Vessel sealing system for video-assisted lung resection for cancer reduces chylothorax and bleeding

Performance of the ENSEAL X1 Curved Jaw Tissue Sealer in thoracic procedures in a Japanese cohort: a case series report

BACKGROUND

Advanced vessel sealing electrosurgical systems have been widely adopted for grasping, cutting, and sealing vessels. Data remain sparse with regard to its use in thoracic procedures. Thus, a prospective case series, utilizing the ENSEAL X1 Curved Jaw Tissue Sealer (X1CJ) and its companion energy source, the Generator 11 (GEN11), in thoracic procedures was performed in a Japanese cohort.

METHODS

Subjects were recruited at two Japanese surgical sites. The primary endpoint of this post-market study was the achievement of hemostasis (≤ Grade 3) for each thoracic vessel transection. Performance endpoints included scores for tasks completed with X1CJ (adhesiolysis, lymphatics or tissue bundles divided, tissue grasping, tissue cutting, or tissue dissection); hemostasis grading vessel transected; additional products required to achieve hemostasis for Grade 4 vessel transections. Safety was evaluated by evaluating device-related adverse events. All endpoint data were summarized.

RESULTS

Forty subjects (50.0% female) of Asian ethnicity with a mean age of 67.6 ± 11.3 years underwent a lung resection. Estimated mean blood loss was 39.5 mL. Hemostasis was achieved in 97.5% of vessel transections. Thirty-seven vessel sealings resulted in a hemostatic Grade 1 (92.5%). All surgeons reported satisfaction/neutral in terms of tissue grasping (100.0%) while most reported satisfaction/neutral with tissue cutting (95.7%). One device-related serious adverse event was reported (2.5%), a chylothorax requiring an extension of hospitalization. There was no post-operative bleeding or deaths reported during the study period.

CONCLUSION

The X1CJ demonstrated safe and effective performance without any reports of significant intra-operative or post-operative hemorrhage in thoracic vessel sealing.

Comparison of the LigaSure™ bipolar vessel sealer to monopolar electrocoagulation for thoracoscopic lobectomy and lymphadenectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

High-energy devices allow better vessel sealing compared with monopolar electrocautery and could improve the outcomes of surgical operations. The objective of the study was to compare tissue dissection by the LigaSure™ device with that by monopolar electrocoagulation for thoracoscopic lobectomy and lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

This pragmatic, parallel group, prospective randomized controlled trial was funded by the Medtronic External Research Program (ISR-2016-10,756) and registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT03125798). The study included patients aged 18 years or older, who had undergone thoracoscopic lobectomy with lymphadenectomy at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Poznan University of Medical Sciences between May 3, 2018, and November 4, 2021. Using simple randomization, the patients were assigned to undergo tissue dissection with either the LigaSure device (study group) or monopolar electrocautery (control group). Participants and care givers, except operating surgeons, were blinded to group assignment. The primary outcome was postoperative chest drainage volume. Secondary outcomes were change of the esophageal temperature during subcarinal lymphadenectomy and C-reactive protein level 72 h after surgery.

RESULTS

Study outcomes were analyzed in 107 patients in each group. We found no differences between the study and control groups in terms of chest drainage volume (550 vs. 600 mL, respectively; p = 0.315), changes in esophageal temperature (- 0.1 °C vs. - 0.1 °C, respectively; p = 0.784), and C-reactive protein levels (72.8 vs. 70.8 mg/L, respectively; p = 0.503). The mean numbers of lymph nodes removed were 12.9 (SD: 3.1; 95% CI, 12.4 to 13.5) in the study group and 11.6 (SD: 3.2; 95% CI, 11.0 to 12.2) in the control group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the LigaSure device did not allow to decrease the chest drainage volume, local thermal spread, and systemic inflammatory response. The number of lymph nodes removed was higher in patients operated with the LigaSure device, which indicated better quality of lymphadenectomy.

Robot-assisted vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer

Background

The major advantages of robot-assisted surgery are the fine field of view provided by the high-precision three-dimensional (3D) images and the good operability provided by the robotic arms that enables precise movements. A growing number of retrospective studies have compared robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), but the number of cases is limited and the results are contradictory.

Methods

We studied the medical records of primary lung cancer patients who underwent lobectomy with lymph node dissection between 2017 and 2020. Four hundred and eleven patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria in this study (RATS: 103; VATS: 308). We compared the perioperative factors and postoperative results of the VATS and RATS groups. Further, we adjusted background factors using propensity score matching (PSM) then compared the results of 200 patients (100 patients in each group). In this study, we matched interlobar fissure completeness, which affects operative difficulty and operative time; however, this has been superficially compared in previous studies.

Results

After PSM, a significant difference was observed in the intraoperative blood loss (RATS: 53.3 mL, VATS: 120.3 mL, P=0.04). The rates of surgical complications were comparable between the groups (10.0% vs. 13.0%, P=0.66) with similar mean operation times (RATS: 215.0 min, VATS: 210.1 min, P=0.57). The mean postoperative stay in the RATS group was shorter than that in the VATS group (10.0 vs. 11.5 days, P=0.04).

Conclusions

Initial experience of RATS had no obvious drawbacks when compared with that of VATS on propensity-matched analysis.

Interlobar division using vessel-sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy

Objective

We investigated the safety of a novel interlobar fissure division technique using the da Vinci vessel sealing system in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy.

Methods

The medical records of patients who underwent robotic pulmonary lobectomy with node dissection for primary lung cancer between 2018 and 2020 were reviewed. The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by 111 patients, whose perioperative factors and postoperative results were compared with those previously reported. Furthermore, the new robotic lung interlobar division technique using the da Vinci vessel sealing system without a robotic stapler was evaluated in patients with low-grade incomplete fissure. We considered the Craig and Walker classification of lung fissures grades 1 and 2 as a good adaptation for the vessel sealing system interlobar fissure division.

Results

The vessel sealing system group had shorter mean operative and console times (P = .03 and P = .01, respectively) and lesser median intraoperative blood loss (20 mL vs 50 mL; P = .01). The vessel sealing system group had lower surgical complication rates (2.2% vs 20.0%; P = .01). The incidence of persistent postoperative air leak was lower (0% vs 10.0%; P = .06), and fewer robotic stapler cartridges were used during surgery (3.4 vs 5.6; P < .001) in the vessel sealing system group than in the stapler group.

Conclusions

We report the safety of using the da Vinci vessel sealing system as an alternative to the use of robotic staples for interlobar fissure division in robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy. This technique seems easy and feasible though limited to the low-grade incomplete fissure.