1
|
Haque M, Atallah N, Patke R, Harris AE, Woodcock CL, Varun D, Thompson RL, Jackson-Oxley J, Okui CH, Dean A, Alsaleem M, Rakha E, Irshad S, Davis MB, Jeyapalan JN, Mongan NP, Rutland CS. Cardiotoxicity of breast cancer drug treatments. Transl Oncol 2025; 55:102352. [PMID: 40090070 PMCID: PMC11952852 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2024] [Revised: 01/14/2025] [Accepted: 03/04/2025] [Indexed: 03/18/2025] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. BC is regarded as a systemic disease. Consequently, the majority of BC patients undergo systemic therapy to reduce the risk of distant metastasis (DM) and associated mortality. Although systemic therapies improve patients' outcome, they are associated with significant side effects, particularly cardiotoxicity and cardiovascular complications. Such side effects vary significantly in severity and duration. Cardiotoxicity may remain undetected for years post-treatment until the symptoms of heart failure (HF) present in the patient, which can reduce life expectancy, quality of life, and even lead to death. Therefore, it is vital to investigate the cardiotoxic and cardiovascular risks of BC treatment regimens to identify patients who would benefit most from cardiac monitoring. As it stands, cardiotoxicity is reported from individual studies or for selected drug therapies only. This review fulfils a gap in the literature by combining clinical studies of cardiotoxicity together from clinical trial data published on clinicaltrials.gov.uk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Haque
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Nottingham, UK; Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Nehal Atallah
- Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Rodhan Patke
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Nottingham, UK; Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Anna E Harris
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Nottingham, UK; Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Corinne L Woodcock
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Nottingham, UK; Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Dhruvika Varun
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Nottingham, UK; Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Rachel L Thompson
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Nottingham, UK; Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Jorja Jackson-Oxley
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Nottingham, UK; Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Cyntholia H Okui
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander Dean
- Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Mansour Alsaleem
- Unit of Scientific Research, Applied College, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia
| | - Emad Rakha
- Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK; Pathology Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Sheeba Irshad
- Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London & Guys & St Thomas NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Melissa B Davis
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Microbiology, Biochemistry and Immunology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Institute of Translational Genomic Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jennie N Jeyapalan
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Nottingham, UK; Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Nigel P Mongan
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Nottingham, UK; Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK; Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
| | - Catrin S Rutland
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Nottingham, UK; Biodiscovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The Role of Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment. Curr Cardiol Rep 2023; 25:1-8. [PMID: 36527535 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-022-01825-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Modern therapeutics have led to improved survival for many types of cancer but have also been associated with adverse effects including potentially life-threatening cardiotoxicities. We sought to review the uses of multimodality cardiac imaging for risk stratification, prevention, and identification of cardiotoxicities in patients undergoing cancer treatment. RECENT FINDINGS Advancements in both echocardiography and emerging modalities, like cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac computed tomography, continue to improve the pre- and during therapy cardiac evaluation of cancer patients. Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, with the incorporation of global longitudinal strain, can identify overt and subclinical cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction and myocarditis, and stress echocardiography and cardiac computed tomography can noninvasively screen and monitor for coronary artery disease. Multimodality cardiac imaging is an evolving and critical tool for the pre-therapy screening and risk stratification, as well as during therapy surveillance of cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity.
Collapse
|
3
|
Cartas‐Espinel I, Telechea‐Fernández M, Manterola Delgado C, Ávila Barrera A, Saavedra Cuevas N, Riffo‐Campos AL. Novel molecular biomarkers of cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity in adult population: a scoping review. ESC Heart Fail 2022; 9:1651-1665. [PMID: 35261178 PMCID: PMC9065865 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Cancer treatments are associated with cardiotoxic events that predispose to cardiac pathology and compromise the survival of patients, making necessary the identification of new molecular biomarkers to detect cardiotoxicity. This scoping review aims to identify the available evidence on novel molecular biomarkers associated with cardiotoxicity in the adult population undergoing cancer therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS The databases Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase were screened for the identification of published studies until 23 August 2020, searching for novel molecular biomarkers reported in cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction in adult patients. A total of 42 studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. Fourteen studies reported 44 new protein biomarkers, 18 studies reported 57 new single nucleotide polymorphism biomarkers, and 11 studies reported 171 new gene expression profiles associated with cardiotoxicity. Data were extracted for 272 novel molecular biomarkers reported and evaluated in 7084 cancer patients, of which only 13 were identified in more than one study (MPO, sST2, GDF-15, TGF-B1, rs1056892, rs1883112, rs4673, rs13058338, rs1695, miR-1, miR-25-3p, miR-34a-5p, and miR-423-5p), showing values for area under the curve > 0.73 (range 0.74-0.85), odds ratio 0.26-7.17, and hazard ratio 1.28-1.80. CONCLUSIONS Multiple studies presented a significant number of novel molecular biomarkers as promising predictors for risk assessment of cardiac dysfunction related to cancer therapy, but the characteristics of the studies carried out and the determinations applied do not allow suggesting the clinical use of these molecular biomarkers in the assessment of cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Cartas‐Espinel
- Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias mención Biología Celular y Molecular AplicadaUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
| | | | - Carlos Manterola Delgado
- Departamento de CirugíaUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
- Centro de Excelencia en Estudios Morfológicos y Quirúrgicos (CEMyQ)Universidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
- Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias MédicasUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
| | - Andrés Ávila Barrera
- Centro de Excelencia de Modelación y Computación CientíficaUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
| | | | - Angela L. Riffo‐Campos
- Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias MédicasUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
- Vicerrectoría AcadémicaUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
| |
Collapse
|