A non-randomized retrospective observational study on the subcutaneous esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy: is it feasible in high-risk patients?

Dislocation of the gastric conduit reconstructed via the posterior mediastinal route is a significant risk factor for anastomotic disorder after McKeown esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic disorder of the reconstructed gastric conduit is a life-threating morbidity after thoracic esophagectomy. Although there are various reasons for anastomotic disorder, the present study focused on dislocation of the gastric conduit (DGC).

METHODS

The study cohort comprised 149 patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy. The relationships between DGC and peri- and postoperative morbidities were analyzed retrospectively. Data were analyzed to determine whether body mass index (BMI) and extension of the gastric conduit were related to DGC. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with anastomotic disorder.

RESULTS

DGC was significantly related to anastomotic leakage (P < .001), anastomotic stricture (P = .018), and mediastinal abscess/empyema (P = .031). Compared with the DGC-negative group, the DGC-positive group had a significantly larger mean preoperative BMI (23.01 ± 3.26 kg/m2 vs. 21.22 ± 3.13 kg/m2, P = .001) and mean maximum cross-sectional area of the gastric conduit (1024.75 ± 550.43 mm2 vs. 619.46 ± 263.70 mm2, P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that DGC was an independent risk factor for anastomotic leakage (odds ratio: 4.840, 95% confidence interval: 1.770-13.30, P < .001). Body weight recovery tended to be better in the DGC-negative group than in the DGC-positive group, although this intergroup difference was not significant.

CONCLUSION

DGC reconstructed via the posterior mediastinal route is a significant cause of critical morbidities related to anastomosis. In particular, care is required when performing gastric conduit reconstruction via the posterior mediastinal route in patients with a high BMI.

Laparoscopic creation of a retrosternal route for gastric conduit reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Retrosternal reconstruction is associated with a lower risk of mediastinitis, gastro-tracheal fistula, and hiatal hernia. Historically, traumatic manual creation of the retrosternal tunnel has been performed using one's fist. We report a novel and atraumatic laparoscopic procedure to create the retrosternal route.

METHODS

We have laparoscopically created the retrosternal route in 25 thoracoscopic, mediastinoscopic, or robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies since August 2019. Specifically, a peritoneal incision is started at the dorsal side of the xiphoid process. Through a 12-mm port inserted slightly to the right of and superior to the umbilical camera port, we dissect loose connective tissues from the caudal to the cranial side using behind the sternum and inside the internal thoracic vessels as landmarks. The time required to create the route was calculated. Then, the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method and the simple moving average of five cases were used to evaluate the learning curve of this novel procedure. Operative outcomes were analyzed according to the learning curve results and also compared with 25 cases of postmediastinal reconstruction counterparts.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were divided into the early group (six patients) and late group (19 patients) based on the peak of the CUSUM chart. The time required for route creation was 28.5 min (median) in the early and 15 min in the late group, indicating a significant difference (P = 0.038). The overall incidence of pleural injury was 20% (5 of 25 patients), with no significant difference between the groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative complications. Also, there were no significant differences in perioperative complications or gastric conduit functions 1 year after surgery between the retrosternal and the postmediastinal reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic creation of a retrosternal route for gastric conduit reconstruction is safe and feasible and has a short learning curve.

Risk factors and outcomes associated with anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anastomotic leaks (AL) are a major complication after esophagectomy. This meta-analysis aimed to determine identify risks factors for AL (preoperative, intra-operative, and post-operative factors) and assess the consequences to outcome on patients who developed an AL. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, and eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to 31 December 2018. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of random-effects modeling and prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database (Registration CRD42018130732). This review identified 174 studies reporting outcomes of 74,226 patients undergoing esophagectomy. The overall pooled AL rates were 11%, ranging from 0 to 49% in individual studies. Majority of studies were from Asia (n = 79). In pooled analyses, 23 factors were associated with AL (17 preoperative and six intraoperative). AL were associated with adverse outcomes including pulmonary (OR: 4.54, CI95%: 2.99-6.89, P < 0.001) and cardiac complications (OR: 2.44, CI95%: 1.77-3.37, P < 0.001), prolonged hospital stay (mean difference: 15 days, CI95%: 10-21 days, P < 0.001), and in-hospital mortality (OR: 5.91, CI95%: 1.41-24.79, P = 0.015). AL are a major complication following esophagectomy accounting for major morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis identified modifiable risk factors for AL, which can be a target for interventions to reduce AL rates. Furthermore, identification of both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors will facilitate risk stratification and prediction of AL enabling better perioperative planning, patient counseling, and informed consent.

Robotic substernal esophageal bypass and reconstruction with gastric conduit-frequently overlooked minimally invasive option

Modern esophagectomy includes the esophageal extirpation with immediate reconstruction of the gastrointestinal (GI) continuity via posterior mediastinal route. In the majority of cases tubularized stomach is chosen as the conduit of choice. Other conduits, such as colon or small bowel can be used for these purposes as well. In rare circumstances use of the alternative route for the conduit placement is required. Authors describe the technique of robotic substernal esophageal bypass and reconstruction of the esophageal continuity.