Impact of cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandin-E2 expression on clinical outcome after pulmonary metastasectomy

Redox-Responsive Dual Drug Delivery Nanosystem Suppresses Cancer Repopulation by Abrogating Doxorubicin-Promoted Cancer Stemness, Metastasis, and Drug Resistance

Chemotherapy is a major therapeutic option for cancer patients. However, its effectiveness is challenged by chemodrugs' intrinsic pathological interactions with residual cancer cells. While inducing cancer cell death, chemodrugs enhance cancer stemness, invasiveness, and drug resistance of remaining cancer cells through upregulating cyclooxygenase-2/prostaglandin-E2 (COX-2/PGE2) signaling, therefore facilitating cancer repopulation and relapse. Toward tumor eradication, it is necessary to improve chemotherapy by abrogating these chemotherapy-induced effects. Herein, redox-responsive, celecoxib-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles with poly(β-cyclodextrin) wrapping (MSCPs) for sealing doxorubicin (DOX) are synthesized. Celecoxib, an FDA-approved COX-2 inhibitor, is employed as a structural and functional element to confer MSCPs with redox-responsiveness and COX-2/PGE2 inhibitory activity. MSCPs efficiently codeliver DOX and celecoxib into the tumor location, minimizing systemic toxicity. Importantly, through blocking chemotherapy-activated COX-2/PGE2 signaling, MSCPs drastically enhance DOX's antitumor activity by suppressing enhancement of cancer stemness and invasiveness as well as drug resistance induced by DOX-based chemotherapy in vitro. This is also remarkably achieved in three preclinical tumor models in vivo. DOX-loaded MSCPs effectively inhibit tumor repopulation by blocking COX-2/PGE2 signaling, which eliminates DOX-induced expansion of cancer stem-like cells, distant metastasis, and acquired drug resistance. Thus, this drug delivery nanosystem is capable of effectively suppressing tumor repopulation and has potential clinical translational value.

Mutational profile of colorectal cancer lung metastases and paired primary tumors by targeted next generation sequencing: implications on clinical outcome after surgery

Background

Pulmonary metastasectomy is one of the cornerstones in the treatment of oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the selection of patients who benefit from a surgical resection is difficult. Mutational profiling has become an essential part of diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. Despite this, comprehensive data on the mutational profile of CRC and its clinical impact in the context of pulmonary metastasectomy is sparse. We therefore aimed to provide a complete mutational status of CRC pulmonary metastases (PM) and corresponding primary tumors by targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS), and correlate sequencing data with clinical outcome variables.

Methods

Case-matched, formalin-fixed paraffin embedded surgical specimens of lung metastases (n=47) and matched primary CRC (n=24) were sequenced using the TruSeq Amplicon Cancer Panel (Illumina platform). Penalized Cox regression models were applied to identify mutations with prognostic impact.

Results

Mutations were found most frequently in APC, TP53 and KRAS, in both PM and matched primary tumors. Concordance between primary tumors and PM was 83.5%. Adaptive elastic-net regularized Cox regression models identified mutations being prognostic for time to pulmonary recurrence (EGFR, GNAQ, KIT, MET, and PTPN11) and for overall survival (OS) (PDGFRA, SMARCB1, and TP53).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that CRC PM harbor a variety of conserved and de novo mutations. We could identify a mutational profile predicting clinical outcome after pulmonary metastasectomy. Moreover, our data provide a rationale for future targeted therapies of patients with CRC lung metastases.

Pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: analysis of prognostic factors affecting survival

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary metastasectomy is considered a standard procedure in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Different prognostic factors including multiple metastatic nodules, the presence of extra-pulmonary metastases and BRAF mutation status have been associated with poor survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate which factors influenced survival in CRC patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy by studying primary tumors and pulmonary metastases.

METHODS

All patients treated for primary CRC who presented pulmonary metastases in a 10-year period were considered (group A). A control group treated for primary CRC who did not develop any pulmonary or extra-pulmonary metastases was taken for comparison (group B). Different prognostic factors including gender, age, tumor location, histological type, inflammatory infiltrate, BRAF, CDX2 and extra-pulmonary metastases were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and patients' survival after pulmonary metastasectomy were also considered.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were evaluated in group A and twenty-three in group B. In group A, BRAF immunohistochemistry did not significantly differ between primary tumors and pulmonary metastases; no difference of BRAF expression was found between group A and B. Even the expression of CDX2 was not significantly different in primary tumors and metastases. Similarly, in group B CDX2 did not significantly differ from primary CRC of group A. The most significant prognostic factor was the presence of extra-pulmonary metastases. Patients with extra-pulmonary metastases experienced a significant shorter survival compared to patients with pulmonary metastases alone (P=0.001 with log-rank test vs. P=0.003 with univariate Cox regression). Interestingly, patients with right pulmonary metastases presented a significant longer survival than those with left pulmonary metastases (P=0.027 with log-rank test vs. 0.04 with univariate Cox regression).

CONCLUSIONS

The main prognostic factor associated with poor survival after lung resection of CRC metastases is a history of extra-pulmonary metastases. BRAF and CDX2 did not have a significant role in this small series of patients.