Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy: is it a superior approach for locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?

Pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Eastern versus Western countries: meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma can be treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy followed by oesophagectomy. Discrepancies in pathological response rates have been reported between studies from Eastern versus Western countries. The aim of this study was to compare the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in Eastern versus Western countries.

METHODS

Databases were searched until November 2022 for studies reporting pCR rates after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Multi-level meta-analyses were performed to pool pCR rates separately for cohorts from studies performed in centres in the Sinosphere (East) or in Europe and the Anglosphere (West).

RESULTS

For neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 51 Eastern cohorts (5636 patients) and 20 Western cohorts (3039 patients) were included. Studies from Eastern countries included more men, younger patients, more proximal tumours, and more cT4 and cN+ disease. Patients in the West were more often treated with high-dose radiotherapy, whereas patients in the East were more often treated with a platinum + fluoropyrimidine regimen. The pooled pCR rate after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 31.7% (95% c.i. 29.5% to 34.1%) in Eastern cohorts versus 40.4% (95% c.i. 35.0% to 45.9%) in Western cohorts (fixed-effect P = 0.003). For cohorts with similar cTNM stages, pooled pCR rates for the East and the West were 32.5% and 41.9% respectively (fixed-effect P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is less favourable in patients treated in Eastern countries compared with Western countries. Despite efforts to investigate accounting factors, the discrepancy in pCR rate cannot be entirely explained by differences in patient, tumour, or treatment characteristics.

Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Neoadjuvant therapy and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) are widely used in the comprehensive treatment of esophageal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the advantages of MIE for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Published clinical studies were reviewed and survival data and safety data were extracted. We compared the long-term survival and safety of MIE versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant surgery in a series of meta-analyses.

RESULTS

6 retrospective studies were included. Overall, MIE could significantly improve the overall survival of patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy compared with open esophagectomy [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.75, 0.98)]. Compared with open esophagectomy, MIE could significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss and operative time [mean difference (MD) = -40.28.78, 95% CI (- 62.98, - 17.58); MD = -28.78, 95% CI (- 42.48, - 15.07), respectively]. There was no significant difference in 30-day and 90-day mortality between MIE and open esophagectomy [odds ratio (OR) = 0.42, 95% CI (0.09, 2.01); OR 0.80, 95% CI (0.25, 2.60), respectively]. MIE could not significantly reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and chylothorax [OR 0.70, 95% CI (0.37, 1.32); OR 1.43, 95% CI (0.33, 6.25); HR = 1.79, 95% CI (0.67, 4.75), respectively], but the incidence of pneumonia was significantly reduced [HR = 0.43, 95% CI (0.22, 0.82)]. In addition, the length of hospital stay and the incidence of total complications were significantly reduced after MIE [MD = -2.61, 95% CI (- 3.10, - 2.12); HR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.45, 0.98), respectively].

CONCLUSION

MIE after neoadjuvant therapy is effective and safe. Compared with open esophagectomy, MIE can improve the long-term survival and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications of esophageal cancer patients.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy is recommended for locally advanced esophageal cancer, but the optimal strategy remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients staged as cT3-4aN0-1M0 ESCC were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to the nCRT or nCT group stratified by age, cN stage, and centers. The chemotherapy, based on paclitaxel and cisplatin, was administered to both groups, while concurrent radiotherapy was added for the nCRT group; then MIE was carried out. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03001596).

RESULTS

A total of 264 patients were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis. By 30 November 2021, 121 deaths had occurred. The median follow-up was 43.9 months (interquartile range 36.6-49.3 months). The overall survival in the intention-to-treat population was comparable between the nCRT and nCT strategies [hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-1.18; P = 0.28], with a 3-year survival rate of 64.1% (95% CI 56.4% to 72.9%) versus 54.9% (95% CI 47.0% to 64.2%), respectively. There were also no differences in progression-free survival (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.59-1.16; P = 0.27) and recurrence-free survival (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.71-1.60; P = 0.75), although the pathological complete response in the nCRT group (31/112, 27.7%) was significantly higher than that in the nCT group (3/104, 2.9%; P < 0.001). Besides, a trend of lower risk of recurrence was observed in the nCRT group (P = 0.063), while the recurrence pattern was similar (P = 0.802).

CONCLUSIONS

NCRT followed by MIE was not associated with significantly better overall survival than nCT among patients with cT3-4aN0-1M0 ESCC. The results underscore the pending issue of the best strategy of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced bulky ESCC.

Robot-assisted versus thoracolaparoscopic oesophagectomy for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Robot-assisted oesophagectomy (RAE) and thoracolaparoscopic oesophagectomy (TLE) are surgical techniques for the treatment of oesophageal cancer. This study aimed to compare the perioperative and mid-term outcomes of RAE versus TLE for patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

METHODS

Consecutive patients receiving nCRT plus RAE or TLE were retrospectively included in this single-institution study from January 2016 to January 2021. Perioperative outcomes were compared and survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 251 patients, 80 (31.9%) in RAE and 171 (68.1%) in TLE. The conversion rate was equivalent in RAE versus TLE (3.8% vs 2.9%, P = 1). Median operative time in RAE was significantly shorter than that in TLE (254 vs 289 min, P < 0.001). Compared to TLE, RAE harvested more lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerve [4 (3-6) vs 3 (1-5), P < 0.001]. Overall complications were similar in RAE compared to TLE (38.8% vs 38.0%, P = 0.911). No statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (log-rank P = 0.721) or overall survival (log-rank P = 0.325) was found between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to TLE, RAE could achieve shorter operative duration and better lymph nodes dissection along the bilateral RLN for locally advanced ESCC after nCRT, with comparable short-term outcomes. A long-term survival remains to be verified.

Neoadjuvant Anlotinib and chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Short-term results of an open-label, randomized, phase II trial

Background

Clinical benefits of neoadjuvant Anlotinib for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant Anlotinib plus chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for the treatment of patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced ESCC were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant Anlotinib combined with chemotherapy (Anlotinib group) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy alone (nCRT group) with an allocation ratio of 1:1. The primary endpoint was the R0 surgical resection rate. Secondary endpoints included postoperative pathologic stage, complete response (CR) rate, and safety. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs) and postoperative complications.

Results

From August 2019 to August 2021, 93 patients were assigned to the nCRT or Anlotinib group. Of the 93 patients, 79 underwent MIE and were finally included in the per-protocol set (nCRT group: n=39; Anlotinib group: n=40). The R0 resection rate was 97.4% for nCRT versus 100.0% for Anlotinib group (p&gt;0.05). Compared with the nCRT group, patients in the Anlotinib group had shorter total operation duration (262.2 ± 39.0 vs. 200.7 ± 25.5 min, p=0.010) and less blood loss (161.3 ± 126.7 vs. 52.4 ± 39.3 mL, p&lt;0.001). No significant differences were found in the postoperative pathologic stage between the Anlotinib group and nCRT group (all p&gt;0.05). Besides, the incidences of AEs (80.0% vs. 92.3%) and postoperative complications (22.5% vs. 30.8%) were similar between the two groups (all p&gt;0.05).

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant Anlotinib plus chemotherapy had a similar safety profile and pathologic response, but better surgical outcomes than nCRT for locally advanced ESCC.

Neoadjuvant Sintilimab Plus Chemotherapy in Resectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) are the standard treatments in patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Adding PD-1 inhibitor to the chemotherapy has shown significant clinical benefits in first-line treatment of advanced ESCC. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy in patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC.

Methods

The clinical data of 96 patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC, treated with sintilimab plus chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy, were reviewed. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, major pathological response (MPR) rate, R0 resection rate, tumor downstaging, survival, and safety were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Patients were between the ages of 43 and 78 years (interquartile range [IQR], 60-69 years). Forty (41.7%) were diagnosed with stage II ESCC, 52 (54.2%) with stage III, and 4 (4.2%) with stage IVA. Sixty-seven (69.8%) were male, and 84 (87.5%) patients had an ECOG PS of ≤1. Forty-eight (50.0%) patients received 3-4 cycles of the neoadjuvant treatment. Twenty-nine (30.2%) patients obtained pCR, and MPR was achieved in 60 (62.5%) patients. The R0 resection rate was 99%. Eighty (83.3%) patients achieved clinical downstaging, and 71 (74.0%) achieved pathological downstaging. The median follow-up was 8.9 months, and 1-year DFS rate was 95.2% (95% CI, 88.8%-100%). Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 12 (12.5%) patients, and the incidence of grade 3-4 surgical complications was 2.1%. No deaths were reported.

Conclusion

These real-world data revealed that neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy could provide encouraging pCR with good tolerability for resectable locally advanced ESCC, and this regimen warrants further exploration in prospective clinical studies.

Minimally invasive oesophagectomy with a total two-field lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus: A prospective study

INTRODUCTION

In the era of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACTRT), the safety and clinical significance of radical lymphadenectomy specifically lymphadenectomy along the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) has been questioned. Furthermore, the compliance to NACTRT with the CROSS regimen has not been well studied in the Indian population. This prospective study aimed to determine the compliance with CROSS regimen, feasibility and short-term outcomes of minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIE) with a total two-field lymphadenectomy after NACTRT.

METHODS

A prospective study (January 2014 to December 2018) of patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) eligible for NACTRT (cT1-4a, N0-1, M0) with CROSS regimen followed by MIE with total two-field lymphadenectomy. The compliance rate, post-operative complications and the pathological response rate were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 166 patients with locally advanced SCC, 76 (45.8%) were eligible for NACTRT and 34 completed NACTRT followed by MIE with a total two-field lymphadenectomy (study group). Twenty-nine (38.1%) patients did not complete NACTRT due to complications or poor compliance. Median (range) blood loss was 125 (50-450) ml and the median (range) operation time for the thoracoscopic phase was 205 (155-325) min. Total median (range) lymph node count and mediastinal lymph node counts were 20 (11-33) and 12, (8-21) respectively. Most common post-operative complications were pneumonia (n = 12, 35.3%) followed by RLN palsy (n = 10, 29.4%). Of the 22 patients who had a complete pathological response of the primary tumour, 7 (31.8%) patients had a node-positive disease.

CONCLUSION

NACTRT followed by MIE is feasible in patients with locally advanced SCC. The nodal disease is common even in patients with the complete pathological response of the primary tumour. The dropout rate with NACTRT using the CROSS regimen is high in the present study.

Residual tumor characteristics of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The study was to investigate the characteristics of residual tumors of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

The resection specimens of 187 patients undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University were reevaluated. Tumor regression grade determined by residual tumor ratios was scored for each specific layer of the esophageal wall and all removed lymph nodes for 4 grades as tumor regression grade 1, 0% residual tumors, tumor regression grade 2, less than 10%; tumor regression grade 3, 10% to 50%; tumor regression grade 4, greater than 50%. The pretreatment pathologic tumor stage and pretreatment pathologic lymph node stage before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were recorded reflecting the original depth of primary tumor and number of originally involved lymph nodes, respectively. According to regression directionality, regression pattern was classified into 4 categories as type I: regression toward the lumen, type II: regression toward the invasive front, type III: concentric regression, and type IV: scattered regression. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney, chi-square, Cochran Q tests, and Kendall τ-b coefficient, appropriately.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients have residual tumors, and 97 patients (70.3%), 100 patients (72.5%), 89 patients (64.5%), 63 patients (45.7%), and 68 patients (49.3%) have malignant cells in mucosa, submucosa, muscularis propria, adventitia/surrounding stroma, and lymph nodes, respectively. A total of 115 patients (83.3%) had residual tumors in the mucosa or submucosa, but 63 (54.8%) were graded as tumor regression grade 2 with small amounts of tumors in these 2 layers, 9 patients (6.5%) had residual tumors only in the deep 2 layers, and 14 patients (10.1%) had residual tumors only in lymph nodes. Overall, 86 patients (62.7%) with residual tumors are difficult to identify via present techniques. In patients with tumors that involved all esophageal layers before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, only muscularis propria contained residual tumors significantly more frequently than the adventitia/surrounding stroma (P < .001). The random type IV and nonrandom regression patterns of type I to III were comparable with 48.9% and 51.1%, respectively. In patients with positive lymph node before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, only a small portion of patients (29.2%, 28/96) achieved ypN0 status (nodes pathological complete response), even worse than the primary lesions (33.6%, 63/187) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The small amount of viable tumor cells in the superficial layers, low pathological complete response rate of lymph nodes, and diverse regression patterns lead to difficulty of detecting residual tumors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Nodal Downstaging of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: Survival Analysis if ypN0 Is Achieved

BACKGROUND

It is known that ypN0 status after induction treatment can be divided into "natural" N0 (cN0/ypN0) and "downstaged" N0 (cN+/ypN0). Whether natural N0 patients and downstaged N0 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after neoadjvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) have similar prognosis is unknown.

METHODS

An institutional database was reviewed to identify ESCC patients after nCRT, whose CT scans were retrieved and reviewed to reclassify nodal status. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on node status: natural N0, downstaged N0, and ypN+. Impact of nodal status on survival and associations with survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 110 patients, and 25 had natural N0 disease, 52 had downstaged N0 disease, and 33 had ypN+ disease. The 3-year OS was 76.7%, 79.5%, and 49% in natural N0, downstaged N0 and ypN+ group, respectively, and, correspondingly, the 3-year DFS was 77%, 73.9%, and 36.3%. In multivariable analysis, OS (P = 0.794) and DFS (P = 0.957) did not differ between natural N0 and downstaged N0 groups, but it was significantly shorter in ypN+ group (OS, P = 0.032; DFS, P = 0.021). In subgroups with "poor response" of primary tumor, the prognosis of natural N0 and downstaged N0 paitents was poor almost identical to ypN+ in both OS (P = 0.721; P = 0.252) and DFS (P = 0.694; P = 0.114).

CONCLUSIONS

The ypN0 status is an important hallmark demonstrating the effectiveness of nCRT for ESCC, regardless of cN status. Additionally, the survival of natural N0 and downstaged N0 patients with bad response at primary site may be poor, similar to ypN+ patients.

Postoperative short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to synthesize the available evidence regarding short‐term outcomes between minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE).

Methods

Studies were identified by searching databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to March 2019 without language restrictions. Results of these searches were filtered according to a set of eligibility criteria and analyzed in line with PRISMA guidelines.

Results

There were 33 studies included with a total of 13 269 patients in our review, out of which 4948 cases were of MIE and 8321 cases were of OE. The pooled results suggested that MIE had a better outcome regarding all‐cause respiratory complications (RCs) (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.41–0.78, P = <0.001), in‐hospital duration (SMD = −0.51; 95% CI = −0.78−0.24; P = <0.001), and blood loss (SMD = −1.44; 95% CI = −1.95−0.93; P = <0.001). OE was associated with shorter duration of operation time, while no statistically significant differences were observed regarding other outcomes. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed for a number of different postoperative events.

Conclusions

Our study indicated that MIE had more favorable outcomes than OE from the perspective of short‐term outcomes. Further large‐scale, multicenter randomized control trials are needed to explore the long‐term survival outcomes after MIE versus OE.

Total laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant Chemoradiation with minimal overall and anastomotic complications

BACKGROUND

The published rates of morbidity and mortality remain relatively high for patients who undergo laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. We report the postoperative and oncologic outcomes of a large cohort of patients with esophageal carcinoma who were uniformly treated with laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study of 112 patients diagnosed with esophageal carcinoma who underwent total laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy from May 2014 to May 2018. All of the patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation consisting of 45 to 50.4 Gray of radiation and 3-5 cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. Perioperative morbidity and 90-day mortality were recorded. The overall and disease-free survival rates were estimated by Kaplan Meier techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients completed induction chemoradiation followed by a total laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. There were 87 (77.68%) males and 25 (22.32%) females with a mean age of 61.6 years ± 10.4. A total of 28 (25%) patients had one or more complications. A total of 4 patients (3.57%) had an anastomotic leak. The 90-day mortality rate was 0.89%. The 3-year overall survival rate was 64.7% and the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 70.2%.

CONCLUSION

The current outcomes suggest that laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy can be performed with minimal overall and anastomotic complications following neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Influencing factors of postoperative early delayed gastric emptying after minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

The main clinical treatment for esophageal cancer is surgery. Since traditional open esophageal cancer resection has the disadvantages of large trauma, long recovery period, and high postoperative complication rate, its clinical application is gradually reduced. The current report of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (MIILE) is increasing. However, researchers found that patients with MIILE had a higher incidence of early delayed gastric emptying (DGE).

AIM

To investigate the influencing factors of postoperative early DGE after MIILE.

METHODS

A total of 156 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer at Deyang People's Hospital were enrolled. According to the criteria of DGE, patients were assigned to a DGE group (n = 49) and a control group (n = 107). The differences between the DGE group and the control group were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to further determine the influencing factors of postoperative early DGE. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess potential factors in predicting postoperative early DGE.

RESULTS

Age, intraoperative blood loss, chest drainage time, portion of anxiety score ≥ 45 points, analgesia pump use, postoperative to enteral nutrition interval, and postoperative fluid volume in the DGE group were higher than those in the control group. Perioperative albumin level in the DGE group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Age, anxiety score, perioperative albumin level, and postoperative fluid volume were independent factors influencing postoperative early DGE, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) for anxiety score was 0.720. The optimum cut-off value was 39, and the sensitivity and specificity were 80.37% and 65.31%, respectively. The AUC for postoperative fluid volume were 0.774. The optimal cut-off value was 1191.86 mL, and the sensitivity and specificity were 65.3% and 77.6%, respectively. The AUC for perioperative albumin level was 0.758. The optimum cut-off value was 26.75 g/L, and the sensitivity and specificity were 97.2% and 46.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Advanced age, postoperative anxiety, perioperative albumin level, and postoperative fluid volume can increase the incidence of postoperative early DGE.

The current optimal multimodality treatments for oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multimodality treatments including definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) or chemotherapy (nCT) followed by surgery (S) are frequently used to improve prognosis in locally advanced oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (LAESCC), while the optimal multimodality regimen has yet to be defined; therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to find out the current best multimodality regimen for LAESCC.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane Library databases for studies comparing nCRT + S with nCT + S or dCRT. The primary outcome was overall survival. The secondary outcomes were the rates of R0 resection, pathologic complete response (pCR), tumor-free lymph nodes (pN0) and postoperative recurrence.

RESULTS

Five studies comparing nCRT + S with nCT + S and fourteen studies comparing nCRT + S with dCRT were finally included. Meta-analysis showed that nCRT + S had higher rates of R0 resection (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.03-3.29), pCR (OR: 2.90 95% CI 1.37-6.14) and pN0 (OR: 2.55 95% CI 1.54-4.24) with a significant survival advantage (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.52-0.99) when compared with nCT + S in LAESCC. When nCRT + S was compared with dCRT, nCRT + S yielded a significant survival benefit (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.56-0.76) and had a significantly lower rate of local recurrence (OR: 0.35 95% CI 0.22-0.57).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that CRT + S may be the optimal potential curative treatment mode for patients with LAESCC as long as they are suitable for this multimodality regimen.