An innovative cold storage system for donor heart transportation-lessons learned from the first experience in Switzerland

Evaluation of target temperature on effectiveness of myocardial preservation during hypothermic machine perfusion

Background

Ex-situ heart perfusion (ESHP) has been proposed as an optimal method for preserving donated hearts prior to transplantation. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOP) is a simple method from a device design perspective, with enhanced safety compared to normothermic perfusion in the event of device failure. However, the optimal temperature for cardiac HOP has yet to be determined. We evaluated the effectiveness of 12-hour HOP using University of Wisconsin Machine Perfusion Solution (UWMPS) in different temperatures compared to static cold storage (SCS) for 6 hours followed by simulated transplantation. Additionally, we sought to determine the impact of oxygen supplementation in hypothermic ESHP in the heart function preservation.

Methods

Hearts were procured from Yorkshire pigs (n = 35) randomized into 3 preservation therapies: 6 hours-SCS; 12 hours-HOP and 12 hours hypothermic non-oxygenated perfusion (HNOP-without oxygen supplementation). For either HOP or HNOP groups, 3 temperatures were tested (5°C; 10°C; 15°C). After the preservation period, hearts had their function assessed in a normothermic perfusion machine capable of working mode, simulating transplantation.

Results

All perfusion parameters were stable throughout (mean ± SD): aortic flow 65 ± 5.57 ml/min, aortic pressure: 11.51 ± 3.17 mm Hg. All HOP hearts presented a better cardiac index than SCS (p < 0.05). The HNOP hearts presented similar cardiac function results compared to SCS.

Conclusions

HOP for 12 hours had better heart function preservation than SCS for 6 hours. Even HNOP had similar results compared to SCS. Greater edema formation in ESHP hearts did not affect heart function. Hypothermic ESHP safely enhances function preservation compared to SCS.

Evaluating Heart Transplant Outcomes Using the SherpaPak Heart Storage System

The SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System (SCTS) is a novel hypothermic organ transport device which maintains an optimal temperature range of 4-8°C during donor heart transport. Its use in many major transplant centers has increased over the last several years. We retrospectively examined 120 heart transplant patients, 60 using SCTS and 60 using traditional cold storage on ice (TCS), at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) between June 2020 and June 2023. Baseline characteristics were comparable except there were less males in TCS versus SCTS (70% vs. 85%; p = 0.049) and less diabetics (23% vs. 47%; p = 0.07). The TCS group had significantly shorter ischemic times than the SCTS group (177 vs. 204 min; p = 0.008). On analysis, no statistically significant difference was noted in primary graft dysfunction (PGD; 12% vs. 15%; p = 0.59), total length of stay (LOS; 19 vs. 17 days; p = 0.061), 1 year all-cause mortality (12% vs. 8.4%; p = 0.196), and 1 year cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV; 58% vs. 63%, p = 0.333] between these two groups. Multivariate analysis also showed no significant difference in PGD and LOS between groups. We conclude that despite having longer ischemic times in the SCTS group, the post-transplant outcomes were comparable to TCS.

Investigating Cardiac Temperature During Heart Transplantation Using the Static Cold Storage Paradigm

BACKGROUND

Static cold storage is a mainstay of the heart transplantation (HTx) process. However, the temperature distribution within the organ at each stage of HTx is unknown. In this study, we aimed to quantify how long it took for the heart to warm up and cool down and the nature of temperature distribution with the organ at each stage of HTx.

METHODS

We used high-fidelity computational time-varying biothermal modeling on an anatomical human heart model to model the HTx process in 5 interdependent stages, including cardioplegia, back-table preparation, static cold storage ice box storage and transport, back-table preparation at the recipient institution and warm-up within the recipient body before cross-clamp release.

RESULTS

Results indicate that the heart experiences roller-coaster-like temperature changes in stage, including rapid cool down from body temperature to <10 °C within 15 min in stage 1 with a maximum cooling rate of 5 °C/min. This was followed by cooling and extended duration of temperatures <2 °C in the ice box and rapid warming up to body temperature within 10 min at rates of 2 °C/min and 4 °C/min for the left and right sides, respectively, during implantation. Temperature distribution throughout the heart was heterogeneous, with right-sided temperature change occurring nearly 2× faster than on the left side.

CONCLUSIONS

We present, for the first time, detailed temperature distributions and evolution at each stage of HTx. Quantification of the rapid and heterogeneous temperature changes is crucial to optimize HTx and improve organ viability.

Clinical Outcomes of Machine Perfusion and Temperature Control Systems in Heart Transplantation: Where We Stand

Heart transplantation remains the preferred treatment for carefully selected patients with end-stage heart failure refractory to medical therapy. Advances in donor management, organ preservation, donor and recipient selection, immunosuppressive strategies, and mechanical circulatory support have significantly improved the safety and efficacy of heart transplantation. However, the persistent shortage of donor hearts and their limited preservation period continues to restrict access to this lifesaving procedure. The advent of innovative machine perfusion and temperature control systems for heart allograft preservation offers a promising avenue to address these challenges. These technologies aim to extend preservation times and enable the use of extended-criteria donors, thereby expanding the donor pool. In this review, we examine the outcomes from clinical trials, registry data, and single-center studies, utilizing the TransMedics Organ Care System Heart, Paragonix SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System, and XVIVO Heart Preservation System. As the field of heart transplantation evolves to accommodate longer ischemia times, expand organ sharing, and utilize donors previously considered marginal, the integration of these advanced technologies will be essential for optimizing post-transplant outcomes.

Innovations in transplant techniques for complex anomalies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With advances in the field of congenital cardiac surgery and in the management of congenital heart defects in early life, the population of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients is increasing. End-stage heart failure is currently the main cause of cardiovascular mortality and is expected to increase in the coming years. This review summarizes recent innovations in transplant techniques, with special attention to what is known in the population of ACHD recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of machine perfusion for heart preservation enables longer preservation times. Normothermic (organ care system - OCS) and hypothermic (hypothermic oxygenated perfusion - HOPE) machine perfusion will alleviate the time pressure associated with heart transplantation in the ACHD population, may allow for expansion of the geographical range in which donors can be matched and may improve graft quality. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation, either through direct procurement-machine perfusion (DP-MP) or thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) is a viable strategy to further expand the donor pool.

SUMMARY

The use of machine perfusion and DCD donors in ACHD is feasible and shows promise. Time pressure and shortage of donors is even more critical in ACHD than in other patient populations, making these innovations particularly relevant. Further clinical experience and research is needed to elucidate their impact.

Long-distance donor heart procurement using an innovative cold static storage system

The global lack of donor shortage poses a major limitation for heart transplantation. New concepts with expanded donor inclusion criteria comprise extended transport distances and prolonged ischemic times with the aim of reaching a larger number of potential donors. Recent developments in cold storage solutions may allow more donor hearts with prolonged ischemic times to be use for transplantation in the future. We present our experience during a long-distance donor heart procurement with the longest reported transport distance and transport time in the current literature. This was made possible through the use of SherpaPak™, an innovative cold storage system which allows for controlled temperatures during transportation.

Early Outcomes in Patients With LVAD Undergoing Heart Transplant via Use of the SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System

BACKGROUND

Heart transplant (HT) in recipients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is associated with poor early post-HT outcomes, including primary graft dysfunction (PGD). As complicated heart explants in recipients with LVADs may produce longer ischemic times, innovations in donor heart preservation may yield improved post-HT outcomes. The SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System is an organ preservation technology that maintains donor heart temperatures between 4 °C and 8 °C, which may minimize ischemic and cold-induced graft injuries. This analysis sought to identify whether the use of SherpaPak versus traditional cold storage was associated with differential outcomes among patients with durable LVAD undergoing HT.

METHODS

Global Utilization and Registry Database for Improved Heart Preservation-Heart (NCT04141605) is a multicenter registry assessing post-HT outcomes comparing 2 methods of donor heart preservation: SherpaPak versus traditional cold storage. A retrospective review of all patients with durable LVAD who underwent HT was performed. Outcomes assessed included rates of PGD, post-HT mechanical circulatory support use, and 30-day and 1-year survival.

RESULTS

SherpaPak (n=149) and traditional cold storage (n=178) patients had similar baseline characteristics. SherpaPak use was associated with reduced PGD (adjusted odds ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.32-0.99]; P=0.045) and severe PGD (adjusted odds ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.13-0.75]; P=0.009), despite an increased total ischemic time in the SherpaPak group. Propensity matched analysis also noted a trend toward reduced intensive care unit (SherpaPak 7.5±6.4 days versus traditional cold storage 11.3±18.8 days; P=0.09) and hospital (SherpaPak 20.5±11.9 days versus traditional cold storage 28.7±37.0 days; P=0.06) lengths of stay. The 30-day and 1-year survival was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SherpaPak use was associated with improved early post-HT outcomes among patients with LVAD undergoing HT. This innovation in preservation technology may be an option for HT candidates at increased risk for PGD.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04141605.

Outcomes of Heart Transplantation Using a Temperature-controlled Hypothermic Storage System

BACKGROUND

The SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System is a novel technology that provides stable, optimal hypothermic control during organ transport. The objectives of this study were to describe our experience using the SherpaPak system and to compare outcomes after heart transplantation after using SherpaPak versus the conventional static cold storage method (non-SherpaPak).

METHODS

From 2018 to June 2021, 62 SherpaPak and 186 non-SherpaPak patients underwent primary heart transplantation at Stanford University with follow-up through May 2022. The primary end point was all-cause mortality, and secondary end points were postoperative complications. Optimal variable ratio matching, cox proportional hazards regression model, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Before matching, the SherpaPak versus non-SherpaPak patients were older and received organs with significantly longer total allograft ischemic time. After matching, SherpaPak patients required fewer units of blood product for perioperative transfusion compared with non-SherpaPak patients but otherwise had similar postoperative outcomes such as hospital length of stay, primary graft dysfunction, inotrope score, mechanical circulatory support use, cerebral vascular accident, myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, new renal failure requiring dialysis, postoperative bleeding or tamponade requiring reoperation, infection, and survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, this is one of the first retrospective comparison studies that evaluated the outcomes of heart transplantation using organs preserved and transported via the SherpaPak system. Given the excellent outcomes, despite prolonged total allograft ischemic time, it may be reasonable to adopt the SherpaPak system to accept organs from a remote location to further expand the donor pool.