Robot-assisted thoracic surgery for complex procedures

Multidisciplinary surgical strategy for an invasive thymoma in an immunocompromised patient: a case of a successful resection and postoperative troubleshooting

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has become prevalent as a feasible approach for anterior mediastinal tumor resections, while conventional open surgery, such as a median sternotomy, remains preferred for a combined resection of adjacent organs. However, an additional thoracotomy may be necessary when tumors extend into one hemithorax. This complex approach can cause significant damage to the osseous thoracic cage, increasing the risk of surgical morbidity especially in immunocompromised patients.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 77-year-old man presented with an anterior mediastinal thymoma measuring 71 mm, detected during an annual health check with suspected involvement of the left brachiocephalic vein and upper lobe of the left lung. The patient had a medical history of recurrent surgical site infections and fasciitis panniculitis syndrome requiring immunosuppressive therapy. To minimize any thoracic cage destruction, a multidisciplinary approach combining robotic surgery with open surgery according to vascular or pulmonary invasion was planned. The patient, initially placed in the supine position with the robot docked over the right side, underwent a thymic dissection, revealing a firm adhesion to the left brachiocephalic vein. The robot was then undocked, and a transmanubrial osteomuscular sparing approach was initiated, enabling a tumor dissection under the proximal and distal control of the left brachiocephalic vein. As invasion into the proximal upper pulmonary vein and extensive dorsal adhesions were observed, the patient was repositioned to the right lateral decubitus position, and a thoracoscopic left upper segmentectomy with adhesiolysis was performed, achieving an R0 resection. The patient was extubated on day 1 but required non-invasive ventilation until day 5. Mediastinitis, likely due to a sternal wire infection, developed on day 9, necessitating debridement, sternal wire removal, and negative pressure wound therapy. After 17 days of treatment, the infection subsided, allowing for a sequestrectomy and chest wall reconstruction with a pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. By avoiding a total sternotomy, the extent of the mediastinitis was localized, allowing for a limited sequestrectomy. Wound healing was satisfactory, with no recurrent infection at 12 months and minimal functional impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary approach offers a feasible option for managing an invasive thymoma to minimize postoperative morbidity, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Preoperative surgical planning is essential for guiding intraoperative decision-making and ensuring optimal outcomes.

Advantages of robot-assisted resection of large mediastinal tumors: a single-center preliminary study

Current study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for sizable mediastinal masses with a minimum diameter ≥6 cm, compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open surgery. This study enrolled 130 patients with mediastinal tumors with no less than 6 cm diameter in Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, including 33 patients who underwent RATS, 52 patients who underwent VATS and 45 patients who underwent open surgery. After classifying based on mass size and whether it has invaded or not, we compared their clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes. There was no significant difference in age, gender, mass size, myasthenia gravis, mass location, pathological types (p > 0.05) in three groups. Patients undergoing open surgery typically presenting at a more advanced stage (p < 0.05). No obvious difference was discovered in the average postoperative length of stay, operation duration, chest tube duration and average postoperative day 1 drainage output between RATS group and VATS group (p > 0.05), while intraoperative blood loss in RATS group was significantly lower than VATS group (p = 0.046). Moreover, the postoperative length of stay, operation duration, chest tube duration and intraoperative blood loss in RATS group were significantly lower than open surgery group (p < 0.001). RATS is a secure and efficient approach for removing large mediastinal masses at early postoperative period. In comparison with VATS, RATS is associated with lower intraoperative blood loss. Compared with open surgery, RATS is also associated with shorter postoperative length of stay, operation duration, chest tube duration and intraoperative blood loss.

Minimally invasive thoracic surgery: robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Minimally invasive techniques have been widely applied in general thoracic surgery. Compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), due to its theoretic superiority, robotic surgery is challenging the traditional position of VATS. With its unique advantages, including 3D vision and a high-freedom endowrist, it leads to easier lymph node dissection, more convenient blood vessel dissection, a shorter learning curve and competence for the completion of complex surgery. However, as a new surgical technology, the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) still need to be further verified. Thus, in this article, we review and summarize the application of RATS versus VATS in general thoracic surgery.

Robotic resection of anterior mediastinal masses >10 cm: a case series

Background

Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for intrathoracic pathology and especially for mediastinal mass resection has been increasingly accepted as an alternative method to open sternotomy and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). However, the utilization of this approach for complex and advanced in size cases needs more clinical evidence. We are presenting a series of 4 patients who had resection of >10 cm mediastinal masses via RATS.

Cases Description

The mean age was 76.25±10.3 years and 3 were males (75%). All masses were positron emission tomography (PET) positive, and 1 patient had positive Acetyl-cholinesterase antibodies and myasthenia gravis (MG). All patients underwent RATS resection via DaVinci® X system. The dissections were conducted with spatula and/or Maryland bipolar forceps. In 2 cases, the resection was done with bilateral docking, and in 1 case, a drain was not inserted at the end. In 1 patient, pericardial resection was necessitated. All masses were thymomas with 1 dimension measured >10 cm on pathology. All patients were discharged on day 1 or 2 postoperatively with uneventful recoveries. There was no in-hospital, 30- or 90-day mortality. All patients were found to be without issues on follow-up.

Conclusions

This report shows that RATS is safe and can be offered in the management of >10 cm anterior mediastinal masses. The previous size limit of the tumor for minimally invasive and especially RATS approach of 5 cm should be challenged.

Introduction of robotic surgery leads to increased rate of segmentectomy in patients with lung cancer

Background

Pulmonary segmentectomy provides an anatomic lung resection while avoiding removal of excess normal lung tissue. This may be beneficial in patients with minimal pulmonary reserve who present with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the operative performance of a segmentectomy using a video-assisted thoracoscopic approach can be technically challenging. We hypothesized that introduction of the robotic surgical system would facilitate the performance of a segmentectomy as measured by an increase in the proportion of segmentectomies being pursued.

Methods

We completed a retrospective analysis of thoracoscopic and robotic anatomic lung resections, including lobectomies and segmentectomies, performed in patients with primary lung cancer from the time of initiation of the robotic thoracic surgery program in November 2017 to November 2019. We compared the proportion of thoracoscopic and robotic segmentectomies performed during the first year compared to the second year of the data collection period.

Results

A total of 138 thoracoscopic and robotic anatomic lung resections were performed for primary lung cancer. Types of lung cancer resected (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or other), tumor size based on clinical T staging (T1–T4), and tumor location were not significantly different between years (P=0.44, P=0.98, and P=0.26, respectively). The proportion of segmentectomies increased from 8.6% during the first year to 25.0% during the second year (P=0.01). One out of 6 (16.7%) segmentectomies were performed using the robot during the first year versus 15 out of 17 (88.2%) during the second year (P=0.003).

Conclusions

Use of the robot led to a significant increase in the number of segmentectomies performed in patients undergoing anatomic lung resection. With increasing lung cancer awareness and widely available screening, a greater number of small, early-stage tumors suitable for segmentectomy will likely be detected. We conclude that robotic-assisted surgery may facilitate the challenges of performing a minimally invasive segmentectomy.

Robotic Pneumonectomy for Lung Cancer: Perioperative Outcomes and Factors Leading to Conversion to Thoracotomy

OBJECTIVE

In the tide of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery, few cases of robot-assisted pneumonectomy exist in the literature. This study evaluates the perioperative outcomes and risk factors for conversion to thoracotomy with an initial robotic approach to pneumonectomy for lung cancer.

METHODS

This study is a single-center retrospective review of all pneumonectomies for lung cancer with an initial robotic approach between 2015 and 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups: surgeries completed robotically and surgeries converted to thoracotomy. Patient demographics, preoperative clinical data, surgical pathology, and perioperative outcomes were compared for meaningful differences between the groups.

RESULTS

Thirteen total patients underwent robotic pneumonectomy with 8 of them completed robotically and 5 converted to thoracotomy. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the groups. The Robotic group had a shorter operative time (P < 0.01) and less estimated blood loss (P = 0.02). There were more lymph nodes harvested in the Robotic group (P = 0.08) but without statistical significance. There were 2 major complications in the Robotic group and none in the Conversion group. Neither tumor size nor stage were predictive of conversion to thoracotomy. Conversions decreased over time with a majority occurring in the first 2 years. There were no conversions for bleeding and no mortalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic pneumonectomy for lung cancer is a safe procedure and a reasonable alternative to thoracotomy. With meticulous technique, major bleeding can be avoided and most procedures can be completed robotically. Larger studies are needed to elucidate any advantages of a robotic versus open approach.

[Minimally invasive thoracoscopic and robot-assisted lobectomy]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the early outcomes of video-assisted and robot-assisted lobectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 74 robot-assisted lung resections for the period 2017-2018. Sixty-six patients underwent lobectomy and 8 - segmentectomy. Patients were divided into 2 groups to compare thoracoscopic procedures. The main group consisted of 66 patients after robot-assisted lobectomy. The control group included 247 patients after video-assisted lobectomy. Mean age of patients was 60.5 years (range 35-70). There 72% men and 28% women.

CONCLUSION

Both thoracoscopic procedures are characterized by high efficiency and safety. However, certain disadvantages are peculiar to both methods.

Robot-assisted en bloc anterior mediastinal mass excision with pericardium and adjacent lung for locally advanced thymic carcinoma

Robot-assisted surgery for anterior mediastinal mass resection has been increasingly adopted as an alternative method to open sternotomy and conventional video-assisted thoracic surgery. However, more evidence is needed to expand the indication of this technique to more complicated cases. We present a case of robot-assisted en bloc resection of a 7-cm anterior mediastinal mass with pericardium and adjacent lung for thymic squamous cell carcinoma, accompanied by reconstruction of pericardium with polytetrafluoroethylene patch. In conclusion, complex anterior mediastinal mass excision is feasible with robotic thoracic surgery.

Hybrid robotic thoracic surgery for excision of large mediastinal masses

Between April 2016 and October 2017, we retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing excision of large mediastinal masses using a hybrid robotic thoracic approach at the Unit of Thoracic Surgery of Monaldi Hospital in Naples. The inclusion criteria for this approach were: evident unilateral predominance of the mass; absence of invasion to surrounding structures. Planned conversion to sternotomy was necessary in one patient for tenacious adhesions between the mediastinal goiter and the left innominate vein. In all cases the postoperative course was uneventful. The hybrid robotic approach, adopted in our Unit, consists of a thoracic procedure performed completely with articulated surgical instruments under three-dimensional vision and followed by final extension of a port-site incision to retrieve the voluminous specimen. This approach uses all the advantages of robotic technology that enables to perform a fine dissection in the small space of the anterior mediastinum and at the same time, through the simple extension of a minimally invasive access, avoids the painful sequelae of thoracotomy. In selected cases, with increased experience in robotic surgery, it can be proposed for excision of large mediastinal masses, although a longer follow-up period is necessary to validate our findings.