Surgical approaches in patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Current perspective on resectability in stage III locally advanced NSCLC - The thoracic surgeons' view

Surgical expertise is crucial in determining resectability. Due to differences in surgical expertise, cooperation with other surgical departments, and technical equipment available, a differentiation between "standard resectability" and "resectability with advanced technical requirements" can introduce a clear decision algorithm for interdisciplinary tumorboards. The current 2024 EORTC survey highlights areas with a lack of consensus on surgical indications in stage III NSCLC. T4 NSCLC with involvement of adjacent structures should be managed in high-volume, experienced centers following MDT discussion. Future research should focus on refining selection criteria for surgery and optimize treatment strategies in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

The clinical value of local consolidative therapy for oligo-residual disease in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors-treated non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Few real-world studies exist regarding the clinical value of local consolidative therapy (LCT) for oligo-residual disease (ORD) in NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated whether LCT could improve the prognosis of NSCL patients with ORD after effective first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors treatment.

Methods

A total of 132 patients with metastatic NSCLC who had received first-line PD-1/PD-L1inhibitors-based systemic treatment and developed ORD (defined as residual tumors limited to three organs and five lesions) were included. The LCT group consisted of 41 patients received LCTs for oligo-residual lesions before treatment failure, and the remaining 91 patients, who did not receive local therapies, constituted the non-LCT group. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the two groups were analyzed.

Results

With a median follow-up of 12.0 months, 86 patients developed progressive disease and 42 patients died. Compared with the non-LCT group, LCT group exhibited significant longer progression-free survival (PFS) (median 11.0 vs. 7.0 months, P=0.017) and overall survival (OS) (median 26.0 vs. 17.0 months, P=0.003). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that LCT was an independent predictor of prolonged PFS (HR=0.606, 95% CI=0.370-0.964, P=0.035) and OS (HR=0.467, 95% CI=0.229-0.949, P=0.035). Subgroup analysis revealed that the dominant population considerably benefited from LCT in terms of PFS and OS included patients with 1-2 residual tumor sites (mPFS: 11.0 vs. 7.0 months, P=0.013; mOS: 23.0 vs. 17.0 months, P=0.018) and those with high PD-L1 expression (mPFS: 13.0 vs. 7.0 months, P=0.018; mOS: 34.0 vs. 16.0 months, P=0.030). In addition, the All-LCT group had significantly longer PFS (mPFS 16.0 vs. 7.0, P=0.002) and OS (mOS 28.0 vs. 17.0, P= 0.002) than did the non-LCT group. However, patients who received LCT to only some of their lesions had not experienced improvements in PFS (P=0.546) or OS (P=0.198).

Conclusion

LCT may provide extra survival benefits among patients with oligo-residual NSCLC after effective first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors treatment, particularly in those patients with one or two residual lesions, high PD-L1 expression, or who had received LCT for all lesions. LCT may be a novel treatment option for this specific population.

Current treatment landscape for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer

The management of patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) has undergone major changes in recent years. On the one hand, improved sensitivity of diagnostic tests, both radiological and endoscopic, has altered the way patients are staged. On the other hand, the arrival of new drugs with antitumoral activity, such as targeted therapies or immunotherapy, has changed the prognosis of patients, improving disease control and prolonging survival. Finally, the development of radiotherapy and surgical and interventional radiology techniques means that radical ablative treatments can be performed on metastases in any location in the body. All of these advances have impacted the treatment of patients with advanced lung cancer, especially in a subgroup of these patients in which all of these treatment modalities converge. This poses a challenge for physicians who must decide upon the best treatment strategy for each patient, without solid evidence for one optimal mode of treatment in this patient population. The aim of this article is to review, from a practical and multidisciplinary perspective, published evidence on the management of oligometastatic NSCLC patients. We evaluate the different alternatives for radical ablative treatments, the role of primary tumor resection or radiation, the impact of systemic treatments, and the therapeutic sequence. In short, the present document aims to provide clinicians with a practical guide for the treatment of oligometastatic patients in routine clinical practice.

A risk stratification scheme for synchronous oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer developed by a multicentre analysis

BACKGROUNDS

Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients represent a category without a standard therapeutic approach. However, in selected oligometastatic NSCLC, radical surgery seems to offer a good prognosis. This retrospective study aimed to analyse the long-term outcomes of synchronous oligometastatic patients treated with curative intent and identify the factors associated with better results and the proposal of a risk stratification system for classifying the synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC.

METHODS

The medical records of patients from 18 centres with pathologically diagnosed synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC, radical surgical treatment of the primary tumour with or without neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy and radical treatment of all metastatic sites. The Kaplan - Meier method estimated survivals. A stratified backward stepwise Cox regression model was assessed for multivariable survival analyses.

RESULTS

281 patients were included. The most common site of metastasis was the brain, in 50.89 % patients. Median overall survival was 40 months (95 % CI: 29-53). Age ≤65 years (HR = 1.02, 95 % CI: 1.00-1.05; p = 0.019), single metastasis (HR = 0.71, 95 % CI: 0.45-1.13; p = 0.15) and presence of contralateral lung metastases (HR = 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.15 - 0.62; p = 0.001) were associated with a good prognosis. The presence of pathological N2 metastases negatively affected survival (HR = 2.00, 95 % CI: 1.21-3.32; p = 0.0065). These prognostic factors were used to build a simple risk classification scheme.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of selected synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC with curative purpose could be conducted safely and at acceptable 5-year survival levels, especially in younger patients with pN0 disease.

Treatments for combined small cell lung cancer patients

Background

Combined small cell lung cancer (CSCLC) is a subtype of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) which contains both components of SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The prognostic outcomes and treatment strategy of it are still unclear. A large-scale retrospective study was performed to investigate proper treatments for CSCLC.

Methods

All cases of CSCLC were identified from the SEER database during the period of 2004–2016. Clinical characteristics, first-line treatments, surgical procedures and survival data including overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed.

Results

A total of 37,639 SCLC patients were identified. CSCLC accounted for 2.1% (784/37,639). The mean age of CSCLC cohort is 67.3±9.9 years old. Male and white ethnicity patients were accounted for larger proportions (55.7% and 80.4%). The oncological characteristics of CSCLC were consistent with SCLC that most of patients were diagnosed as higher grade and advanced stages. The prognosis of CSCLC was better than SCLC but worse than NSCLC in IA-IIIA stages. No difference was observed in IIIB-IV. Surgery was beneficial in IA-IB stage CSCLC. Adjuvant chemotherapy seemed to have few effects on early stage patients. Trimodality treatment could significantly improve OS in IIA-IIIA CSCLC patients. Chemotherapy-based treatment is predominant choice in advanced stage patients.

Conclusions

CSCLC is a rare and special subtype of SCLC. It has better survival outcome than non-CSCLC in early stage. Surgical treatment is crucial in early stage of CSCLC. Prognostic improvement might be achieved from trimodality treatment in stage IIA-IIIA. Chemotherapy-based treatments should be considered in advanced stage. The effect of surgical treatments in advanced stage patients should be further investigated.