everyday clinical practice to treat advanced disease. We present a case of success of a 50-year-old male with stage IIIC adenocarcinoma of the lung with high PD-L1 expression and no driver mutations whose disease progressed after two cycles of induction chemotherapy. After that, he started systemic treatment with pembrolizumab monotherapy, and there was such a good response that he proposed definitive radiotherapy for the only remaining pulmonary lesion. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was performed with no major toxicity. He is alive, in follow-up for more than two years, with no signs of active oncological disease. Our case represents an example of success, demonstrating a great tumor response with immunotherapy that allowed a patient with advanced non-metastatic NSCLC whose disease had progressed with platinum-based chemotherapy to get radical treatment with SBRT. The failure of the first-line treatment can result in more investigation on the efficacy and benefits of beginning treatment of these kinds of tumors with ICI directly.

Thermal immuno-nanomedicine in cancer

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of patients with cancer. However, promoting antitumour immunity in patients with tumours that are resistant to these therapies remains a challenge. Thermal therapies provide a promising immune-adjuvant strategy for use with immunotherapy, mostly owing to the capacity to reprogramme the tumour microenvironment through induction of immunogenic cell death, which also promotes the recruitment of endogenous immune cells. Thus, thermal immunotherapeutic strategies for various cancers are an area of considerable research interest. In this Review, we describe the role of the various thermal therapies and provide an update on attempts to combine these with immunotherapies in clinical trials. We also provide an overview of the preclinical development of various thermal immuno-nanomedicines, which are capable of combining thermal therapies with various immunotherapy strategies in a single therapeutic platform. Finally, we discuss the challenges associated with the clinical translation of thermal immuno-nanomedicines and emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary and inter-professional collaboration to facilitate the optimal translation of this technology from bench to bedside.

Current Landscape of Therapeutic Resistance in Lung Cancer and Promising Strategies to Overcome Resistance

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide with a 5-year survival rate of less than 18%. Current treatment modalities include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Despite advances in therapeutic options, resistance to therapy remains a major obstacle to the effectiveness of long-term treatment, eventually leading to therapeutic insensitivity, poor progression-free survival, and disease relapse. Resistance mechanisms stem from genetic mutations and/or epigenetic changes, unregulated drug efflux, tumor hypoxia, alterations in the tumor microenvironment, and several other cellular and molecular alterations. A better understanding of these mechanisms is crucial for targeting factors involved in therapeutic resistance, establishing novel antitumor targets, and developing therapeutic strategies to resensitize cancer cells towards treatment. In this review, we summarize diverse mechanisms driving resistance to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, and promising strategies to help overcome this therapeutic resistance.

Comparison of Pneumonitis Rates and Severity in Patients With Lung Cancer Treated by Immunotherapy, Radiotherapy, and Immunoradiotherapy

Introduction

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a common dose-limiting toxicity of radiotherapy to the chest in lung cancer patients. Similarly, the revolutionary use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to treat lung cancer can be complicated by immune-related adverse events (irAEs), particularly checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP). Our study aimed to assess the effect of immunotherapy, with and without radiotherapy, on pneumonitis and other outcomes.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of 680 lung cancer patients treated with either radiotherapy, immunotherapy, or both at St. Luke's University Health Network to determine the incidence rates of pneumonitis. Then, a more extensive review of 346 patients was completed, 181 of whom had pneumonitis, to investigate risk factors and outcomes.

Results

All-grade pneumonitis incidence was 26.6% while more severe pneumonitis (grade 3 or higher) was 13%. Receiving programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, having squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and having poorer performance status were independently and significantly associated with increased risk of pneumonitis, with AOR (adjusted odds ratios) of 8.32, 4.10, 2.91, and 1.71, respectively. Among those who had pneumonitis, more severe cases (grade 3 or higher) were related to immunotherapy, either alone (58.32%) or with radiation (55.7%), compared to radiation therapy alone (36.2%).

Poorer performance status (defined as a higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score) was the only covariate we found to be significantly and independently associated with reduced odds of 18-months survival. More of the patients treated with both lung radiation and immunotherapy had progressive disease (53.8%) compared to those treated with only radiation (30.4%) or immunotherapy (36.7). Progressive disease occurred more in patients with pneumonitis grade 3 or higher (48.3%) than those with no or low-grade pneumonitis (27.2%).

Conclusion

Receiving PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors, either with or without radiotherapy, was associated with a higher risk of more severe pneumonitis (PD-L1 > PD-1) than radiotherapy alone. Given its high incidence and complications, more about therapy-induced pneumonitis is yet to be studied. Learning more about pneumonitis' risk factors and complications is of great clinical importance, as it may result in better treatment planning and improved outcomes. Future studies are needed to investigate the suggested association between symptomatic pneumonitis and poorer response to treatment and whether SCC increases the risk of higher-grade pneumonitis.

Alternative methods for local ablation-interventional pulmonology: a narrative review

OBJECTIVE

To discuss and summarise the background and recent advances in the approach to bronchoscopic ablative therapies for lung cancer, focusing on focal parenchymal lesions.

BACKGROUND

This series focusses on the challenges highlighted by increasing recognition of the prognostically more favourable oligometastatic disease rather than the more frequent, but prognostically poor, high tumour burden metastatic disease. While surgery, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and trans-thoracic percutaneous ablative techniques such as microwave (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are well recognised options for selected cases of pulmonary oligometastasis, bronchoscopic approaches to pulmonary tumour ablation are becoming realistic alternatives. An underlying tenet driving research and implementation in this domain is that percutaneous ablative techniques are obliged to traverse the pleura leading to a high rate of pneumothorax, and risks also goes up for peri-vascular lesions. Historically low yield bronchoscopic targeting of isolated peripheral tumors have significantly improved by incorporating multi-modality high resolution imaging and processing, including navigation planning and real-time image guidances (ultrasound, electromagnetic navigation, cone-beam CT). Combining advanced image guidance with ablative technology adaptations for bronchoscopic delivery opens up the options for high dose local ablative therapies that may reduce transthoracic complications and provide palliative to curative options for limited stage primary and oligometastatic diseases.

METHODS

We conduct a narrative review of the literature summarizing the history of bronchoscopic tumor ablation approaches, technical details including biologic rational for their uses, and current evidence for each modality, as well as investigations into future applications. Because of the relative paucity of prospective studies, we have been very inclusive in our inclusion of experiences from the published clinical databases.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst surgical resection and SBRT remain the current mainstay of curative therapies for peripheral cancers, in the foreseeable future, developments and further research will see bronchoscopic ablative therapies become viable lung sparing alternatives in those deemed suitable. The future is bright.

Primary and Acquired Resistance to Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer: Unveiling the Mechanisms Underlying of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy

After several decades without maintained responses or long-term survival of patients with lung cancer, novel therapies have emerged as a hopeful milestone in this research field. The appearance of immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, has improved both the overall survival and quality of life of patients, many of whom are diagnosed late when classical treatments are ineffective. Despite these unprecedented results, a high percentage of patients do not respond initially to treatment or relapse after a period of response. This is due to resistance mechanisms, which require understanding in order to prevent them and develop strategies to overcome them and increase the number of patients who can benefit from immunotherapy. This review highlights the current knowledge of the mechanisms and their involvement in resistance to immunotherapy in lung cancer, such as aberrations in tumor neoantigen burden, effector T-cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment (TME), epigenetic modulation, the transcriptional signature, signaling pathways, T-cell exhaustion, and the microbiome. Further research dissecting intratumor and host heterogeneity is necessary to provide answers regarding the immunotherapy response and develop more effective treatments for lung cancer.