Is a 5-mm diameter an appropriate cut-off value for the diagnosis of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma in situ on chest computed tomography and pathological examination?

Imaging of lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Imaging is essential in the screening, diagnosis, staging, response assessment, and surveillance of patients with lung cancer. Subtypes of lung cancer can have distinguishing imaging appearances. The most frequently used imaging modalities include chest radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Artificial intelligence algorithms and radiomics are emerging technologies with potential applications in lung cancer imaging.

High-resolution CT image analysis based on 3D convolutional neural network can enhance the classification performance of radiologists in classifying pulmonary non-solid nodules

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) is able to enhance the classification performance of radiologists in classifying pulmonary non-solid nodules (NSNs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of patients with solitary NSNs and diagnosed as adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), or invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) in pathological after surgical resection were analyzed retrospectively. Ultimately, 532 patients in our institution were included in the study: 427 cases (144 AIS, 167 MIA, 116 IAC) were assigned to training dataset and 105 cases (36 AIS, 41 MIA and 28 IAC) were assigned to validation dataset. For external validation, 177 patients (60 AIS, 69 MIA and 48 IAC) from another hospital were assigned to testing dataset. The clinical and morphological characteristics of NSNs were established as radiologists' model. The trained classification model based on 3D CNN was used to identify NSNs types automatically. The evaluation and comparison on classification performance of the two models and CNN + radiologists' model were performed via receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was calculated to find the best-fit model.

RESULTS

In external testing dataset, radiologists' model showed inferior classification performance than CNN model both in discriminating AIS from MIA-IAC and AIS-MIA from IAC (the area under the ROC curve (Az value), 0.693 vs 0.820, P = 0.011; 0.746 vs 0.833, P = 0.026, respectively). However, combining CNN significantly enhanced the classification performance of radiologists and exhibited higher Az values than CNN model alone (Az values, 0.893 vs 0.820, P < 0.001; 0.906 vs 0.833, P < 0.001, respectively). The IDI index further confirmed CNN's contribution to radiologists in classifying NSNs (IDI = 25.8 % (18.3-46.1 %), P < 0.001; IDI = 30.1 % (26.1-45.2 %), P < 0.001, respectively). The CNN + radiologists' model also provided the best fit over radiologists' model and CNN model alone (AIC value 63.3 % vs. 29.5 %, 49.5 %, P < 0.001; 69.2 % vs. 34.9 %, 53.6 %, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

CNN successfully classified NSNs based on CT images and its classification performance were superior to radiologists' model. But the classification performance of radiologists can be significantly enhanced when combined with CNN in classifying NSNs.

Exposure-lag-response associations between lung cancer mortality and radon exposure in German uranium miners

Exposure-lag-response associations shed light on the duration of pathogenesis for radiation-induced diseases. To investigate such relations for lung cancer mortality in the German uranium miners of the Wismut company, we apply distributed lag non-linear models (DLNMs) which offer a flexible description of the lagged risk response to protracted radon exposure. Exposure-lag functions are implemented with B-Splines in Cox models of proportional hazards. The DLNM approach yielded good agreement of exposure-lag-response surfaces for the German cohort and for the previously studied cohort of American Colorado miners. For both cohorts, a minimum lag of about 2 year for the onset of risk after first exposure explained the data well, but possibly with large uncertainty. Risk estimates from DLNMs were directly compared with estimates from both standard radio-epidemiological models and biologically based mechanistic models. For age > 45 year, all models predict decreasing estimates of the Excess Relative Risk (ERR). However, at younger age, marked differences appear as DLNMs exhibit ERR peaks, which are not detected by the other models. After comparing exposure-responses for biological processes in mechanistic risk models with exposure-responses for hazard ratios in DLNMs, we propose a typical period of 15 year for radon-related lung carcinogenesis. The period covers the onset of radiation-induced inflammation of lung tissue until cancer death. The DLNM framework provides a view on age-risk patterns supplemental to the standard radio-epidemiological approach and to biologically based modeling.

Histogram analysis combined with morphological characteristics to discriminate adenocarcinoma in situ or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from invasive adenocarcinoma appearing as pure ground-glass nodule

OBJECTIVE

To construct a predictive model to discriminate adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) from invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) appearing as pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) using computed tomography (CT) histogram analysis combined with morphological characteristics and to evaluate its diagnostic performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred eighty-nine patients with surgically resected solitary pGGN and pathologically diagnosed with AIS, MIA, or IAC in our institution from January 2014 to May 2018 were enrolled in our study. Two hundred twenty-six pGGNs (79 AIS, 84 MIA, and 63 IAC) were randomly selected and assigned to a model-development cohort, and the remaining 63 pGGNs (11 AIS, 29 MIA and 23 IAC) were assigned to a validation cohort. The morphological characteristics were established as model A and histogram parameters as model B. The diagnostic performances of model A, model B, and model A + B were evaluated and compared via receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis and logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Entropy (odd ratio [OR] = 23.25, 95%CI: 6.83-79.15, p < 0.001), microvascular sign (OR = 8.62, 95%CI: 3.72-19.98, p < 0.001) and the maximum diameter (OR = 4.37, 95%CI: 2.44-7.84, p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors in the IAC group. The area under the ROC (Az value), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of model A + B were 0.896, 88.1%, 79.4% and 91.4%, respectively, exhibiting a significantly higher Az value than either model A or model B alone (0.785 vs 0.896, p < 0.001; 0.849 vs 0.896, p = 0.029). Model A + B also conveyed a good diagnostic performance in the validation cohort, with an Az value of 0.851.

CONCLUSION

Histogram analysis combined with morphological characteristics exhibit a superior diagnostic performance in discriminating AIS-MIA from IAC appearing as pGGNs.