Effects of pulsatile minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation on fibrinolysis and organ protection in adult cardiac surgery-a prospective randomized trial

2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery

Clinical practice guidelines consolidate and evaluate all pertinent evidence on a specific topic available at the time of their formulation. The goal is to assist physicians in determining the most effective management strategies for patients with a particular condition. These guidelines assess the impact on patient outcomes and weigh the risk-benefit ratio of various diagnostic or therapeutic approaches. While not a replacement for textbooks, they provide supplementary information on topics relevant to current clinical practice and become an essential tool to support the decisions made by specialists in daily practice. Nonetheless, it is crucial to understand that these recommendations are intended to guide, not dictate, clinical practice, and should be adapted to each patient's unique needs. Clinical situations vary, presenting a diverse array of variables and circumstances. Thus, the guidelines are meant to inform, not replace, the clinical judgement of healthcare professionals, grounded in their professional knowledge, experience and comprehension of each patient's specific context. Moreover, these guidelines are not considered legally binding; the legal duties of healthcare professionals are defined by prevailing laws and regulations, and adherence to these guidelines does not modify such responsibilities. The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC) and the European Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion (EBCP) constituted a task force of professionals specializing in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) management. To ensure transparency and integrity, all task force members involved in the development and review of these guidelines submitted conflict of interest declarations, which were compiled into a single document available on the EACTS website (https://www.eacts.org/resources/clinical-guidelines). Any alterations to these declarations during the development process were promptly reported to the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP. Funding for this task force was provided exclusively by the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP, without involvement from the healthcare industry or other entities. Following this collaborative endeavour, the governing bodies of EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP oversaw the formulation, refinement, and endorsement of these extensively revised guidelines. An external panel of experts thoroughly reviewed the initial draft, and their input guided subsequent amendments. After this detailed revision process, the final document was ratified by all task force experts and the leadership of the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP, enabling its publication in the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, the British Journal of Anaesthesia and Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. Endorsed by the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP, these guidelines represent the official standpoint on this subject. They demonstrate a dedication to continual enhancement, with routine updates planned to ensure that the guidelines remain current and valuable in the ever-progressing arena of clinical practice.

Effects of pulsatile flow on postoperative recovery in adult cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The role of pulsatile versus non-pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is still in debate. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively assess the impact of pulsatile versus non-pulsatile flow on patients' recovery.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials comparing pulsatile and non-pulsatile flow in cardiac surgeries with CPB. Data were analyzed using the random-effects model. Then, sensitive analysis and meta-regression were conducted.

Findings

32 studies including 2568 patients were considered in this meta-analysis. There is no difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (risk ratio [RR] = 0.74, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.35-1.56, p = 0.43). The ICU stay for the pulsatile group was still significantly shorter than that for the non-pulsatile group (mean difference [MD] = -0.19, 95%CI = -0.35∼-0.03, p = 0.02). Patients in the pulsatile group experienced a shorted stay in hospital (MD = -0.68, 95%CI = -0.97∼-0.39, p < 0.01) and a lower risk for acute kidney injury (AKI) compared with non-pulsatile group (RR = 0.46, 95%CI 0.35-0.60, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference of the postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) between the two groups no matter the roller pump or the intra-aortic balloon pump was used (RR = 0.98, 95%CI = 0.87-1.11, p = 0.78).

Conclusions

The use of pulsatile flow during CPB in heart surgery has a protective effect on patient recovery. It can reduce the incidence of AKI, shorten the ICU and hospital stays, but its positive effect on postoperative mortality and POCD is not yet apparent.

2021 MiECTiS focused update on the 2016 position paper for the use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery

The landmark 2016 Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Technologies International Society (MiECTiS) position paper promoted the creation of a common language between cardiac surgeons, anesthesiologists and perfusionists which led to the development of a stable framework that paved the way for the advancement of minimal invasive perfusion and related technologies. The current expert consensus document offers an update in areas for which new evidence has emerged. In the light of published literature, modular minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) has been established as a safe and effective perfusion technique that increases biocompatibility and ultimately ensures perfusion safety in all adult cardiac surgical procedures, including re-operations, aortic arch and emergency surgery. Moreover, it was recognized that incorporation of MiECC strategies advances minimal invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) by combining reduced surgical trauma with minimal physiologic derangements. Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Technologies International Society considers MiECC as a physiologically-based multidisciplinary strategy for performing cardiac surgery that is associated with significant evidence-based clinical benefit that has accrued over the years. Widespread adoption of this technology is thus strongly advocated to obtain additional healthcare benefit while advancing patient care.

A novel pulsatile blood pump design for cardiothoracic surgery: Proof-of-concept in a mock circulation

BACKGROUND

Pulsatile perfusion during extracorporeal circulation is a promising concept to improve perfusion of critical organs. Clinical benefits are limited by the amount of pulsatile energy provided by standard pumps. The present study investigated the properties of a novel positive displacement blood pump in a mock circulation.

METHODS

The pump was attached to an aortic model with a human-like geometry and compliance as a pseudo patient. Hemodynamic data were recorded while the pump settings were adjusted systematically.

RESULTS

Using a regular oxygenator, maximum flow was 2.6 L/min at a pressure of 27 mm Hg and a frequency (F) of 90 bpm. Pulse pressure (PP; 28.9 mm Hg) and surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE; 26.1% of mean arterial pressure) were highest at F = 40 bpm. Flow and pressure profiles appeared sinusoid. Using a low-resistance membrane ventilator to assess the impact of back pressure, maximum flow was 4.0 L/min at a pressure of 58.6 mm Hg and F = 40 bpm. At F = 40 bpm, PP was 58.7 mm Hg with an SHE of 33.4%. SHE decreased with increasing flow, heart rate, and systolic percentage but surpassed 10% with reasonable settings.

CONCLUSIONS

The present prototype achieved sufficient flow and pressure ranges only in the presence of a low-resistance membrane ventilator. It delivered supraphysiologic levels of pulse pressure and SHE. Further modifications are planned to establish this concept for adult pulsatile perfusion.

Application of ultrasound microbubble contrast to evaluate the effect of sitaxentan on renal microvascular perfusion in beagles undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effect of sitaxentan on renal microvascular perfusion via application of ultrasound microbubble contrast.

METHODS

Male beagles were randomly divided into: Sham, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and sitaxentan-infused (Sit) groups (n = 6). The ascending slope rate (ASR), area under the curve (AUC), derived peak intensity, and time to peak (TTP) were obtained via ultrasound microbubble contrast before CPB (T1), after 1 h CPB (T2), at end of CPB (T3), and 2 h after CPB (T4).

RESULTS

Compared with the Sham group, the CPB group had lower ASR of the renal cortex and medulla at T2 - 4, higher AUC and TTP at T3 - 4, and lower derived peak intensity at T4. The ASR at T2 - 4 in the Sit group was lower, TTP was higher at T2 - 4, and AUC was higher at T3 - 4 (P < 0.05). Compared with the CPB group, the Sit group had higher ASR of the renal cortex and medulla at T3 - 4 and AUC and TTP at T3 - 4 (P < 0.05). Compared with that at T1, the ASR of the renal cortex and medulla at T2 - 4 in the CPB group was lower, and AUC and TTP were higher at T3 - 4. The ASR of the renal cortex and medulla at T2 - 4 in the Sit group was lower, TTP was higher at T2 - 4, and AUC was higher at T4 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound microbubble contrast could be effectively used to evaluate renal microvascular perfusion peri-CPB in beagles, which was prone to decrease and could be improved via pretreatment with sitaxentan.