Lung transplantation in elderly patients

Radiological distribution patterns in restrictive chronic lung allograft dysfunction: Impact on survival across all phenotypes

Background

Restrictive chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) demonstrates poor outcomes after lung transplantation. However, the impact of radiological patterns on survival within a restrictive CLAD under the new International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria remains unclear.

Methods

We analyzed retrospectively 241 bilateral lung transplant recipients between 2005 and 2021. CLAD was diagnosed and classified per the 2019 ISHLT criteria. Restrictive phenotype included restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) and mixed phenotype. In these cases, RAS-like opacities (RLOs) were evaluated both qualitatively and semiquantitatively on computed tomography at CLAD diagnosis. RLOs were classified into upper-predominant and diffuse/lower-predominant distribution groups. Overall survival after CLAD diagnosis was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Eighty-three patients were diagnosed with CLAD after transplantation. Twenty-one (25.3%) had restrictive phenotype, which showed shorter survival compared to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (median survival: 19.8 vs 68.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 4.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96-10.49; p < 0.001). Within the restrictive phenotype, the upper-predominant group demonstrated longer survival than the diffuse/lower-predominant group (median survival: 61.1 vs 15.5 months; p = 0.008). The diffuse/lower-predominant group had shorter survival compared to any other CLAD phenotype (HR, 8.45; 95% CI, 3.40-21.04; p < 0.001). The extent of RLOs within each distribution pattern was not significantly associated with survival.

Conclusions

In restrictive phenotype CLAD, RLO distribution patterns determined survival outcomes, with diffuse/lower-predominant showing the poorest prognosis, while the extent of RLOs within each pattern did not correlate with prognosis.

Return-to-work in lung transplant recipients: an Australian perspective

BACKGROUND

Return-to-work (RTW) following lung transplant has been associated with increased quality of life, but little is known regarding the rates of and barriers to this in the Australian population.

AIMS

We aimed to describe, characterise and determine predictors of return to work and social participation in Australian lung transplant recipients. We also sought to explore the relationship between return to work and quality of life.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study at the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne between October 2018 and August 2019. The questionnaire evaluated demographics, transplant history, respiratory parameters, employment history and social integration prior to and after lung transplantation.

RESULTS

A total of 172 lung transplant recipients were included for analysis. The population was mostly male (56.5%), median age 61 years (interquartile range (IQR) 49.8-67.0) and median time from transplant 4 years (IQR 2-7). A total of 19.2% of patients were working at time of transplant, with 35.5% working after transplant representing an increase in workforce engagement of 84.8% (P < 0.001). A total of 96% of those who returned to work reported an improvement in quality of life. Median time to RTW after transplant was 180 days (IQR 90-360). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an increased rate of RTW in younger recipients (odds ratio (OR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-0.99, adjusted P = 0.029), at greater length of time after transplant (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.99-1.19, P = 0.084), among those working at the time of transplant (OR 9.55, 95% CI 2.70-33.75, P < 0.001) and with higher socioeconomic status (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, P = 0.009). Recipients with cystic fibrosis were more likely to RTW (65.8%) than those with other underlying conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

RTW should be encouraged in lung transplant recipients. Targeted supports and resources aimed at younger recipients may result in greater workforce engagement and overall outcomes after transplant.

Lung transplant outcomes in recipients of advanced age: Are two always better than one?

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation has become more common in patients aged 65 years and older. We aimed to examine outcomes across age groups and identify risk factors for decreased survival.

METHODS

United Network for Organ Sharing data for all primary lung transplants from January 1, 2006, to March 8, 2023, were retrospectively reviewed. The impact of recipient age on survival was analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 33,644 lung transplant recipients who were identified, 23,125 (69%), 7270 (21%), 2895 (9%), and 354 (1%) were aged 12 to 64, 65 to 69, 70 to 74, and 75 to 79 years, respectively. Older patients underwent single lung transplantation more often (12-64 years: 19%, 65-69 years: 41%, 70-74 years: 57%, 75-79 years: 75%, P < .001). Median survival was greater in bilateral compared with single lung transplant in all groups except those aged 75 to 79 years (12-64 years: 7.6 vs 5.6, P < .001; 65-69 years: 5.8 vs 4.8, P < .001; 70-74 years: 5.0 vs 3.9, P < .001; 75-79 years: 4.0 vs 3.9 years, P = .919). Previous cardiac surgery was associated with increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.41, P < .001) and greater likelihood of receiving a single lung transplant with older age (12-64 years: 45.3%, 65-79 years: 71.0%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral lung transplantation offers a survival advantage over single lung transplantation in recipients up to 74 years of age. Recipients aged 75 to 79 have poor long-term survival. Previous cardiac surgery is associated with worse long-term survival, necessitating careful patient selection, especially in older patients being offered a single lung transplant.

How safe is lung transplantation in patients of 65 years or older? A single-center retrospective cohort

INTRODUCTION

With increasing experience in high-volume centers, age alone should not be an absolute contra-indication to lung transplantation (LT) but be considered as part of the patient's initial characteristics. The objective of this study is to provide early and long-term outcomes of LT in recipients aged 65 or older, compared with their younger counterparts.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study, including all patients undergoing LT in Bichat Hospital (Paris, France) from January 2014 to March 2019. Two groups were defined depending on the patients' age when they were transplanted: patients older than 65 were defined as the "elderly group" and patients younger than 65 years old were defined as the « younger group ». Primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included 1-year mortality, 1-year FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second), and 5-year overall survival.

RESULTS

From September 2014 to March 2019, 22 patients were included in the "elderly group" and 213 were included in the « younger group ». The elderly group had more single LT (SLT) (82% vs. 29%, p < 0.001), with a shorter cold ischemic time (243 min vs. 310 min, p = 0.001) and a lower rate of early humoral rejection (9% vs. 30%, p = 0.045) compared to the younger group. Ninety-day mortality was not significantly different between elderly and younger group (9% vs. 14%, p = 0.95, respectively), nor were 1-year mortality (23% vs. 25%, p = 0.9, respectively) and 5-year overall survival. Six months after LT, FEV1 was significantly better in the elderly group compared to the younger group (77.0% vs. 65.5%, p = 0.037 respectively), but the difference did not reach statistical significance after one year (78.5 vs. 68.3%, p = 0.18 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients underwent more frequently single LT, and achieved similar short and long term postoperative outcomes compared to their younger counterparts. LT for patients 65 years or older should be routinely considered when carefully selected.

Analysis of the waitlist performance and post-transplant outcomes of lung transplant in elderly recipients in Korea: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of information on the waitlist performance and post-transplant outcomes of lung transplants in elderly recipients in Korea.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed data from the Korean Network for Organ Sharing database between March 2010 and August 2023.

RESULTS

In total, 2574 patients were listed for lung transplantation during the study period, with 511 (19.9%) of them being over 65 years of age. Among these, 188 patients (36.8%) underwent transplantation, while 184 patients (36%) passed away without undergoing transplantation at the time of data extraction. The most prevalent underlying disease on the waitlist was idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, accounting for 68.1%. The 1-year survival rate was significantly lower in the elderly compared to that in the nonelderly (65.4 vs. 75.4%; p = .004). In the multivariate Cox analysis, elderly (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.14-1.97; p = .004) and a high urgent status at registration (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.40-2.40; p < .001) were significantly associated with post-transplant 1-year mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a significant difference in post-transplant mortality based on the urgency status at enrollment (χ2 = 8.302, p = .016). Even with the same highly urgent condition at the time of transplantation, different prognoses were observed depending on the condition at listing (χ2 = 9.056, p = .029).

CONCLUSION

The elderly exhibited worse transplant outcomes than nonelderly adults, with a highly urgent status at registration identified as a significant risk factor. Unprepared, highly urgent transplantation was associated with poor outcomes.

Rehabilitation interventions to modify physical frailty in adults before lung transplantation: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Lung transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for end-stage lung disease for a small group of patients meeting strict acceptance criteria after optimal medical management has failed. Physical frailty is prevalent in lung transplant candidates and has been linked to worse outcomes both on the waiting list and postoperatively. Exercise has been proven to be beneficial in optimising exercise capacity and quality of life in lung transplant candidates, but its impact on physical frailty is unknown. This review aims to assess the effectiveness of exercise interventions in modifying physical frailty for adults awaiting lung transplantation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol was prospectively registered on the PROSPERO database. We will search four databases plus trial registries to identify primary studies of adult candidates for lung transplantation undertaking exercise interventions and assessing outcomes pertaining to physical frailty. Studies must include at least 10 participants. Article screening will be performed by two researchers independently at each stage. Extraction will be performed by one reviewer and checked by a second. The risk of bias in studies will be assessed by two independent reviewers using tools appropriate for the research design of each study; where appropriate, we will use Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 or ROBINS-I. At each stage of the review process, discrepancies will be resolved through a consensus or consultation with a third reviewer. Meta-analyses of frailty outcomes will be performed if possible and appropriate as will prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Where we are unable to perform meta-analysis, we will conduct narrative synthesis following Synthesis without Meta-analysis guidance. The review will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethical issues are predicted due to the nature of this study. Dissemination will occur via conference abstracts, professional networks, peer-reviewed journals and patient support groups.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022363730.

Donor and Recipient Age in Interstitial Lung Disease: Types of Lung Transplant Survival Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Lung transplantation is the last option for patients with end-stage interstitial lung disease (ILD), yet organ allocation remains a challenge. This single-center study investigated the correlation of procedure type and donor and recipient age with survival outcomes in patients with ILD.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of lung recipients diagnosed with ILD who were transplanted in our center. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests according to the following variables: double lung transplant (DLT) or single lung transplant (SLT), recipient age <65 and ≥65, recipient sex, donor sex, and donor age. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed using the same variables. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Of 969 lung recipients transplanted at our center, 648 (66.8%) were diagnosed with ILD. There was no significant difference in survival for patients <65 or ≥65 when compared by DLT versus SLT. There were no significant differences in survival based on donor age. Survival at 5 y was significantly higher for recipient age <65 versus ≥65 (P = 0.0014). For DLT patients <65 or ≥65, there was no significant survival difference. However, for SLT patients, survival at 5 y was significantly higher for patients <65 (P = 0.0109).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that donor age did not have a significant association with survival of patients with ILD posttransplant. In older patients with ILD, there was no significant difference for DLT versus SLT. However, within the SLT group, younger patients with ILD showed better survival compared to older patients.

Lung Transplantation Outcomes in Recipients Aged 70 Years or Older and the Impact of Center Volume

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate trends and outcomes of lung transplants (LTx) in recipients ≥ 70 years.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the UNOS database identifying all patients undergoing LTx (May 2005-December 2022). Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared by age (<70 years, ≥70 years) and center volume. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed with pairwise comparisons between subgroups.

RESULTS

34,957 patients underwent LTx, of which 3236 (9.3%) were ≥70 years. The rate of LTx in recipients ≥ 70 has increased over time, particularly in low-volume centers (LVCs); consequently, high-volume centers (HVCs) and LVCs perform similar rates of LTx for recipients ≥ 70. Recipients ≥ 70 had higher rates of receiving from donor after circulatory death lungs and of extended donor criteria. Recipients ≥ 70 were more likely to die of cardiovascular diseases or malignancy, while recipients < 70 of chronic primary graft failure. Survival time was shorter for recipients ≥ 70 compared to recipients < 70 old (hazard ratio (HR): 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28-1.44, p < 0.001). HVCs were associated with a survival advantage in recipients < 70 (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.94, p < 0.001); however, in recipients ≥ 70, survival was similar between HVCs and LVCs (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.99-1.25, p < 0.08). HVCs were more likely to perform a bilateral LTx (BLT) for obstructive lung diseases compared to LVCs, but there was no difference in BLT and single LTx likelihood for restrictive lung diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful consideration is needed for recipient ≥ 70 selection, donor assessment, and post-transplant care to improve outcomes. Further research should explore strategies that advance perioperative care in centers with low long-term survival for recipients ≥ 70.

Lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease: evolution over three decades

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) has emerged as the most common indication for lung transplantation globally. However, post-transplant survival varies depending on the underlying disease phenotype and comorbidities. This study aimed to describe the demographics, disease classification, outcomes and factors associated with post-transplant survival in a large single-centre cohort.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively assessed for 284 recipients who underwent lung transplantation for ILD in our centre between 1987 and 2020. Patient characteristics and outcomes were stratified by three eras: 1987-2000, 2001-2010 and 2011-2020.

RESULTS

Median patients' age at time of transplantation was significantly higher in the most recent decade (56 (51-61) years, p<0.0001). Recipients aged over 50 years had worse overall survival compared with younger patients (adjusted HR, aHR 2.36, 95% CI 1.55 to 3.72, p=0.0001). Better survival was seen with bilateral versus single lung transplantation in patients younger than 50 years (log-rank p=0.0195). However, this survival benefit was no longer present in patients aged over 50 years. Reduced survival was observed in fibrotic non-specific interstitial pneumonia compared with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, which remained the most common indication throughout (aHR 2.61, 95% CI 1.40 to 4.60, p=0.0015).

CONCLUSION

In patients transplanted for end-stage ILD, older age and fibrotic non-specific interstitial pneumonia were associated with poorer post-transplant survival. The benefit of bilateral over single lung transplantation diminished with increasing age, suggesting that single lung transplantation might still be a feasible option in older candidates.

Association of cardiac disease with the risk of post-lung transplantation mortality in Chinese recipients aged over 65 years

The current organ allocation rules prioritize elderly and urgent patients on the lung transplantation (LT) waiting list. A steady increase in the threshold at which age is taken into consideration for LT has been observed. This retrospective cohort study recruited 166 lung transplant recipients aged ≽ 65 years between January 2016 and October 2020 in the largest LT center in China. In the cohort, subgroups of patients aged 65-70 years (111 recipients, group 65-70) and ≽ 70 years (55 recipients, group ≽ 70) were included. Group D restrictive lung disease was the main indication of a lung transplant in recipients over 65 years. A significantly higher percentage of coronary artery stenosis was observed in the group ≽ 70 (30.9% vs. 14.4% in group 65-70, P = 0.014). ECMO bridging to LT was performed in 5.4% (group 65-70) and 7.3% (group ≽ 70) of patients. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that recipients with cardiac abnormalities had a significantly increased risk of mortality. After adjusting for potential confounders, cardiac abnormality was shown to be independently associated with the increased risk of post-LT mortality (HR 6.37, P = 0.0060). Our result showed that LT can be performed in candidates with an advanced age and can provide life-extending benefits.

A comparison of outcomes after lung transplantation between European and North American centers

BACKGROUND

With advancements in basic science and clinical medicine, lung transplantation (LT) has evolved rapidly over the last three decades. However, it is unclear if significant regional variations exist in long-term outcomes after LT.

METHODS

To investigate potential differences, we performed a retrospective, comparative cohort analysis of adult patients undergoing deceased donor single or double LT in North America (NA) or Europe between January 2006 and December 2016. Data up to April 2019 were abstracted from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Thoracic Organ Registry. We compared overall survival (OS) between North American and European LT centers in a propensity score matched analysis.

RESULTS

In 3,115 well-matched pairs, though 30-day survival was similar between groups (NA 96.2% vs Europe 95.4%, p = 0.116), 5-year survival was significantly higher in European patients (NA 60.1% vs Europe 70.3%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This survival difference persisted in a sensitivity analysis excluding Canadian patients. Prior observations suggest that these disparities are at least partly related to better access to care via universal healthcare models prevalent in Europe. Future studies are warranted to confirm our findings and explore other causal mechanisms. It is likely that potential solutions will require concerted efforts from healthcare providers and policymakers.

The Intersection of Aging and Lung Transplantation: its Impact on Transplant Evaluation, Outcomes, and Clinical Care

Purpose

Older adults (age ≥ 65 years) are the fastest growing age group undergoing lung transplantation. Further, international consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates no longer suggest a fixed upper age limit. Although carefully selected older adults can derive great benefit, understanding which older adults will do well after transplant with improved survival and health-related qualiy of life is key to informed decision-making. Herein, we review the epidemiology of aging in lung transplantation and its impact on outcomes, highlight selected physiological measures that may be informative when evaluating and managing older lung transplant patients, and identify directions for future research.

Recent Findings

In general, listing and transplanting older, sicker patients has contributed to worse clinical outcomes and greater healthcare use. Emerging evidence suggest that measures of physiological age, such as frailty, body composition, and neurocognitive and psychosocial function, may better identify risk for poor transplant outcomes than chronlogical age.

Summary

The evidence base to inform transplant decision-making and improvements in care for older adults is small but growing. Multipronged efforts at the intersection of aging and lung transplantation are needed to improve the clinical and patient centered outcomes for this large and growing cohort of patients. Future research should focus on identifying novel and ideally modifiable risk factors for poor outcomes specific to older adults, better approaches to measuring physiological aging (e.g., frailty, body composition, neurocognitive and psychosocial function), and the underlying mechanisms of physiological aging. Finally, interventions that can improve clinical and patient centered outcomes for older adults are needed.

Allocation of Donor Lungs in Korea

The expansion of indications for lung transplantation, the growth of the waiting list, and donor shortages are increasing the waiting list mortality rate in Korea. The current lung allocation system in Korea is based mainly on urgency, but outcomes should also be considered to avoid futile transplantation. This review describes the current status of, and issues with, the lung allocation system in Korea including donors, the waiting list, and transplant outcomes in the context of an aging society, in which the frequency of end-stage pulmonary disease is increasing.

Anesthetic Management During Lung Transplantation - What's New in 2021?

As outcomes of lung transplantation (LTx) are improving transplant centers are pushing boundaries. There has been a steady increase in the medical complexity of lung transplant candidates. Many transplant centers are listing older patients with comorbidities, and there has been a steady rise in the number of candidates supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to transplantation. There has been a growing appreciation of the importance intraoperative management of potentially modifiable risk factors has on postoperative outcomes. Evidence suggests that LTx even in high-risk patients requiring perioperative ECMO can offer excellent results. This article outlines the current state-of-the-art intraoperative management of LTx.

Lung transplantation in the septuagenarian can be successfully performed though long-term results impacted by diseases of aging

BACKGROUND

Advanced age is considered a risk factor for lung transplantation (LTX). We sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes of LTX in the septuagenarian.

METHODS

LTX recipients in the UNOS transplant registry (May 1, 2005 to June 12, 2020) were stratified into 18-59, 60-69, and > = 70 years of age. Recipient and transplant characteristics were evaluated for survival, cause of death (COD), length of stay (LOS), and complications. A Kaplan-Meier analysis examined long-term survival for all patients stratified by age, specifically looking at cause of death.

RESULTS

A total of 27632 recipients were identified. As recipients aged, we found a decrease in proportion of cystic fibrosis and an increase in restrictive disease while obstructive disease peaked in the 60-69yo cohort (p<0.001). Septuagenarians had higher rates of single LTX, male gender and white race (p<0.001). Older recipients had significantly longer donor recovery distances traveled with paradoxical shorter ischemic times, shorter hospital LOS and were transplanted at higher volume centers. There was no difference with in-hospital mortality among groups (p = 0.5). Acute rejection during initial hospitalization, rejection within 1 year, and post-transplant dialysis incidence decreased with age. Graft failure was a common COD in younger patients while malignancy and cardio/cerebrovascular diseases were common COD in > = 70yo.

CONCLUSION

Select septuagenarian LTX candidates may be safely transplanted with relatively few complications. Immunosenescence and conditions of the aged are likely contributing factors to the decreased rejection and graft failure observations. Septuagenarians should not be excluded from LTX consideration based solely on age. Transplantation in septuagenarians should only be done in very selected patients (screened for malignancies and atherosclerotic disease) and these recipients should be carefully followed after transplantation because of these risk factors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Critical care considerations in the post-operative period for the lung transplant patient

The post-operative management of a lung transplant recipient can be complex. Several factors including medical comorbidities, severity of illness at the time of transplant and intra-operative events can affect graft function and overall survival. During the immediate post-operative period, it becomes essential for early recognition of disease-specific sequelae as they can impact the patient’s outcome and quality of life. This often necessitates a multidisciplinary team of pulmonologists, surgeons, medical sub-specialists as well as skilled nurses and respiratory therapists familiar with caring for these patients. Based on the experiences of a high-volume transplant center, this chapter will outline key considerations within each organ system in this specific patient population in the Intensive Care Unit.

Significance of phenotype change after chronic lung allograft dysfunction onset

Definitions for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) phenotypes were recently revised (2019 ISHLT consensus). Post-CLAD onset phenotype transition may occur as a result of change in obstruction, restriction, or RAS-like opacities (RLO). We aimed to assess the prevalence and prognostic implications of these transitions. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of bilateral lung transplants performed in 2009-2015. CLAD phenotypes were determined per ISHLT guidelines. CLAD phenotype transition was defined as a sustained change in obstruction, restriction or RLO. We specifically focused on phenotype changes based on RLO emergence. Association of RLO development with time to death or retransplant were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Among 211 patients with CLAD, 47 (22.2%) experienced a phenotype transition. Nineteen patients developed RLO. Development of RLO phenotype after CLAD onset was associated with a shorter time to death/retransplant when considering the entire CLAD patient cohort (HR = 4.00, CI 2.74-5.83, P < 0.001) and also when restricting the analysis to only patients with a Non-RLO phenotype at CLAD onset (HR 9.64, CI 5.52-16.84, P < 0.0001). CLAD phenotype change based on emergence of RAS-like opacities implies a worse outcome. This highlights the clinical importance of imaging follow-up to monitor for phenotype transitions after CLAD onset.

Outcomes after lung transplantation in recipients aged 70 years or older

BACKGROUND

The proportion of lung transplant (LTx) recipients older than 70 years is increasing, thus we assessed long-term survival after LTx in this cohort relative to younger counterparts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients who underwent LTx between 2012 and 2016 at our center and divided patients by age: group A (<65 years), B (65-69 years), and C (≥70 years). Survival statistics were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.

RESULTS

The study included 375 LTx recipients: 221 (58.9%) in group A, 109 (29.1%) in group B, and 45 (12.0%) in group C. Group C was mostly men (37/45 [82.2%]; P = 0.003) and had the highest mean serum creatinine at listing (P = 0.02). Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplant in group A (93.2%, 70.1%, 58.8%) was significantly higher than group B (83.5%, 59.6%, 44.0%; P = 0.005, 0.028, 0.006, log-rank test) and was similar to group C (86.7%, 64.4%, 57.8%), although trended higher at 1 year (P = 0.139, 0.274, 0.489, log-rank test). Groups B and C had comparable survival at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Although survival decreased after age 65, long-term survival was comparable between LTx recipients aged 65-69 years and recipients ≥70 years.

Frailty in Lung Transplantation: Candidate Assessment and Optimization

The concept of frailty has gained considerable interest in clinical solid-organ transplantation over the past decade. Frailty as a phenotypic construct to describe a patient's risk from biologic stresses has an impact on posttransplant survival. There is keen interest in characterizing frailty in lung transplantation, both to determine which patients are suitable candidates for listing and also to prepare for their care in the aftermath of lung transplantation. Here, we review the current status of research on frailty in lung transplant candidates and recipients. This review will highlight areas of uncertainty for frailty in clinical lung transplantation that are likely to impact the state-of-the-art in the field for the next decade.

Disparities in heart and lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiothoracic transplantation is the definitive therapy for end-stage heart and lung disease. In service to this population, disparities in access and care must be simultaneously understood and addressed.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are sex, race, geographic, age, and underlying disease disparities in both heart and lung transplantation. Women have reduced waitlist survival but improved posttransplant survival when compared with men for both heart and lung transplantation. Black patients have worse outcome compared with other races postheart transplant. Geographic disparities impact the likelihood of receiving heart or lung transplant and the growing number of patients with advanced age seeking transplant complicates discussions on survival benefit. Finally, underlying disease has affected outcomes for both heart and lung transplant and now are incorporated into the allocation system.

SUMMARY

Though heart and lung transplantation have several existing disparities, it remains to be seen how advancements in medical technology, changes in donor organ allocation policies, and growing experience in patient selection will impact these concerns.

Construct and Predictive Validity of Sarcopenia in Lung Transplant Candidates

Rationale: Sarcopenia is associated with disability and death. The optimal definition and clinical relevance of sarcopenia in lung transplantation remain unknown. Objectives: To assess the construct and predictive validity of sarcopenia definitions in lung transplant candidates. Methods: In a multicenter prospective cohort of 424 lung transplant candidates, we evaluated limited (muscle mass only) and expanded (muscle mass and quality) sarcopenia definitions from the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH), and a cohort-specific distribution-based lowest quartile definition. We assessed construct validity using associations with conceptually related factors. We evaluated the relationship between sarcopenia and frailty using generalized additive models. We also evaluated associations between sarcopenia definitions and key pretransplant outcomes, including disability (quantified by the Lung Transplant Valued Life Activities scale [range, 0-3; higher scores = worse disability; minimally important difference, 0.3]) and waitlist delisting/death, by multivariate linear and Cox regression, respectively. Results: Sarcopenia prevalence ranged from 6% to13% by definition used. The limited EWGSOP2 definition demonstrated the highest construct validity, followed by the expanded EWGSOP2 definition and both limited and expanded FNIH and lowest quartile definitions. Sarcopenia exhibited a linear association with the risk of frailty. The EWGSOP2 and expanded lowest quartile definitions were associated with disability, ranging from 0.20 to 0.25 higher Lung Transplant Valued Life Activities scores. Sarcopenia was associated with increased risk of waitlist delisting or death by the limited and expanded lowest quartile definitions (hazard ratio [HR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-9.9 and HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.1-11.0, respectively) and the EWGSOP2 limited definition (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 0.9-8.6) but not with the three other candidate definitions. Conclusions: The prevalence and validity of sarcopenia vary by definition; the EWGSOP2 limited definition exhibited the broadest validity in lung transplant candidates. The linear relationship between low muscle mass and frailty highlights sarcopenia's contribution to frailty and also questions the clinical utility of a sarcopenia cut-point in advanced lung disease. The associations between sarcopenia and important pretransplant outcomes support further investigation into using body composition for candidate risk stratification.

Lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease

Lung transplantation (LTx) can be a life-extending treatment option for patients with advanced and/or progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, sarcoidosis and connective tissue disease-associated ILD. IPF is now the most common indication for LTx worldwide. Several unique features in patients with ILD can impact optimal timing of referral or listing for LTx, pre- or post-transplant risks, candidacy and post-transplant management. As the epidemiology of LTx and community practices have evolved, recent literature describes outcomes and approaches in higher-risk candidates. In this review, we discuss the unique and important clinical findings, course, monitoring and management of patients with IPF and other progressive fibrotic ILDs during pre-LTx evaluation and up to the day of transplantation; the need for co-management with clinical experts in ILD and LTx is emphasised. Some post-LTx complications are unique in these patient cohorts, which require prompt detection and appropriate management by experts in multiple disciplines familiar with telomere biology disorders and infectious, haematological, oncological and cardiac complications to enhance the likelihood of improved outcomes and survival of LTx recipients with IPF and other ILDs.

Selection Criteria for Lung Transplantation: Controversies and New Developments

Lung transplantation is an accepted therapeutic option for end-stage lung diseases. The imbalance between limited availability and vast need of donor organs necessitates careful selection of recipient candidates, ensuring the best possible utilization of the scarce resource of organs. Nonetheless, possible lung transplant candidates who could experience a meaningful improvement in survival and quality of life should not be excluded solely based on the complexity of their case. In this review, controversial issues or difficult limitations for lung transplantation, and new developments in recipient selection criteria, are discussed, which may help broaden recipient eligibility for lung transplantation without compromising long-term outcomes.

Risk factors for mortality in lung transplant recipients aged ≥65 years: A retrospective cohort study of 5,815 patients in the scientific registry of transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is increasingly performed in recipients aged ≥65 years. However, the risk factors for mortality specific to this population have not been well studied. In lung transplant recipients aged ≥65 years, we sought to determine post-transplant survival and clinical factors associated with post-transplant mortality.

METHODS

We investigated 5,815 adult lung transplants recipients aged ≥65 years in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Mortality was defined as a composite of recipient death or retransplantation. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median time to mortality. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to examine the association between time to mortality and 23 donor, recipient, or center characteristics.

RESULTS

Median survival in lung transplant recipients aged ≥65 years was 4.41 years (95% CI: 4.21-4.60 years) and significantly worsened by increasing age strata. In the multivariable model, increasing recipient age strata, creatinine level, bilirubin level, hospitalization at the time of transplantation, single lung transplant operation, steroid use at the time of transplantation, donor diabetes, and cytomegalovirus mismatch were independently associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the 8 risk factors we identified, 5 factors are readily available, which can be used to optimize post-transplant survival by informing risk during candidate selection of patients aged ≥65 years. Furthermore, bilateral lung transplantation may confer improved survival in comparison with single lung transplantation. Our results support that after careful consideration of risk factors, lung transplantation can provide life-extending benefits in individuals aged ≥65 years.

[Early outcomes following lung transplantation in patients aged 65 years and older]

INTRODUCTION

The number of lung transplantations performed is increasing worldwide. With an improved experience and outcomes, the age of the recipient on its own has ceased to be an absolute contra-indication. We report our first experience with lung transplantation in patients aged 65 years or older.

METHODS

From January 2014 to March 2019, the files of patients aged 65 years or older undergoing lung transplantation were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 241 patients underwent lung transplantation in Bichat hospital (Paris, France), including 25 recipients aged 65 years or older. Underlying diagnoses were interstitial (72%) and obstructive (28%) disease. The rate of single lung transplantation was 80%. Sixteen patients required ECMO assistance during the procedure. Early complications were mostly grade III primary graft dysfunction (12%) and cellular rejection (20%). Overall one-year survival rate was 76%.

CONCLUSION

After a careful selection of the recipients, the early results of our retrospective single center series are encouraging. We continue to consider lung transplantation in rigorously selected recipients of aged 65 years and more.

Prophylactic vaccination with a live-attenuated herpes zoster vaccine in lung transplant candidates

BACKGROUND

Herpes zoster (HZ) is caused by the reactivation of varicella-zoster virus (VZV). Patients with lung transplants are at high risk for HZ owing to their immunocompromised status and the need for lifelong immunosuppression. In this study, patients on the waiting list for lung transplantation were vaccinated by a live-attenuated HZ vaccine (Zostavax, Merck Sharp & Dohme), and the safety and immunogenicity of this vaccine were studied.

METHODS

In total, 105 patients with end-stage pulmonary disease (ESPD) were enrolled (68 participants received 1 dose of Zostavax and 37 participants were enrolled as unvaccinated controls). Among them, 43 patients underwent lung transplantation and were followed up for further analysis. VZV immunoglobulin G antibody titers and VZV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) on multiple time points before and after vaccination and before and after transplantation were measured.

RESULTS

Immune response to Zostavax was higher in younger patients, highest within 3 months after vaccination, and not influenced by gender or type of ESPD. Age, cytomegalovirus serostatus, and immunity to VZV at baseline impacted the subsequent immune response to the vaccine. Short-term immunosuppressant treatment had strong effects on VZV CMI levels, which returned to a high level at 6 months after transplantation in vaccinated patients. Zostavax did not impact infection or rejection rate after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Zostavax was safe and induced a robust humoral and cellular response for patients awaiting lung transplantation regardless of the type of ESPD. Patients younger than the recommended vaccination age of over 50 years showed a strong response and could also benefit from pre-transplant immunization.

Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life During the First Year in Lung Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has increasingly been accepted as a supplementary outcome measure for patients before and after lung transplantation (LT). This longitudinal study was conducted to recognize the tracks of HRQOL during the first year after transplantation and the main factors associated with HRQOL of LT recipients. The research was conducted in accordance with the 2000 Declaration of Helsinki and the Declaration of Istanbul 2008. The transplant organs were from volunteer donation, and next of kin provided written informed consents of their own free will. No prisoners were used, and donors were neither paid nor coerced.

METHODS

A total of 118 patients were investigated before and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-transplantation. The Medical Outcomes SF-36 (Chinese version) was used to measure the HRQOL. The recipients' demographic characteristics and clinical data were evaluated to determine the relative contributions to HRQOL outcomes.

RESULTS

Recipients reported a mean physical component summary of 39.62 ± 6.57, 57.90 ± 9.99, 59.15 ± 8.73, 58.79 ± 8.52, and 58.72 ± 8.99 before transplantation and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after LT (F = 64.960, P < .001). By 3 months after transplant, patients experienced significant improvement in physical component summary (MD = 18.27, SE = 1.52, P < .001); but between 3 and 12 months, no significant improvement was observed (MD = 0.82, SE = 1.77, P = .645). Patients reported a continuous rise with means of 44.63 ± 5.35, 51.13 ± 10.25, 51.92 ± 9.72, 53.23 ± 10.34, and 55.40 ± 8.83 for the mental component summary before LT and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after transplant (F = 13.059, P < .001). By 3 months after transplant, patients experienced significant improvement in mental component summary (MD = 6.50, SE = 1.50, P < .001). Between 3 and 12 months, a continuous significant improvement was observed (MD = 4.27, SE = 1.92, P = .030). The generalized estimated equation showed that age, marital status, residence, disease diagnosis, transplant type, sleep disorders, gastrointestinal complications, and BODE index (body mass index, obstruction, dyspnea, exercise) were all found to be related to HRQOL.

CONCLUSION

The HRQOL of LT patients improved significantly at 3 months after transplantation, but between 3 and 12 months after transplantation, the changes were not obvious. Health practitioners should pay more attention to elderly patients, unmarried patients, patients living in urban areas, patients diagnosed with pneumoconiosis, patients with left single-lung transplantation, patients with sleep disorders, patients with high BODE indexes, and patients with gastrointestinal complications.

Post-lung transplantation abdominopelvic complications: the role of multimodal imaging

Lung transplantation (LT) is an established method for treating end-stage lung disease. Although most of the post-lung transplant imaging surveillance is focused on chronic lung allograft rejection, abdominopelvic complications have been reported in 7-62% of patients. The reported wide range of post-LT abdominopelvic complications is thought to be secondary to lack of current standardized definitions. These complications encompass a heterogeneous group of disorders including upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, inflammatory conditions of solid organs, lymphoproliferative disorders, and neoplasms; each with varying pathophysiology, timing, severity, and treatment. Clinical manifestations of these complications may overlap or be masked by immunosuppression; therefore, imaging plays a paramount role in the early management and treatment.

Single versus bilateral lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation, either single or bilateral, serves as the only effective treatment for end-stage idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but their superiority is still being debated, and its application in Chinese patients has not been data analysed.

METHODS

We reviewed 109 IPF patients who received lung transplantation at our centre between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017. The patients were divided into single lung transplantation (SLT) group and bilateral lung transplantation (BLT) group. We compared the two groups' demographic characteristics and clinical indexes (intraoperative conditions, postoperative complications, follow-ups and life qualities).

RESULTS

Patients in BLT group were significantly younger than those in SLT group (P < 0.001), and had more pretransplant infections (P = 0.007). The total ischemic time (P < 0.001) was shorter and intraoperative blood loss was less (P = 0.001) in SLT group. No significant difference was found in the proportion of patients in using anti-fibrosis drugs, pulmonary artery pressure, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the surgery; the length of intensive care unit stay; the incidence of complication; and the overall survival rate between two groups. However, the hierarchical analysis found that patients aged > 60 years showed a better survival in SLT group (P = 0.008). Both groups got normal MOS 36-item Short Form (SF-36) scores, and the scores of BLT were higher than those of SLT. The BLT group had better lung function than SLT group 1 year post-lung transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SLT and BLT are effective and SLT is more favourable for the patients of > 60 years.