Is pneumonectomy still necessary?

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of resectable central non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing sleeve lobectomy: a large-scale, single-center, real-world study

Background

In the treatment of central-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sleeve lobectomy (SL) has emerged as the surgical treatment of choice over pneumonectomy (PN). This retrospective study evaluates the clinical profiles and prognostic elements impacting survival and recurrence rates in patients who underwent SL.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 288 patients who underwent SL from January 2010 to December 2023. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival curves were subsequently drawn. Factors predicting SL outcomes were investigated through univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses.

Results

Univariate and multivariable analyses consistently demonstrated significant variations in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) among subgroups receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NT), which also stood out as independent prognostic factors. Patients undergoing NT showed enhanced OS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.4652, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3042-0.7116, P=0.004] and DFS (HR =0.5182, 95% CI: 0.3243-0.8279, P=0.01). Earlier pT stages were associated with better prognosis (P<0.05). Significant differences in both OS and DFS were noted across pN stages, with earlier stages indicating improved prognosis; this was a significant independent factor for DFS (P<0.001). Similar significant trends were observed across pathological Tumor-Node-Metastasis (pTNM) stages, with earlier stages linked to better outcomes. Additionally, body mass index (BMI) was identified as an independent prognostic factor for both OS and DFS. Clinical T stage independently influenced DFS. No significant prognostic disparities were observed in other clinical characteristics (P>0.05).

Conclusions

NT significantly improves the prognosis for NSCLC patients undergoing SL. Pathological staging is proven to be more indicative of prognosis than clinical staging. Understanding the staging of lymph nodes (LNs) is crucial for predicting the long-term recurrence risk in patients with NSCLC who undergo SL treatment. Mediastinal and hilar LN dissection is especially important in minimizing this risk and improving prognosis.

The Impact of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications on Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Pneumonectomy: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study of the German Thorax Registry

Postoperative pulmonary complications have a deleterious impact in regards to thoracic surgery. Pneumonectomy is associated with the highest perioperative risk in elective thoracic surgery. The data from 152 patients undergoing pneumonectomy in this multicenter retrospective study were extracted from the German Thorax Registry database and presented after univariate and multivariate statistical processing. This retrospective study investigated the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and their impact on perioperative morbidity and mortality. Patient-specific, preoperative, procedural, and postoperative risk factors for PPCs and in-hospital mortality were analyzed. A total of 32 (21%) patients exhibited one or more PPCs, and 11 (7%) died during the hospital stay. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression identified a preoperative FEV1 < 50% (OR 9.1, 95% CI 1.9-67), the presence of medical complications (OR 7.4, 95% CI 2.7-16.2), and an ICU stay of more than 2 days (OR 14, 95% CI 3.9-59) as independent factors associated with PPCs. PPCs (OR 13, 95% CI 3.2-52), a preoperative FEV1 < 60% in patients with previous pulmonary infection (OR 21, 95% CI 3.2-52), and continued postoperative mechanical ventilation (OR 8.4, 95% CI 2-34) were independent factors for in-hospital mortality. Our data emphasizes that PPCs are a significant risk factor for morbidity and mortality after pneumonectomy. Intensified perioperative care targeting the underlying risk factors and effects of PPCs, postoperative ventilation, and preoperative respiratory infections, especially in patients with reduced pulmonary reserve, could improve patient outcomes.

Is sleeve lobectomy safe after induction therapy?-a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sleeve lobectomy (SL) is a lung-sparing procedure, which is accepted as a valid operation for centrally-located advanced tumors. These tumors often require induction treatment by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy to downstage the disease and thus facilitate subsequent surgery. However, induction therapy may potentially increase the risk of bronchial anastomotic complications and related morbidity. This meta-analysis aims to determine the impact of induction therapy on the outcomes of pulmonary SL.

METHODS

We compared studies of patients undergoing SL or bilobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with and without induction therapy. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, morbidity, anastomosis complication and 5-year survival. Odds ratio (OR) were computed following the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included for a total of 1,204 patients. There was no statistical difference for between patients who underwent induction therapy followed by surgery and patients who underwent surgery alone in term of post-operative mortality (OR: 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-4.25, P value =0.19) and morbidity (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.90-1.52, P value =0.237). Anastomosis related complications rate were 5.2% and appears increased after induction therapy with a statistical difference close to the significance (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 0.97-2.83, P value =0.06). Patients undergoing surgery alone showed better survival at 5 years (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.15-2.00, P value =0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

SL following induction therapy can be safely performed with no increase of mortality and morbidity. However, the need for induction therapy before surgery is associated with increased anastomotic complications and poorer survival prognosis at 5 years.

Sleeve lobectomy versus lobectomy for primary treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: A single-center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

It is unclear how much additional perioperative risk a sleeve lobectomy could pose in comparison to lobectomy. The objective of this analysis was to compare the complication rate, 30-day mortality, and overall survival between lobectomy and sleeve lobectomy without prior neoadjuvant treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study using our prospective database for quality assurance in our hospital. Inclusion criteria for our study was a completed lobectomy or sleeve lobectomy for primary treatment of NSCLC.

RESULTS

In 506 patients, the tumor was treated by means of standard lobectomy. In 252 patients with central tumor localization, sleeve lobectomy was performed. Postoperative complications occurred in n:148 (29.24%) patients of the lobectomy group and in n = 76 (30.15%) of the sleeve group. The mortality rate difference between the two groups was statistically significant and favored the lobectomy group (0.78% vs. 4.76%, p = .007). Five year survival was 69.97% for the lobectomy and 65.59% for the sleeve group (p = .829).

CONCLUSION

Sleeve lobectomy for primary surgical treatment of NSCLC has comparable perioperative complications with lobectomy. Sleeve lobectomy does not seem to negatively influence survival. Postoperative mortality was higher in the sleeve group.

Two cases of carina resection for bronchogenic tumor with lung parenchyma sparing: A brief report

INTRODUCTION

Carinal resection (CR) with or without lung parenchyma sparing is one of the challenging issues in thoracic surgery and performed rarely. It is usually not used for the difficulty of the technique, or, in the majority of the situations, it is replaced by pneumonectomy when the patient conditions and the tumor characteristics allow the radical surgical approach. The difficulty includes the dissection of the trachea and main bronchi, the resection of the carina and the reconstruction of the trachea and bronchus. In spite of the knowledge of the technique, one of the most important problem is the incidence of postoperative complications which is higher compared to standard resections.

CLINICAL CASES

We show two cases of carina resection for a bronchogenic tumor with lung parenchyma sparing and good postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that this type of surgery is possible in selected centers with good quality of life for the patient after surgery.