Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy: the initial experience in Hong Kong

Comparison of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopic localization and computed tomographic imaging-guided methylene blue localization in the resection of pulmonary nodules: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Accurate localization of small-to-medium pulmonary nodules before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is essential for success. Traditional imaging methods face challenges in the thoracic cavity. This study compares electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopic (ENB), computed tomography (CT)-guided localization effectiveness and safety with methylene blue marker dye.

Materials and Methods

This study, approved on May 4, 2024 by the Institutional Review Board of Wuhan Union Hospital (IRB ID UHCT240340) affiliated with Tongji Medical College, included patients with pulmonary nodules scheduled for VATS. Methylene blue was used as a marker dye and injected via CT-guided percutaneous or ENB techniques. The study compared clinical parameters, success rates, and complications between the two localization methods.

Results

Out of 378 patients who underwent preoperative localization, 254 received electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB) and 124 had CT-guided percutaneous marker dye injections. Nodules were significantly larger in the ENB group (p < 0.001). Success rates were similar: ENB at 97.24% and CT-guided at 97.58%. ENB was more effective in the upper lobes than the lower lobes (p = 0.005), with no lobar preference for CT-guided localization (p = 0.073). ENB also had significantly fewer complications than CT-guided procedures (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

ENB localization success rates are comparable to CT-guided methods, but ENB carries lower risks, particularly for puncture-related complications. CT-guided localization is more effective than ENB for lower lobe nodules.

CT-Guided vs. Navigational Bronchoscopic Biopsies for Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: A Single-Institution Retrospective Comparison

OBJECTIVE

Lung cancer is the second most common cause of death by cancer. Multiple modalities can be used to obtain a tissue sample from a pulmonary nodule. We aimed to compare the yield and adverse events related to transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA) and Electromagnetic Navigation Biopsy (ENB) at our institution.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study in which all patients referred for evaluation of a pulmonary lesion over 5 years (1 January 2013 to 31 December 2018) were identified. Our primary outcome was to compare the accuracy of TTNA to that of ENB in establishing the diagnosis of pulmonary lesions. Secondary outcomes included the evaluation of the adverse events and the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value of each modality.

RESULTS

A total of 1006 patients were analyzed. The mean age of patients in the TTNA and the ENB group was 67.2 ± 11.2 years and 68.3 ± 9.2 years respectively. Local anesthesia was predominantly used for TTNA and moderate sedation was more commonly used in the ENB group. We found ENB to have an accuracy of 57.1%, with a sensitivity of 40.0%, a specificity of 100.0%, a positive predictive value of 100.0%, and a negative predictive value of 40.0%. As for the TTNA, the accuracy was 75.9%, with a sensitivity of 77.5%, a specificity of 61.5%, a positive predictive value of 95.0%, and a negative predictive value of 22.5%. The rate of clinically significant complications was higher in the TTNA group (8.2%) as compared to the ENB group (4.7%) with a p-value < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

TTNA was superior to ENB-guided biopsy for the diagnostic evaluation of lung nodules. However, the complication rate was much higher in the TTNA group as compared to the ENB group.

Guided Bronchoscopy for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Lesions: An Updated Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Guided bronchoscopy is increasingly used to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). A meta-analysis published in 2012 demonstrated a pooled diagnostic yield of 70%; however, recent publications have documented yields as low as 40% and as high as 90%.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Has the diagnostic yield of guided bronchoscopy in patients with PPLs improved over the past decade?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed of studies evaluating the diagnostic yield of differing bronchoscopic technologies used to reach PPLs. Study quality was assessed using the Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy of studies (QUADAS-2) assessment tool. Number of lesions, type of technology used, overall diagnostic yield, and yield by size were extracted. Adverse events were recorded. Meta-analytic techniques were used to summarize findings across all studies.

RESULTS

A total of 16,389 lesions from 126 studies were included. There was no significant difference in diagnostic yield prior to 2012 (39 studies; 3,052 lesions; yield 70.5%) vs after 2012 (87 studies; 13,535 lesions; yield 69.2%) (P > .05). Additionally, there was no significant difference in yield when comparing different technologies. Studies with low risk of overall bias had a lower diagnostic yield than those with high risk of bias (66% vs 71%, respectively; P = .018). Lesion size > 2 cm, presence of bronchus sign, and reports with a high prevalence of malignancy in the study population were associated with significantly higher diagnostic yield. Significant (P < .0001) between-study heterogeneity was also noted.

INTERPRETATION

Despite the reported advances in bronchoscopic technology to diagnose PPLs, the diagnostic yield of guided bronchoscopy has not improved.

Diagnostic yield and safety of navigation bronchoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Navigation bronchoscopy has seen rapid development in the past decade in terms of new navigation techniques and multi-modality approaches utilizing different techniques and tools. This systematic review analyses the diagnostic yield and safety of navigation bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules suspected of lung cancer.

METHODS

An extensive search was performed in Embase, Medline and Cochrane CENTRAL in May 2022. Eligible studies used cone-beam CT-guided navigation (CBCT), electromagnetic navigation (EMN), robotic navigation (RB) or virtual bronchoscopy (VB) as the primary navigation technique. Primary outcomes were diagnostic yield and adverse events. Quality of studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. Random effects meta-analysis was performed, with subgroup analyses for different navigation techniques, newer versus older techniques, nodule size, publication year, and strictness of diagnostic yield definition. Explorative analyses of subgroups reported by studies was performed for nodule size and bronchus sign.

RESULTS

A total of 95 studies (n = 10,381 patients; n = 10,682 nodules) were included. The majority (n = 63; 66.3%) had high risk of bias or applicability concerns in at least one QUADAS-2 domain. Summary diagnostic yield was 70.9% (95%-CI 68.4%-73.2%). Overall pneumothorax rate was 2.5%. Newer navigation techniques using advanced imaging and/or robotics(CBCT, RB, tomosynthesis guided EMN; n = 24 studies) had a statistically significant higher diagnostic yield compared to longer established techniques (EMN, VB; n = 82 studies): 77.5% (95%-CI 74.7%-80.1%) vs 68.8% (95%-CI 65.9%-71.6%) (p < 0.001).Explorative subgroup analyses showed that larger nodule size and bronchus sign presence were associated with a statistically significant higher diagnostic yield. Other subgroup analyses showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Navigation bronchoscopy is a safe procedure, with the potential for high diagnostic yield, in particular using newer techniques such as RB, CBCT and tomosynthesis-guided EMN. Studies showed a large amount of heterogeneity, making comparisons difficult. Standardized definitions for outcomes with relevant clinical context will improve future comparability.

Non‑diagnostic electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy biopsy: Predictive factors and final diagnoses

The present study aimed to explore the final diagnosis of pulmonary nodules with an initial non-diagnostic result on electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) biopsy and the predictive factors for a non-diagnostic result. A total of 198 nodules from 194 patients that were suspected to be malignant tumors were included in the present study. The initial biopsy pathology results were divided into two groups: The diagnostic group and the non-diagnostic group. The diagnostic group was defined as a successful initial biopsy to obtain a diagnosis, including malignant and benign diagnoses. The non-diagnostic group was defined as a non-specific benign diagnosis, normal lung tissue or an unsuccessful biopsy. Among the 198 nodules, 139 (70.2%) were in the diagnostic group and 59 (29.8%) were in the non-diagnostic group. Predictive factors for a non-diagnostic biopsy included nodule size ≤1.5 cm [odds ratio (OR), 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-4.09], non-solid nodules (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.33-5.64) and nodules in the left lung (OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.27-4.92). Of the 59 non-diagnostic biopsies, 46 were finally confirmed to be malignant by surgery. Notably, non-diagnostic biopsies with non-solid nodules (OR, 7.64; 95% CI, 3.11-18.76) were more likely to be malignant. In conclusion, the predictive factors for a non-diagnostic biopsy were nodule size ≤1.5 cm and non-solid nodules. It was not rare for patients to finally be diagnosed with a malignancy in the non-diagnostic group. Therefore, care should be taken when the results of an ENB are non-diagnostic to prevent misdiagnosis.

[Diagnostic Value and Safety of Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy in Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: A Meta-analysis]

BACKGROUND

The incidence and mortality of lung cancer have always been at the forefront of malignant tumors. With the development of lung cancer detection techniques, more peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) have been detected. The diagnostic accuracy of procedures for PPLs keeps controversial. This study aims to systematically evaluate the diagnostic value and the safety of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) in the diagnosis of PPLs.

METHODS

The relevant literatures in the diagnostic yield of PPLs by ENB were systematically retrieved from Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The software of Stata 16.0, RevMan 5.4 and Meta-disc 1.4 were used to conduct the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 54 literatures with 55 studies were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio of ENB in the diagnosis of PPLs were 0.77 (95%CI: 0.73-0.81), 0.97 (95%CI: 0.93-0.99), 24.27 (95%CI: 10.21-57.67), 0.23 (95%CI: 0.19-0.28) and 104.19 (95%CI: 41.85-259.37), respectively. The area under curve (AUC) was 0.90 (95%CI: 0.87-0.92). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses indicated that the potential heterogeneity resulted from study type, additional localization techniques, sample size, lesion size and type of sedation. The use of additional localization techniques and general anesthesia have improved the diagnostic efficiency of ENB in PPLs. The incidence of adverse reactions and complications associated with ENB was very low.

CONCLUSIONS

ENB provides well diagnostic accuracy and safety.

When Pulmonologists Are Novice to Navigational Bronchoscopy, What Predicts Diagnostic Yield?

Predicting factors of diagnostic yield in electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) have been explored in a number of previous studies based on data from experienced operators. However, little is known about predicting factors when the procedure is carried out by operators in the beginning of their learning curve. We here aim to identify the role of operators' experience as well as lesion- and procedure characteristics on diagnostic yield of ENB procedures in the hands of novice ENB operators. Four operators from three centers without prior ENB experience were enrolled. The outcome of consecutive ENB procedures was assessed and classified as either diagnostic or non-diagnostic and predicting factors of diagnostic yield were assessed. A total of 215 procedures were assessed. A total of 122 (57%) of the ENB procedures resulted in diagnostic biopsies. Diagnostic ENB procedures were associated with a minor yet significant difference in tumor size compared to non-diagnostic/inconclusive ENB procedures (28 mm vs. 24 mm; p = 0.03). Diagnostic ENB procedures were associated with visible lesions at either fluoroscopy (p = 0.003) or radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS), (p = 0.001). In the logistic regression model, lesion visibility on fluoroscopy, but none of operator experience, the presence of a bronchus sign, lesion size, or location nor visibility on rEBUS significantly impacted the diagnostic yield. In novice ENB operators, lesion visibility on fluoroscopy was the only factor found to increase the chance of obtaining a diagnostic sample.

[The Importance of Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy in the Clarification of Pulmonary Nodules]

Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is a very helpful examination for clarifying pulmonary nodules (PDs). The advantages are the low complication rate, avoiding the dangers of punctures in several areas of the lungs during an examination under general anesthesia and no radiation exposure. If malignancy is confirmed, PDs are curatively treatable as they are often early-stage cancers and, in case the disease is benign, it is treatable as other infectious diseases. With experience and routine use, the ENB procedure can contribute to the successful diagnosis of peripheral lesions (at least 1.5 cm in size) in about 75 % of cases. Due to the increase in CT chest examinations and the aging population, clarification of patients with PD is becoming increasingly important in lung clinics. The ENB should therefore develop into a routine examination procedure in interventional pulmonology in addition to the now indispensable endobronchial ultrasound examination. Unfortunately, the ENB is not yet mapped in the DRG system in a cost-relevant manner.

Diagnostic yield of electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy: A safety net community-based hospital experience in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB) is an excellent tool to diagnose peripheral pulmonary nodules, especially in the setting of emphysema and pulmonary fibrosis. However, most of these procedures are done by interventional pulmonologists and academic tertiary centers under general anesthesia. Studies evaluating the diagnostic utility of this tool in safety-net community hospitals by pulmonologists not formally trained in this technology are lacking. The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of ENB done in such a setting and its associated complications.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of consecutive ENB procedures over 5 years from 2014, since its inception in our institution-a safety-net community based hospital was performed. Multiple variables were analyzed to assess their impact on diagnostic yields.

RESULTS

After exclusion criteria were applied, 72 patients with 76 procedures were eventually included within our study, with an overall 1-year diagnostic yield of 80.2%. Sensitivity for malignancy was 73% and negative predictive value of 65%. Primary lung cancer was the most common diagnosis obtained, followed by tuberculosis (TB). The overall complication rates were low, with only 1 patient (1.3%) requiring hospitalization due to pneumothorax needing tube thoracostomy. No deaths or respiratory failures were noted within the cohort. The only significant variable affecting diagnostic yield was forced expiratory volume in 1 s. The presence of emphysema did not affect diagnostic yield.

CONCLUSIONS

ENB is safe and feasible with a high diagnostic success rate even when performed by pulmonologists not formally trained in interventional pulmonology in low resource settings under moderate sedation.

Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy as an adjunct diagnostic tool in the Danish lung cancer diagnostic pathway: an initial retrospective single centre series

Background

The performance of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is reported with substantial variation, which may question its clinical usefulness. However, ENB may hold its true value when used as an additional minimal invasive diagnostic option before potential surgery in selected diagnostically challenging patients where traditional diagnostic methods have failed. We evaluated the safety and performance of ENB when used as an adjunct diagnostic tool in the Danish lung cancer diagnostic pathway (DLCDP) and its ability to reduce surgical diagnostic procedures.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on eighty-two consecutive patients at Odense University Hospital from June 2016 to March 2018 with diagnostically challenging pulmonary lesions referred for ENB as an adjunct diagnostic procedure under the DLCDP. Patients with benign or inconclusive ENB pathology were either referred for further biopsies, surgery or repeated computer tomography (CT) scans for surveillance purposes.

Results

Eighty-one ENB procedures were performed in 80 patients. In 87.7% of the cases previous diagnostic methods had been unsuccessful. The mean target diameter was 1.55 cm and the average follow-up duration was 11 months. The diagnostic accuracy was 75%, while the diagnostic yield/sensitivity, negative predictive value and negative likelihood ratio was 51%, 67% and 0.49, respectively. No pneumothoraces and only one intrapulmonary haemorrhage was recorded, which was managed conservatively. The learning curve revealed an increase in diagnostic accuracy from 67.5% to 82.9% when comparing the first 40 ENB procedures with the last 41 procedures, however, this was not statistically significant (p-value: 0.11).

Conclusions

ENB was found to be a safe procedure with an acceptable diagnostic accuracy and yield in highly selected diagnostically challenging patients. The introduction of ENB carried a notable learning curve but proved to be a valuable adjunct diagnostic option in the DLCDP, which may help to reduce the number of potentially unnecessary or harmful surgical procedures in frail patients.

Sensitivity and Safety of Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Lung Cancer Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bronchoscopy is a useful tool for the diagnosis of lesions near central airways; however, the diagnostic accuracy of these procedures for peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) is a matter of ongoing debate. In this setting, electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is a technique used to navigate and obtain samples from these lesions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore the sensitivity of ENB in patients with PPLs suspected of lung cancer.

RESEARCH QUESTION

In patients with peripheral pulmonary lesion suspected of lung cancer, what is the sensitivity and safety of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy compared to surgery or longitudinal follow up?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A comprehensive search of several databases was performed. Extracted data included sensitivity of ENB for malignancy, adequacy of the tissue sample, and complications. The study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, and the combined data were meta-analyzed using a bivariate method model. A summary receiver operatic characteristic curve (sROC) was created. Finally, the quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Forty studies with a total of 3,342 participants were included in our analysis. ENB reported a pooled sensitivity of 77% (95% CI, 72%-82%; I² = 80.6%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 99%-100%; I² = 0%) for malignancy. The sROC showed an area under the curve of 0.955 (P = .03). ENB achieved a sufficient sample for ancillary tests in 90.9% (95% CI, 84.8%-96.9%; I² = 80.7%). Risk of pneumothorax was 2.0% (95% CI, 1.0-3.0; I² = 45.2%). We found subgroup differences according to the risk of bias and the number of sampling techniques. Meta-regression showed an association between sensitivity and the mean distance of the sensor tip to the center of the nodule, the number of tissue sampling techniques, and the cancer prevalence in the study.

INTERPRETATION

ENB is very safe with good sensitivity for diagnosing malignancy in patients with PPLs. The applicability of our findings is limited because most studies were done with the superDimension navigation system and heterogeneity was high.

TRIAL REGISTRY

PROSPERO; No.: CRD42019109449; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for lung nodule evaluation. Patient selection, diagnostic variables and safety

BACKGROUND

Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is a relatively new technique to diagnose pulmonary lesions in patients with reduced lung function. Several parameters have been shown to affect diagnostic yield including patient selection. We performed a prospective registration of data on one hundred patients who consecutively underwent electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy. Selection criteria, patient characteristics, lesion size, distance to pleura, location of the lesion and presence of bronchus sign on computed tomography were registered.

METHODS

Navigation was performed using the superDimension hardware and software system. Patients were referred to ENB from a multidisciplinary team conference. We did not use fluoroscopy, endobronchial ultrasound equipment, rapid onsite evaluation or general anesthesia during the procedure. All patients in whom no malignant diagnose was found were subsequently followed for two years in order to verify a benign nature of the pulmonary lesion.

RESULTS

One hundred and nine ENB procedures were performed between September 2009 and November 2014. Overall diagnostic yield was 68%. Twenty seven of 49 malignant tumors were found by ENB leading to a sensitivity for malignancy of 55%. The sensitivity for malignancy was significantly higher for lesions in the upper and middle lobes compared to the lower lobes (P = 0.01). Lesions size, distance to pleura and presence of bronchus sign did not affect sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

ENB is a safe diagnostic procedure in an everyday setting with an acceptable diagnostic yield even without addition of supportive diagnostic methods and offers a possibility to diagnose pulmonary nodules in patients for whom other diagnostic procedures are too hazardous or have proven unsuccessful.