Estimation of the median effective dose and the 95% effective dose of alfentanil required to inhibit the bronchoscopy reaction during painless bronchoscopy with i-gel supraglottic airway device: an Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Trial

Buccal Acupuncture Reduces the Dose of Sufentanil Needed in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

BACKGROUND This study assessed the effects of buccal acupuncture on perioperative analgesia and serum inflammatory factors in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighty patients who underwent elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery were selected and randomly allocated to the control and buccal acupuncture groups, with 40 patients in each group. Hemodynamic indices and dosages of propofol, remifentanil, sufentanil, and vasoactive drugs used during the surgery were recorded. We collected the Ramsay sedation score (RSS) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores of the patients at T4. Magnetic-sensitive immunoassay kits were used to measure plasma IL-6, SAA, CRP, and PCT concentrations in the venous blood at T0, T3, and T5. RESULTS The average dosage of sufentanil in the control group was significantly higher than that in the buccal acupuncture group (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the dosages of remifentanil and propofol or in the usage rates of urapidil, phenylephrine, atropine, and metoprolol between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences in SBP, DBP, HR, and MAP at T0-T5 (all P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in IL-6, SAA, CRP, or PCT levels at T0, T3, or T5 (all P>0.05). At T4, the RSS and VAS pain scores were similar (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Buccal acupuncture therapy for laparoscopic gynecological surgery can reduce the dosage of sufentanil and does not aggravate fluctuations in hemodynamic indices, inflammatory responses, or the incidence of adverse reactions. This has practical clinical significance in reducing the burden on patients.

EC50 and EC95 of Remifentanil for Inhibiting Bronchoscopy Responses in Elderly Patients During Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy Under Ciprofol Sedation: An Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Trial

Background

Opioids are used to suppress cough during fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB). However, evidence regarding the optimal dose of remifentanil during FOB under ciprofol sedation is limited. This study aimed to investigate the effective concentration (EC) of remifentanil required to suppress bronchoscopy responses during FOB under ciprofol sedation in elderly patients.

Materials and Methods

Elderly patients aged 60 to 90 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III, scheduled for FOB, were enrolled. Patients were assigned to either the male or the female group. Remifentanil was administered intravenously prior to ciprofol administration. The endpoints included responses to FOB, such as vocal cords movement, coughing, and body movement. The EC50 and EC95 values of remifentanil required to alleviate the responses to FOB were calculated using Dixon's up-and-down method for both male and female groups. Probit analysis was used to generate a dose-response curve.

Results

Thirty-nine patients (19 males and 20 females) were enrolled. The EC50 values (plasma concentration) of remifentanil for blunting FOB responses under ciprofol sedation were 3.25 (2.75 to 3.26) ng/mL and 2.25 (1.75 to 2.25) ng/mL in males and females, respectively (p = 0.0023). Probit analysis indicated that the EC50 of remifentanil required to suppress responses to FOB under ciprofol sedation was 3.102 [95% confidence interval (CI):2.694 to 3.749] ng/mL and 2.052 [95% CI: 1.345 to 2.750] ng/mL in males and females, respectively. The EC95 of remifentanil required to suppress responses to FOB under ciprofol sedation was 3.741 [95% CI: 3.366 to 7.699] ng/mL and 2.943 [95% CI: 2.456 to 9.533] ng/mL in males and females, respectively.

Conclusion

The results indicate differences between males and females in the EC50 and EC95 of remifentanil needed to suppress responses to FOB under ciprofol sedation while preserving spontaneous breathing in elderly patients.

Trial Registration

The study was registered with chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2300077720; 17 th November 2023).

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Remimazolam Besylate versus Dexmedetomidine for Patients Undergoing Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective

Remimazolam besylate is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that is rapidly hydrolyzed to zolpidem propionic acid by tissue lipases. We designed this study to compare the safety and efficacy of remimazolam besylate alfentanil versus dexmedetomidine-alfentanil for fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FB).

Methods

One hundred and twenty patients undergoing FB into this prospective randomized controlled trial were divided into two groups. The anesthesia induction consisted of 6 mg/kg/h of remimazolam besylate in the RA group and 0.5 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine in the DA group. 1-2 mg/kg/h of remimazolam besylate or 0.2-0.7 µg/kg/h of dexmedetomidine were administered to maintain during FB. The lowest oxygen saturation, success rate of FB, hemodynamics, time metrics, bronchoscopy feasibility, drug dose requirements, patient and bronchoscopist satisfaction scores, occurrence of intraoperative awareness, number of patients willing to repeat FB with the same sedation regimen, and occurrence and severity of adverse events.

Results

The lowest oxygen saturation during the FB was significantly higher in the RA group (P = 0.001). Compared with the variables in the DA group, peripheral oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were significantly lower at T2 and T3 in the RA group (P < 0.05). Heart rates were significantly higher from T2 to T4 in the DA group (P < 0.05). More patients experienced bradycardia in the DA group (P = 0.041). Compared with time metrics in the DA group, the induction time, fully-alert time, and recovery room-leaving time were all significantly shorter in the RA group (P < 0.05). The bronchoscopy feasibility scores in the RA group were significantly lower at T2, whereas they were lower at T3 in the DA group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Remimazolam besylate is superior to dexmedetomidine when combined with alfentanil during FB, promoting faster patients' recovery, better operative conditions and respiratory stability with similar rates of occurrence and severity of adverse events.

Bolus administration of remimazolam was superior to midazolam for deep sedation in elderly patients undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

To date, there is no standardized practice for the use of pharmacological sedatives during flexible bronchoscopy, particularly for elderly patients. This exploratory study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of remimazolam at a single induced dose for deep sedation in elderly patients undergoing diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy (DFB), and compare with midazolam, a commonly used sedative.

METHODS

A total of 100 elderly patients (age range 65-80 yr; American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I-III) undergoing DFB were randomly allocated into 2 groups according to the sedatives used for induction: the remimazolam group and the midazolam group. Sedation induction was initiated by an intravenous bolus of remimazolam (0.135 mg/kg) or midazolam (0.045 mg/kg), respectively, both groups were combined with a high-dose of alfentanil (18 µg/kg), and supplemented with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen supply at a flow rate of 45 L/min. If the target depth of sedation was not achieved, propofol would be titrated as a rescue. The primary outcome was the success rate of sedation at a single induced dose to achieve target depth (Ramsay sedation score [RSS] = 4) during induction, intraoperative changes in vital signs, postoperative follow-up situation and incidence of post-bronchoscopy adverse events were evaluated as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The success rate of sedation in the remimazolam group was significantly higher than that in the midazolam group (65.2% vs 39.6%, P = .013), while the incidence of extra sleep within 6 hours after procedure was lower in the remimazolam group as compared to the midazolam group (10.9% vs 31.3%, P = .016). No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups regarding hemodynamic fluctuations, incidence of hypoxemia, and cough response during the procedure, as well as postoperative recall, willingness to undergo reexamination, and other post-bronchoscopy adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Bolus administration of remimazolam offers advantages over midazolam for deep sedation in elderly patients undergoing DFB, in terms of a higher success rate of sedation and a lower incidence of extra sleep within 6 hours after procedure, though the safety profiles of both groups were favorable.

The safety and efficacy of alfentanil combined with midazolam in fiberoptic bronchoscopy sedation: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

Sedation is recommended by most guidelines to be offered to all patients undergoing diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy (DFB) without contraindications, and the most commonly reported regimen is midazolam in combination with a short-acting opioid (fentanyl or alfentanil) to provide both sedative and antitussive effects. However, the optimal dose or ideal regimen of the combination therapy with midazolam and opioids has not yet been found. So this randomized, double-blinded clinical trial was designed and registered (ChiCTR2100049052) to assess the safety and efficacy of midazolam combined with different doses of alfentanil in DFB sedation. Our study showed that relative high doses of alfentanil (10–25 μg/kg) combined with a fixed low dose of midazolam can markedly reduce hemodynamic fluctuations, cough reactions, patients’ discomforts, and improve their satisfaction in a dose-dependent manner during DFB, with no significant increase in the desaturation risks.